UBE2J1 is significantly down-regulated in CRC and correlated with favorable clinicopathology as well as prognosis.
To identify the differentially expressed proteins in CRC progression, proteomics sequencing was performed using matched liver metastasis, primary tumor, and adjacent normal tissues from 3 CRC patients(Fig. S1A). Heatmap demonstrated the top 20 upregulated and downregulated proteins and qRT-PCR was used to detect the top 10 differentially expressed proteins in 24 paired tissues (Fig. 1A, S1B). Since UBE2J1 possessed the most dramatic downregulation in 24 paired tissues, it was chosen for subsequent research. To determine the significance of UBE2J1 in CRC, the mRNA and protein levels of UBE2J1 in CRC patients' samples were detected: 200 samples for qRT-PCR assay (cohort 1), 9 for western blotting assay, and 50 for IHC assay (cohort 2). UBE2J1 expression was remarkably down-regulated in CRC samples compared with the paired adjacent normal tissues by using qRT-PCR (Fig. 1B). Metastatic CRC tissues had lower UBE2J1 protein levels than primary CRC tissues and adjacent normal tissues (Fig. 1C). The association between UBE2J1 levels and clinicopathological characteristics of cohort 1 is shown in Table S1. UBE2J1 mRNA expression was negatively correlated to tumor size (P=0.0067), T classification (P=0.0353), TNM stage(P=0.0024), lymph node metastasis (P=0.0125), and distant metastasis (p=0.0112), which indicated that UBE2J1 might play a vital role in modulating proliferation and metastasis of CRC. Furthermore, IHC staining demonstrated that UBE2J1 protein expression was notably lower in CRC tissues than in the adjacent normal counterpart and was mainly located in the cell cytoplasm (Fig. 1D, E). The Kaplan-Meier analysis of cohort 2 revealed that patients with low UBE2J1 expression exhibited unfavorable overall survival (Fig. 1F). Consistent with our above observation, TCGA and GEO database (GSE41258) further confirmed that UBE2J1 is down-regulated in CRC tissues and associated with good RFS and OS, which may serve as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for CRC (Fig. 1G-K).
UBE2J1 inhibits CRC cell proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.
To elucidate the biological roles of UBE2J1 in CRC, a series of cell functional assays were performed. qRT-PCR and western blot assays were conducted to detect UBE2J1 expression in seven CRC cell lines and human normal colonic epithelial cells NCM460. The results showed that DLD-1 and LoVo expressed higher levels of UBE2J1, while HT-29 and HCT 116 expressed lower levels of UBE2J1(Fig. S2A, B). Hence, we knocked down or overexpressed UBE2J1 in the above-mentioned cell lines via lentivirus-mediated infection, respectively. Then, the transfection efficiency of the four cell lines was examined. Sh-UBE2J1#1 and sh-UBE2J1#3 exerted a comparatively better UBE2J1 knockdown efficiency in DLD-1 and LoVo cells and were applied for subsequent experiments (Fig. S2C, D). Cell proliferation ability was evaluated by CCK-8, colony formation, and EdU staining assays. Depletion of UBE2J1 in DLD-1 and LoVo cells yielded expediated growth curves, more and larger colonies formation, and an increased percentage of EdU-positive cells; conversely, UBE2J1 overexpression caused an opposite effect in HT-29 and HCT 116 cells (Fig. 2A-F). Furthermore, transwell and scratch wound healing assays were conducted to measure cell migration and invasion capability. UBE2J1 knockdown prominently promoted the invasion and migration ability of DLD-1 and LoVo cells, whereas UBE2J1 overexpression abated this ability in HT-29 and HCT 116 cells (Fig. 2G, H and 3A, B). Collectively, these results strongly suggested that UBE2J1 suppressed the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells in vitro.
To validate whether UBE2J1 affects CRC cell proliferation in vivo, DLD-1 and HCT 116 were exploited to establish UBE2J1 knockdown and overexpression cells via lentivirus transfection. Xenograft tumor models showed that cells with depleted UBE2J1 had a promoting tumor growth, which was reflected in more tumor volume and weight than that in control, while overexpression of UBE2J1 exhibited an opposite effect (Fig. 3C). Moreover, Ki-67 (a proliferation marker), UBE2J1, RPS3, and p-P65 (downstream of UBE2J1) protein levels were measured by IHC staining. Compared to the control group, a relatively elevated Ki-67, RPS3, and p-P65 expressions were detected in the UBE2J1 knockdown group. A negative association between UBE2J1 and the above proteins was also observed in the UBE2J1 overexpression group (Fig. 3D). Subsequently, to investigate the effect of UBE2J1 on metastasis in vivo, we constructed a liver and lung metastasis model via the above-mentioned cells. Knockdown of UBE2J1 significantly enhanced the luciferase intensity and increased the number of hepatic as well as pulmonary metastatic nodules; whereas, a decreased luciferase intensity and a diminished number of hepatic as well as pulmonary metastatic nodules were measured in UBE2J1 overexpression cells (Fig. 3E-J). These findings illustrated that UBE2J1 suppresses CRC cell proliferation and metastasis in vivo.
UBE2J1 interacts with RPS3 and negatively regulates its protein level.
To uncover the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of UBE2J1 on CRC suppression, UBE2J1-interacting proteins were identified by mass spectrometry and immunoprecipitation (IP) analyses. Silver staining assay showed that the UBE2J1 overexpression group was observed with several specific bands of proteins compared to the IgG group (Fig. 4A). The top ten differential proteins were listed and RPS3 had the highest abundance except for cell skeleton protein (Fig. 4B, S2E). A tissue microarray of cohort 2 was analyzed by IHC staining. IHC score showed that RPS3 was more highly expressed in CRC tissues than that in adjacent tissues, which is similar to the expression pattern of RPS3 observed in the TCGA database (Fig. 4C, D, and S2G). Kaplan-Meier plot revealed that patients with high RPS3 expression exhibited reduced overall survival (Fig. 4E). More importantly, the protein levels of RPS3 were negatively correlated with UBE2J1 in CRC tissues (Fig. 4F, G). All these features are contrary to the characteristics of UBE2J1 in CRC patients.
Next, co-immunoprecipitation experiments were employed to verify the physical binding between UBE2J1 and RPS3. Results confirmed that endogenous UBE2J1 is associated with RPS3 and vice versa (Fig. 4H). Furthermore, exogenously expressed UBE2J1 and RPS3 interacting with each other were also observed (Fig. 4I). Since UBE2J1 is a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) that mediates ubiquitination and degradation of targeted proteins [12], we surmised that RPS3 might be a ubiquitination substrate of UBE2J1. Knockdown of UBE2J1 with specific shRNAs led to a promotion of endogenous RPS3 protein levels in DLD-1 and LoVo (Fig. 4J). Consistent with this idea, ectopic expression of UBE2J1 significantly down-regulated RPS3 protein levels, and this modulation obeyed a dose-dependent manner in HT-29 and HCT 116 (Fig. 4K, 4L). Whereas, exogenously manipulated UBE2J1 expression did not alter the abundance of RPS3 mRNA levels (Fig. S2H), which suggested that UBE2J1 participates in regulating RPS3 stability through a post-transcriptional mechanism. These results demonstrated that UBE2J1 interacts with RPS3 and regulates its protein levels.
Poly-ubiquitination and degradation of RPS3 were promoted by UBE2J1 via targeting K214 residue.
We next sought to explore whether UBE2J1 regulates the stability of RPS3 via ubiquitination. As the cysteine 91 (C91) residue and the ubiquitin-conjugating core (UBC) domain is responsible for the catalytic activity of UBE2J1 [33], we constructed two mutants in which the C91 residue was substituted with a serine (M1, C91S) and the UBC domain was depleted (M2), respectively (Fig. 5A). RPS3 degradation was considerably elevated by ectopic expression of wild-type (WT) UBE2J1, however, the catalytic mutants M1 and M2 failed to do so (Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, UBE2J1 overexpression could prominently induce the poly-ubiquitination of RPS3 compared to the UBE2J1 mutants M1 and M2 (Fig. 5C). In agreement with these findings, WT UBE2J1 overexpression led to a shortened half-life of endogenous RPS3 as compared to the control, whereas UBE2J1 mutant M1 abrogated this trend (Fig. 5D). These data indicated that UBE2J1 serves as a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) that induces the ubiquitination and degradation of RPS3.
It has been reported that the ubiquitination of RPS3, as a 40S subunit of ribosomes, could be regulated by several E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinates, which participate in Ribosome-Associated Quality Control (RQC) [34-37]. We subsequently intended to discern the potential lysine site of RPS3 that is responsible for UBE2J1 mediated RPS3 ubiquitination. Considering ubiquitin-modified lysine residues are highly conserved across eukaryotes and several specific lysine residues have been documented to be mono-ubiquitination sites of human RPS3 [38], we generated a series of lysine (K) to arginine (R) mutants of RPS3 (K75R, K202R, and K214R) to verify our speculation (Fig. 5E). The ectopic expression of UBE2J1 led to a degradation of RPS3-WT, K75R, and K202R, while the K214R mutant abolished the decrease of RPS3 induced by UBE2J1 overexpression (Fig. 5F). Furthermore, the K214R but not K75R nor K202R mutant dramatically compromised poly-ubiquitination of RPS3 in the presence of UBE2J1 overexpression (Fig. 5G). In line with these observations, the RPS3 K214R mutant possessed an extended half-life than that of WT RPS3 (Fig. 5H). In addition, our data verified that UBE2J1 promotes the K48-linked, but not K11- nor K63-linked poly-ubiquitination of RPS3 (Fig. 5I). Accordingly, these findings provided evidence that UBE2J1 targets RPS3 ubiquitination and degradation via inducing its poly-ubiquitination at K214 residue.
Ubiquitin E3 ligase TRIM25 cooperates with UBE2J1 to enhance the ubiquitination of RPS3.
Given that E2 targeting substrate to ubiquitination and degradation is largely dependent on an E3 ligase [7, 8], we further interrogated the mass spectrometric results to identify an E3 ligase that may partner with UBE2J1. In keeping with our speculation, TRIM25, an E3 ligase with a comparatively high abundance in the UBE2J1-binding proteins pool, was identified (Fig. 4B, S2F). Endogenous and exogenous co-IP experiments demonstrated that UBE2J1 was immunoprecipitated with TRIM25, and vice versa (Fig. 6A, B). Moreover, compared with ectopic expression of UBE2J1 or TRIM25 individually, a more pronouncedly promoting effect on RPS3 degradation and poly-ubiquitination was observed for the overexpression of UBE2J1 and TRIM25 synchronously (Fig. 6C, E). Besides, the knockdown of TRIM25 could diminish RPS3 degradation and poly-ubiquitination caused by the introduction of UBE2J1 (Fig. 6D, F). Thus, we verified that TRIM25 collaborates with UBE2J1, which forms an E2-E3 pair, inducing ubiquitination and degradation of RPS3.
UBE2J1 suppresses NF-κB translocation into the nucleus and inactivates the NF-κB signaling pathway in CRC by inducing RPS3 degradation.
As RPS3 acts as a positive regulator of the NF-κB signaling pathway [29], we were particularly interested in exploring whether UBE2J1 could inactivate the NF-κB signaling pathway via inducing degradation of RPS3. Depletion of UBE2J1 led to a notably increased p-P65 expression in the total cell lysates, promoted accumulation of nuclear P65, as well as enhanced DNA-binding activity of nuclear P65. Whereas, RPS3 knockdown abolished these effects caused by the silence of UBE2J1 (Fig. 6G, I). By contrast, ectopic expression of UBE2J1 markedly decreased the amount of p-P65 in the total cell lysates and diminished nuclear P65 levels, and further attenuated the DNA-binding activity of nuclear P65. However, overexpression of RPS3 rescued the above effects which were detected in UBE2J1 overexpressing cells (Fig. 6H, J). Thus, we verified that UBE2J1 suppresses the NF-κB signaling pathway via down-regulating RPS3 expression.
UBE2J1 impairs the proliferation and metastasis of CRC cells via negatively regulating RPS3.
Next, we investigated whether RPS3 is a necessary mediator of the biological functions of UBE2J1 suppressing CRC progression. Stably depleting UBE2J1 cells or control cells were transfected with lentivirus that encodes shRNA-RPS3 or shRNA-control. Meanwhile, UBE2J1, RPS3, or their corresponding vector were also transfected into CRC cells through a lentivirus-mediated system. RPS3 silencing rescued the promoting cell growth caused by UBE2J1 deficiency (Fig. S3A). In contrast, the introduction of RPS3 reversed the decreased cell growth caused by UBE2J1 overexpression (Fig. S3B). Similar results were also observed in the colony formation assay and EdU staining assays (Fig. S3C-F). Transwell assay and Wound healing assay indicated that RPS3 depletion could restore the elevated migration and invasion ability of cells caused by UBE2J1 knockdown, and vice versa (Fig. S4A, B; S5A, B). Collectively, these results showed that UBE2J1 inhibits cell proliferation and metastasis via down-regulating RPS3 in CRC cells.
UBE2J1 is silenced by promoter CpG methylation in colorectal cancer.
As a tumor suppressor protein, we further explored the mechanism of UBE2J1 downregulation in CRC. Bioinformatic analysis of the CDH11 promoter indicated that it contains a typical CpG island (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/seqstats/emboss_cpgplot/; Fig. 7A), which suggests that the silencing of UBE2J1 may be mediated by promoter CpG methylation. Semi-quantitative RT-PCR showed that UBE2J1 expression was relatively high in NCM460; the levels of UBE2J1 were reduced in SW620, SW480, Caco-2, and HT-29 cells, and lost in HCT 116 cells. Furthermore, the above-mentioned cell lines with downregulation or silencing UBE2J1 were treated with 5-Aza, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. A restored expression of UBE2J1 was observed (Fig. 7B). Methylation-specific PCR (MSP) revealed that complete methylation was found in the UBE2J1 promoter region of HT-29 and HCT 116 cells, and partial methylation was observed in DLD-1, LoVo, SW620, SW480, and Caco-2 cells, and unmethylation was detected in NCM460. (Fig. 7C). Methylation results were reaffirmed by bisulfite sequencing PCR (BSP) in DLD-1, LoVo, HT-29, and HCT 116 cells (Fig. 7D). We further investigated the methylation status of the UBE2J1 promoter by MSP in primary CRC samples and matched adjacent normal tissues. Methylation of UBE2J1 was detected in 71.4% (20/28) of primary colorectal cancers, and no methylation was found in all 28 cases of non-cancerous colorectal tissue samples (Fig. 7E).