Effect of blood pregnancy test time on IVF clinical outcomes in urine β-HCG-positive patients: A retrospective cohort study

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1784219/v1

Abstract

Background

To evaluate the optimal time of blood pregnancy test for urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG)-positive patients following embryo transfer.

Methods

A total of 1,106 women who underwent embryo transfer between January 2019 and December 2019 were divided into three groups based on the time of positive pregnancy test at the hospital: the ≤ 9 days group (n = 355), the 10–12 days group (n = 598), and the ≥ 13 days group (n = 153). Clinical pregnancy ratio, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, late pregnancy loss rate, live birth ratio, preterm birth rate, very preterm birth rate, gestational week of delivery, and congenital malformation rate of the three groups were compared.

Results

The time preference for pregnancy test was 10 days among patients with D3 embryo transfer and 11 days among those with blastocyst transfer. Patients in the ≥ 13 days group were older and had a higher proportion of previous childbirth(s). Patients in the ≤ 9 days group had a higher live birth ratio and a lower risk of early miscarriage than the other two groups; similar results were seen in a sensitivity analysis that excluded women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s). Nevertheless, no differences were observed in the clinical pregnancy ratio, ectopic pregnancy rate, late pregnancy loss rate, very preterm birth rate, gestational week of delivery, or congenital malformation rate for all ranges of pregnancy test time. The pregnancy test time to predict the early miscarriage and live birth based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was day 9 after embryo transfer. After excluding women aged over 35 years or those with previous childbirth(s), the optimal time to conduct pregnancy test based on ROC curve was day 9 or 10 after embryo transfer in predicting early miscarriage, the pregnancy test time to predict live birth should be conducted on day 9 after embryo transfer.

Conclusion

Patients with positive results for urine β-HCG after embryo transfer should receive blood pregnancy test on day 9–10 after embryo transfer, which probably facilitated the optimization of live birth.

Background

Since the birth of the world's first test-tube baby in 1978, constant innovations have been made in the in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer (IVF–ET) technology, both in terms of protocols and drugs, with the goal of alleviating patient suffering and increasing patient compliance. For instance, the long-acting gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol reduces the number of downregulation injections in patients [1], while the vaginal progesterone gel greatly lessens adverse reactions of progesterone injection [2]. Although technological innovations can reduce the partial physical stresses, literature shows that patients face varying psychological pressures at different stages of assisted pregnancy [3, 4]. As indicated by the comparison of patient stresses before and after embryo transfer and during pregnancy test, the psychological stress is particularly high during the pregnancy test. According to previous reports, a pregnancy test taken up to 14 days after an IVF protocol can make patients anxious and stressed [5, 6]. Such stress stems from facing the final outcomes after ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval or the upcoming fulfillment of years-long expectation following an excessively long infertility period [7].

Because patients cannot wait to learn about their IVF outcomes, the majority of them perform a urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test at home beforehand. Some patients even perform the pregnancy test just 5–6 days after embryo transfer. Patients with persistently negative test results often return to the hospital on the 14th day of transfer and undergo a blood β-HCG test to rule out false negatives. Patients with positive pregnancy test results are eager to know about the blood level changes and embryonic development. Furthermore, they are often unsure whether they should come to the hospital beforehand for blood tests and how far in advance the blood sampling should be performed. To our knowledge, no other studies have yet been conducted on this topic. Hence, in the present retrospective study, we intended to identify the time preference for pregnancy test among urine β-HCG-positive patients and evaluate whether their IVF and obstetric outcomes are affected by the time of blood pregnancy test at the hospital.

Methods

Study design

All patients who received fresh/frozen embryo transfers between January 2019 and December 2019 at Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital (China) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Those with biochemical pregnancy (referred to the pregnancy diagnosed by either serum or urine β-HCG only [8]) were divided into three groups based on the time span from embryo transfer to the pregnancy test at the hospital: the ≤ 9 days group (n = 355), the 10–12 days group (n = 598), and the ≥ 13 days group (n = 153) (Fig. 1). The exclusion criteria were as follows: patients aged over 38 years; patients with a history of recurrent miscarriage, repeated biochemical pregnancy, repeated embryo implantation failure, or oocyte or sperm donation; and patients who received HCG trigger during natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) and stimulated cycles. This study was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital (reference: B2021-7).

Ovarian stimulation, Preparation of the endometrium

Protocols in fresh cycles: Oocytes were obtained by the follicular phase long-acting GnRH agonist (GnRHa) protocol in 64.1% subjects, the luteal phase long-acting GnRH-agonist protocol in 23.1% subjects, and the GnRH antagonist protocol in 12.8% subjects. With the follicular phase protocol, a hypodermic injection of GnRHa (Beiyi, Lizhu Pharmaceutical) was administered at 1.875–3.75 mg on the second day of menstrual cycle. After achieving pituitary suppression, Gn was administered daily to stimulate follicle growth until the administration of HCG. With the luteal phase protocol, an intramuscular injection of long-acting GnRHa was administered once at 1.25–3.75 mg during the midluteal phase. After achieving pituitary suppression, Gn was administered daily to stimulate follicle growth until HCG administration. With the GnRH antagonist protocol, Gn was administered daily from the third day of menstruation. When the leading follicle was between 12–14 mm in size, short-acting GnRH antagonist (Cetrotide, Merck) was administered at 0.25 mg daily until the administration of HCG. Oocyte was collected 34–36 h following the administration of HCG in all the above protocols.

Endometrial preparation in frozen cycles: For the NC-FET, ultrasound was performed transvaginally from the 8th to 10th day of the menstrual cycle to assess the ovarian follicle development. Serum samples were collected after the dominant follicles were 16–20 mm in diameter, and the serum levels of estradiol, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone were examined. Luteal support was started with 20 mg of oil-based intramuscular progesterone injection (Zhejiang Xianju Pharmaceutical) once daily or 90 mg of vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone; Merck) once daily until the day of pregancy test, according to the patient’s preference. For hormonal replacement cycles (HRCs), all patients received estradiol (Femoston red tablets; Abbott Biologicals B.V.) treatment at 4 mg orally, with or without prior GnRH agonist suppression, and the dosage was regulated on a 7-day basis by the endometrial thickness. When the endometrial thickness reached ≥ 7 mm, secretory transformation was initiated using Fematon-yellow tablets (containing estradiol 2 mg and dydrogesterone 10 mg; Abbott Biologicals B.V.) twice daily, and based on the patient’s preference, 40 mg oil-based intramuscular progesterone injection (Zhejiang Xianju Pharmaceutical) once daily, 90 mg of vaginal progesterone gel (Crinone; Merck) once daily, or vaginal micronized progesterone capsules 200 mg (Utrogestan; Laboratoires Besins International) three times daily was administered from the day of embryo transfer to the day of pregancy test. For the stimulated cycles, 50 mg of oral clomiphene citrate (Fertilan; Codal–Synto Ltd.) or 2.5 mg of oral letrozole (Furui Pharmaceutical) was prescribed for five days starting from the third day of menstrual cycle, with or without 75–150 IU of human menopausal gonadotropin (Lizhu Pharmaceutical). The remaining procedures were identical to those of the natural cycle.

Outcome measures

In this study, the outcome measures included clinical pregnancy ratio, ectopic pregnancy rate, multiple pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, late pregnancy loss rate, live birth ratio, preterm and very preterm birth rates, gestational week of delivery, and congenital malformation rate. Clinical pregnancy was confirmed upon observation of a gestational sac with heartbeat on ultrasonography. Ectopic pregnancy referred to the visualization of a pregnancy outside the endometrial cavity either surgically or ultrasonically. Early miscarriage was defined as the intrauterine loss of pregnancy on ultrasound within 10 weeks. Late pregnancy loss referred to all pregnancy losses between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation [9, 10]. Preterm birth was defined as a live birth at 24–37 weeks of gestation, whereas very preterm birth was defined as a birth less than 32 weeks of gestation [1114].

Statistical analyses

SPSS Statistics version 25 was used to perform all analyses. The frequency distributions of pregnancy test times were plotted for different populations with GraphPad prism version 8. Count data were expressed as rates (%) and compared by the χ2 or Fisher's exact test. Measurement data following a normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons among the three groups were made by analysis of variance, while pairwise comparisons were performed using the least significant difference test. Measurement data following a non-normal distribution were described by P50 (P25, P75), and comparisons among the three groups were made by the Kruskal–Wallis H test, while pairwise comparisons were performed by Bonferroni correction. All missing data were imputed using a mean completer. Additionally, logistic regression analysis was conducted by two methods of population grouping (≤ 9d group, 10-12d group and ≥ 13d group) and incorporating the pregnancy test time into the linear model as a continuous variable, so as to evaluate whether test time level was independently associated with the risk of early miscarriage rate and live birth rate. The models were adjusted for age, type of infertility, smoking history, previous childbirth, BMI, antral follicle count, transfer type, and endometrial thickness. Meanwhile, odds ratios (OR) were expressed as 95% confidence intervals (CI). P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted to set the optimal cutoff of test time to predict the early miscarriage and live birth.

Results

In 2019, a total of 1,746 patients took blood HCG pregnancy tests at our hospital following fresh/frozen embryo transfer. Among them, 1,106 were eligible (Fig. 1) for our final analysis, with 355 categorized under ≤ 9 days group, 598 under 10–12 days group, and 153 under ≥ 13 days group. Figure 2 depicts the distribution of hospital pregnancy test times for the embryo transferred patients. For patients with D3 embryo transfer, the pregnancy test time tended to be the 10th day after transfer, while for those with blastocyst transfer, the most common pregnancy test time was the 11th day after transfer. The HCG levels on pregnancy test days in the three groups were 133.9 (76.3–212.9), 267 (116.4–532.4), and 559 (142.7–1,318.7) mIU/mL, respectively (P < 0.001). The 10–12 days and ≥ 13 days groups exhibited older ages and higher proportions of fresh embryo transfer than the ≤ 9 days group (P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). The number of antral follicles was the lowest in the 10– 12 days group (P = 0.004). In the FET procedure, the highest ratio of HRC with downregulation protocol was found in the ≤ 9 days group (P = 0.01), while the ≥ 13 days group exhibited the highest proportion of previous childbirth(s) and the greatest endometrial thickness on the day of transfer (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). There were insignificant statistical differences between the three groups in terms of infertile duration, body mass index, maternal smoking, primary infertility rate, fresh cycle protocols, number of oocytes retrieved in fresh cycles, number of embryos transferred, and the good-quality embryo/blastocyst transfer rates. Table 1 lists all the background characteristics. 

 
Table 1

General characteristics and laboratory data of patients with different pregnancy test times

 

≤ 9 days group

N = 355

10–12 days group

N = 598

≥ 13 days group

N = 153

P valuea

Patient age (years)

29.7 ± 3.5

30.4 ± 3.7a

30.5 ± 3.9a

.01

Infertile duration (years)

3 (1–5)

3 (2–5)

3 (2–5)

.14

BMI (kg/m2)

22.0 ± 3.1

21.9 ± 3.2

22.1 ± 3.6

.83

Maternal smoking

26 (7.3%)

50 (8.4%)

4 (2.6%)

.05

Primary infertility

179 (50.4%)

294 (49.2%)

75 (49.0%)

.92

Previous childbirth ratio

36 (10.1%)

53 (8.9%)

29 (18.9%)ab

.001

AFC

15.1 (7.3)

13.5 (6.8)a

14.0 (6.8)

.004

Fresh embryo transfer

64 (18%)

177 (29.6%)a

49 (32%)a

< .001

Frozen cycles

291 (82%)

421 (70.4%)a

104 (68%)a

< .001

Fresh cycle protocols

     

.19

Follicular phase long-acting

46 (71.9%)

10 7 (60.5%)

33 (67.4%)

 

Luteal phase long-acting

8 (12.5%)

48 (27.1%)

11 (22.4%)

 

GnRH antagonist protocol

10 (15.6%)

22 (12.4%)

5 (10.2)

 

FET protocols

     

.01

HRC without downregulation

224 (76.9%)

324 (77%)

80 (76.9%)

 

HRC with downregulation

28 (9.6%)

17 (4%)a

2 (1.9%)a

 

Natural cycles

38 (13.1%)

78 (18.5%)

22 (21.1%)

 

Stimulated cycles

1 (0.3%)

2 (0.5%)

0 (0)

 

No. of oocytes retrieved in fresh cycles

14.7 (5.6)

14.2 (6.2)

14.1 (6.3)

.80

Good-quality embryo ratio (%)

472 (66.9%)

742 (63.2%)

192 (62.9%)

.23

No. of embryos transferred

1.9 (0.4)

1.9 (0.5)

1.9 (0.4)

.62

Blastocyst transfer rate (%)

126 (35.5%)

188 (31.4%)

49 (32.0%)

.43

Endometrial thickness (mm)

10.4 ± 1.8

10.8 ± 2.1a

10.9 ± 2.1a

.002

Progesterone level on pregnancy test day (ng/mL)

38.9 (18.20–60)

35 (17–58.75)

43.6 (18.60–59.55)

.94

HCG on pregnancy test day (mIU/mL)

133.9 (76.28–212.88)

267 (116.35–532.44)a

559 (142.7–1318.7)ab

< .001

Note: Data are expressed as means (standard deviations), medians (interquartile ranges), or numbers (percentages), as appropriate. BMI: body mass index; AFC: antral follicle count; GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; HRC: hormonal replacement cycle; FET: frozen embryo transfer; HCG: human chorionic gonadotropin
a Comparison with the ≤ 9 days group (P < .05); b Comparison with the 10–12 days group (P < .05).
Good-quality embryo ratio (%) = total number of good-quality embryos/ total number of embryos transferred
Blastocyst transfer rate = number of blastocysts transferred/ total number of embryos transferred

The live birth ratio was the highest for the ≤ 9 days group and the lowest for the ≥ 13 days group (P < .001). The 10–12 days group exhibited the lowest rates of multiple pregnancy and preterm birth (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). The early miscarriage rate was the highest in the ≥ 13 days group (P < .001). As shown in Table 2, the inter-group differences were not statistically significant in terms of clinical pregnancy ratio, ectopic pregnancy rate, late pregnancy loss rate, very preterm birth rate, gestational week of delivery, or congenital malformation rate. The aforementioned statistical significances remained the same in a sensitivity analysis that excluded women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s) (Table 3). 

 
Table 2

Comparisons of IVF and obstetric outcomes between patients with different pregnancy test times

IVF and obstetric outcomes

≤ 9 days group

N = 355

10–12 days group

N = 598

≥ 13 days group

N = 153

P valuea

Clinical pregnancy ratio

337 (94.9%)

554 (92.6%)

137 (89.5%)

.09

Ectopic pregnancy rate

3 (0.9%)

15 (2.7%)

3 (2.2%)

.18

Multiple pregnancy rate

106 (31.4%)

91 (16.4%)a

32 (23.4%)

< .001

Early miscarriage rate

36 (10.7%)

96 (17.3%)a

41 (29.9%)ab

< .001

Late pregnancy loss rate

10 (3.0%)

15 (2.7%)

2 (1.5%)

.64

Live birth ratio

290 (81.7%)

435 (72.7%)a

90 (58.8%)ab

< .001

Preterm birth rate

95 (32.8%)

82 (18.8%)a

27 (30.0%)

< .001

Very preterm birth rate

11 (3.8%)

9 (2.1%)

2 (2.2%)

.36

Malformation rate

6 (1.7%)

7 (1.2%)

2 (1.3%)

.79

Gestational week

37.0 ± 2.2

37.1 ± 2.1

37.1 ± 2.2

.93

Note: Data are expressed as means (standard deviations) or numbers (percentages), as appropriate. IVF: in vitro fertilization
a Comparison with the ≤ 9 days group (P < .05); b Comparison with the 10–12 days group (P < .05).
Clinical pregnancy ratio = number of clinical pregnancy cycles/ number of included cycles; Ectopic pregnancy rate = number of ectopic pregnancy cycles/ number of clinical pregnancy cycles; Multiple pregnancy rate = number of multiple pregnancy (gestational sacs ≥ 2) cycles/ number of clinical pregnancy cycles; Early miscarriage rate = number of early miscarriages/ number of clinical pregnancies; Late pregnancy loss rate = number of miscarriages between 12–24 weeks/ number of clinical pregnancies; Live birth ratio = number of live birth cycles/ number of included cycles; Preterm birth rate = number of deliveries at 24–37 weeks/ total number of deliveries; Very preterm birth rate = number of deliveries at 24–32 weeks/ total number of deliveries; Malformation rate = number of malformed fetus cycles/ number of included cycles

 
Table 3

Comparisons of IVF and obstetric outcomes between patients with different pregnancy test times (excluding women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth)

IVF and obstetric outcomes

≤ 9 days group

(n = 296)

10–12 days group

(n = 497)

≥ 13 days group

(n = 112)

P valuea

Clinical pregnancy ratio

283 (95.6%)

462 (92.9%)

101 (90.2%)

0.11

Ectopic pregnancy rate

2 (0.7%)

12 (2.6%)

2 (2.0%)

0.18

Multiple pregnancy rate

95 (33.6%)

91 (19.7%)a

24 (23.8%)

< 0.001

Early miscarriage rate

28 (9.9%)

77 (16.7%)a

25 (24.8%)a

0.001

Late pregnancy loss rate

9 (3.2%)

11 (2.4%)

2 (2.0%)

0.74

Live birth ratio

245 (82.8%)

369 (74.3%)a

71 (63.4%)a

< 0.001

Preterm birth rate

79 (32.2%)

66 (17.9%)a

18 (25.4%)

< 0.001

Very preterm birth rate

10 (4.1%)

9 (2.4%)

2 (2.8%)

0.51

Malformation rate

4 (1.4%)

5 (1.0%)

1 (0.9%)

0.88

Gestational week

37.2 ± 2.3

37.5 ± 2.1

37.6 ± 1.8

0.10

Note: Data are expressed as means (standard deviations) or numbers (percentages), as appropriate. IVF: in vitro fertilization
a Comparison with the ≤ 9 days group (P < 0.05); b Comparison with the 10–12 days group (P < 0.05).

In linear regression, pregnancy test time was incorporated into the model as a continuous variable, then, logistic regression was conducted to evaluate the relation of pregnancy test time with early miscarriage and live birth. The results suggested that an earlier pregnancy test time correlated with the lower early miscarriage rate (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.14–1.38) and higher live birth rate (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.76–0.88) (Table 4). In sensitivity analysis performed after excluding women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s), the earlier pregnancy test time continued to exhibit the gradually decreased early miscarriage rate (adjusted OR: 1.21; 95% CI: 1.09–1.35) and the gradually increased live birth rate (adjusted OR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.78–0.93) (Table 5

 
Table 4

Association of pregnancy test time with early miscarriage and live birth in the general population

 

Test time

Linear model

 

≤ 9d

10-12d

≥ 13d

Early miscarriage

1.00

1.69(1.10–2.59)

3.67(2.18–6.19)

1.26(1.14–1.38)

Live birth

1.00

0.61(0.44–0.86)

0.31(0.20–0.48)

0.82(0.76–0.88)

Note: CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio, adjusted for age, type of infertility, smoking history, previous childbirth, BMI, antral follicle count, transfer type, and endometrial thickness.

Table 5 Association of pregnancy test time with early miscarriage and liver birth in the population after excluding women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s)

 

Test time

Linear model

 

≤9d

10-12d

≥13d

Early miscarriage

1.00 

1.65(1.03-2.65)

2.87(1.56-5.27)

1.21(1.09-1.35)

Live birth

1.00 

0.61(0.42-0.88)

0.39(0.23-0.64)

0.85(0.78-0.93)

Moreover, we evaluated the pregnancy test time to predict early miscarriage and live birth rates using ROC curve for the general population. According to our results, the area under the ROC curve-1 (AUC) values were 0.614(95% CI: 0.57–0.66) and 0.598 (95% CI: 0.56–0.64), respectively, and the cutoff value was day 9. After women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s) were excluded, the ROC curve-2 (AUC) value for predicting early miscarriage rate, with cutoff value day 9 or 10, was 0.595 (95% CI: 0.54–0.65) and for predicting live birth rate, with cutoff value day 9, was 0.576 (95% CI: 0.53–0.62) ( Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).

Discussion

Follow-up strategies for IVF patients slightly vary among reproductive centers. Most reproductive centers adopt blood pregnancy tests 14 days after embryo transfer [15, 16], while some centers implement hospital pregnancy tests on the 11th or 12th day after the transfer [17, 18]. In our center, HCG demonstrated spikes two to three times at 72–96-h intervals following pregnancy tests. Approximately 30 days after embryo transfer, a viability ultrasound was performed to determine whether a fetal heartbeat existed. If the HCG levels grew poorly, the number of follow-ups prior to the initial B-mode ultrasound should be increased to avoid the risk of ectopic pregnancy and threatened abortion. However, as a matter of fact, women undergoing IVF usually feel anxious due to their own infertility and the unpredictability of pregnancy progress. Such stress leads to several behavioral changes [19]. For instance, some patients start performing pregnancy tests just 5–6 days after embryo transfer, and if the urine β-HCG test is positive, they immediately go to the hospital for a blood test verification.

Stress fluctuates during IVF treatment; the period from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer and the waiting time for pregnancy tests were specifically linked to high degrees of anxiety and stress [20, 21]. For patients, the stress of waiting is the direct cause of taking a pregnancy test beforehand. In this study, we found that patients whose pregnancy test time was ≤ 9 days from the day of embryo transfer were younger, indicating that younger patients were more eager to undergo a pregnancy test earlier. In contrast, older patients showed varying expectation levels and complied better, probably because of higher previous childbirth ratios, with many of them taking pregnancy tests within the prescribed period. The ≥ 13 days group was not inferior to the other two groups in terms of factors conducive to embryo implantation, such as endometrial thickness, blastocyst transfer rate, and good-quality embryo transfer rate. Thus, we may consider that the reason for late pregnancy test time was linked to the difference in patient compliance. Additionally, despite the earlier implantation requirement following blastocyst transfer, the overall pregnancy time preference of blastocyst transfer patients was later than the D3 embryo transfer patients, suggesting that the pregnancy test time was decided based on patient compliance.

For the general population, patients taking pregnancy tests on days 9 or 10 after transfer exhibited the highest clinical pregnancy rate, low early miscarriage rate, and high live birth rate. Even after women aged over 35 years and those with previous childbirth(s) were excluded, the population taking pregnancy test on day 9–10 after transfer exhibited a lower early miscarriage rate and higher live birth rate. The too-early testing behavior did not necessarily predict a favorable pregnancy outcome. The reasons are stated as follows: 1. Some patients are detected positive for urine HCG in an extremely early period after transfer, suggesting that the embryo cleaves rapidly, with an advanced implantation compared with an embryo developing at a normal rate. The further development potential of rapidly-cleaving embryo remains controversial, and some scholars suggest that the rapidly-cleaving embryo is associated with a markedly increased chromosomal abnormality rate. It is interesting that the fast cleaving rate is related to similar chromosomal patterns to the slowly-cleaving counterparts. Embryos that exhibit 9 blastomeres after insemination for 62 h may experience chromosomal abnormality at an identical probability to that of their slowly-cleaving counterparts. Compared to embryos that contain 8 cells, those containing 9–11 cells have a lower development potential [22]. 2. As suggested in some articles, stress level in the IVF process affects reproductive outcome [23]. An early pregnancy test time demonstrates that the patient is anxious to some extent, and when she obtains the positive result, she may be worry about the blood HCG level. As confirmed by a study concerning the association of emotion with early miscarriage, emotional health deficiency increases the risk of miscarriage [24]. The reasons for poor pregnancy outcome at a late pregnancy test time may be due to the following reasons. Uterine receptivity occurs around 5–7 days after ovulation and lasts for 4 days, when embryo implantation commences. To ensure a successful implantation, the growth and maintenance of blood vessels should be coordinated at the maternal-embryo interface, so that the environment offered is nourished [25]. Patients with a pregnancy test time around 9–10 days are in the stage of embryonic post invasion and persistent uterine decidualization [2628]. If these patients come to the hospital for a blood pregnancy test during this period, they can receive individualized luteal phase support (LPS) and other medications (e.g. low-molecular-weight heparin or glucocorticoid adjustments) based on the results of hormone levels, D2 dimers, immunoassays, and other tests, which may better facilitate endometrium remodeling, including an influx of uterine-specific NK cells and the exclusion of maternal B and T cells [27]. This is beneficial for continuous embryo implantation. However, if the test time around 9th-10th day is missed, the patient may miss the optimal luteal support adjustment time, leading to a poor pregnancy outcome.

There were no differences in the late-term miscarriage rate or the gestational week of delivery among the three groups, suggesting that women with a relatively stable early pregnancy showed no differences in pregnancy outcomes during later gestation. The stability of early pregnancy under identical blastocyst transfer rate and good-quality transfer ratio, i.e., under equal development potentials of embryos, can be improved in the following ways: 1. Strengthening the post-transfer lifestyle and psychological support. Some treatments or therapies, including relaxation training, medical clowning, coping cards, and hypnosis during embryo transfer, can be used to relieve the anxiety and stress caused by the uncertainties of pregnancy outcomes [2932]. We should not object to the patients performing an early pregnancy test at home but help them in properly accepting the self-tested urine HCG results. 2. Progesterone administration remains controversial regarding dosages, routes, and timing [3335]. In our reproductive center, a combination therapy with varying routes is used. For patients with deficient serum progesterone levels under a single treatment, our therapy seems a plausible option for maintaining adequate progesterone exposure. Besides, it can eliminate the increase in early miscarriage rates resulting from improper medications, drug allergies, and incompatible luteal support. There was no difference in the number of women with natural cycle FET among the three groups, and the luteal support protocols were consistent for each procedure of fresh/frozen embryo transfer. According to some literature, the serum progesterone measurements on the day of pregnancy test are linked to the ongoing pregnancy rate and live birth ratio [3638]. In our study, the progesterone levels on the day of pregnancy test did not differ among the three groups. Nevertheless, Manuel Alvarez et al. argued that the appropriate time point for initiating an individualized LPS should be the day prior to blastocyst transfer [39]. Further prospective research is required to determine whether progesterone detection one week following the transfer and the corresponding adjustment of luteal support protocol is necessary.

This study has some shortcomings, regarding the fact that there are no data on pregnancy tests prior to the test at the hospital (self tests), and this is a factor that interferes with the final conclusion, which is a limitation of retrospective analysis. The cause analysis of early miscarriage (especially the embryo karyotype abnormalities, which are the most frequent cause of miscarriage during the first trimester) is lacking in the present study because not every miscarriage patient can accept the embryo chromosomal analysis. Replication and extension of our study can be a valuable direction for future prospective research.

Conclusions

In conclusion, taking a pregnancy test soon after embryo transfer is a common phenomenon. Such early pregnancy tests, especially on day 9–10 after embryo transfer, do not adversely affect the pregnancy outcomes. However, it is not advisable that patients return to the hospital for a blood pregnancy test only 14 days after the transfer.

Abbreviations

BMI: body mass index; AFC: antral follicle count; GnRH: gonadotropin-releasing hormone; HRC: hormonal replacement cycle; FET: frozen embryo transfer; HCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; IVF: In vitro fertilization; CI: Confdential interval; OR: odds ratio.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate The study was approved by the Scientific Ethics Committee of Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital (reference: B2021-7). The Ethics Committee waived the need for written informed consent due to the retrospective nature and patients’ data were used anonymously. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. 

 Consent for publication Not applicable. 

 Availability of data and materials The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article. 

Competing Interests The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Funding The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions XK supervised the entire study, including the procedures, conception, design, and completion. XK and FW performed the acquisition of data, analysis of data. DC wrote the manuscript. YHL and FW revised the manuscript. All the authors take full responsibility for the work. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

 Acknowledgements We wish to thanks to all the authors who contributed to this article.

Xue Ke, Yonghong Lin, Fang Wang

Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

References

  1. Yang R, Guan Y, Perrot V, Ma J, Li R(2021)Comparison of the long-acting GnRH agonist follicular protocol with the GnRH antagonist protocol in women undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Ther 38(5):2027-2037
  2. Casper RF(2014) Luteal phase support for frozen embryo transfer cycles: intramuscular or vaginal progesterone? Fertil Steril 101(3):627-628
  3. Geisler M, Meaney S, Waterstone J, O’Donoghue K(2020)Stress and the impact on the outcome of medically assisted reproduction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 248:187-192
  4. Lakatos E, Szigeti JF, Ujma PP, Sexty R, Balog P(2017)Anxiety and depression among infertile women: a cross-sectional survey from Hungary. BMC Womens Health.17(1):48
  5. Cheung C, Saravelos SH, Chan T(2019)A prospective observational study on the stress levels at the time of embryo transfer and pregnancy testing following in vitro fertilization treatment: a comparison between women with different treatment outcomes. BJOG 126(2):271-279
  6. Boivin J, Takefman JE(1995)Stress level across stages of in vitro fertilization in subsequently pregnant and nonpregnant women. Fertil Steril 64(4):802-810
  7. An Y, Sun Z, Li L, Zhang Y, Ji H(2013)Relationship between psychological stress and reproductive outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: psychological and neurohormonal assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet 30(1):35-41
  8. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB(2015)Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. Hum Reprod 30(3):495-498
  9. ESHRE Guideline Group on RPL, Bender Atik, Christiansen OB(2018)ESHRE guideline. : recurrent pregnancy loss. Hum Reprod Open 2018(2):hoy004
  10. Jayasena CN, Abbara A, Comninos AN(2016)Novel circulating placental markers prokineticin-1, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, soluble endoglin and placental growth factor and association with late miscarriage. Hum Reprod 31(12):2681-2688
  11. Yao F, Miao H, Li B, Wu Y, Zhao Q(2018) New birthweight percentiles by sex and gestational age in Southern China and its comparison with the INTERGROWTH-21st standard. Sci rep:7567. Sci Rep 8(1):7567
  12. Howson CP, Kinney MV, McDougall L, Lawn JE(2013)Born Too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born too Soon Preterm Birth Action Group. Born too soon: preterm birth matters. Reprod Health 10(suppl 1):S1
  13. Kanninen TT, Sisti G, Ramer I, Goldschlag D, Witkin SS, Spandorfer SD(2015)Predictive biomarkers of preterm delivery in women with ongoing IVF pregnancies. J Reprod Immunol 112:58-62
  14. Bortoletto P, Romanski PA, Magaoay BI, Rosenwaks Z, Spandorfer SD(2021)Time from oocyte retrieval to frozen embryo transfer in the natural cycle does not impact reproductive or neonatal outcomes. Fertil Steril 115(5):1232-1238
  15. Genesio Ceratto KM, Cullere ME, Capitanelli I(2018)Clinical or biochemical pregnancies after ICSI cycles: threshold values of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin ( β-HCG) helping in better prediction and counselling. Fertil Steril 110:e258-e259
  16. Xu H, Zhang XQ, Zhu XL(2021)Comparison of vaginal progesterone gel combined with oral dydrogesterone versus intramuscular progesterone for luteal support in hormone replacement therapyfrozen embryo transfer cycle. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 50(7):102-110
  17. Asoglu MR, Celik C, Karakis LS, Findikli N, Gultomruk M, Bahceci M(2019)Comparison of daily vaginal progesterone gel plus weekly intramuscular progesterone with daily intramuscular progesterone for luteal phase support in single, autologous euploid frozen–thawed embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(7):1481-1487
  18. Waldman IN, Racowsky C, Disler ER, Thomas A, Lanes A, Hornstein MD(2021)The clinical relevance of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst stage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study. Fertil Res Pract 7(1):4
  19. Baum A. Stress, intrusive imagery, and chronic distress(1990)Health Psychol 9(6):653-675
  20. Raguz N, McDonald SW, Metcalfe A, O’Quinn C, Tough SC(2014)Mental health outcomes of mothers who conceived using fertility treatment. Reprod Health11(1):19
  21. Verhaak CM, Lintsen AME, Evers AWM, Braat DD(2010)Who is at risk of emotional problems and how do you know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 25(5):1234-1240
  22. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, Lappi M, Ruberti A, Farfalli V(2007) Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil Steril 87(3):534-541
  23. Pons MC, Carrasco B, Parriego M(2019)Deconstructing the myth of poor prognosis for fast-cleaving embryos on day 3.is it time to change the consensus? J Assist Reprod Genet 36(11):2299-2305
  24. San Lazaro Campillo ISL, Meaney S, Corcoran P, Spillane N, O’Donoghue K(2019) Risk factors for miscarriage among women attending an early pregnancy assessment unit (EPAU): a prospective cohort study. Ir J Med Sci 188(3):903-912
  25. Bergh PA, Navot D. The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation(1992)Fertil Steril 58(3):537-542
  26. Gellersen B, Brosens JJ(2014)Cyclic decidualization of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr Rev 35(6):851-905
  27. Mori M, Bogdan A, Balassa T, Csabai T, Szekeres-Bartho J. The decidua-the maternal bed embracing the embryo-maintains the pregnancy(2016)Semin Immunopathol 38(6):635-649
  28. Ramathal CY, Bagchi IC, Taylor RN, Bagchi MK(2010)Endometrial decidualization: of mice and men. Semin Reprod Med 28(1):17-26
  29. Holter H, Bergh C, Gejervall AL(2021)Lost and lonely: a qualitative study of women’s experiences of no embryo transfer owing to non-fertilization or poor embryo quality. Hum Reprod Open 2021(1):hoaa062
  30. Raad G, Tanios J, Kerbaj S(2021)Stress management during the intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle may slow down first embryo cleavage and accelerate embryo compaction: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Psychother Psychosom 90(2):119-126
  31. Okhowat J, Murtinger M, Schuff M(2015)Massage therapy improves in vitro fertilization outcome in patients undergoing blastocyst transfer in a cryo-cycle. Altern Ther Health Med 21(2):16-22
  32. Heredia A, Padilla F, Castilla JA, Garcia-Retamero R(2019)Effectiveness of a psychological intervention focused on stress management for women prior to IVF. J Reprod Infant Psychol 38(2):113-126
  33. Devine K, Richter KS, Widra EA, McKeeby JL(2018)Vitrified blastocyst transfer cycles with the use of only vaginal progesterone replacement with Endometrin have inferior ongoing pregnancy rates: results from the planned interim analysis of a three-arm randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril 109(2):266-275
  34. Shapiro DB, Pappadakis JA, Ellsworth NM, Hait HI, Nagy ZP(2014)Progesterone replacement with vaginal gel versus i.m. injection: cycle and pregnancy outcomes in IVF patients receiving vitrified blastocysts. Hum Reprod 29(8):1706-1711
  35. Mizrachi Y, Horowitz E, Ganer Herman HG, Farhi J, Raziel A, Weissman A(2021) Should women receive luteal support following natural cycle frozen embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 27(4):643-650
  36. Alsbjerg B, Thomsen L, Elbaek HO(2020)Can combining vaginal and rectal progesterone achieve the optimum progesterone range required for implantation in the HRT-FET model? Reprod Biomed Online 40(6):805-811
  37. Labarta E, Mariani G, Holtmann N, Celada P, Remohí J, Bosch E(2017)Low serum progesterone on the day of embryo transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in oocyte donation cycles after artificial endometrial preparation: a prospective study. Hum Reprod 32(12):2437-2442
  38. Cédrin-Durnerin I, Isnard T, Mahdjoub S(2019)Serum progesterone concentration and live birth rate in frozen–thawed embryo transfers with hormonally prepared endometrium. Reprod Biomed Online 38(3):472-480
  39. Álvarez M, Gaggiotti-Marre S, Martínez F(2021)Individualised luteal phase support in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles based on serum progesterone levels: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod 36(6):1552-1560