Quantitative
Table 2: Survey Results of COVID-Relation Questions in Formative Longitudinal Cohort Study Round 5, July 2020
Question and Answer Options
|
Participant Responses: Round 5, July 2020 (N=184) N (%)
|
|
Due to Coronavirus, has there been any changes in household conflict among your family?
|
|
No
|
83 (44.1)
|
Yes
|
105 (55.9)
|
Has there been any changes in your husband's alcohol consumption in the past three months (women only, N=102)
|
|
Increase
|
31 (30.4)
|
Decrease
|
12 (11.8)
|
Remained same
|
59 (57.8)
|
Has anyone in your household lost income due to the COVID-19 pandemic?
|
|
No
|
31 (16.5)
|
Yes
|
157 (83.5)
|
As seen in Figure 1, the Formative Longitudinal Cohort Study showed an overall increase in alcohol use between February 2017- July 2020. Drinking “often (at least one time a week)” increased from 5% (N=10/200) at baseline (round 1, 2018) to 23.4% (N=43/184) (round 5, 2020). Drinking “very often (everyday)” increased from 1.5% (N=3/200) at baseline (round 1, 2018) to 13.6% (N=25/184) (round 5, 2020). After the onset of the pandemic specifically, between 2019-2020 (round 4, 2019 to round 5, 2020) drinking “often (at least one time a week)” and “very often (everyday)” both increased 4.4% with “often (at least one time a week)” increasing from 19% (N=35) to 23.4% (N=43) and drinking “very often (everyday)” increasing from 9.2% (N=17) to 13.6% (N=25).
To asses the influence of the pandemic on alcohol consumption and economic insecurity, Table 2 was compiled to display the results of Round 5 of Phase 1: the Formative Longitudinal Cohort Study (July 2020). This table shows that 30% (N=31/184) of newly married women said their husband’s alcohol consumption in the past three months (in the beginning of the pandemic) had increased. Additionally, 55.9% (N=105/184) reported that there had been changes in household conflict due to the pandemic. Most (83.5%, N=157/184) also reported that someone in their household had lost income due to the pandemic and 41.5% (N=78/184) expressed that “not being able to meet basic needs of food and shelter” was the top challenge they were facing due to the pandemic. Thirty-three out of 184 newly married women (17.9%) ranked “worrying that someone in the family or home will use violence against me” within their top five top concerns out of 12 concerns total.
In Phase 2: the Quantitative COVID Study (a year into the COVID-19 pandemic in January 2021), 74% (N=23/31) of women reported being physically forced to have sexual intercourse with their husband when they did not want to and 68% (N=21/31) reported being forced to perform sexual acts they did not want to in the past four months. This can be compared to Phase 1: the Formative Longitudinal Cohort Study from which women in 2019 had 47.06% (N=88/187) reported that they had ever experienced any form of IPV. Additionally, from Phase 2: the COVID Study Part 1, 42% (N=13/31) of women reported that they were prohibited by their husband from getting a job, going to work, trading or earning money in the past four months.
Qualitative
The qualitative data also revealed increased rates of alcohol use and IPV due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Uniquely, there was mention of increases in general community violence. Mother-in-laws discussed the ways that the COVID-19 pandemic increased family contact and aggravation:
“During this time of Corona, people fear each other. There have been lockdowns for long periods of time. Many people don’t have a job. As all the [family] members stay at home all day, there are fights between family members for small issues. There are different types of people in the community. Some are aggressive and quarrel with family members. There has not been any kind of fights and misunderstanding in my family due to covid. But there has been violence in my neighborhood. There have been fights and quarrels among family members in their house”. (Mother-in-law #13, age 48).
In the interviews, reference to “violence in my neighborhood” may have indicated instances of IPV or may have generally referred to disruptions and quarrels between neighbors or family members.
Other participants commonly discussed the financial impacts of the pandemic and what they perceived to be the resulting challenging consequences. A mother-in-law and a newly married woman discussed how the economic hardship of being jobless led to increased rates of alcohol use and conflict in the community:
“It’s closed everywhere. The males of the house haven’t been able to go out of the house. If there’s no job, then there’s no money. And if there’s no money, it will be hard for food and clothing. That’s why many conflicts are happening. When there’s no work to do, many kinds of thoughts come to mind. Therefore, different kinds of incidents are happening in society like theft, abuse, drinking alcohol, fighting in the society, and gambling. These kinds of incidents are heard to be happening in the society. If the person had a job to do, then they would focus on that. When they have no work, bad thoughts and opinions come to mind, because of which the society gets badly affected.” (Mother-in-law #9, age 54).
“Because of Covid-19, people don’t have any jobs and as they don’t have jobs it is difficult to even eat. When people don’t have enough to eat or wear, there will be fights at home, psychological distress increases, and this can be been seen in many households. My father-in-law is constantly complaining about how there is no business. When people do not have enough money to buy food, the fights and violence increases within the family”. (Newly Married Woman #14, age 20).
The pandemic was described to have a compounding effect on the lives of the poor and on the community’s youth. The lockdown created an atmosphere that increased the risk of alcohol use and misuse among these groups in particular:
This corona has ruined the life of poor people. Everyone has lost their job. There is no money if there’s no job. Lack of money has led to shortage of food. The boys of the village are seen to be drinking, gambling, and fighting as they are free the whole day. There has been a lot of stress due to corona. (Mother-in-Law #5, age 41).
The mother-in-law group were the most likely to discuss the impacts of the pandemic and point out increased IPV in the community. Many husbands expressed that COVID-19 had not had a negative impact on the community, or they were likely to downplay the extent of the violence:
“There wasn't any violence due to COVID-19 in my household. Due to COVID lockdown, people could not work which reduced the household income. This led to some disputes in some households of the community. It was not too big though. It was just normal household disputes. For example, husband couldn’t go out to work so he drank alcohol in a nearby place. Upon returning home he started shouting to the family members and it created dispute.” (Husband #30, age 27).
Some husbands, however, did express that IPV was commonly observed in their communities. They noted that violence most often takes place in households when the husband or father-in-law is under the influence of alcohol. The frequency of alcohol use and IPV was associated with lower class families:
“Yes, [in my community] there are cases of violence. This has reduced though. This usually happens in low-income families where husbands come home drunk and start beating their wives." (Husband #9, age 26).
“Participant: Many people stayed home during the lockdown, they went through financial scarcity. This gave rise to violence. Due to lack of money, there were disputes leading to violence.
Interviewer: How often was it seen?
Participant: It was frequently observed. Violence was mostly seen in the houses where husband is an alcoholic.” (Husband #13, age 22).