IV.1- Performance verification of the CFSv2 model in the simulation of precipitation at the intra-seasonal scale
It was done on the basis of two mathematical techniques: GROC score and RPSS.
IV.1.1- Performance assessment of the CFSv2 model by GROC score
Figure 2 represents the representative grid points of the GROC score for the forecast precipitation and the observed climatology of the CFSv2 model for the three (03) weeks of August 2021. According to Fig. 2, the CFSv2 model records a precipitation rate of around 20 to 40% in the great South (East, Center, South, Littoral, West, North-West, South-West) and a relatively 55% in the great North (Adamawa, North, and Far North) in the first week. It records a rainfall rate of around 20 to 40% in the great south and vice versa in the north-west and great north in the 2nd and 3rd week.
IV.1.2- Performance assessment of the CFSv2 model by RPSS
Figure 3 represents the representative grid points of the RPSS score measuring the accuracy of the probability forecasts compared to the CHIRPS observation of the CFSv2 model for the first three (03) weeks of August 2021. According to Fig. 3, for the first week, the CFSv2 model tends to underestimate the observation in the Center to the South and Far North zone and to overestimate in the North and North-West zone. For the second week, it tends to underestimate the observation in the northern area and the great south and to overestimate an area of Adamawa. For the third week, CFSv2 tends to underestimate the observation in the Far North and Adamawa zone up to the Center zone while in the West and South zone tends to overstate the observation.
The different results obtained make it possible to make the choice of the most skillful model from the performances assessment of the CFSv2 model in the simulation of the precipitations using the scores of the RPSS and the GROC. The CFSv2 model presents relatively good scores because the values of this model tend to be closer to the climatology in certain areas. So the CFSv2 model performs better.
IV.2- Amount assessment of extreme rainfall by the CFSv2 model
The amount assessment of extreme rainfall distributed on a scale of 1 to 100 provided by the CFSv2 model was made on the basis of percentiles. To enable the determination of extreme rainfall events in Cameroon, the 90th and 99th percentile will be chosen in this study.
Figure 4 illustrates the probability of excess of 90th and 99th percentile respectively of CFSv2 for the first three (03) weeks of August 2021. Figure 4a shows that the Center area has a high value of excess precipitation (80–100 percentiles) for the first week and from 0 to 20 percentiles (the low excess values) for the other two weeks. The other areas display a low excess precipitation value (on average 45 percentiles) for the first week and 0 to 20 percentiles for the other two weeks. Figure 4b shows, for the first three (03) weeks of August 2021, a low excess of precipitation from 0 to 20 percentiles in all areas of the country.
In view of these 90th percentile values during the three weeks, the CFSv2 model is better suited to detect areas of excess rainfall in areas of Cameroon.
IV.3- Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function
The excess exceedance probabilities and the precipitation density function are shown in Figs. 5 and 6. The forecast and climatology curves are shown in red and blue, respectively.
Figure 5 illustrates the Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function for the 90th percentile of the first three (03) weeks of the CFSv2 model. Figure 5a shows the Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function for the 90th percentile of the first week of the CFSv2 model. Forecasting and climatology are confused. It will be 0.6% less than the normal amount of precipitation. The forecast and climatology probability density function is shifted before normal; the forecast is high compared to the climatology.
Figure 5b illustrates the Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function for the 90th percentile of the second week of the CFSv2 model. Forecasting and climatology are almost confused. It will be 0.6% less than the normal amount of precipitation. The forecast and climatology probability density function is shifted before normal; the forecast is high compared to the climatology. An excess of precipitation on average of 9.99% of having an excess of precipitation exceedance is observed.
Figure 5c represents the probability of excess and the precipitation density function for the 90th percentile and the third week of the CFSv2 model. It shows that forecasting and climatology are confused. It will be 0.4% less than the normal amount of precipitation. The forecast probability density function and the climatology are lagged before normal; the forecast is high compared to the climatology. Below-average precipitation of 9.8% to have an excess precipitation overshoot is observed.
Figure 6 represents the excess probability and precipitation density function for the 99th percentile of the first three (03) weeks of August 2021 from the CFSv2 model. According to Fig. 6a, the forecast and climatology are confounded and will be 0.0% less than the normal precipitation amount. The forecast probability density function and the climatology are lagged before normal; the forecast is high compared to the climatology. Figure 6b shows the Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function for the 99th percentile and the second week of the CFSv2 model. According to Fig. 6b, the forecast and the climatology are confounded and will be 0.0% less than the normal precipitation amount. The forecast probability density function and the climatology are lagged before normal and the forecast is high relative to the climatology. Figure 6c represents the Excess Probability and Precipitation Density Function for the 99th percentile and the third week of the CFSv2 model. For the CFSv2 model, the forecast and the climatology are confounded and will be 0.0% less than the normal precipitation amount. The forecast probability density function and the climatology are lagged before normal; the forecast is high compared to the climatology.
The results obtained with the 90th percentile show that the areas likely to receive an excess amount of precipitation can lead to flooding in this country using the CFS v2 model.
IV.4- Impact of extreme rainfall variability on road transport in Cameroon
The results of the re-analyses of the outputs of the CFS v2 model are presented on the rainfall vigilance maps of Cameroon. In view of these results, the country was flooded from the point of view of hydro-meteorological phenomena. These hazardous hydro-meteorological phenomena (extreme rainfall) have a strong impact on Cameroon compared to other phenomena or systems that may occur on an aerological or local scale. Figure 7 displays the Cameroon Floods Vigilance Map. It shows the probability of occurrence and the area of occurrence of floods in this country. These floods are explained by the fact that rainwater cannot infiltrate and accumulates on the surface of the ground because of the infrastructures and the nature of the soil resulting in its compaction and its waterproofing (Hardoy et al. 2001; Nchito 2007; Douglas et al. 2008; Engel et al. 2017).
Most vehicle and motorcycle accidents and delays that are caused by weather are due to rainfall. The latter can submerge roads and flood underground passages. Floods cause scouring and gullying of roads. They damage or undermine the foundations of the railway tracks and cause overflows on the rails and mudslides which damage the tracks (Rosseti, 2002 and Marjorie et al., 2009).
In addition, episodes of heavy rainfall disrupt the entire road transport system, including the transport of goods, people, and properties.
As intense precipitation events lead to loss of traction and control, delays, reduced speeds, stress on vehicle parts and tires, wet pavement, splashed roads, detours, hard braking, and uneven road washouts. As of August 1, 2021, for example, the Far North region of Cameroon recorded major floods causing various damages. Since that day, the populations of the departments of Mayo-Sava, Logone and Chari, and Mayo-Tsanaga have suffered the inconveniences linked to the phenomenon aroused. In addition, one can cite the collapse of the Palar Bridge on the night of Sunday 30 to Monday 31 August 2020 in Maroua causing economic losses in cross-border exchanges between Cameroon and Chad (OMM No 1275, 2021). These disasters are frequently observed in certain areas of the country such as Douala and Garoua.
Conversely, rainfall deficits lower water levels, which can have a negative impact on the use of inland waterways. Drought brings the risk of dust and smoke reducing visibility. It influences the marketing and production of cereals in the great north of Cameroon.