3.1 Paleodata assimilation
The parameters that will be optimized using temperature and precipitation data, are: (i) input volcanic activity, (ii) input solar activity, (iii) a possible bias for the temperature (δT) and (iv) for the precipitation (δP), (v) the standard error of temperature (σT) and (vi) precipitation (σP).From the posterior distributions (Table 3), it appears that the volcanic activity impacts were the strongest during the cold periods (2500, 1300, 700 and 200 yr BP) and rather weak during the dry periods (4200 and 3200 yr BP) and warm periods (2000 and 1000 yr BP). The confidence intervals do not overlap so that these differences are significant. For the present slice, volcanic and solar activities have no significant impact, as it is expected that the warming is explained by increased GHG concentration (not used for constraining the assimilation). The impact of solar activity is not clear, as there is no significant difference between cold and warm periods or between the dry and wet periods. The temperature bias (δT independent of the spatial variability) is estimated to be between 0.6 and 1.6°C for the periods between 2500 and 200 yr BP and is not significantly different from zero for the dry periods and the present. The δP estimates were not significant for any time period. Fig. S4 presents the overall correlations between the emulator outputs and the proxy-based reconstructions. The temperature was particularly well simulated by the emulator with a squared correlation (R2) of 0.75. As expected precipitation is less well simulated with an R2 of 0.28, which is nevertheless significant, with a significant underestimation of the large (negative or positive) anomalies.
3.3 Emulator application to past and future scenarios
This assimilation process was applied to simulate the annual temperature and precipitation for the ten boxes in the 13 time slices/scenarios. The spatial patterns of the reconstructions and simulations are consistent (Fig. 3). Therefore, global forcing variables can drive not only the mean climate evolution but also the spatial patterns reconstructed by the proxy data in the Mediterranean. Volcanic activity seems to be the main driver for the cold periods of the Iron Age (2500 yr BP), the LALIA (1300 yr BP), the LIA (700, 200 yr BP), and for the warm periods of the RCO (2000 yr BP) and MCA (1000 yr BP). The main driver of the present warming and drying (Present time in Fig. 3) is GHG forcing. For the 4200 yr BP and 3200 yr BP periods, the volcanic and solar activity drivers do not seem to be plausible explanations for the droughts, at least according to our emulator.
Future projections (Fig. 4) show general warming for the four scenarios (+1.5C, +2C, +3C, +5C) particularly strong for +3C and +5C scenarios. The local warming is less strong in the areas influenced by the Atlantic Ocean (France and the Iberian Peninsula). For precipitation, we simulated a weak signal for +1.5C and +2C with drier and wetter zones, but the signal became clearer for +3C and +5C (all the symbols are triangles, i.e. negative). Combined with the warming, it is undeniable that water stress will increase considerably with +3C and +5C temperatures.
To answer the question of whether volcanic activity can mitigate the impact of high GHG emissions, fig. 4 shows that the temperature distributions of +5CV+ and 5CV- are quite similar, meaning that the cooling effect of volcanoes is low in a large GHG emission scenario. The precipitation distributions of +5CV+ and 5CV- were similar in the western Mediterranean, and +5CV+ produced slightly higher precipitation anomalies than +5CV- in the eastern Mediterranean.
3.4 Independent validation
Additional independent validation was completed through comparisons with a tree-ring-based reconstruction of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) (Cook et al 2015) for the last two millennia, when tree-ring data are available. The PDSI reflects the spring-summer soil moisture conditions. We compared this variable with the reconstruction of the E/PE (ratio of actual to potential evapotranspiration in %) variable provided by BIOME4 in the previous steps. E/PE is a moisture index which is equal to zero when the soil is fully dry and 100 when it is fully wet. The range of the PDSI index is usually between -6 and 6 units. Considering that both indices are slightly different, a visual comparison shows pretty good agreement (Fig. 5).
3.5 Evolution of viticulture from the Bronze Age to the end of the 21st century
We subsequently applied our emulator to the question of how viticulture has evolved in the Mediterranean region and in response to which climatic stimuli and global forcing. Numerous bioclimate indices have been published to delimit viticultural zones in the world (Tonietto and Carbonneau 2004, Santos et al 2012, Howell 2001). Among them cite (1) the sum of degree-days above 10°C during the growing season or the heliothermal index of Huglin (HI), (2) the number of days with a minimum temperature below -17°C which is very important for the grapes growing in continental climates, (3) the minimum temperature of September (cool night index CI) important for the ripening, (4) the sum of the product of monthly temperature and precipitation for the growing season (Hyl), and (5) the drought stress index (DI) related to the potential water balance of the soil during the growing season. Malheiro et al. (2010) have proposed a composite index (CompI) calculated based on the ratio of years simultaneously satisfying four criteria (HI>1400, DI>-100, Hyl<5100 and Tmin >-17°C). Some of the climate variables needed for these indices were not available from the BIOME4 outputs. However, other BIOME4 variables, such as those associated with the net primary production of plant types are very interesting because they include the CO2 effect on photosynthesis. Considering only rainfed viticulture, we propose the following index VI:

and x=NPPtrop, the net primary production of tropical plants with interval [xmin, xmax] equal to [0, 10 kg C m-2]; x=NPP, the total ecosystem net primary production with interval = [500, 1000 kg C m-2]; x=Pann, the total annual precipitation with interval = [400, 800 mm]; x=MTWA, the mean temperature of the warmest month with interval = [18, 23°C]; x=MTCO, the mean temperature of the coldest month with interval [3, 12°C]; x=, the actual to potential evapotranspiration ratio with interval = [30, 60%]. The VI index combines the total ecosystem productivity of a viticultural system with a few key bioclimatic variables. All except those related to NPPtrop assume that the vine growth is limited only by their lower values and not by their higher values. Because there is no possible viticulture in the tropics (where temperature is not cold enough for an appropriate dormancy), 1-INPPtrop is limited by its upper value.
Applied to the mean climate of 1980-2009, VI approximately reproduces the area in Europe where viticulture is present (Fraga et al 2013) (Fig. 6). As shown in Fig. 6a, the existing wine sites range from 35°N to 52°N. In Fig. 6b, the simulations give approximately the same limits with an optimum at approximately 42°N, with some exceptions in the Alpine and Balkan regions, which are likely too continental to pass the MTCO criterion. Considering that this criterion is much dependent on local factors such as valleys, slopes, and soil, which are not accounted for in our analysis, we consider that this index adequately represents the macroclimate of potential vine distribution in Europe and the Mediterranean region.
The variables needed for the viticulture equation (1) are provided by the emulator for all time slices studied in the past time slices and for future scenarios. As shown by fig. 7, we modify the global forcings according the values of Table 3 for the past and Table 2 for the future. We so obtain simulated maps of the viticulture extension.
Fig. 8 shows that during the dry time slices of 4200 and 3200 yr BP, the suitable areas were located between 34°N and 46°N latitudes. During the cold periods (2500, 1300, 700, and 200 yr BP), they occupied approximately the same zone between 34°N and 47°N. During the warmer periods (2000 and 1000 yr BP), the southern limit did not change much, but the northern limit reached 49°N, implying that most of Gaul was suitable for viticulture, as already shown by (Bernigaud et al 2021). The present map is warmer than the pre-industrial period (200 yr BP slice), which suggests that viticulture is now at its maximum potential extension in four thousand years, up to 51°N. Because of the drier conditions, the southern limit has shifted from 34°N to 35°N. Note that these variations only depend on climate changes, and that we do not consider the type of soils.
In the future projections, the northern extension of potential viticulture should shift from 51°N (+1.5C scenario) to 53°N (+3C scenario), and even more than 55°N (for the +5C scenario). This would allow viticulture to be possible up to Central England, but it would regress in the south due to higher water stress. In the Iberian Peninsula, only the Atlantic coast should be suitable for cultivating wine grapes, unless significant irrigation. These projected unfavourable conditions were confirmed by (Fraga et al 2013) based on other viticulture indices. The 5CV+ and 5CV- scenarios appear quite similar to the 5C scenario, indicating that the effect of high or low volcanic activities should have a weak effect on the potential distribution of the viticulture in comparison to a strong GHG forcing.
The results are summarized in Fig. 9. In the past, only the warm regions of the southern band (29-37°N) had a suitable wine-growing area equivalent to the present. The central geographical band (37-44°N) and the northern one (44-48°N) underwent sudden changes in the viticulture area, first from the cool Iron Age (2500 yr BP) to the RCO (2000 yr BP), and later from the end of the LIA (200 yr BP) to the present. The cold periods are all characterized by a decline in viticulture at latitudes above 37°N. For the future projections, northward displacements are likely to be drastic from +3°C global warming. Viticulture potential will likely disappear from North Africa and is set to decrease drastically in the Iberian Peninsula. In contrast, potential productive areas will likely expand at latitudes above 50°N, in the Balkans and in the Alps (considering that local climates already enable grape cultivation in some areas with particularly favourable local climates).
For the two additional scenarios of high emissions combined with extreme volcanic and solar activities, the question is whether an entirely hypothetical set of strong volcanic events could slow down the decline in viticulture in the south. The answer is slightly positive for Spain, Italy, Greece and Turkey (green curve increases for +5CV+ and decreases for +5CV-), but it is negative in North Africa and the Levant (red curve) because the water stress should remain too substantial. The effect is also positive in the northern band and Turkey (the blue and cyan curves increase for +5CV+ and decrease for +5CV-). In all the cases, the effect was clearly too small to compensate for the GHG effect.