Figure 1a, b showed FTIR spectra of insulin@chitin and insulin @chitin-guar gum respectively [30].
The distinctive FTIR spectra of both insulin@chitin and insulin@chitin-GG nanocomposites confirmed the modification of chemical structure of chitin on grafting by GG. Insulin@chitin-GG nanocomposite showed both functional groups of chitin (CH2OH, CH3CONH-) in addition to NH2 and COOH of insulin. All the assigned FTIR vibrational bands at the characteristic wavenumber, (\(\stackrel{-}{\upsilon },\)cm− 1) confirmed successful intercalation between chitin and GG polymeric matrix, Table SI.1. The SEM micrographs of native insulin and chitin as well as insulin@chitin and insulin@chitin-g-guar gum are shown in Figs. 2 (a, b) and 3 (a, b) at magnification 45000x.
The layered microstructure of insulin polypeptide is attributed to the interconnected polypeptide chains by: disulphide bond, hydrogen bond between amino (NH2) and carboxylic (COOH) group of cysteine amino acids (aa) residues [6].
Bright fine spherical Chitin nanoparticles (NPs) are regularly and homogeneously distributed on insulin polypeptide chains. Morpholgy of chitin and insulin are maintained in both IDDS.The copolymer is a smoother polymeric carrier for insulin therapy. Insulin chains are more firmely linked to chitin NPs as carbonyl group in chitin acetamide (NHCOCH3) is broken in alkaline pH of reaction media for binding NH2 group of insulin molecules.
In insulin@chitin-g-GG, acloholic CH2OH group of chitin form intermolecular hydrogen bonding H.B. with guar gum [6]. Some aggregations are also attibuted due to intra-molecular H-B. within GG chaines. No aggregation or agglomeration are observed in both IDDS.
Powder XRD patterns of DDS sample are show in Fig. 4a, b
PXRD pattern of insulin@chitin showed semi-crystalline structure characterizing native chitin. Insulin@chitin-g-GG has both crystalline and amorphous domains [31]. Grafting chitin by GG declined crystallinity of chitin, improve proteolytic stability and membrane permeability of this IDDS. The higher crystalline insulin@chitin indicated that N atom of (NH) group of chitin is strongly binding to O atom of COOH of insulin in a bidentate chelating mode. Binding GG to both insulin and chitin involved H.B. and Van der Waals interaction. Figures 5 (a, b) and 6 (a, b) showed TGA and DTA thermograms respectively.
These Figs.showed that insulin@chitin exhibited better thermal stability compared to Insulin@chitin-g-GG. The comparative thermal parameters of the tested samples are collected in Table 2 [32].
Table 2
Thermal data of insulin@chitin and Insulin@chitin-g-GG
Sample
|
Steps
|
t, °C
|
Wt. loss%
|
Residue%
|
DTA, peaks t, °C
|
Insulin@chitin
|
I
II
III
|
36.4–74.8
74.8-230.4
230.4–696.0
|
3.45
18.30
27.74
|
66.86
|
86.3-140.8 (endo, intense)
248.4-292.7 (exo weak)
295.5-381.1 (exo weak)
|
Insulin@chitin-g-GG
|
I
II
|
36.3–376.0
376.0-700.1
|
59.78
21.53
|
18.59
|
276.5-402.1 (exo, broad& intense), 447.4-508.2 ( exo, broad& intense)
|
Insulin@chitin thermally decomposed in three steps, wt. loss % 3.45, 18.30, 27.74, and 66.86 residue. Insulin@chitin-g-GG decomposed in two steps, wt. loss% (59.78%, 21.53% (higher than Insulin@chitin) and only 18.59 residue. Insulin@chitin exhibited only one endothermic peak at temperature range: 86.3oC-140.8oC due to the strong binding between functional groups of chitin and insulin. Insulin@chitin-g-GG exhibited two broad and intense exothermic peaks due to bond formation between various decomposed carboneous polymeric residues species [33].
Figure 7 showed UV-Vis.absorption bands for the known concentrations of insulin used in construction of its calibration curve, Fig.SI.3.
Applying the least square method on absorbance-concentration plot, good straight line is obtained with slope equals molar extension coefficient, ε 0.005). Insulin concentration is determined using Beers Lambert law. The high correlation coefficient R2 0.9984 confirmed the validity of UV-Vis. spectroscopy for monitoring invitro-insulin release. Fig. SI.3 (a-c) showed UV-Vis. spectra for insulin release from insuline@chitin-g-guar gum [27].
Figure 8a, b represented insulin release form insulin@chitin at pH 7.4, insulin@chitin-g-GG at pH 1.2, 6.8, 7.4 respectively.
Insulin release at pH 7.4 from insulin@chitin give 5 ppm negligible maximum concentration. Insulin release from this IDDS at pH 1.2 and 6.8 cannot be followed spectrophotometrically. Insulin@chitin-g-GG showed higher concentration (10 ppm,16 ppm and 18 ppm at pH 1.2, 7.4, and 6.8) respectively of released insulin than insulin@chitin. The initial rapid burst Insulin-release is attributed to the fast detachment of encapsulated insulin which adhered to surface of polymer shell in response to pressure of the media [34]. Burst release at about 15 min. is in agreement with half life time of insulin pharmacokinetic in blood stream as few min. [35]. Insulin@chitin-GG showed controllable insulin release that is limited at 76.2%, 80.7% and 67.2% at pH 1.2, 6.8 and 7.4 respectively. Insulin released data from insulin@chitin-g-GG are linearly fit to different kinetic models, SI.III.3 applying least square method in linear regression analysis. The suitable kinetic model for release kinetic is selected to have highest correlation coefficient, R2 ≥ 0.95 between the dependent parameter y and the independent parameter x in the empirical equation of each kinetic model [29].
Table 3 collected R2 obtained from the linear fitting to release data of insulin to the tested kinetic models.
Table 3
Correlation coefficient, R2 for linear fitting of release data to kinetic models
pH
|
Run
|
Zero order
|
Pseudo 1o
|
Pseudo 2o
|
Elovich
|
Higuchi
|
Ritger-Peppas
|
|
|
Correlation coefficient, R2
|
1.2
|
1
|
0.7259
|
0.8845
|
0.9965
|
0.943
|
0.8452
|
0.897
|
2
|
0.8338
|
0.974
|
0.9994
|
0.9857
|
0.9261
|
0.9609
|
6.8
|
1
|
0.3691
|
0.3611
|
0.9959
|
0.5906
|
0.4794
|
0.6197
|
2
|
0.3977
|
0.3821
|
0.9618
|
0.6574
|
0.5293
|
0.6915
|
7.4
|
1
|
0.7466
|
0.7549
|
0.9975
|
0.8645
|
0.8098
|
0.8368
|
2
|
0.7721
|
0.7889
|
0.9998
|
0.9652
|
0.8815
|
0.9432
|
Higuchi plot model showed low correlation coefficient, therefore the mechanism of insulin desorption from polymer matrix is not under diffusion control as suggested by this kinetic model [38]. The linear fitting of insulin release to pseudo second order kinetic model gave the highest value of R2 in the range (0.9618–0.9998) [6], Fig. 9. Hence pseudo 2o model is the suitable kinetic model for describing release kinetics of insulin from the prepared IDDS.
Figure 9 showed plot t/q versus t for pseudo second order kinetic. The linear regression equation, R2 and the standard errors (S.D.) are collected in Table SI.3. The kinetic parameters k2, qe are obtained from the slope and the intercept of the obtained straight line and are collected in Table 4.
Table 4
kinetic parameter of pseudo-2o model
pH
|
Run NO.
|
k2, g/mg min
|
qe cal., ppm
|
h, ppm. g− 1 min− 1
|
R2
|
1.2
|
Run1
|
0.0073
|
19.64
|
2.816
|
0.9965
|
Run2
|
0.0067
|
19.92
|
2.674
|
0.9994
|
6.8
|
Run1
|
0.0305
|
11.32
|
3.908
|
0.9959
|
Run2
|
0.0290
|
15.79
|
7.237
|
0.9618
|
7.4
|
Run1
|
0.0134
|
15.12
|
3.063
|
0.9975
|
Run2
|
0.0161
|
21.05
|
7.133
|
0.9998
|
The best fitting of data of insulin release to Pseudo 2o order model indicated that of insulin@chitin-g-GG is heterogeneous solid surface has active sites of different energy [40]. Each insulin molecule is release from two adsorption sites. The rate constant k2 for insulin release followed the order:
pH 6.8 > 7.4 > 1.2
This trend is confirmed by impedance measurements expressed as Nyquist plots, Fig. 10
Charge transfer resistance (Rct) equals diameter of semicircle. The smaller Rct for insulin @chitin-GG at all pH indicated that low concentration of insulin released due to tight linkage to chitin. Correspondingly, few insulin molecules are liberated from insulin@chitin microcapsule to adsorb on surface of working electrode by heteroatoms of functional groups. DDS polarized by applied AC current field, the liberated insulin from microcapsule adsorb on surface working electrode increased charge transfer resistance over electrode surface [29].
Rate of insulin release is retarded at pH 1.2, while there is a significant release at pH 6.8 and 7.4.
For insulin @chitin-GG, slow insulin release at low pH indicating insulin protection against aggressive HCl in GIT environment (pH 1–3). Hence increases transit time till passage into small intestine for enhanced absorption in blood stream. Chitin is mucoadhesive polymeric carrier retard insulin degradation, hence reduces insulin loss in gastric acid and intestinal environment. At pH 6.8 of body fluids, the absorption enhancers in mosaic layer and enterocytes connected by tight junction improved release and absorption of insulin.
This result also confirmed that insulin release is pH dependent, with a higher release rate at colon pH (6.8), where insulin-NPs connections become weak and insulin is released without any protein degradation. Similar pH response, such as retention of insulin within polymer matrix at acidic pH and significant release at higher pH are also observed in insulin-loaded alginate microspheres [12, 27].
Applied AC electric signal potential on various applied frequency polarized electron clouds and changed the dielectric properties in atoms of IDDS generating electron-hole pair and current flow. The amphoteric Zwitter ionic amino of insulin confirmed polarizability of insulin monomers [6, 40]. Capacitive impedance plots confirmed the macroscopic dielectric properties and polarizability of IDDS as well charge separation and phase transition [41, 42]. The mucoadhesive GG enhanced insulin release in a controlled sustained manner via improving hydrophilicity, charge density, pH-sensitivity and response [40].
Impedance plots confirmed pH effect on insulin release from DDS in simulated physiological fluids. Release insulin from microcapsule core via swelling of polymeric shell by aqueous buffer solution. Relaxation of released insulin appear as one time constant.
Impedance results satisfactory agreed UV-Vis. Spectroscopy in the fact that insulin@chitin is very difficult to release insulin. This finding suggested the validation of impedance spectroscopy is novel technique for qualitative determination of release insulin in physiological body fluids.
The better performance of insulin @chitin-g-GG in insulin release is interpreted in terms of swelling and porosity [22, 23], Table 5.
Table 5
Porosity and swelling% of insulin DDS
Sample
|
Chitin
|
Guar gum
|
Insulin @chitin
|
Insulin @chitin-g-guar gum
|
Porosity
|
503 ± 20
|
723 ± 37
|
63.37 ± 20
|
47.37 ± 20
|
Swelling%
|
3100
|
2900
|
980
|
650
|
The largest swelling percentage belonged to chitin. GG the greatest ability to form intramolecular H.B. (four H.B. for each monomeric unit) forming 3D network structure but its high rheology limited water absorption. Although the swelling of insulin @chitin exceeded that of insulin @chitin-g-GG, however the strong linkage between semi crystalline chitin and insulin retard insulin release [22].
The largest porosity of GG is attributed strong intramolecular H.B. The lower porosity of insulin @chitin-g-GG although having better insulin release suggested high cross linking on this DDS increased insulin loading capacity. Insulin loaded by both penetration into pores and binding multiple functional groups. However, chitin-g-GG copolymer is loaded by more insulin peptide chains decreased porosity of DDS than that of insulin@chitin [23].
Swelling of DDS in aqueous physiological body fluid enabled absorption of body fluid, increase interior surface accessible for body fluid. Insulin @chitin-g-GG has hydrogel character behave as low viscus liquid with rapid phase transition. Grafted chitin is loaded by more insulin than native chitin due to multiple functional groups [23].
Amino acid test from IDDS along 8 hrs. immersion in phosphate buffer saline (BFS), Table 6 confirmed more peptides and aa sequence from insulin@chitin-g-GG [22, 23].
Table 6
Peptides and amino acid sequence for insulin drug delivery systems
Variable
|
Insulin DDS
|
Insulin@chitin
|
Insulin@chitin-g-GG
|
C mg/mL
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
1
|
3
|
8
|
Peptide
|
0.39
|
0.43
|
0.50
|
0.61
|
1.46
|
2.27
|
aa
|
0.05
|
0.51
|
0.9
|
0.071
|
0.69
|
1.04
|
Peptide and aa produced by degradation of insulin by ninhydrin as insulin monomer is a biological polypeptide protein hormone; Mw. 5.800 k Da.. The aa are linked by peptide bond via removal water molecule [42] giving dipeptide that link a third aa yield tripeptide. Repeated peptide bond formation gives specific aa sequence of insulin [22], especially sulfur-containing aa cysteine and methionine.
Insulin exists in solution as monomers, dimers, tetramers, and hexamers due to ions-, and solvent interaction. The aa monomers of insulin are nonpolar hydrophobic, polar, neutral, basic, and acidic. These aa differ in NH2 position to COOH group [23]. Insulin has primary protein structure (chains of aa sequence and S-S linkage) has neither α-helix pleated sheet nor 3D conformation in addition to the absence of any associated two or more chains.
The formulated oral administration nanocomposites of IDDS showed insulin loading efficiency and permeability to biological fluids facilitate insulin absorption and bioavailability.
Figure 11 showed that both IDDS have the same particle size distribution between nanoscale microscale (70 nm-1000nm) up to 1 µm. confirmed successful insulin loading on polymeric carrier.
Particle size distribution is slightly modified at µm region for insulin@chtin-g-GG due to increased surface area by additional functional groups [26].
Negative zeta potential, Fig. 12 for both IDDS confirmed stability against coagulation and enabled outstanding to storage temperatures, mechanical shear force, etc. to ensure sustained insulin release [26].
Chitin-g-GG is ether copolymeric hydrophilic hydrogel arranged in a block, random or alternating configuration throughout polymeric chains network, or interpenetrating polymeric hydrogel or polymer blends [40–43].
The traces amount of catalyst, initiator and cross linkers used in preparation of IDDS are all below the toxicity limits. Both insulin@chitin and insulin@chitin-g-GG nanocomposites could not show neuroinflammation or alteration autophagy metabolic process [44, 45].