3.1 Characterization of Ti3C2Tx/CF hybrids
Surface morphologies and structure of CF, CF/PDA and CF/Ti3C2Tx were observed by SEM. As shown in the Fig. 2, the diameter of CFs prepared in this work was approximately 7 µm. The pristine CF exhibited a smooth and clean surface, with a small amount of sizing agent residue (Fig. 2a and b). In addition, after self-polymerized of dopamine under the alkaline condition, the CF surface formed a thin layer of PDA particles (Fig. 2c and d), and the surface of CF-PDA was rougher. Later, after grafting Ti3C2Tx nanosheets on the surface of CF/PDA, the surface of CF/Ti3C2Tx was rougher than that of CF/PDA. Under the higher magnification, it could be seen that scaly wrinkles were covered on the CF/PDA surface, which confirmed that the successful grafting of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets (Fig. 2e and f). Moreover, Ti3C2Tx as an anchor point could increase the surface roughness and specific surface area of CFs, and hopefully strengthen the mechanical interlocking between carbon fiber and epoxy resin.
3.2 Structural characterization
The FTIR spectra of CF, CF/PDA, and CF/Ti3C2Tx were shown in Fig. 3a. The typical peaks of CF respectively appeared at 3439 cm-1 and 2923 cm-1 were ascribed to the telescopic vibration peaks of O-H and C-H bond, while the peak at 1630 cm-1 was attributed to the telescopic vibration of C = C bond32. In addition, after surface polymerization of dopamine, typical peaks of amide bond characteristics appeared at 1512 cm-1 and 1384 cm-1 in CF/PDA, corresponding to the telescopic vibrations of N-H and C-N bond33. This phenomenon suggested that dopamine successfully grafted on the surface of carbon fiber. For CF/Ti3C2Tx, and the new peaks at 1262 cm-1 and 578 cm-1 were attributed to the telescopic vibrations of C-F and Ti-O bond34, which indicated that the carbon fiber surface had been successfully grafted with the Ti3C2Tx two-dimensional sheets.
The structure of carbon fibers was further analyzed using Raman spectroscopy. As shown in Fig. 3b, carbon fiber showed two inherent characteristic peaks (D peak and G peak), which were important indicators to describe the structural defects of carbon materials. The D-band peak at 1358 cm− 1 was associated with amorphous carbon atoms, while the G-peak at 1580 cm− 1 was caused by the ordered graphite structure. At the same time, the area ratio (ID/IG) of D peak to G peak intensity was usually used to evaluate the degree of graphitization of the sample. The higher the ID/IG, the higher the degree of surface disorder35. As mentioned above, the ID/IG value increased from 1.73 for CF to 2.07 for CF/PDA and 2.68 for CF/Ti3C2Tx. As could be observed from the Raman curve, there was little change in the peak positions of D and G band, which implied that the solid structure of CF was not destroyed, and introducing PDA and Ti3C2Tx caused more disorder structure on the CF surface.
XPS was used to investigate the chemical composition and binding pattern of carbon fiber surfaces, C 1s spectra of CF, CF/PDA and CF/Ti3C2Tx were shown in Fig. 3c, respectively. Apparently, the prominent C 1s, N 1s, and O 1s spectra were centered on ~ 283 eV, ~ 397 eV, and ~ 535 eV, respectively, corresponding to the basic components of CF, CF/PDA, and CF/Ti3C2Tx (Fig. 3c)36. The N atomic content was low of the pristine CF, possibly attributing to incomplete removal of the sizing agent on the CF surface. Correspondingly, the N atom content on the CF/PDA surface increased, indicating the self-polymerization of the PDA on the CF surface. In addition, after the Ti3C2Tx incorpration, there were a significant Ti 2p and F 1s binding energy peaks at ~ 458 eV and ~ 684 eV. In Fig. 3d-f, C 1s spectra of CF, CF/PDA and CF/Ti3C2Tx surfaces were shown respectively. In Fig. 3d, the C 1s peak of the CF was resolved into three component peaks, C = C/C-C (284.6 eV), C-O (285.9 eV), and O-C = O (288.4 eV) peaks37. These three identical characteristic peaks also appeared in the fine spectrum of C 1s of CF/PDA and CF/Ti3C2Tx (in Fig. 3e and f), and a new C-N peak (286.5 eV) appeared in the fine spectrum of CF/PDA, indicating that the self-polymerization of dopamine on the surface of the carbon fiber. In addition to the above four characteristic peaks, there was also a Ti-C peak of 281.4 eV on the CF/Ti3C2Tx surface38, which demonstrating the successful attachment of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets on the surface of CF/PDA.
3.3 Mechanical properties
By means of the three-point bending test, the comprehensive interface performance between carbon fibers and resin matrix was evaluated. The stress-strain curve and the averaged flexural strength were shown in Fig. 4a. The flexural strength of specimens showed an increasing trend in turn, compared with EP, the flexural strength of CF@EP, CF/PDA@EP and CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP were also significantly increased (Fig. 4b), and the amine group of dopamine could participate in the EP curing process, effectively enhancing the interfacial binding of the composite material. More importantly, compared with pure EP, the flexural strength of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP increased by 27% (from 59.74 MPa to 75.89 MPa). This significant reinforcement can be attributed to the fact that Ti3C2Tx nanosheets grafting on the carbon fiber greatly enhanced the interfacial strength of carbon fiber/resin and restricted the delamination and failure of CF composites.
TGA was used to analyze the CF after PDA and Ti3C2Tx grafting on the surface of carbon fibers. As shown in Fig. 4c, the original carbon fiber showed a mass loss of 2.02% at 344.2°C, and the fiber itself had excellent thermal stability, so its mass loss should be attributed to the residual sizing agent on the surface. For CF/PDA, the degradation temperature was at 316.8°C, which corresponded to the decomposition of the PDA backbone, then the mass loss before this temperature could be considered as the elimination of moisture and other residues, as well as the fracture decomposition of some catechol and amine groups at about 180°C, it turned out that the PDA was chemically grafted on the CF, and the mass loss was about 3.40 wt%. At the same time, Ti3C2Tx was relatively stable under nitrogen atmosphere, so the residual mass of CF/Ti3C2Tx at 800 ℃ was proportional to the loading amount of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets (9.90%). Therefore, TGA also demonstrated the successful construction of a multi-dimensional reinforcement structure on the surface of carbon fiber using a simple solution method.
The adhesion strength between coatings and steel matrix were characterized, as shown in the Fig. 4d. The adhesion strength of pure EP coating on the steel matrix was 2.92 MPa, it could be seen from the surface morphology of the steel substrate was smooth due to the weak adhesion strength between the steel substrate and the pure EP coating. By contrast, CF@EP, CF/PDA@EP and CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coatings on the steel substrate were increased by 20.22%, 29.81% and 41.95%, respectively. Moreover, there were more residual coatings on the surface of the steel substrate, suggested that the CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP composite coating had larger adhesion strength on the surface of the steel substrate.
3.4 Interface performance
As shown in Fig. 5, the cross-section morphologies of the composite materials were observed by SEM, and the damage type and interfacial binding mechanism were also analyzed. Clearly, in Fig. 5a, river and stair patterned morphology appeared on the fracture surface of pure EP, which was due to the stress concentration39. The internal structure of the pure EP coating was defective, these defects would promote propagation of cracks and reduce the mechanical strength of the whole coating.
When CFs were filled in the composite material, the cracks of the epoxy resin were significantly reduced (Fig. 5b), which indicated that the presence of carbon fibers improved the mechanical strength of the composite materials. And at the same time, a significantly pull-out failure mechanism was also observed on the fiber/resin interface, this was due to the poor interfacial combination between pristine CF and epoxy resin.
For CF/PDA@EP, under the action of tensile stress, the damage spreaded from the surface to both sides of the carbon fiber, and the PDA enhanced substantial interface compatibility between carbon fiber with the resin matrix (Fig. 5c). Importantly, for CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP composite (Fig. 5d), the morphological characteristics were rough the same as those of CF/PDA@EP. But the large number of residual resins on the fiber surface illustrated that better interfacial compatibility and interfacial strength between CF/Ti3C2Tx and EP resin. The results showed that although the presence of carbon fibers increased the mechanical strength of the reinforced composite, the interfacial combination strength of pristine carbon fiber/epoxy resins was not strong enough, and the grafting of PDA and Ti3C2Tx on the CF surface increased the mechanical meshing effect of the interface.
3.5 Tribological properties
As shown in Fig. 6, in order to describe the wear resistance properties of EP, CF@EP, CF/PDA@EP and CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coatings, their friction coefficients, wear rates and wear scar were characterized, respectively. The friction coefficients (COF) of EP, CF@EP, CF/PDA@EP and CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coatings were 0.66, 0.54, 0.52 and 0.47, respectively (Fig. 6e), the COF of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP was reduced by 40.4% compared with EP. In addition, the trend of wear rate of these coatings was similar to that of COF, in the order of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP < CF/PDA@EP < CF@EP < EP. The wear rate of EP (2.29×10− 4 mm3/N·m) was higher than other composite coatings, and the wear rate of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP was the lowest, which was 43.67% much lower than that of the EP coating. It was concluded that the Ti3C2Tx/CF hybrids possessed better wear resistance, which was well consistent with its flexural strength.
In Fig. 6f, the cross-sectional profiles of the wear scar were characterized in order to further character the anti-wear properties of coatings. Clearly, CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP displayed the minimum depth of wear scars (38.9 µm) and pure EP composites with the maximum depth of 91.3 µm, and the surface area of the wear scar decreased with the increase of fiber/epoxy’s interfacial strength. The improvement of tribological properties of the CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP composites was attributed to the increase of surface roughness on the modified CF. As shown in Fig. 6a-d, the surface features of wear scars were visualized by three-dimensional morphology. We took the lowest point of wear scars as the zero point, and the color bar represented the depth of the wear scars. Apparently, the results of the 3D morphology and histogram of the depth of the wear scars were consistent, and the wear resistance of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP was the best.
3.6 Analysis of wear scar morphology and anti-wear mechanism.
The failure modes of epoxy resin during the wear process were mainly plastic deformation and fatigue deformation40. In order to analysis the anti-wear mechanism, we observed the wear scars of EP and its composites by SEM (as shown in Fig. 7). Regarding to the pure EP coating, there was no doubt that the dominative wear mechanism was the fatigue wear, which was induced by the repeated local stresses during friction sliding. Prolongating cracks and resin fragments were observed from the wear scar, which showed the pure EP coating could not resist the crack initiation and crack growth because of poor wear resistance properties.
For pristine CF/EP in the Fig. 7b, the wear surface was smoother than that of the pure EP coating, the width of wear track was reduced to 1.04 mm, and we observed the failure of interface between original CF and resin under higher magnification. Due to the high mechanical properties of CF, the introduction of CF can indeed improve the anti-wear properties of the coating. However, due to the weak interface combination performance of fiber/resin, the anti-wear capability of the CF@EP coating was limited. For CF/PDA@EP, the number of surface cracks was significantly reduced (Fig. 7c), which meant that the interfacial strength of CF/PDA@EP was stronger than that of CF@EP. In the case of grafting Ti3C2Tx on the surface, less groove and fiber peeling-off on the wear surface of the CF/Ti3C2Tx coating (Fig. 7d1) could be detected, comparing to that of the pristine CF/EP coating, the width and length of cracks was significantly reduced, and the fiber/resin interface was in favorable conditions. The higher magnification morphologies of Fig. 7d2 illustrated that the grafting of Ti3C2Tx improved the fiber-resin interface property significantly. Moreover, the higher surface roughness of CF/Ti3C2Tx enhanced the mechanical meshing effect at the interface between the fiber and resin, thus the tribological properties of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP were greatly improved. We can attribute it to that the modification of the fiber surface improved the wear resistance of the composite coating by enhancing the interfacial combination strength with the resin41.
3.7 Erosion wear properties
In order to evaluate the erosion wear resistance of the coatings, an erosion test was carried out with liquid-solid two-phase flow (SiC particles and deionized water) as an erosion medium. Figure 8a-d visualized the 3D morphologies of the coatings’ erosion wear area. After the continuous impact of SiC particles, the surface of the coating formed pits with different size, and the surface of the erosion area was rougher than the uneroded area. In addition, the erosion resistance of the coatings can be analyzed by the mass loss, volume loss, erosion area and maximum depth of the erosion pits.
To assess the integrity of the coating under the attack of SiC, Fig. 8e showed the mass loss of the coatings. The mass loss of the CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP was 148.07 mg, compared with CF/PDA@EP (156.67 mg), CF@EP (164.67 mg), EP (188.17 mg), which was reduced by 5.11%, 10.12% and 21.31%, respectively. However, SiC will be embedded in coatings under high-speed impact, thus we used the volume loss to characterize the erosion wear resistance of the composite coating. It could be seen that the volume loss of CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP was the lowest, 44.50% lower than that of pure EP coating. Through the histogram of the surface area and the maximum depth of the erosion pits (Fig. 8f), the CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coating behaved the best erosion resistance, and the maximum depth and surface area were reduced by 15.91% and 7.70% when compared with pure EP, respectively. Therefore, by introducing CF in the EP coating, the erosion resistance of the composite coating in the marine environment improved significantly, and combined with the above test results, it was believed that the CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coating displayed the best erosion wear resistance.
3.8 Analysis of erosion morphology and erosion wear mechanism
Figure 9a-d showed the erosion wear morphology of the composite coatings, and an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) was used to investigate the distribution of Si and Ti elements on the erosion surface. The surface of the pure EP coating was severely damaged, and due to the impact of silicon carbide particles, the epoxy resin matrix was crushed, and cracks and cavity structures appeared on the eroded surface (Fig. 9a). The enrichment areas of SiC on the pure EP coating were scattered around cracks and holes. Large SiC particles were deeply embedded in the resin matrix, which was due to the poor ability of the pure EP coating resisting the impact of SiC particles.
Subsequently, for the carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin coating, from Fig. 9b, the erosion wear area of the CF@EP coating was obviously reduced, and the number of cracks and cavity structures were much lower than those on the pure EP coating. Unfortunately, cracks propagated under continuously impact, weak interface combination led the resin around the carbon fibers peeled off, which caused the carbon fibers to be exposed to the erosion environment. However, in the energy spectrum of the CF@EP coatings, the Si element was enriched around the carbon fibers, big sized SiC particles were broken when continuously impacting to the carbon fiber, which indicated that carbon fibers resisted the severe impact and the resin matrix under fiber was free of impacting.
For the erosion wear zone of CF/PDA@EP coating, CF/PDA was not obviously damaged, and the interface combination between CF/PDA and resin was excellent (Fig. 9c). Under the same condition, the enrichment area of Si showed that SiC was broken into smaller particles, indicating that PDA modified carbon fibers can resist the serious impact of silicon carbide. For CF/Ti3C2Tx@EP coating (Fig. 9d), the continuous impact of SiC particles resulted in a small part of the epoxy matrix was peeled off compared to other three type coatings, and the CF/Ti3C2Tx was not completely exposed to erosion wear environment. The energy spectrum of Ti and Si elements indicated the interface combination between the CF/Ti3C2Tx and epoxy was still strong, but the SiC particles were broken into very small size. We can infer Ti3C2Tx nanosheets bonded on the surface of CF increased their surface roughness, and the interfacial strength between the carbon fiber and the resin matrix improved. The grafting of Ti3C2Tx nanosheets on the surface of fiber greatly enhanced the erosion resistance of the carbon fiber reinforced composite coating.
In Fig. 9e, the erosion resistance of the coatings was further evaluated by characterizing the particle size distribution and morphology of SiC particles before and after erosion wear test. Before the erosion wear test, SiC particles showed the characteristics of rough surface and sharp edge, particle size was less than 305 µm. In terms of differential distribution, the peak value showed that the particle distribution of SiC was about 114.5 µm-164.3 µm. After the erosion test, from the distribution curves, the SiC particle size was about 68.47 µm-97.12 µm (Fig. 9f), which was due to that the SiC particles were destroyed due to the high-speed impact on the coating surface.
Based on the above analysis, the erosion wear resistance of the coatings depended on how carbon fibers acted in the erosion wear zone and how the erosion stress was propagated within the coating42. In Fig. 10a, SiC particles caused surface scratches under continuous impact, and the stress concentration in the resin matrix (EP) caused severe damage and large erosion wear pits on the coating. Therefore, by introducing carbon fibers into the coating (Fig. 10b), the germination and propagation of cracks could be restricted, providing discontinuous paths for the impact delivery of the resin matrix, endowing the composite coating better erosion wear resistance. However, the weak interface adhesion between carbon fiber/resin cannot defend against the severe impact of the SiC particles, which can cause the carbon fibers to be peeled off or broken from the resin matrix. As shown in Fig. 10c, the adhesion strength of carbon fiber/resin interface was improved by surface modification, so the surface roughness and specific surface area of the modified fiber increased, thus improving its interfacial strength with the resin matrix, making the composite coating more durable in severe erosion environments.