3.1 Crystal structure
Figure 1 depicts the XRD patterns of the prepared catalyst materials. Pure FeIn2S4 (FIS) has a cubic phase crystal structure, which agrees well with the standard card (JCPDS No. 80–0608)(Shangguan et al. 2021), and pure BiOBr has a tetragonal phase crystal structure (JCPSDS09-0393)(Ren et al. 2019). The XRD diffraction peaks of FIS/BiOBr composites are essentially the same as those of pure BiOBr due to the uniformly dispersion of FIS on BiOBr nanosheets at lower FIS concentrations (Shangguan et al. 2021). As the FIS content increases, the (111) diffraction peak of FIS becomes prominent and shows a slight shift towards higher diffraction angles, indicating a strong interaction between FIS and BiOBr(Jiang et al. 2017).
3.2 Morphology and microstructure analysis
The surface morphology and microstructure of the samples were investigated by SEM and TEM analysis. The morphology of the FIS depicts a large number of microsphere-like structure in Fig. 2a, which is formed by the self-assemble of small nanoscale flakes (Fig. 2b). The pure BiOBr displays irregular thin layered microplates (Fig. 2c). As shown in Fig. 2d, the FIS10/BiOBr exhibits tightly layered nanosheets structure, which is necessary for an efficient charge transfer in heterojunction system(Wangkawong et al. 2020). The TEM image of FIS10/BiOBr in Fig. 3a shows the stack structure of nanoplates, which is consistent with SEM images. In the HRTEM image (Fig. 3b), the distinct lattice plane are 0.23 nm and 0.32 nm, corresponding to the (112) plane of BiOBr and (311) plane of FIS, respectively. In Fig. 3c, the element distributions reveal the coexistence of Fe, In, S, Bi, O and Br in FIS10/BiOBr nanocomposites. The aforementioned results demonstrate the success synthesis of FIS/BiOBr composite, which promotes the creation of heterojunction interfaces(Zhao et al. 2021).
3.3 XPS analysis
The surface chemical compositions and states of FIS, BiOBr and FIS10/BiOBr heterojunction were detected by XPS. The XPS survey spectrum of FIS10/BiOBr in Fig. S2 suggests Fe, In, S, Bi, O and Br are six components, which is in good agreement with element mapping results. The high-resolution XPS spectra of the sample is shown in Fig. 4. The Bi 4f spectrum of the FIS10/BiOBr composite in Fig. 4a shows two characteristic peaks at 159.3eV (Bi 4f 7/2) and 164.5 eV (Bi 4f 5/2), which proves Bi3+ oxidation state(Ye et al. 2015). The O 1s peaks of FIS10/BiOBr composite in Fig. 4b locates at 530.1 and 532.8 eV, corresponding to the Bi–O and Br–O bonds, respectively(Zhang &Ma 2017). The asymmetric Br 3d peaks at 68.4 eV, 69.5 eV in Fig. 4c suggest the exist of Br-(Ren et al. 2019). For Fe 2p spectrum in Fig. 4d, the deconvoluted peaks at 705.3 eV and 727.2.4 eV are from Fe 2p 3/2 and Fe 2p 1/2, respectively, indicating that the valence of Fe is positive 2. The binding energies at 442.5 eV, and 453.1 eV in Fig. 4e correspond to In 3d 5/2 and In 3d 3/2 of In3+, respectively(Chachvalvutikul et al. 2021). In Fig. 4f, two peaks at 161.4 eV and 162.8 eV for the S 2p spectrum of FIS10/BiOBr correspond to S 2p 3/2 and S 2p 1/2, respectively, implying the existence of S2-(Yang et al. 2020). Compared with those of pure FIS and BiOBr, the binding energies of Bi 4f, O 1s, Br 3d, Fe2p, In3d, and S2p of FIS10/BiOBr composite exhibit a slight change, revealing an intense electronic interaction between FIS and BiOBr components(Jiang et al. 2015), further suggesting the forming of the FIS/BiOBr heterojunction photocatalyst.
3.4 BET analysis
The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of FIS, BiOBr, and FIS10/BiOBr samples were shown in Fig. S3, and the related specific areas and pore parameters are provided in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, the specific surface areas of FIS, BiOBr, and FIS10/BiOBr measured by BET are 17.88, 2.03 and 15.67 m2 /g, respectively, and the average pore size of FIS, BiOBr and FIS10/BiOBr are 5.50, 5.72, and 10.11 nm, respectively. Compared to BiOBr, larger surface area of FIS10/BiOBr could offer a more efficient transport pathway and more reaction sites for the reactants in the photocatalytic reaction process(Jiang et al. 2020), resulting in the efficient photocatalytic property. Nevertheless, specific surface area is only one of several factors that influence photocatalytic performance(Jia et al. 2016). The large average pore size and large pore volume conducive to the entry of reactant molecules into the inner surface of the material and more sufficient contact with the catalyst.
Table 1
BET analysis of photocatalysts.
Photocatalyst
|
Specific area (m2/g)
|
Pore volume (cm3/g)
|
Average pore size
(nm)
|
FIS
|
17.88
|
0.12079
|
5.50
|
BiOBr
|
2.03
|
0.105552
|
5.72
|
FIS10/BiOBr
|
15.67
|
0.216924
|
10.11
|
3.5 Photocatalytic performance
The degradation of Rh B under visible light was used to test the photocatalytic activity of the photocatalyst. The Rh B degradation efficiency for pure FIS and BiOBr in Fig. 5a are 18% and 37% within 60 min, respectively, while for FIS10/BiOBr, the degradation efficiency of Rh B grows to 96%. The first-order model (ln(C0/C) = kt) was used to evaluate the photocatalytic degradation kinetics. The kinetic constants of FIS, BiOBr, FIS5/BiOBr, FIS10/BiOBr, FIS40/BiOBr, and FIS80/BiOBr in Fig. 5b are 0.00255, 0.00718, 0.04186, 0.05519, 0.03488 and 0.02217 min− 1, respectively. The k-value of the FIS10/BiOBr is 21.64 and 7.59 times greater than those of pure FIS and BiOBr, respectively. These results suggest that the complexing of FIS and BiOBr can significantly enhance the photocatalytic property due to the promoted contact and charge transfer between the two semiconductor components(Chen et al. 2021). Table S1 lists the degradation efficiency of Rh B with reported and our Bi-based semiconductor Z-scheme heterojunction photocatalysts. Our photocatalysts shows higher photocatalytic activity under low-power light source within short time and with less amount of catalyst in the degradation of Rh B, representing a powerful potential in the environmental remediation.
The stability and durability of FIS10/BIOBr were also investigated through the cycling test. In Fig. 6a, the efficiency of Rh B degradation by FIS10/BIOBr decreased slightly from 97–88% after three cycles of photocatalysis. The possible reason is the absorption of some small organic molecules in the pores of FIS10/BIOBr before and after the cycle, which also led to a slight change of XRD patterns before and after the cycle (Fig. 6b).
3.6 Optical properties
The efficient light absorption capacity is an important factor influencing the photocatalytic activity(Zhang et al. 2021a). Figure 7a shows the UV-Vis DRS adsorption spectra of pure FIS, BiOBr and FIS10/BiOBr heterojunction. Due to the narrow band shape, pure FIS adsorbs strongly from UV to visible light. FIS10/BiOBr exhibits a significant redshift enhancement compared to pure BiOBr, which has an absorption edge of 440 nm. The findings show that coupling FIS and BiOBr can effectively improve FIS/ BiOBr's light absorption, thereby improving photocatalytic performance. According to the Kubelka-Munk equation(Meng et al. 2015), the bandgap energies of pure FIS and BiOBr are calculated to be 1.62 and 2.68 eV, respectively (Fig. 7b).
Photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy was used to assess the photogenerated electron and hole recombination rates of the prepared photocatalysts. Lower photoluminescence intensities, in general, indicate better separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs(Chen et al. 2019b). That is, the lower the PL spectrum intensity, the better the photocatalytic performance. The PL intensity of FIS10/BiOBr in Fig. 8 is significantly lower than that of FIS or BiOBr, indicating that the combination of FIS and BiOBr effectively enhances the separation of photogenerated electron hole pairs and improves photocatalytic performance.
3.7 Photocatalytic mechanism
XPS valence band spectra were used to characterize the VB positions of different photocatalysts in order to reveal the charge transfer mechanism of Z-scheme heterojunction FIS/BiOBr photocatalysts. The VB values of FIS and BiOBr are 1.14 and 2.67 eV, respectively, as shown in Fig. 9. The energy band widths of FIS and BiOBr are 1.62 and 2.68 eV, respectively, based on the UV-Vis DRS spectra (Fig. 7). According to the empirical equation Eg = EVB - ECB, the CB positions of FIS and BiOBr are − 0.48 and − 0.01 eV, respectively. Due to the energy band position relationship, FIS and BiOBr are fully equipped to construct Z-scheme heterojunction.
The main active species were identified using capture experiments of FIS10/BiOBr under the same conditions. In general, the CB and VB potentials of photocatalyst can have a direct impact on the production of active species during photodegradation(Wang et al. 2021). Tert-butanol (TBA), p-benzoquinone (BQ) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na) were used as trapping agents for hydroxyl radicals (·OH), superoxide radicals (·O2−), and photogenerated holes (h+), respectively. The degradation of Rh B slightly reduces with the addition of TBA (Fig. 10a), indicating that ·OH is not the main active agent in the photocatalysis. While the degradation of RhB significantly reduces after the addition of BQ and EDTA-2Na, implying that ·O2− and h+ are the primary reactive agents affecting the degradation of RhB by FIS10/BiOBr. In order to further validate the free radicals generated in the photocatalytic reaction process, electron spin resonance (ESR) measurements were performed. We used 5,5-dimethyl-1-pyrroline N-oxide (DMPO) as free radical trapping agent to detect the active species of FIS10/BiOBr materials in the dark and under visible light irradiation. As shown in the Fig. 10b and 10c, there is no intensity signal under dark conditions, but four main characteristic peaks of DMPO-·O2− and ·OH are observed under the light radiation. These results indicate that the photocatalytic process generates free radicals ·O2− and ·OH, which agrees with the radical trapping experiments.
Based on the analysis and discussion of the aforementioned experimental results, the ECB/EVB values of FeIn2S4 and BiOBr are − 0.48/1.14 eV and − 0.01/2.67 eV (vs NHE), respectively, implying two plausible photocatalytic mechanisms: type II heterojunction and Z-heterojunction. If the heterojunction is a type II heterojunction (Fig. 11a), photogenerated electrons will be transported from the CB of FeIn2S4 to the CB of BiOBr, and no ·O2− will be produced since the CB position of BiOBr (-0.01 eV) is higher than the O2/·O2− (-0.33 eV)(Yin et al. 2021a) potential. Because the VB position of FeIn2S4 (1.14 eV) is lower than the OH−/·OH (1.99 eV)(Tang et al. 2020) potential, photogenerated holes will be transported from the VB of BiOBr to the VB of FeIn2S4 and no ·OH will be formed. This process contradicts the results of our radical trapping experiments and ESR. As for Z-scheme heterojunction (Fig. 11b), photogenerated electrons can migrate from the CB of BiOBr to the VB of FeIn2S4 across a tight heterogeneous interface in the Z-scheme structure and quench local photogenerated holes, leaving electrons in the CB of FeIn2S4 and holes in the VB of BiOBr. The CB position of FeIn2S4 is less than the potential required to generate ·O2− (-0.48 eV ˂ O2/·O2− 0.33 eV), while the VB position of BiOBr is greater than the potential required to generate ·OH (2.67 eV ˃ OH−/·OH 1.99 eV). Hence, the FIS10/BiOBr heterojunction can generate ·O2− and ·OH for effective Rh B degradation.