Currently, the commonly used minimally invasive percutaneous reduction and fixation technique is derived from the method described by Essex-Lopresti [22], and DIACFs that undergo percutaneous reduction are often fixed with Kirschner wires or screws. At the early stage, screws combined with the percutaneous reduction technique were used for simple Essex-Lopresti tongue-type fractures [16, 17, 19, 23] and Sanders type II fractures [21, 24, 25]. However, with the progress of percutaneous reduction techniques, more complex types of DIACFs can also be reduced using this technique [15, 18]. As a result, percutaneous reduction combined with screw fixation has become more widely indicated, with some researchers even applying this technique to almost all types of calcaneal fractures [18, 26, 27, 28]. Subsequently, the disadvantages of screw fixation have gradually emerged [20, 21], which are mainly manifested as screw pullout associated with osteoporosis and the loss of reduction caused by the unstable fixation of fractures. From this point of view, screw fixation is not suitable for patients with severe osteoporosis. As for the loss of fracture reduction is often closely related to the improper position and orientation of the screw in addition to severely fractures.
Studies have shown that the sustentaculum tali and thalamus, the tuberosity and the anterior part of the calcaneus are the three key points of calcaneal fracture fixation. Any type of fixation method can achieve firm fixation of calcaneal fractures only on the premise of fixing these key points. In view of the anatomical characteristics of the calcaneus itself, most calcaneal fractures in the clinic have completely retained these key points with large fragment, which provide a favorable supporting point and anatomical basis for screw fixation.Therefore, the presence or absence of a large critical fragment is the key to the suitability of the technique for the treatment of DIACFs, rather than the degree of articular facet comminuted as an absolute indication of the choice of screw fixation.
Few clinical studies have been conducted on the direction of screws to ensure maximum fixation strength. According to the author’s experience, the first screw should be placed from the thalamus toward the sustentaculum tali, which is more tightly fixed because of the high density of the trabeculae radiating from the body. The second screw should be placed from the medial part of the tuberosity along the longitudinal axis of the calcaneus to the sustentaculum tali. The sustentaculum tali has a hard cortex and forms a strong inner bearing column with the medial wall of the calcaneus so that the screw can well maintain the height of the calcaneus. The third screw should be placed from the lateral part of the tuberosity along the transverse axis to the anterior part of the calcaneus. However, according to the specific situation,the author will try to make the screw toward the anterior part, where the trabeculae are more abundant and the bone is more rigid (Fig. 5).
In terms of complications, the incidence of complications (1 case of superficial infection of the needle track and 1 case of sural nerve injury) in this study was 6.7%, which was basically consistent with the 0%-15% [17, 18, 19, 29] reported in the literature. For the purpose of preventing the pain caused by skin irritation of the screw tail cap, the screw head was specially buried, and no patient experienced such a complication. A study by Tomesen [18] using percutaneous screws to treat DIACFs showed that the width of the calcaneus was widened by approximately 23.6% compared to the normal, resulting in approximately 22% of patients being unable to walk normally with shoes on. This can be attributed to the large number of Sanders IV cases in the study and the fact that all of them were reduced using a minimally invasive percutaneous approach. In this study, Sanders type IV and some Sanders type III fractures were reduced through the sinus tarsi approach under direct vision, and the satisfactory reduction of the collapsed articular facet was beneficial for the recovery of calcaneus width, which was also better than that achieved by the method used in Tomesen’s study. Therefore, effective reduction is a prerequisite for screw fixation. For cases with obvious fracture displacement, closed reduction should not be pursued excessively, and satisfactory reduction can be obtained by combining limited incision, which provides a preferable foundation for screw fixation and reduction of complications.
In summary, in this study, percutaneous screw fixation at key points of the calcaneus was applied to treat nonsevere osteoporotic DIACFs with large calcaneus tuberosity ,anterior part and sustentaculum tali fragment, which was characterized by the advantages of being minimally invasive and having few complications and reliable fixation, and achieved favorable clinical outcomes. This technique is still an effective supplement to classic surgery, especially with more prominent advantages for patients with contraindications of open reduction and internal fixation. Furthermore, percutaneous screw fixation at key points of the calcaneus in the treatment of patients with DIACFs significantly shortens the preoperative waiting time and total hospital stay, significantly reduces the medical burden, and achieves favorable social benefits.