Pain adverse events, Bell’s palsy, and Guillain-Barré syndrome Following Vaccination

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1758910/v1

Abstract

Some individuals (vaccinees) experience pain related adverse events following vaccinations. The majority of vaccination reactogenicity adverse events resolve within days. Rare adverse events like Bell’s palsy and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) have been associated with some vaccines. Herein, multiple working hypotheses are examined in the context of datamining results of the Vaccine Adverse Event System (VAERS) database. Observed onset occurrences of examined pain associated adverse events are consistent with likely etiology relationship with innate immune responses to vaccinations for multiple vaccines including SARS-CoV-2 COVID-19, influenza, and additional vaccines. Innate immune responses may be contributing to the initial etiology of Bell’s palsy and GBS post SARS-CoV-2 mRNA and adenoviral vaccinations.

Introduction

Vaccines are designed to protect vaccinees against viral and bacterial infectious disease. Some vaccinees experience one or more adverse events post vaccination. Vaccine reactogenicity refers to the subset of adverse events that occur soon after vaccination and are physical manifestations of the inflammatory response to vaccination [1]. Most reactogenicity adverse events resolve within days. Other adverse events have persistent symptoms that may last weeks, months, or longer. The etiology of these adverse events remains unknown. Recently, it was proposed that the majority of the reactogenicity adverse events are caused by innate immune response to vaccination releasing inflammatory molecules including histamine [2].

Pain is a common element in a subset of the adverse events reported post vaccination. Some adverse events like “injection site pain” have obvious causal relationship with injection vaccinations. Other rare adverse events like Bell’s palsy and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) can occur with causality difficult to assess with frequencies close to background occurrence frequencies [3, 4]. GBS has been associated with influenza [5] and COVID-19 vaccinations [6]. One etiology model for GBS following COVID-19 vaccination is autoimmune autoantibodies [6]; but, no serum anti-ganglioside antibodies were found in 15 of 17 patients tested [7]. Nearly all GBS patients after COVID-19 vaccinations also had facial weakness or paralysis [8].

Bell’s palsy is a disease characterized by a rapid and unilateral onset of peripheral paresis (paralysis) of the seventh cranial nerve. Bell’s palsy has been reported as an adverse event following immunization for influenza [9] and COVID-19 CoronaVac (Sinovac Biotech, Hong Kong) [10]. Burrows et al. [11] report a patient with sequential contralateral facial nerve palsies following the first and second doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine. Other studies do not detect an enrichment signal for Bell’s palsy or facial paralysis with COVID-19 vaccines [3, 12]. Some cases of facial paralysis may be caused by reactivation of latent herpes simplex virus (HSV) [13] or varicella zoster virus (VSV) in a mechanism similar to Ramsey Hunt syndrome. An increased risk for Bell’s palsy has been observed for concomitant administration of meningococcal conjugate vaccine with another vaccine [14].

The Vaccine Adverse Event System (VAERS) database tracks reported adverse events following vaccinations for the United States. Herein, VAERS is data mined for reports of pain associated adverse events. Multiple working hypotheses[15] are evaluated for pain related adverse events following vaccination leveraging these VAERS data mining results.

Methods

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database [16] was datamined for pain associated vaccine adverse events data by vaccine name or vaccine type, age, gender, dose, and onset post vaccination. The downloaded data includes all VAERS reports from 1990 until May 13, 2022. A Ruby program named vaers_slice.rb [17] was used to tally selected reported vaccine adverse events by vaccine. The vaers_slice.rb program takes as input a list of one or more symptoms to summarize and the yearly VAERS Symptoms, Vax, and Data files from 1990 to 2022. The output from vaers_slice.rb consists of five reports: summaries by vaccine, summaries by age of onset of symptoms, summaries by day of onset of symptoms, and two summaries of additional symptoms reported (selected symptoms and all other symptoms). The VAERS adverse events by vaccine name were extracted for Abdominal pain, Abdominal pain lower, Abdominal pain upper, Arthralgia (pain in joint), Asthenia (abnormal physical weakness or lack of energy), Axillary pain, Back pain, Bell's palsy, Bone pain, Breast pain, Chest pain, Dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing), Ear pain, Eye pain, Facial pain, Facial paralysis, Facial paresis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Hemiparesis, Hypoaesthesia (partial or total loss of sensation), Injection site pain, Lymph node pain, Lymphadenopathy (enlarged lymph nodes), Musculoskeletal chest pain, Musculoskeletal pain, Musculoskeletal stiffness, Myalgia (muscle pain), Neck pain, Neuralgia, Oropharyngeal pain (mouth and pharynx pain), Pain, Pain in extremity, Pain in jaw, Pain of skin, Paraesthesia (an abnormal sensation, typically tingling or pricking), Renal pain, Spinal pain, and Swelling face were extracted. The VAERS adverse events by vaccine type were extracted for Bell’s palsy, Fatigue, Guillain-Barre syndrome, Headache, Miller Fisher syndrome, and Pyrexia. Microsoft Excel was used create figures.

Results

Figures 1 and 2 illustrate day of onset for 16 pain associated adverse events in VAERS. Figure 3 illustrates excess reports of pain associated adverse events post vaccination for females compared to males for twenty vaccines. Immediate onset of GBS and Bell’s palsy are illustrated in Figs. 4 and 5. Summarized data for each VAERS pain associated adverse event are included in the supplemental data tables for days 0 to 120 for each vaccine with associated adverse event. Correlations of multiple pain associated adverse events are summarized in Table 1 for the most frequently reported adverse events and Table S1 for selected pain associated adverse events with all adverse events. Each vaers_slice.rb report in the Supplemental data includes correlations with all other reported adverse events; the top 20 for selected pain adverse events are illustrated in Supplemental Table S2. Proportional enrichment by vaccine for GBS and Bell’s palsy are calculated for three reactogenicity adverse events (headache, fatigue, and pyrexia/fever) in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 1

Co-occurrences of highest frequency vaccine associated pain adverse events from VAERS (1990 to May 13, 2022).

Adverse event

Arthralgia

Asthenia

Hypoaesthesia

Myalgia

Pain

Pain in extremity

Paraesthesia

Arthralgia

 

8,315

4,195

26,645

19,818

18,744

4,982

Asthenia

8,315

 

3,895

10,336

13,827

7,990

4,674

Hypoaesthesia

4,195

3,895

 

2,731

6,556

8,138

16,237

Myalgia

26,645

10,336

2,731

 

14,898

12,787

3,975

Pain

19,818

13,827

6,556

14,898

 

28,608

7,683

Pain in extremity

18,744

7,990

8,138

12,787

28,608

 

8,002

Paraesthesia

4,982

4,674

16,237

3,975

7,683

8,002

 

Table 2

Proportional Guillain-Barré syndrome enrichment compared to reactogenicity adverse events headache, fatigue, and pyrexia (fever). The following vaccines with at least 50 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome were included: COVID19, DTAP (diphtheria, pertussis, & tetanus), Influenza: FLU(H1N1), FLU3, FLU4 (quadivalent), FLUN3, FLUX, FLUX(H1N1), HEP (hepatitis B), HEPA (hepatitis A), HEPAB (hepatitis B), HPV2 (human papillomavirus), HPV4 (human papillomavirus type 4), IPV (inactivated poliovirus), MMR (measles, mumps, & rubella), MNQ (Menigococcal), PNC13 (Pneumococcal conjugate), PPV (Pneumococcal polysaccharide), TD (tetanus & diphtheria), TDAP (diphtheria, pertussis, & tetanus), TYP (typhoid), UNK (unknown), VARCEL (chickenpox Varicella), VARZOS (Herpes Zoster), and YF (yellow fever). Enrichment was normalized to the vaccine (FLUX) with the highest ratio of adverse events: Guillain-Barré syndrome /reactogenicity adverse event for headache, fatigue, and pyrexia.

Vaccine

Headache

Guillain-Barré syndrome

Enrichment

Fatigue

Enrichment

Pyrexia

Enrichment

FLUX

29,755

779

100.0%

1,797

100.0%

5,249

100.0%

FLUX(H1N1)

2,681

65

92.6%

228

65.8%

581

75.4%

FLU3

97,513

1,386

54.3%

3,576

89.4%

12,757

73.2%

FLU(H1N1)

9,179

139

57.8%

458

70.0%

1,065

87.9%

HEPAB

5,707

84

56.2%

424

45.7%

636

89.0%

HPV2

4,798

61

48.6%

394

35.7%

513

80.1%

FLUN3

6,443

58

34.4%

245

54.6%

993

39.4%

YF

4,239

50

45.1%

284

40.6%

871

38.7%

FLU4

37,252

297

30.5%

1,794

38.2%

3,956

50.6%

TYP

9,923

77

29.6%

551

32.2%

1,592

32.6%

TDAP

42,404

267

24.1%

2,178

28.3%

5,935

30.3%

MNQ

26,174

132

19.3%

1,007

30.2%

2,957

30.1%

TD

18,558

94

19.3%

518

41.9%

3,596

17.6%

HPV4

46,341

154

12.7%

3,024

11.7%

2,681

38.7%

HEPA

41,067

131

12.2%

1,092

27.7%

5,691

15.5%

PNC13

38,876

137

13.5%

1,079

29.3%

7,916

11.7%

HEP

71,720

219

11.7%

1,805

28.0%

11,117

13.3%

IPV

43,249

81

7.2%

474

39.4%

8,900

6.1%

PPV

68,903

199

11.0%

2,215

20.7%

14,372

9.3%

MMR

86,556

133

5.9%

1,185

25.9%

21,749

4.1%

UNK

23,789

78

12.5%

2,356

7.6%

3,450

15.2%

VARZOS

105,019

270

9.8%

9,752

6.4%

14,461

12.6%

DTAP

62,560

52

3.2%

687

17.5%

12,832

2.7%

VARCEL

82,205

55

2.6%

779

16.3%

11,961

3.1%

COVID19

1,116,854

2,001

6.8%

154,437

3.0%

153,429

8.8%

Table 3

Bell’s palsy enrichment compared to reactogenicity adverse events headache, fatigue, and pyrexia (fever). The following vaccines with at least 50 reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome were included: COVID19, FLU4 (influenza quadivalent), UNK (unknown), and VARZOS (Herpes Zoster). Enrichment was normalized to the vaccine (COVID19) with the highest ratio of adverse events: Bell’s palsy/reactogenicity adverse event for headache, fatigue, and pyrexia.

Vaccine

Headache

Bell's palsy

Enrichment

Fatigue

Enrichment

Pyrexia

Enrichment

COVID19

1,116,854

5,711

100.0%

154,437

100.0%

153,429

100.0%

UNK

23,789

49

40.3%

2,356

56.2%

3,450

38.2%

FLU4

37,252

40

21.0%

1,794

60.3%

3,956

27.2%

VARZOS

105,019

94

17.5%

9,752

26.1%

14,461

17.5%

Discussion

For all of the pain associated adverse events examined, the highest reports are within 24 hours of vaccination (day 0). For each pain associated adverse event, the number of reports for day 1 are roughly half that of day 0; likewise, the number of adverse events reported for day 2 are roughly half that of day 1 (Figs. 1 and 2). Females report pain associated adverse events between two and three fold more frequently than males (Fig. 3). Vaccinees sometimes report more than one pain associated adverse event (Table 1). For adverse events like injection site pain, this is consistent with expectations. Other adverse events reported by vaccinees are nausea, headache, pyrexia, fatigue, chills, and other. The onset of pain associated adverse events coincides with the same onset as these reactogenicity adverse events [2]. The consistency of the frequency patterns of these adverse events following vaccinations for multiple unrelated vaccines enables the exclusion of specific vaccine components and excipients as specifically causative entities; however, these components and excipients are likely the key determinates of the reactogenicity level associated with each vaccine. Possible working hypotheses of the causes of pain, paresis, or paralysis related adverse events following vaccination include innate immune responses, inflammation, latent virus reactivation, and autoimmune antibodies.

\Vaccinations are designed to stimulate immune humoral (e.g., antibody) immune responses. Vaccines elicit immediate innate immune responses from vaccinees. These innate immune responses include the release of inflammatory molecules including chemokines, cytokines, interleukins, lymphokines, and monokines from immune cells [1821]. The blood-nerve barrier is not as tight as the blood-brain barrier; it is possible for T cells and macrophages to leak in at inflamed tissues [22]. Vaccination induced autoimmune antibody responses would require either primary humoral immune response or memory humoral immune responses; these humoral immune responses would peak roughly 7 to 10 days post vaccination). Hence, autoimmune antibody responses are unlikely associated with the majority of observed immediate onset reactogenicity adverse responses observed (Figs. 1, 2, and supplemental data). Miller Fisher syndrome has some presentation overlaps with GBS [23]; like other examined adverse events, immediate onset signals also occur for Miller Fisher syndrome adverse events in VAERS associated with COVID-19 and influenza vaccines (supplemental data table V_Miller_Fisher). Reactivation of latent viruses has been observed post SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations [24, 25]; clinical and molecular evidence of reactivation of latent viruses associated with the majority of the reported pain associated adverse events is current lacking. While reactivation of latent viruses has occurred post vaccinations, the onset timing of 7 to 21 days [24, 25] is inconsistent with observed immediate onset of pain associated adverse events. Consistent with the observed immediate onset of reported pain associated adverse events, innate immune response molecules are known to be associated with pain. These innate immune responses include the release of inflammatory molecules, including histamine, interleukin 1β (IL-1β), interleukin 6 (IL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP-1), prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), tumor necrosis factor (TNF; formerly TNFα), etc. from macrophages, granulocytes including mast cells, T helper cells, and other immune cells [18, 19, 26, 27]. PGE2 is a well-known lipid mediator that contributes to inflammatory, neuropathic, and visceral pain, see [27]. IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF are involved in the process of pathological pain [19]. Elevated histamine levels has been proposed to be causative for the majority of reactogenicity adverse events [2]. Histamine is known to be algesic (cause pain) to peripheral nervous system [21]. Type I interferons have been proposed as a potential mechanism linking COVID-19 mRNA vaccines to Bell’s palsy [28].

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS)

VAERS reports for GBS illustrate a pattern of immediate onset timing associated with seven vaccines (Figure 4).  The onset for the majority of the GBS reports are within 24 hours (day 0), roughly ½ this the next day (day 1), and roughly ¼ this the second day (Figure 4 and supplemental data table: V_Guillain_Barre).  This onset pattern is too rapid for molecular mimicry, epitope sharing, and autoimmune antibodies to be causative prior to day 7.  Similar patterns shared by COVID-19, Influenza, Shingles Zoster, human papillomavirus, and Pneumococcal vaccines support innate immune responses as a major component of disease early etiology.  Three of the highest frequencies reactogenicity adverse events shared across the examined pain related adverse events are headache, fatigue, and pyrexia (fever).  Examining the frequencies of GBS in proportion to these reactogenicity adverse events illustrates that the frequency of GBS is highest for Influenza vaccines with a lower frequency for COVID-19 vaccines (Table 2).  The general consistency of occurrence frequencies across all of the examined unrelated vaccines in Table 2 further supports the hypothesis that reactogenicity responses to vaccination in general are coupled to the frequency of GBS following vaccinations.  Clinically, most GBS patients following COVID-19 vaccination showed typical demyelination neuropathy with albumin-cytological dissociation [29]; the timing suggests that demyelination neuropathy and albumin-cytological dissociation might be subsequent events in the disease etiology for patients with immediate onset adverse events.  The immediate onset pattern of GBS following vaccination is different from the observed pattern for Zoster vaccines [30]; their reported Zoster vaccine onset pattern is consistent with the development of autoimmune antibodies in contrast to the immediate onset Zoster vaccine records in VAERS (Figure 4).

Bell’s palsy

The frequency of Bell’s palsy is highest for COVID-19 and lower for Zoster and Influenza vaccines (Table 3 and Figure 5).  The frequencies for non-COVID-19 vaccines is low for vaccines but with enrichment for day 0 onsets for a few vaccines (supplemental data V_Bells_palsy).  The association pattern for immediate onset is consistent with innate immune responses for very high reactogenicity vaccines (COVID-19 mRNA and adenovirus) or concomitant administration of vaccines.  The working hypothesis for live Zoster vaccines reactivating latent Herpes family viruses is also consistent with current models for Bell’s palsy [19].

Persistent pain models

Candidate models for persistent pain include autoimmune antibodies, nerve damage and/or demyelination, reactivated latent viruses, immune cells infiltration at blood-never barrier during inflammation (albumin-cytological dissociation seen in GBS), innate immune cells with feedback loops with nerve cells, mast cell and eosinophil paired couplets, and ongoing expression of vaccine protein[31] by innate immune cells.  Immediate onset adverse event lymphadenopathy (Figure 3) is consistent with ongoing expression of vaccine protein by innate immune cells.  Mast cells and eosinophils are known to form bidirectional interactions resulting in a hyperactivated state, reviewed [32].  Additional research is needed to resolve the pathogenesis model(s) of persistent pain adverse events following vaccinations.  Immediate onset of pain related adverse events might suggest that early interventions might lesson the severity of symptoms and possibly even decrease the frequencies of occurrences.  Cellular feedback loops are possible between nerve cells and mast cells driving neurogenic inflammation and nociceptive pain [33].  

Histamine

Pain related inflammatory molecules released by innate immune responses include histamine.  Histamine is known to be associated with peripheral nerve pain [21,34].  Elevated histamine levels are predicted as drivers of most post vaccination adverse events including reactogenicity adverse events [2], cardiac adverse events including myocarditis and pericarditis [17], and menstrual adverse events [2].  Ongoing vaccine expression in innate immune cells, lasting months, [31] may drive localized releases of inflammatory molecules including histamine.  

Exploratory treatment candidates

Dampening histamine responses from innate immune mast cells may reduce the population frequency and severity of some pain adverse events following vaccinations.  Antihistamine treatments exhibiting efficacy in treating COVID-19 patients are may target possible granulocytes and mast cells associated with vaccine responses.   Candidate treatments for evaluation include high dose famotidine [35–38], cetirizine [39,40], and dexchlorpheniramine [39].  Oral treatment with diamine oxidase may also be beneficial.  Alternatively, if mast cell and eosinophil couplets are involved, targeting them with anti-IL-5 (mepolizumab) [41] may be beneficial.  Evaluation of these treatments and treatment combinations on vaccinees in case reports, case series, etc. can inform subsequent randomized controlled clinical trials for reducing vaccine pain adverse events.  

Summary

Data mining VAERS for pain associated adverse events illustrates likely etiology of innate immune responses driving pain related adverse events post vaccination including rare reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome and Bell’s palsy. Identification of likely role of innate immune responses in the etiology of pain related adverse events post vaccination suggest possible candidate treatments for evaluation in clinical studies.

Abbreviations

COVID-19                  Coronavirus Disease 2019

GBS                            Guillain-Barré syndrome

IL-1β                           Interleukin 1β

IL-6                             Interleukin 6

MCP-1                        Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein

PGE2                           Prostaglandin E2

SARS-CoV-2             Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2

TNF                            Tumor Necrosis Factor

VAERS                       Vaccine Adverse Event System

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Nora Smith for useful discussions.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Consent statement/ethical approval

Not required.

Funding

None

References

  1. Hervé C, Laupèze B, Del Giudice G, et al. (2019) The how’s and what’s of vaccine reactogenicity. npj Vaccines 4: 39.
  2. Ricke DO (2022) Hypothesis: Histamine Intolerance Causes Most Major Vaccine Reactogenicity Adverse Events (including SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccines). Research Square.
  3. Renoud L, Khouri C, Revol B, et al. (2021) Association of Facial Paralysis With mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines: A Disproportionality Analysis Using the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database. JAMA Internal Medicine 181: 1243–1245.
  4. Shemer A, Pras E, Einan-Lifshitz A, et al. (2021) Association of COVID-19 Vaccination and Facial Nerve Palsy: A Case-Control Study. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 147: 739–743.
  5. Galeotti F, Massari M, D’Alessandro R, et al. (2013) Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after 2010–2011 influenza vaccination. Eur J Epidemiol 28: 433–444.
  6. Khan Z, Ahmad U, Ualiyeva D, et al. (2022) Guillain-Barre syndrome: An autoimmune disorder post-COVID-19 vaccination? Clinical Immunology Communications 2: 1–5.
  7. Caress JB, Castoro RJ, Simmons Z, et al. (2020) COVID-19-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome: The early pandemic experience. Muscle Nerve 62: 485–491.
  8. Hanson KE, Goddard K, Lewis N, et al. (2022) Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. JAMA Network Open 5: e228879–e228879.
  9. Po ALW (2004) Non-parenteral vaccines. BMJ 329: 62.
  10. Wan EYF, Chui CSL, Lai FTT, et al. (2022) Bell’s palsy following vaccination with mRNA (BNT162b2) and inactivated (CoronaVac) SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a case series and nested case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 22: 64–72.
  11. Burrows A, Bartholomew T, Rudd J, et al. (2021) Sequential contralateral facial nerve palsies following COVID-19 vaccination first and second doses. BMJ Case Reports 14: e243829.
  12. Tamaki A, Cabrera CI, Li S, et al. (2021) Incidence of Bell Palsy in Patients With COVID-19. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 147: 767–768.
  13. McCormick DavidP (1972) HERPES-SIMPLEX VIRUS AS CAUSE OF BELL’S PALSY. The Lancet 299: 937–939.
  14. Tseng H-F, Sy LS, Ackerson BK, et al. (2017) Safety of Quadrivalent Meningococcal Conjugate Vaccine in 11- to 21-Year-Olds. Pediatrics 139: e20162084.
  15. Chamberlin T. C. (1890) The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. Science ns-15: 92–96.
  16. VAERS (2021) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
  17. Ricke DO (2022) Vaccines Associated Cardiac Adverse Events, including SARS-CoV-2 Myocarditis, Elevated Histamine Etiology Hypothesis. J Virol Viral Dis 2.
  18. Clark AK, Old EA, Malcangio M (2013) Neuropathic pain and cytokines: current perspectives. J Pain Res 6: 803–814.
  19. Zhang J-M, An J (2007) Cytokines, inflammation, and pain. Int Anesthesiol Clin 45: 27–37.
  20. Thacker MA, Clark AK, Marchand F, et al. (2007) Pathophysiology of Peripheral Neuropathic Pain: Immune Cells and Molecules. Anesthesia & Analgesia 105.
  21. Yu J, Lou G-D, Yue J-X, et al. (2013) Effects of histamine on spontaneous neuropathic pain induced by peripheral axotomy. Neurosci Bull 29: 261–269.
  22. Babazadeh A, Mohseni Afshar Z, Javanian M, et al. (2019) Influenza Vaccination and Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Reality or Fear. J Transl Int Med 7: 137–142.
  23. Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Gidudu J, et al. (2011) Guillain–Barré syndrome and Fisher syndrome: Case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine 29: 599–612.
  24. Agrawal S, Verma K, Verma I, et al. (2022) Reactivation of Herpes Zoster Virus After COVID-19 Vaccination: Is There Any Association? Cureus 14: e25195.
  25. Plüß M, Mese K, Kowallick JT, et al. (2022) Case Report: Cytomegalovirus Reactivation and Pericarditis Following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2. Frontiers in Immunology 12.
  26. Ricciotti E, FitzGerald GA (2011) Prostaglandins and inflammation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31: 986–1000.
  27. Kawabata A (2011) Prostaglandin E2 and Pain—An Update. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin 34: 1170–1173.
  28. Soeiro T, Salvo F, Pariente A, et al. (2021) Type I interferons as the potential mechanism linking mRNA COVID-19 vaccines to Bell’s palsy. Therapie 76: 365–367.
  29. Fernandez PEL, Pereira JM, Risso IF, et al. (2022) Guillain-Barre syndrome following COVID-19 vaccines: A scoping review. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 145: 393–398.
  30. Goud R, Lufkin B, Duffy J, et al. (2021) Risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA Internal Medicine 181: 1623–1630.
  31. Röltgen K, Nielsen SCA, Silva O, et al. (2022) Immune imprinting, breadth of variant recognition, and germinal center response in human SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination. Cell 185: 1025–1040.e14.
  32. Galdiero MR, Varricchi G, Seaf M, et al. (2017) Bidirectional Mast Cell–Eosinophil Interactions in Inflammatory Disorders and Cancer. Frontiers in Medicine 4.
  33. Rosa AC, Fantozzi R (2013) The role of histamine in neurogenic inflammation. Br J Pharmacol 170: 38–45.
  34. Dale HH, Laidlaw PP (1910) The physiological action of beta-iminazolylethylamine. J Physiol 41: 318–344.
  35. Malone RW, Tisdall P, Fremont-Smith P, et al. (2021) COVID-19: Famotidine, Histamine, Mast Cells, and Mechanisms. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12: 216.
  36. Tomera KM, Malone, Robert W., Kittah JK (2020) Brief Report: Rapid Clinical Recovery from Severe COVID-19 with High Dose Famotidine and High Dose Celecoxib Adjuvant Therapy. Enliven: Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety 6: 1–5.
  37. Mather JF, Seip RL, McKay RG (2020) Impact of Famotidine Use on Clinical Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19. Am J Gastroenterol 115: 1617–1623.
  38. Sethia R, Prasad M, Mahapatra SJ, et al. (2020) Efficacy of Famotidine for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. medRxiv 2020.09.28.20203463.
  39. Morán Blanco JI, Alvarenga Bonilla JA, Homma S, et al. (2021) Antihistamines and azithromycin as a treatment for COVID-19 on primary health care - A retrospective observational study in elderly patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 67: 101989–101989.
  40. Hogan II RB, Hogan III RB, Cannon T, et al. (2020) Dual-histamine receptor blockade with cetirizine - famotidine reduces pulmonary symptoms in COVID-19 patients. Pulmonary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 63: 101942.
  41. Otani IM, Anilkumar AA, Newbury RO, et al. (2013) Anti-IL-5 therapy reduces mast cell and IL-9 cell numbers in pediatric patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 131: 1576–1582.