2.1 General situation
A total of 17 patients with liver injury were included, with an incidence rate of 0.37%, including 12 males (70.6%) and 5 females (29.4%); aged 17-84 years, average 45.41±20.405. Among the 17 patients, 1 patient had a history of cholecystectomy, 1 patient had a history of hepatitis B and 1 patient had a history of alcohol consumption. 6 patients had aggravated liver injury, and the remaining 11 patients had new-onset liver dysfunction. All patients were evaluated with Naranjo’s score, score ≥3. 10 patients were likely to be related and 7 patients were likely to be related. The general information of the patients is shown in Table 1, and the basic information of the patients is shown in Table 2.
Table 1 Patient Characteristics
Characteristics
|
Stratification
|
Cases(n=17)
|
No.(%)
|
Age(years)
|
|
|
|
|
<18
|
1
|
5.88
|
|
≥18-<41
|
8
|
47.06
|
|
≥41-<66
|
5
|
29.41
|
|
≥66
|
3
|
17.65
|
Site of infection
|
|
|
|
|
Lung
|
11
|
64.71
|
|
Intracranial
|
1
|
|
|
Urinary Tract
|
1
|
|
|
Postoperative prevention
|
1
|
|
|
Pulmonary infection with bacteremia
|
1
|
|
|
Intracranial infection with bacteremia
|
1
|
|
Concomitant disease
(species)
|
|
|
|
|
1-3
|
12
|
70.59
|
|
4-6
|
4
|
23.53
|
|
7-9
|
1
|
5.88
|
Purpose of medication
|
|
|
|
|
surgical prophylaxis
|
1
|
5.88
|
|
empiric medication
|
14
|
82.35
|
|
targeted treatment
|
2
|
11.77
|
Knott's score
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
1
|
5.88
|
|
4
|
6
|
35.30
|
|
5
|
6
|
35.30
|
|
6
|
4
|
23.53
|
a:Is there any liver disease in the past:,such as hepatitis; b: Blood concentrationb of vancomycin :standard value:10-15; c: Whether to stop and protect liver treatment drugs;
2.2 Analysis of dosage, time and plasma concentration of vancomycin in patients with liver injury
2.2.1 Vancomycin dosage and treatment course
Among the 17 patients, 9 patients (52.94%) received vancomycin at a dose of 1 g Q12h, among which 4 patients had vancomycin blood concentration higher than the upper limit of normal, and 1 patient had liver injury severity of grade 4; and the severity of liver injury was grade 1 in 3 cases which were lower than normal. 4 patients (23.53%) were given 1g Q8h after the initial 1g Q12h administration, among the 4 patients, the blood concentration of vancomycin was higher than the normal value in 1 patient, 2 patients were lower than the normal range; and 1 case was in the normal range with the severity of liver injury was grade 3. The dose adjustment of all patients was made after the determination of blood drug concentration of vancomycin. The administration time of vancomycin was 3-15 days, average 6.82±3.264d. There were 4 patients (23.53%) who received vancomycin for 3-6 days, of which 1 patient had grade 4 liver injury, and 6 patients (35.28%) were 6-9 days, of which 1 case had grade 3 liver injury (Table 3).
2.2.2 Concomitant medication
Analyses the effect of drug combination of 17 patients, 14 patients (82.35%) used 2 to 4 drugs at the same time (Table 3). Of which 5 patients (29.41%) used 2 drugs, 5 patients (29.41%) used 3 drugs, 4 cases(23.53%) of 4 drugs; 2 patients with grade 3-4 liver injury were treated with 2 drugs at the same time.
2.2.3 The time of liver damage after medication
The time of liver damage occurrence in 17 patients was analyzed. Abnormal liver function indexes occurred 2-12 days after vancomycin was started, average 4.41±2.293d. 16 patients (94.1%) showed abnormal liver function within 7 days after drug administration (Table 3). Among them, 8 patients (47.1%) developed liver injury on 3 days, 4 patients (23.5%) on 4 days, 2 patients (11.8%) on 5 days, 1 patient on 6 days and 7 days, respectively. 1 patient developed on 12 days, and 2 cases of grade 3-4 liver injury occurred on 3 days.
Table 3 Analysis of vancomycin use in patients with liver injury
Results
|
Stratification
|
Cases(n=17)
|
No.(%)
|
Dosage
|
|
|
|
|
1g Q12h
|
9
|
52.94
|
|
1g Q12h→1g Q8h
|
4
|
23.53
|
|
1g Q8h→0.5g Q12h
|
1
|
|
|
1g Q12h→0.5g Q8h→0.5g Q12h
|
1
|
|
|
0.5g Q12h
|
1
|
|
|
0.5g Q8h→1.0g Q8h
|
1
|
|
Dosing days (d)
|
|
|
|
|
≤3
|
3
|
17.65
|
|
3<days≤6
|
4
|
23.53
|
|
6<days≤9
|
6
|
35.28
|
|
9<days≤12
|
2
|
11.77
|
|
12<days≤15
|
2
|
11.77
|
Concomitant medication
(types)
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
11.77
|
|
2
|
5
|
29.41
|
|
3
|
5
|
29.41
|
|
4
|
4
|
23.53
|
|
5
|
1
|
5.88
|
Time to Liver Damage After Medication(d)
|
|
|
|
3d inside
|
8
|
47.1
|
|
3-7d
|
8
|
47.1
|
|
>7d
|
1
|
|
2.2.4 Vancomycin plasma concentration
After vancomycin administration, blood concentration of all patients was determined. The blood drug concentration range was 1.20-37.19μg/ml, average 14.8906±11.21257μg/ml. Among them, 6 patients (35.29%) did not reach effective blood concentration. 7 patients (41.18%) beyond the normal range. Among the 7 patients with vancomycin beyond the normal range, Naranjo’s score of 6 patients (85.71%) is possible, and 1 case is probable. But only 1 patient with grade 3-4 liver function damage has blood drug concentration above the upper limit of normal, which is grade 4 liver function damage, suggesting that there may be no correlation between severity and plasma concentration.
2.3 Correlation analysis between the severity and vancomycin
2.3.1 Whether there is Dress syndrome
Dress syndrome, also known as drug hypersensitivity syndrome, and drug eruption syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. It has been reported that the typical clinical manifestations of Dress syndrome induced by vancomycin include extensive rash, fever, eosinophilia and multiple organ function involvement, of which rash and fever are the main clinical manifestations [6]. In this study, 13 patients developed fever, which was considered to be caused by infection, but none of them developed clinical manifestations related to allergy such as rash.
2.3.2 Changes of liver and kidney function and severity of liver injury
Among the 17 patients, 2 (11.76%) showed yellow skin staining, including 1 patient with multiple organ failure, and 5 patients (29.41%) showed fatigue. The remaining 10 patients (58.82%) had no liver function damage. All 17 patients had abnormal liver function indexes, mainly including increased AST/ALT and increased direct/indirect bilirubin. 17 patients had abnormal AST/ALT, and 14 patients (82.35%) had AST/ALT increased at the same time, only 2 patients had elevated AST, 1 patients with elevated ALT, Abnormal bilirubin in 9 patients (52.94%) at the same time, 4 cases (23.53%) patients with abnormal AST/ALT and bilirubin. Among the 17 patients, 7 patients (41.18%) had AST/ALT≤3ULN, 2 patients (11.76%) had 3ULN < AST/ALT≤5ULN, 7 patients (41.18%) had 5ULN < AST/ALT≤20ULN, and 1 patient (5.88%) had ≥20ULN.
4 of 17 patients (23.53%) had elevated creatinine, including 3 patients with AST/ALT in the range of 5-20ULN, and 1 patient with >20ULN; 3 patients had grade 1 liver injury. And 1 patient had 3 Grade liver injury, the AST/ALT of 5-20ULN. No correlation between the severity and creatinine was observed. According to drug-induced liver injury severity classification standard [7], and to assess function of liver, 15 patients (88.24%) with severity for grade 1, 2 patients occurred 3-4 grade showed skin jaundice, only 1 patient with grade 4 liver function injury had blood drug concentration of vancomycin exceeding the normal range.
2.4 Interventions and Outcomes
Among the 17 patients, 1 patient received no intervention, 4 patients stopped vancomycin after liver injury, 1 patient was given vancomycin reduction, and 11 patients (64.7%) were treated with hepatinica. Among the patients receiving treatment,7 patients were treated with reduced glutathione, 3 patients were treated with 2 kinds of hepatinica, phosphatidylcholine + adenosylmethionine, magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate + reduced glutathione, reduced glutathione + polyene phosphatidylcholine.1 patient was treated with 3 kinds of hepatinica (reduced glutathione, enephosphatidylcholine, adenosylmethionine). 11 patients (64.71%) were treated for 3-29 days, average 12.27±9.76d. Among all patients, 12 patients (70.59%) had improved liver function after intervention, of which 8 patients (47.06%) returned to the normal level of liver function index, and 4 patients (23.53%) had continued decline, but did not return to the normal level during hospitalization. 2 patients (11.76%) were asked to be discharged from hospital by their family members without improvement, and there was no follow-up examination data; 3 patients (17.65%) died, including 2 patients with respiratory failure and 1 patient with acute cardiac failure, all of which died due to multiple organ failure caused by the progression of the primary disease.