1. What is the academic profile of the respondents according to:
Length of teaching experience
N
|
%
|
1-5
|
17
|
16.7%
|
6-10
|
23
|
22.5%
|
11-15
|
22
|
21.6%
|
16 and above
|
40
|
39.2%
|
Table 1 shows the teaching experience of the respondents. Majority of the respondents are teaching for 16 and above years (39.2%).
Highest educational attainment
N
|
%
|
Ph. D
|
54
|
52.9%
|
MA/MS
|
18
|
17.6%
|
BS/BA
|
30
|
29.4%
|
Table 2 shows the highest educational attainment of the respondents. As what can be gleaned from the table, Ph. D. has the highest responses with 52.9%.
Position in the academe
N
|
%
|
faculty
|
69
|
67.6%
|
head
|
19
|
18.6%
|
dean/director
|
14
|
13.7%
|
Table 3 responses shows the position of the respondents in the academe, where 67.6% is the highest coming from the faculty.
2. What is the respondents’ general assessment on the impact of COVID-19 in their institution?
Courses offerings
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Creation of new programmes
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.0392
|
.92192
|
Sustainability of existing programmes
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.0000
|
.86745
|
Hybrid Courses/Blended learning
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1961
|
.85642
|
Modes of Instruction (English/Arabic)
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.9706
|
1.07589
|
Degree Completion (semestral/trimestral)
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2745
|
.81029
|
Table 4 is the respondents’ general assessment on the impact of Covid-19 in their institution based on courses offerings. As what can be gleaned from table 4, the greatest impact is shown in the “Degree Completion” with the mean of 4.2745.
Enrollment
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Class size
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8627
|
.96513
|
Online registration/Enrollment System
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.3725
|
.76974
|
Support system for new students
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1765
|
.94828
|
Support system for transitioning/transferring students
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2843
|
.82507
|
academic adviser’s accessibility to student scholastic records
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1863
|
.94114
|
Table 5 is the respondents response on the impact of Covid-19 with regards enrollment. The table illustrates that the impact is greatly “Online Registration/Enrollment System” with the highest mean of 4.3725.
It has been revealed by Son, Hegde, Smith,Wang, and Sasangohar (2020) that student mental health in higher education is a growing issue. This vulnerable population has been brought into renewed focus by the COVID-19 pandemic situation. In order to examine the mental health and well-being of college students during the pandemic, they performed a timely assessment. Results showed increased tension, anxiety and suicidal thoughts among students due to COVID19. Participants sought help from others to deal with stress and anxiety and supported themselves by adopting either negative or optimistic coping strategies. The COVID- 19 pandemic has had a negative effect on higher education because of the long-lasting pandemic situation and onerous interventions such as lockout and stay-at-home orders. The study highlighted the critical need for approaches and prevention measures to be implemented to address college students' mental health.
Online classes
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
preparation for virtual classes
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.3725
|
.85506
|
maintenance of social connections with the students
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.3725
|
.78250
|
mental health (stress level compared to F2F)
|
102
|
1.000
|
5.000
|
4.28431
|
.825071
|
IT literacy skills
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2843
|
.84873
|
Instruction challenge
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2255
|
.92176
|
Table 6 is the impact of Covid-19 to respondents in terms of online classes. The particular area which to the large extent impacted the online classes is both the “preparation for virtual classes” and “maintenance of social connections with the students”, which both garnered 4.3725 mean respectively.
3. What are the challenges that the faculty encountered during the COVID 19 pandemic?
Communication infrastructure of the institution 3.1.1 Moodle and social media
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Usage of platforms (Zoom, Microsoft Team, Moodle etc.)
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.4020
|
.87041
|
Transition to remote learning/ environment
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.3725
|
.78250
|
Accessibility accommodations (themes)
|
102
|
3.00
|
5.00
|
4.3333
|
.72212
|
Learning experience and social interaction
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2745
|
.81029
|
Connectivity issues
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1275
|
.91923
|
Table 7 displays the challenges that the faculty encountered during the COVID 19 pandemic in terms of Moddle and Social Media. The greatest challenged is seen in “Usage of platforms (Zoom, Microsoft Team, Moodle etc.), with the mean of 4.4020.
Online learning and teaching research indicates that they are only successful if students have reliable access to the internet and computers and if teachers have received tailored online training and support. Since these required efficacy standards have been largely absent for many, teaching and learning have been impeded by remote education during the pandemic. The lack of the requisite efficiency, remote and alternative learning and online instruction requirements during the pandemic has probably affected teaching and learning.
Teaching and students’ learning
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
synchronous and asynchronous facilitation
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1765
|
.78868
|
educational experience
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2745
|
.75984
|
academic achievement and engagement in online learning
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2451
|
.86099
|
establishment of online routine
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2255
|
.81940
|
digestible lessons
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1765
|
.87214
|
Table 8 displays the challenges that the faculty encountered during the COVID 19 pandemic in terms of Teaching and students’ learning. As what can be gleaned the highest mean with 4.2745 is “educational experience.
Remote and alternative learning and at least theoretically, a homeschooling environment have become the two key instruments for education open to children during the lockdowns. Evidence of these two modes clarifies the conditions that will be required in order for children to learn under these conditions effectively and for teachers to teach under these conditions effectively. Most of these requirements have been missing in recent months, as the following subsections indicate Garcia, E. & Weiss E. (2020).
School calendar (Online classes, exams and requirements)
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
weight of Coursework per grading period
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2549
|
.87525
|
grade concerns after the move to online learning
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2255
|
.84322
|
changes to grade structure
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.0784
|
.96150
|
delays due to canceled classes, retakes, transfer concerns
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0098
|
.99995
|
instruction on assignments, exams, and/or quizzes
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.3039
|
.80579
|
Table 9 illustrates the challenges that the faculty encountered during the COVID 19 pandemic in terms of school calendar where “instruction on assignments, exams, and quizzes” poses the greatest challenge with the mean of 4.3039.
Teacher training programs must rapidly rise to the task of keeping their students involved in a growing amount of distance learning and preparing teachers in the coming years for an unpredictable environment of education (Southern Regional Education Board, 2020).
Social mobility
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
adequacy of studying environment
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1961
|
.78399
|
lab and practical applications/simulations
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.3431
|
.77709
|
heterogeneous interactions
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.2647
|
.76981
|
complexity of learning instructions
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.1667
|
.85693
|
personal preference of social distance
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1078
|
.87774
|
Table 10 illustrates the challenges that the faculty encountered during the COVID 19 pandemic in terms of social mobility. The highest extent of challenge is on “lab and practical applications/simulations”. It has the mean of 4.3431.
"As colleges and universities face unpredictable demographic changes in the next few years that include a dramatic decline in "traditional age" undergraduates, as families encounter financial instability due to recent skyrocketing unemployment, In view of the COVID-19 pandemic, and as prospective students around the world rethink their postsecondary education, this resource will help boards build a proactive, educated approach to monitoring the enrollment strategies of their institutions (PR Newswire, 2020).
4. What are opportunities that respondents take consideration for their professional development during the COVID 19 pandemic?
Professional development attendance on virtual international conferences and webinars.
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
eLearning
|
102
|
2.00
|
5.00
|
4.4216
|
.76348
|
Employee Training
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.3039
|
.87642
|
Thought Leadership
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.9608
|
1.13383
|
Continuing Education Delivery
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1765
|
.95867
|
Lead Nurturing
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8922
|
1.08916
|
Corporate Communication
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0392
|
1.06168
|
Branding/Reputation/Management
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1373
|
1.09941
|
Panelist Discussion (Mentor Method)
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8922
|
1.20975
|
Research
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.1176
|
1.00783
|
Faculty Development
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.3431
|
.88435
|
Table 11 shows the opportunities that respondents take consideration for their professional development during the COVID 19 pandemic in terms of Professional development attendance on virtual international conferences and webinars. The highest attainment is on “faculty development” with the mean of 4.3431.
Listen to the podcast "Making the Case for Better Faculty Preparation" on THE Campus. We've learned how to use any video conferencing and meeting platform under the sun, as well as a variety of organizational communication tools (Microsoft Teams, Google Drive, Slack), new LMS features, and how to convert our on-campus activities into Zoom-friendly activities and online tests, among other things.
Participation in Paper Presentation
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Regional
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8137
|
1.23265
|
National
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8627
|
1.17767
|
International
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
3.8627
|
1.30528
|
Table 12 shows the participation of the respondents in paper presentation. The table shows that majority of the respondents indicates a “sometimes” results in national and international paper presentation, with respectively having the mean of 3.0627.
5. Are there any difficulties that the respondents encounter on the aforementioned challenges and opportunities?
N
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Mean
|
Std. Deviation
|
Education/Teaching
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.2059
|
.92638
|
Research activities (priorities and funding)
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0098
|
.99995
|
Student’s satisfaction on online learning
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0588
|
1.05139
|
Health issues
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0000
|
1.02445
|
Expenditures
|
102
|
1.00
|
5.00
|
4.0196
|
.98484
|
Table 13 is the difficulties that the respondents encounter on the aforementioned challenges and opportunities? As what can be gleaned in Table 11, the highest difficulty is on “Education/Teaching” factor. It has the highest mean of 4.2059.
Hybrid and hyflex teaching are the most recent new items that have led to everyone up skill fatigue. They appear in every higher education newsletter or invitation to an online conference, and they are often touted as a panacea for everyone current problems. Some foreign students may have preferred to return to their home country and study remotely in several countries with large populations of international students, or they may be physically unable to enter the country to study on campus, as in Australia.
This means that most subjects would need an online learning alternative, and since enrolment numbers are often low enough that a full on-campus class of 30 to 40 students plus a separate online offering might be inadequate, hybrid teaching is one of the solutions.
Higher education's financial situation is precarious; will institutions be able to invest in the spaces, infrastructure, and workload support necessary to teach hybrid effectively? Can they complete these tasks in a timely manner? Or will educators be asked to “make” something? Or will institutions ask educators to "make do" in the hope that, with increased vaccination, higher education will be "back to normal" soon? Dedicated educators with the financial means can invest their own money in the technology and online tool subscriptions needed to make online and hybrid teaching work, but what about our sessional and casual academics?
6.2. Is there a significant relationship of the computed means of the aforementioned variables?
It is frustrating to operate in one of the most complicated situations. COVID-19 has affected everyone. This has resulted in a substantial rise in stress and anxiety for many individuals. When not properly handled, this stress will prove to be debilitating even in the academy, where the faculty plays an important role in shaping the youth's future, in a time when life is already very difficult. This research is useful for all those who value education and health.
6.1. Is there a significant difference of the computed means of the aforementioned variables?
TEACHING EXPERIENCE
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
Impact of COVID19
|
Between Groups
|
2.664
|
3
|
.888
|
2.328
|
.079
|
Within Groups
|
37.378
|
98
|
.381
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
40.042
|
101
|
|
|
|
Opportunities for Prof Devt
|
Between Groups
|
.123
|
3
|
.041
|
.059
|
.981
|
Within Groups
|
68.154
|
98
|
.695
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
68.277
|
101
|
|
|
|
Difficulties on Challenges &
Opportunities
|
Between Groups
|
3.399
|
3
|
1.133
|
1.575
|
.200
|
Within Groups
|
70.488
|
98
|
.719
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
73.887
|
101
|
|
|
|
Table 14 shows that there is no significant difference in the Impact of Covid 19 considering teaching experience. There is no significant difference in the Opportunities for Professional Development considering the teaching experience of the respondents. There is no significant difference in the Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities considering teaching experience.
Fear and tension arising from COVID-19 can be daunting as faculty, regardless of the existing proximity to an outbreak, and employees face considerable confusion, deviation from familiar routines, and sudden disengagement from social support communities.
As higher education institutions ask staff to quickly abandon campus and transfer to remote teaching, the effect of campus closures reaches far beyond academics. Higher ed leaders must be attentive to the impact of COVID-19 on the mental wellbeing of students and staff and should play a vital role in delivering services proactively, both virtually and in person, to improve the well-being of the school community. (Alyssa Buccella 2020)
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
Impact of COVID19
|
Between Groups
|
1.361
|
2
|
.680
|
1.742
|
.181
|
Within Groups
|
38.681
|
99
|
.391
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
40.042
|
101
|
|
|
|
Opportunities for Prof Devt
|
Between Groups
|
.737
|
2
|
.368
|
.540
|
.584
|
Within Groups
|
67.540
|
99
|
.682
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
68.277
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
Between Groups
|
3.191
|
2
|
1.596
|
2.235
|
.112
|
Within Groups
|
70.696
|
99
|
.714
|
|
No significant difference
|
Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities
|
Total
|
73.887
|
101
|
|
|
|
Table 15 shows that there is no significant difference in the Impact of Covid 19 considering educational attainment of the faculty. It also shows that there is no significant difference in the Opportunities for Professional Development considering education attainment. In like manner, there is no significant difference in the Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities considering educational attainment.
Amanda White is a business school professor at the University of Technology Sydney who focuses on education. Her research priorities include shared learning spaces, team-based learning, and intellectual honesty ( March 2021). She asked about the result of the new situation on handling different types of teaching and if will academics succumb to up skill exhaustion as a result of “ hybrid and hyflex”? Will organizations be willing to invest in the space, infrastructure, and workload support that these approaches need in order to be taught effectively? Amanda White enquires 19th of March, 2021.
She confirmed that anyone who works in a higher education institution is tired. Academics experience it as a result of online training, almost endless Zoom meetings, and pressure to reach research goals. Staff cuts across the industry, including at many universities, have left others lamenting the loss of institutional expertise from long-serving employees who have chosen voluntary redundancy, as well as a general shortage of staff to manage core functions like student inquiries and academic integrity/misconduct. Covid was the crisis needed, and at almost every webinar about teaching change and the pandemic, people say things like "we did what would normally take five years in a year" (if anyone knows where this figure comes from, please let me know – my web searching hasn't turned up anything). This phase of change in unpredictable circumstances is causing what I term "upskill fatigue" – exhaustion from trying to learn too many new things (and just when you think you've figured out how to use the technology or method, something else comes along).
POSITION IN THE ACADEME
Sum of Squares
|
df
|
Mean Square
|
F
|
Sig.
|
Impact of COVID19
|
Between Groups
|
.961
|
2
|
.480
|
1.217
|
.301
|
Within Groups
|
39.081
|
99
|
.395
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
40.042
|
101
|
|
|
|
Opportunities for Prof Devt
|
Between Groups
|
2.060
|
2
|
1.030
|
1.540
|
.219
|
Within Groups
|
66.217
|
99
|
.669
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
68.277
|
101
|
|
|
|
Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities
|
Between Groups
|
3.537
|
2
|
1.769
|
2.489
|
.088
|
Within Groups
|
70.350
|
99
|
.711
|
|
No significant difference
|
Total
|
73.887
|
101
|
|
|
|
Table 16 shows that there is no significant difference in the Impact of Covid 19 considering position in the academe. It also shows that there is no significant difference in the Opportunities for Professional Development considering position in the academe. In like manner, there is no significant difference in the Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities considering position in the academe.
Teaching support is the most obvious area of support needed for hybrid classrooms; most case studies point to smaller classes of one instructor (on average, 25 students or less), and anything larger necessitates the use of a teaching assistant. Will colleges, with their tight budgets, loosen their purse strings, or will we be driving our workers to cognitive overload and exhaustion? What about a more defined and well- recognized course for educational specialists in higher education, with dedicated scholarship and study into hybrid and hyflex teaching and learning?
6.2.Is there a significant relationship of the computed means of the aforementioned variables?
Impact of COVID19
|
Opportunities for Prof Devt
|
Opportunities for Prof Devt
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.570**
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
<.001
|
|
N
|
102
|
|
|
Statistically significant
|
|
Difficulties on Challenges & Opportunities
|
Pearson Correlation
|
.625**
|
.728**
|
Sig. (2-tailed)
|
<.001
|
<.001
|
N
|
102
|
102
|
|
Statistically significant
|
Statistically significant
|
*Correlation is significant at 0.01
Table 18 shows the relationship among the variables is statistically significant at 0.01 level.