Effects of Se on plant growth parameters under salt stress
In order to investigate the function of Se on plant growth and development under salt stress, tomato seedlings were applied with 150 mM NaCl and exogenous Se to evaluate the salt resistance of various treatment groups (Fig. 1). Under normal condition, Se supplementation significantly increased plant height, but had no effect on stem diameter of tomato seedlings (Fig. 1B). After salt stress treatment for 15 d, both the seedlings with and without Se treatment showed shorter plant height and smaller stem diameter compared with the control. Moreover, the tomato seedlings without Se treatment showed obvious wilting, petiole drooping, while the Se-treated plants did not exhibit obvious symptoms of salt damage (Fig. 1A). In addition, compared with the seedlings without Se application, the plant height and stem diameter of tomato seedlings under Se treatment significantly increased by 17.8 and 23.0% respectively (Fig. 1B).
The relative electrical conductivity (REC) is a key parameter of stress damage, which was investigated. In addition, the relative water content (RWC) of tomato seedlings from different treatment groups was also tested (Fig. 1C). Exogenous Se treatment did not change the REC and relative water content of tomato plants compared with the control under non-stress condition. However, compared to the seedling under salt stress without Se treatment, the REC of tomato leaves treated with Se decreased by 16.2%, and the RWC of leaves with Se treatment increased by 9.8%.
Exogenous Se promoted photosynthesis under salt stress
To study the impact of exogenous Se on the plant photosynthesis under salt stress, the photosynthetic parameters of various treatment groups were investigated, such as the net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) (Table 1). Under normal condition, Se addition had no effect on the photosynthetic characteristics of tomato plants compared to control plant. Salt stress treatment dramatically reduced the Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci in tomato seedlings. But compared to the seedling treated with salt stress without Se addition, Se supplementation significantly increased the Pn, Tr, Gs, and Ci of tomato leaves by 27.9%, 11.0%, 73.3%, and 10.7%, respectively. Under normal and stress conditions, Se treatment did not increase water use efficiency (WUE) of tomato leaves.
Table 1
Influence of Se on the photosynthetic characteristics in tomato plants under salt stress
Treatments
|
Net photosynthetic rate
Pn (µmol CO2 m− 2s− 1)
|
Transpiration rate
Tr (mmol H2O m− 2s− 1)
|
Stomatal conductance
Gs (mmol H2O m− 2s− 1)
|
Intercellular CO2 concentration
Ci (µmol CO2 mol− 1 air)
|
Water use efficiency
WUE (mmol CO2 mol− 1 H2O)
|
CK
|
4.95 ± 0.2a
|
3.86 ± 0.87a
|
111.74 ± 5.6a
|
329.49 ± 34.09a
|
1.28 ± 0.26c
|
Se
|
4.73 ± 0.25a
|
3.71 ± 0.28a
|
95.13 ± 7.3a
|
303.08 ± 22.13ab
|
1.27 ± 0.13c
|
NaCl
|
2.72 ± 0.2c
|
1.73 ± 0.08c
|
40.68 ± 3.34c
|
260.5 ± 8.85c
|
1.58 ± 0.17b
|
NaCl + Se
|
3.48 ± 0.37b
|
1.92 ± 0.06b
|
70.52 ± 15.2b
|
288.2 ± 10.92b
|
1.81 ± 0.16a
|
Note: Different lowercase letters denote significant differences among different treatments at P < 0.05. |
Se contents in different parts of tomato plants
We measured the Se content in tomato roots, stems, and leaves with exogenous Se addition under normal and salt stress (Table 2). The results showed that adding Se to the culture solution obviously increased the Se content in different tomato tissues.
Table 2
Influence of exogenous Se on Se content in various parts of tomato under salt stress
Treatment
|
Root (µg/g)
|
Stem (µg/g)
|
Leave (µg/g)
|
CK
|
0.37 ± 0.2c
|
ND
|
ND
|
Se
|
15.07 ± 5.12a
|
0.7 ± 0.09
|
0.52 ± 0.23
|
NaCl
|
0.16 ± 0.06c
|
ND
|
ND
|
NaCl + Se
|
8.85 ± 1.45b
|
0.42 ± 0.17
|
0.75 ± 0.05
|
Note: Different lowercase letters denote significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05). |
As shown in Table 2, applying Se to the culture solution obviously raised the Se content in tomato leaves, stems, and roots under both non-stress and salt stress conditions, demonstrating that making the plants absorb Se by their roots is a convenient and effective strategy to enhance Se content in different tomato tissues.
Effects of Se on lipid peroxidation and osmoprotectants under salt stress
As shown in Fig. 2, under normal condition, the MDA, soluble sugar and proline content was not changed by exogenous Se application, either in tomato leaves or roots. Their contents were significantly induced by salt treatment for 15 d. However, compared to the seedling under salt stress without Se treatment, Se application remarkably decreased the MDA and soluble sugar content of leaves under salt stress by 30.1% and 37.6% respectively (Fig. 2A, B). Se also reduced their contents in tomato roots in response to salt stress by 44.7% and 29.8%, respectively. In addition, added Se slightly decreased the proline content in leaves but did not change its content in roots under salt stress (Fig. 2C).
H2O2 and O2•- accumulation and antioxidant defense
The histochemical staining experiment showed that Se application did not affect the H2O2 and O2•− accumulation in tomato leaves under non-stress environment (Fig. 3A). Salt stress obviously increased the ROS accumulation in tomato leaves, which was significantly decreased by Se application (Fig. 3A upper). Se supplementation remarkably decreased the contents of H2O2 and O2•− in tomato leaves under salt stress treatment by 22.2% and 47.2% respectively (Fig. 3A lower).
In order to investigate the influence of exogenous Se on the antioxidant defense of tomato plants in response to salt stress, several antioxidant enzymes activity was investigated furtherly, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) (Fig. 3B). Se treatment had no effect on the activity of SOD and POD either in the leaves or roots of tomato plants under non-stress conditions, however, it did diminish the activity of CAT in tomato leaves but had no effect on that of in tomato roots. Salt stress treatment remarkedly increased the activity of SOD, POD and CAT, while the added Se obviously decreased their activity by 19.2%, 39.6% and 34.1% in leaves, and 21.7%, 15.1% and 34.1% in roots compared to seedlings in the absence of Se treatment.
Phytohormones contents
To investigate the influence of Se addition on the contents of phytohormones under salt stress treatment, we measured the level of several phytohormones in different tomato tissues after salt stress treatment for 5 days with or without Se addition, including salicylic acid, abscisic acid (ABA), melatonin (MT), and jasmonic acid (JA) (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4A, exogenous Se application obviously raised the SA content in tomato leaves and roots both under non-stress and salt stress environments. In salt stress conditions, the SA contents in leaves and roots of Se-treated tomatoes were 88.8% and 81.4% higher respectively compared with the tomato seedlings without Se supplementation. No significant difference in ABA content was tested among the tomato leaves of different treatment groups. The ABA content in se-treated tomato roots was lower than that of the control plant (Fig. 4B). The MT content in different tomato tissues was not changed significantly by Se addition both under non-stress and salt stress conditions (Fig. 4C). Under normal growth conditions, Se application did not change the JA content in tomato leaves. Salt treatment significantly reduced the JA content in tomato leaves regardless of Se addition or not. Both under non-stress and stress conditions, the JA content in tomato roots was decreased by Se treatment (Fig. 4D).
The expression of genes associated with SA biosynthesis and transformation
Furthermore, qRT-PCR was applied to analyze the transcripts of some genes involved in SA biosynthesis and transformation (Fig. 4E). The transcripts of PAL1 were up-regulated in tomato leaves in response to Se application both under normal and salt stress conditions for 5 d. However, added Se induced the expression of PAL1 under salt stress treatment but did not change its expression in tomato roots in normal condition. Under normal condition, Se application did not change the transcripts of ICS in tomato leaves, but down-regulated its expression in the roots. In addition, exogenous Se treatment especially increased the expression of ICS gene in tomato leaves in response to salt stress. Under normal and stress conditions, the expression of SAMT gene in tomato leaves was not changed by Se treatment. However, added Se up-regulated the PAL1 expression in tomato roots under normal condition but did not change its expression under salt stress condition. Se application down-regulated the expression of SABP2 in different tomato tissues under the normal condition, however added Se did not change its expression under salt stress condition.
Roles of SA in Se-induced salt stress tolerance in tomato seedlings
As shown in Fig. 5A, the tomato pre-treated with 100 µM ABT (a SA biosynthesis inhibitor) still maintained high plant height and stem diameter, indicating that ABT had no obvious inhibition effect on plant growth. The plant height and stem diameter of tomato seedlings were significantly reduced by salt stress treatment, while these two growth indexes were higher in Se-treated plant seedlings (Fig. 5A). However, pre-sprayed with ABT weakened the promoting effect of Se on stem diameter of tomato seedlings. Then the effects of ABT on plant photosynthesis after selenium application in response to salt stress were studied (Fig. 5B). The Pn, Gs, Ci and WUE were significantly reduced under salt stress treatment. However, these parameters were significantly recovered after selenium treatment, while ABT pre-treatment attenuated the promotion effects of Se treatment on plant photosynthesis, as manifested by a significant decline of Pn, Gs, Ci and WUE by 53.0%, 79.5%, 41.7%, and 29.8%. In salt stress condition, ABT pre-treatment also obviously raised the REC by 12.9% compared to the plants with Se treatment alone but did not change the relative water content (Fig. 5C). Se treatment obviously mitigated the wilting status of tomato plants induced by salt stress, but the plants became wilting again after pretreatment with ABT (Fig. 5D). The H2O2 visualization in leaves with ABT and Se addition under salt stress condition was investigated by histochemical staining experiment as well (Fig. 5E). Se-mediated decrease in H2O2 accumulation under salt stress was obviously abolished by ABT pre-treatment.