Materials
Phosphatidylserine (purity ≥ 50%) was provided by Enzymecode Biotechnology Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China) and algal oil (DHA ≥ 60%) was obtained from Cabio Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China). (2-Hydroxypropyl)-β-cyclodextrin (C63H112O42, ≥ 97%) and maltodextrin (C6H12O6) were purchased from Yuan Ye Bio-Technology Co, Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) standards (USP Reference Standard), mucin (1500 μ/mg), pepsin (≥ 250 μ/mg), trypsin (1000 -2000 u/mg), porcine pancreatic lipase (100 - 500 μ/mg) and α-amylase were purchased from Aladdin Chemicals (Shanghai, China). Caco-2 (CW2042S) cells was purchased from CoWin Biosciences (Jiangsu, China), DMEM high glucose liquid medium (SH30243.01B) and penicillin-streptomycin solution (SV30010) were purchased from Hyclone (Utah, USA). Porcine bile salts, sodium chloride, calcium chloride, and dihydrogen phosphate were purchased from Solarbio or Sinopharm (Shanghai, China). Chemical reagents such as ethanol and n-hexane were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All other chemicals and reagents used were of analytical grade.
Fatty acid composition of the algal oil determined by gas chromatography triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC- QQQ- MS)
Fatty acid composition of the algal oil was determined using GC-QQQ-MS according to AOCS method Ce-1b 89 (7890B-7000C, Agilent Technologies Inc., America). Firstly, algal oil was methylated according to our previous study (Wu et al. 2020). Briefly, 200 μL of the algal oil was dissolved in 4 mL of n-hexane. One milliliter of methanol-sodium hydroxide solution (0.5 M) was added, and the mixture was vortexed for 2 min at room temperature. Anhydrous sodium sulfate was added to the mixture, and the mixture was shaken and allowed to stand for 2 min. The upper organic phase was diluted 10 times with n-hexane, filtered and transferred into a GC vial for fatty acid composition analysis.
FAMEs were separated using a DB-2560 capillary column (100 m × 250 μm × 0.2 μm). Nitrogen was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min and a split ratio of 30:1. The injector and detector temperatures were 250 and 300 °C, respectively. The oven temperature was held at 140 °C for 5 min, increased to 240 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min, and finally held at 240 °C for 25 min. Fatty acid peaks were identified by matching retention times to FAME standards (Wu et al. 2020). Relative content of the fatty acids is calculated as ratio of peak area of fatty acids to total peak area.
Preparation and encapsulation efficiency of the anionic liposomes loaded with algal oil
Algal oil loaded liposome was prepared using PS by thin film evaporation and ultrasonic dispersion. Firstly, PS and algal oil were fully dissolved in n-hexane. The solution was heated, and rotary evaporated to form a thin film. The thin film was then hydrated with PBS buffer (0.01 M, pH 7.2) for two hours and then subjected to ultrasonic treatment (JY92-IID, Ningbo Xinzhi Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) at 3 sec ON / OFF for 10 min (power 300 w) to obtain algal oil loaded-liposome with uniform dispersion.
In order to obtain algal oil liposome with high encapsulation rate, the following preparation conditions were optimized: weight ratio of algal oil to PS (5:1, 2.5:1, 1:1, 1:2.5, 1:5); pH of the PBS buffer (6.8, 7.0, 7.2, 7.4, 7.6); volume of PBS buffer (10, 15, 20, 25, 30 mL); concentration of PBS buffer (0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06 mol/L); ultrasound time (10, 15, 20, 25, 30 min); evaporation temperature (30, 35, 40, 45, 50 °C).
The prepared anionic liposomes were centrifuged at 25 °C for 30 min at 10000 g (H1850R, Hunan Xiangyi Laboratory Instrument Development Co., Ltd.) to obtain supernatant containing non-encapsulated algal oil. Two milliliter of the supernatant was added to 10 mL of petroleum ether and their absorbance was measured at 274 nm. Concentration of the algal oil was calculated using a standard curve (Regression equation: y = 0.3269x + 0.0262,R2=0.9575). Encapsulation efficiency (EE) of the anionic liposomes is calculated as follows:
Preparation and encapsulation efficiency of the anionic powdered-liposomes loaded with algal oil
Carrier agents (Hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin, maltodextrin and a mixture of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin and maltodextrin (1:1, w/w) was dissolved in PBS buffer (5%, 0.01 M, pH 7.2). The carrier solution was mixed with liposome dispersion (2:1, v/v) for 1 h. The resulting solution was pumped into spray dryer (YC-500, Shanghai Yacheng Instrument Equipment Co., Ltd., China) at a flow rate of 1.8 m3/min by a peristaltic positive displacement pump. The inlet and outlet air temperatures were set at 150 and 50 °C, respectively. The collected anionic powdered-liposomes loaded with algal oil was stored in a closed container at 4 °C. Spray-dried yield was calculated as mass ratio of spray-dried powder to the total solid in the feed solution.
Encapsulation efficiency of the anionic powdered-liposomes loaded with algal oil was determined according to a previously published method with minor modifications (Jafari et al. 2008a). Liposome powder (3 g) was gently mixed with 15 mL of n-hexane (15 mL) to wash off the surface oil of the powder. Hexane containing the extracted surface oil was collected and evaporated for 3 h at 60 ± 2 °C and weighed. Encapsulation efficiency (EE) is calculated as follows:
Average particle size, size distribution and zeta potential of the anionic liposomes and powdered liposomes loaded with algal oil
Average particle size, particle size distribution (PDI) and zeta potential of liposomes and powdered liposomes were measured using dynamic light scattering particle size analyzer (Malvern Instruments Co., Ltd, United Kingdom). Powdered- liposomes were dissolved in PBS (pH 7.2) buffer prior to analysis.
Thermal properties of the anionic liposomes loaded with algal oil
Phase transition temperature of the anionic liposomes was analyzed using a differential scanning calorimeter (DSC 200F3,Netzsch,Deutschland). Fifty microliter of the liposome suspension was placed in a hermetically sealed aluminum pan. The sample was firstly heated to 25 °C and held at this temperature for 5 min; and cooled to −40 °C at a cooling rate of 5 °C/min and held at this temperature for 10 min. Finally, the sample was heated to 90 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min.
Morphology of the anionic powdered liposomes loaded with algal oil
Morphology of the powdered-liposomes was observed using scanning electron microscope (Sigma 300, Zeiss, Germany). Powdered-liposomes (10 mg) were placed in an aluminium sample holder and treated with gold–palladium immediately prior to analysis and images were obtained at 3.0 kv.
Oxidative stability of anionic powdered liposome loaded with algal oil
Anionic powdered-liposomes loaded with algal oil were stored at 45 °C for 15 days. Oxidative stability of anionic powdered liposome loaded with algal oil were determined by measuring peroxide value (China 2016b) and p-anisidine value (China 2009) at 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 15 days, respectively.
Powdered liposome (0.5 g) was mixed with acetic acid-chloroform (3:2; v/v). Saturated potassium iodide solution (1 mL) was added to the mixture and shake for 30 s and place in dark for 3 min. The solution was then mixed with 50 mL of distilled water and 1 mL of starch indicator; and titrated with Na2S2O3 (0.01 M) solution until the blue color disappeared. Peroxide value was calculated according to the following equation:
Peroxide value (mmol/ kg) = S×M×1000 / 2m (3)
where S is the volume of Na2S2O3; M is the molar concentration of Na2S2O3; m is the sample mass.
Anisidine value (p-AV) of the powdered liposomes was determined according to the following method. Powdered liposome (0.5 g) was dissolved in isooctane (25 mL). The test solution (5 mL) and solvent (5 mL) of the sample were added to different test tubes. p-anisidine reagent (1 mL) was added to each test tube under shaking condition and kept at 25 °C for 8 min in complete darkness. Absorbance of the solution (A0) and blank solution (A) at 350 nm was measured with UV−vis absorption spectroscopy (UV-2600 spectrophotometer, Shimadzu, Japan). p-AV was calculated according to the following equation:
Where V is the volume of dissolved sample, in ml; Q is determining the concentration of the sample in the solution, in g/ml; m is the mass of the sample, in g. A is absorbance of the reaction solution; A0 is absorbance of solution in blank group.
In-vitro stimulated lipolysis of the anionic powdered liposomes loaded with algal oil
In-vitro stimulated lipolysis of the powdered liposomes were determined according to previously published method (Mou et al. 2021). Simulated digestive fluid was prepared according to Table S1 of Supplementary material.
Oral Phase: Powdered liposome (1 g) was mixed with 10 mL of simulated oral digestive fluid (pH adjusted to 6.8) and amylase (50 mg). The mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 10 min with continuous agitation at 100 rpm to simulate oral digestion.
Stomach Phase: Sample obtained from mouth digestion was mixed with simulated gastric fluid (1:1 v/v), pepsin (32 mg) and pH adjusted to 2.0. The solution was incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C under continuous stirring at 100 rpm.
Small Intestinal Phase: The gastric digested liposomes were pH adjusted to 7.0. Simulated intestinal solution (2.6 mL), bile salt solution (2.6 mL) and pancreatin solution from porcine pancreas (2.6 mL) were added and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h at 100 rpm. The solution was titrated using NaOH solution (1 M) and the volume of 1 M NaOH solution required to maintain the system at pH 7.0 was recorded.
Unhydrolyzed lipids were extracted from the digested samples according to Folch method with slight modification (Mou et al. 2021). Five milliliter of digested sample was mixed with 50 mL of chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) and vortexed for 20 min. Five milliliter of NaCl solution (0.9%) was then added to the mixture and mixed for 30 min. Finally, the mixture was centrifuged for 10 min at 8000 rpm. The organic phase was transferred to a new tube and washed with 5 mL of NaCl solution (0.9%). Finally, the chloroform layer was evaporated to dryness under nitrogen flow. Fatty acid composition of the extracted lipid was determined according to method described in section 2.2.
Caco-2 cellular uptake of the digested anionic powdered-liposomes
Caco-2 human colorectal cancer cells were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagles medium (DMEM) containing 20% FBS at 37 °C in a humidified environment with 5% CO2 and expanded in tissue culture flasks (75 cm2, BD Bioscences, USA) ,changing the medium every two days , Caco-2 cells were grown up to 80% confluency in 6-well cell culture plates (Calvello et al. 2016).According to Section 2.2 method, lipids were extracted from different liposome samples after intestinal digestion. Thirty milligrams of the extracted lipids were dissolved in 1 mL of ethanol. Two hundred microliter of this solution was added to 10 mL of 0.33 M bovine albumin (0.01 M PBS, pH = 7.4), mixed with DMEM (1:4, v/v) and incubated with cells in 6-well cell culture plates at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The control was basal medium containing only bovine albumin. After 24 hours of incubation, Caco-2 cells were washed twice with 1 M PBS and harvested for extract genes extraction (Mou et al. 2021).
Changes in gene expression following lipid uptake in Caco-2 cells were measured using quantitative real-time PCR. RNA was extracted using the TransZol Up (ER501,Beijing Quanshijin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.), RNA concentration was measured, and RNA samples with an A260/280 ratio between 1.7 and 2.1 had better purity(Vincent et al. 2020). cDNA was synthesized using the TransScript One-Step kit (AT311, Beijing Quanshijin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.) and analyzed by real-time PCR on the PrefectStart Green qPCR superMix (AQ601,Beijing Quanshijin Biotechnology Co., Ltd.)(Maares et al. 2022), PCR primers are listed in Table S2 of Supplementary material. Relative changes in mRNA levels were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen 2001).
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data were shown as means ± standard deviations (SD). Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a Duncan post hoc test using SPSS software (Version 25.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Significant differences were set at P < 0.05.