Clinical and Imaging Features of Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cysts: A Retrospective Study of 50 cases

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1874932/v1

Abstract

Purpose

Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEDAC) are thought to arise from leakage of CSF through a spinal dural defect. This study investigates the demographics and imaging spectrum of SEDACs at our academic institution and compares them with those reported in the literature.

Material and Methods

Fifty cases with documented MRI diagnosis of SEDAC, Nabors criteria type I meningeal cyst (MC), were identified from retrospective review of imaging records between 1999 to 2020. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, cyst characteristics, and management outcomes studied. Statistical analysis to determine associations between maximum cyst size and presenting symptoms along with other imaging findings.

Results

In all 50 subjects, SEDACs were solitary (single) and sporadic (non-familial). The majority were incidental (62%), located posteriorly (92%) and laterally (80%) in the thoracic and thoracolumbar regions (34%, 30%). They were associated with mild mass effect upon the thecal sac (50%) and bone remodeling (92%). Among symptomatic SEDACs, back pain and radiculopathy were the most reported (68%). Larger cysts were located caudally in the spinal canal, and were associated with greater thecal mass effect, bone remodeling, and septations. Four out of six subjects who underwent surgical management had complete or partial remission. One had cyst recurrence.

Conclusion

In this largest series of SEDACs, most were discovered incidentally, stable over time, and located in the thoracic spine dorsal to the thecal sac. When symptomatic, back pain and radiculopathy were the most common presenting symptoms. Treatment with complete surgical excision may yield the best results for symptomatic lesions.

Introduction

Arachnoid cysts are pockets of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or CSF-like fluid that form next to CSF spaces in the spine or the cranium[1]. Spinal arachnoid cysts (SACs) are uncommon and can be intradural or extradural. Most of them are spontaneous, while only a few are secondary[1]. Most spinal extradural arachnoid cysts (SEDACs) arise from CSF leaking through a dural defect in the thecal sac and forming an extradural cyst[2]. However, there have also been cases of non-communicating SEDACs where the dural defect was not identified. The etiology of this defect remains unclear, although congenital, traumatic, postsurgical, inflammatory, and infective causes have all been implicated[2]. Genetic etiological factor has been suggested in some reports, including FOXC2 mutations associated with lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome, NRAS gene mutations in Neurocutaneous melanosis, Marfan’s, and Milroy's syndromes [3-6]. 

Most SACs are asymptomatic and are discovered incidentally on MRI or myelography performed for neck or back pain, myelopathy, or radiculopathy[7]. Besides watchful waiting, management of symptomatic cysts involves total cyst excision, marsupialization, fenestration, ligation of the communication site, and/or shunting [7].

The classification of spinal arachnoid cysts has always been confusing. In 1988, Nabors et al. [8] proposed a classification to categorize spinal extramedullary meningeal cysts (MC) – a term used interchangeably with arachnoid cysts in the literature – into three types based on spinal nerve presence, spinal level (sacral vs. non-sacral), and dural location (intradural vs. extradural) shown in Table 1 (1). Type IA MC has also been called extradural arachnoid cysts. Nabors et al. also described sacral extradural meningeal cysts (type IB) as "occult sacral meningocele." In 2017, Klekamp et al [9] proposed a new classification for spinal dural pathologies similar to vascular aneurysms into saccular dural diverticular (type I), dural dissection (type II) or fusiforme ectasia (III) [9-11]. According to this classification, SEDACs will fall under type I diverticula or sometimes type II dissections [9]. Reports of SEDAC in the literature have been limited to small case series, and we sought to expand on this by presenting a retrospective study of 50 cases of SEDAC retrieved from our institution’s health records.  To our knowledge, this would be the largest case series of SEDAC in the literature to date.

Methods

Patient identification and selection

To identify patients diagnosed with SEDAC at our institution, full radiology reports records search was conducted using Illuminate InSight™ clinical search engine. "MRI," "spinal," "arachnoid," "extradural," and "cyst" were used as search terms. The search yielded 212 reports between the years 1995 and 2021 for 145 patients – some patients had more than one radiology report for different studies. To determine their eligibility, a certified neuroradiologist with over 20-year experience reviewed the patients’ images using Nabors et al. [8] criteria for type I meningeal cysts (extradural cysts). Patients whose imaging was unavailable for review were excluded and a total of 50 patients with a documented MRI diagnosis of SEDAC were identified between 1999–2020. All the MRI exams included a minimum of unenhanced axial and sagittal T1-weighted and T2-weighted sequences (1.5 or 3.0 Tesla). All the desired data points were present for all the 50 patients, except two with missing histopathology reports (out of six) and one with a missing operative note (out of six). The study was approved by the institution’s Institutional Review Board (IRB 21-005620-01).

Demographic, clinical, and imaging characteristics

A retrospective chart review for demographic data, presenting clinical symptoms, imaging, surgical, and histopathology findings was conducted. Demographic and clinical data collected were – age at diagnosis, sex, date of diagnosis, relevant past medical history (e.g., history of back trauma or surgery), family history, presumed etiology of SEDAC, presenting symptoms, type of management (surgery vs. conservative), date and type of surgery (if any), the presence of subarachnoid communication (from surgical notes), and pre- and post- operative clinical follow up. Imaging data collected included SEDAC count, location, size (using largest diameter), septation, thecal mass effect, myelopathy, bone remodeling, and extraforaminal extension. The thecal mass effect was considered mild if it was less than 50%, moderate, between 50–75%, and severe, if greater than 75% diameter reduction. The presence of subarachnoid communication was recorded when myelography was available. Dates of the first, interval and last imaging follow up (pre- and post-operative) were also recorded.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile range (IQR) while categorical ones as frequencies. The association between cyst size, and clinical and imaging findings were assessed using Mann Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests as appropriate. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.

Results

General information

A total of 50 patients were included [median age 64 years (IQR 49.2–74.2)] years. 31 [62%] were female. All 50 patients had no known etiology (i.e., idiopathic), although 5 (10%) patients had an unrelated history of spinal surgery and 2 (4%) had history of unrelated trauma to the back. 32/50 (64%) SEDACs were discovered incidentally while the remainder 18 (36%) presented with symptoms. These were back pain in 10 (56% symptomatic), radiculopathy in 3 (17%), mixed sensory and motor deficit in 3 (17%), and urinary or bowel dysfunction in 2 (11%). Lack of symptoms was noted mainly in relatively cephalad SEDACs with thoracic and thoracolumbar cysts being asymptomatic in 12/17 (70%), and 10/15 (67%) respectively, compared to lumbar and lumbosacral cysts 8/14 (57%), and 2/4 (50%) respectively. Larger SEDACs were significantly associated with symptomatic presentation [47.2 mm (IQR 31.5–99.9) vs. 30.5 mm (IQR 21.5–48.7), p = 0.020].

Imaging findings

Table 2 shows the imaging findings of SEDACs, including cyst count, extraforaminal extension, mass effect upon thecal sac, myelopathy, bone remodeling, septations, location, spinal level along with communication with subarachnoid space, and cyst stability. It also shows the association of SEDAC median diameter to other imaging findings. T6 was the most crossed segment in all thoracic cysts [11/17 cases (65%)], followed by T5 [7/17 (41%)] and T7 [6/17 (35%)]. There was significant association of larger cysts with extraforaminal extension (p = 0.007), thecal sac mass effect (0.001), septations (0.029), and lower spinal regions (0.006).

Of all 50 cases, 25 (50%) had follow-up MRI. The median follow-up duration between diagnosis and the latest MRI was 34 months (IQR 11–95.5). They all showed cyst stability, i.e., no discernible changes in sizes were noted (Fig. 3).

Only seven (14%) subjects were noted to have both an MRI, and a CT myelogram performed to evaluate their SEDACs. Of them, 4 SEDACs demonstrated contrast filling, indicating communication to the subarachnoid space. Information regarding subarachnoid communication was also collected from operative notes, which showed positive evidence for another 2 SEDACs with no preoperative myelography. This brought the total number of SEDACs with positive evidence for subarachnoid communication to 6 (66%) among the 9 subjects investigated.

Management and follow-up

44/50 (88%) subjects were treated conservatively with follow-up, while 6/50 (12%) were treated surgically. Five underwent surgical excision, while one had an unknown operation as the operative note was not available. All patients treated with surgery were symptomatic, with three having mixed clinical presentation with both motor and sensory deficits; two having back pain and radiculopathy; one having urinary and bowel symptoms. Histopathology reports confirmed the diagnosis of an arachnoid cyst in 4/6 (67%) while histology report was unavailable for two patients. All six patients treated with surgery had clinical and MRI follow-up with a median duration between surgery and follow-up of 42 months (IQR 11–66). Postoperatively, 4/6 (67%) had complete or partial remission of pre-operative symptoms while the remaining 2/6 (33%) did not respond. Follow-up MRI demonstrated no evidence of residual/recurrent cyst in 5/6 (83%), while 1/7 (17%) had cyst recurrence. One of the two cases without symptom improvement had accompanying lumbar spinal stenosis, likely resulting in residual pain, while the other developed cyst recurrence. The operative note was unavailable for the latter, and it is possible that there was incomplete cyst wall resection or another surgical option (i.e., other than excision, such as cyst fenestration) was sought, which is expected to have a higher chance of recurrence [7].

Discussion

Arachnoid cyst is a histological diagnosis. However, in radiology practice, the term is used interchangeably with MC. Despite describing type 1 MC as extradural arachnoid cysts, Nabors et al. identified an arachnoid lining in only one of their six cases and advised against using the term “arachnoid cyst.” However, other studies were able to identify the presence of an arachnoid layer [12, 13]. Nabors et al. also referred to sacral extradural meningeal cysts (type IB MC) as "occult sacral meningocele," a term seen as inconsistent (with other meningoceles) by Muthukumar et al.[14] because of their similarities to other arachnoid cysts, lack of neural contents, and non-association with spinal dysraphism [14]. Moreover, while Nabors et al. [8] specified the lack of spinal nerves within the cyst to characterize SEDACs in contrast to perineural (Tarlov’s) cysts, the herniation of spinal nerve roots through dural defects has been reported in SEDACs before [15, 16]. Differentiating between sacral SEDACs and Tarlov cysts can sometimes prove difficult. This study considered cysts centrally placed in the sacral canal and extending over multiple segments as sacral SEDACs. In contrast, those eccentrically located at a single sacral level, extending into a sacral neural foramina and containing nerve elements were excluded as Tarlov’s cysts [17].

MRI constitutes the primary imaging modality for diagnosis. On MRI, SEDACs exhibit T1-weighted hypointense and T2-weighted hyperintense CSF-like signal intensity [17, 18]. High-resolution MRI sequences, including constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) and dynamic cardiac gated cine-mode balanced steady-state free precession imaging (SSFP), have been suggested as a helpful non-invasive tool for evaluating possible communication to subarachnoid space [7, 19]. This could help identify the target surgical site and limit the extent of laminectomy required [1]. Moreover, kinematic MRI can help correlate clinical symptoms with the cyst shape fluctuation that happens with daily activities, e.g., straining[20]. On the other hand, in the absence of bone remodeling, CT can easily miss SEDACs as they appear isodense to CSF [13]. However, it is reliable in elucidating related bone abnormalities, and when performed with myelography, can readily distinguish between communicating and non-communicating SEDACs [18, 21] (Figs. 1 and 2). Nearly all SEDACs, based on literature, communicate with the subarachnoid space [22]. Digital substraction cystography can reveal the site of communication of SEDAC with the thecal sac [23].

Spinal arachnoid cysts usually present in the third or fourth decade of life [24]. The median age of subjects in this study was 64 years (IQR 49.2–74.2). Female predominance (31:19) in this study is concordant to some studies [18, 25, 26] and contrary to others [18, 25, 26]. All 50 subjects with SEDACs were found to have solitary (single) cysts. Although neither of the study subjects (nor their families) underwent thorough genetic analysis, the mere lack of family history and the cysts singularity point to them as non-syndromic. In Ogura et al. [3], 17 subjects with SEDACs were studied, and they found that 7 out of 7 (100%) subjects without FOXC2 mutations had a single SEDAC, whereas 7 out of 10 (70%) subjects with FOXC2 mutations had multiple SEDACs. However, familial SEDACs could, in theory, be easily missed because they may lack symptoms or even have incomplete penetrance, i.e., possess the culprit mutation(s) without SEDAC development. Other associated findings included a thoracic spinal cord syrinx in one subject. In contrast to other studies which postulated causative relation between syringomyelia with spinal and/or cranial arachnoid cysts [13, 27], in our case, the syringomyelia appeared unrelated and incidental as it was caudal and distant from SEDAC.

The majority of SEDACs are found incidentally [17]. Patients may remain asymptomatic until sufficient expansion of the arachnoid cyst compresses the neural elements [28]. Additionally, the location of the cyst perhaps influences the clinical presentation [29]. Whenever a SEDAC is discovered in a symptomatic patient, it must be determined if there is a better explanation for symptoms and whether the cyst can cause of the symptoms. SEDAC found with an accompanying lesion, e.g., disc herniation may pose a diagnostic dilemma [30]. Therefore clinical presentation must match the radiographic results if treatment is to be successful [17].

Larger cysts were significantly associated with higher degree of thecal mass effect and extraforaminal extension. Postulated mechanisms for cyst enlargement include (a) a one-way valve with intermittent high pressure, (b) hyperosmolar fluid collection causing free water movement inside the cyst, and (c) fluid secretion from the cyst wall lining in the absence of accessible communication with subarachnoid space [31]. For nonsurgical patients who had follow-up MRIs, all cysts remained stable in size and appearance (Fig. 3). Pressure changes caused by Valsalva maneuver-related daily activities have been postulated to fluctuate cyst size and precipitate symptoms intermittently [14, 20]. There was also a relative size discrepancy between SEDACs associated with bone remodeling suggestive of long-standing process versus those without bony change [20]. Not surprisingly larger cysts with higher hydrostatic pressure are expected to gradually remodel the surrounding bone [30]. Also, it is worth noting that bony changes can happen long before the appearance of signs of spinal cord compression, [32] which would explain why the majority (29 out of 46 [63%]) of bone remodeling-SEDACs were discovered incidentally.

SEDACs are most common in the mid to low thoracic spine and are usually in posterior location within the spinal canal [26]. The T6 followed by T5 and T4 vertebrae were the most common segments crossed by thoracic SEDACs. Sadek et al. [33] reported T5 to be the most frequent level, followed by T3, T4, and T6. The largest SEDACs were seen in the lumbosacral and the sacral regions where they were most symptomatic. The small median size of the more cephalad SEDACs could explain that group's relative lack of symptoms. Although it cannot be substantiated, some attribute the common posterior location of SEDACs to diverticula in the septum posticum, a thin longitudinal membranous partition that divides the posterior spinal subarachnoid [7, 32]. This does not explain the pathogenesis of the ventral SEDACs. Also, it does not explain the presence of sacral SEDACs where septum posticum is not found [33]. Another theory by Fortuna et al. might help explain the mechanism of ventrally located SEDACs [12]. They suggested that herniation of an entrapped dilated arachnoid granulation through a dural tear it produces, facilitated by negative epidural pressure, leads to their expansion along the path of least resistance and creation of SEDAC. While the tendency of SEDACs for lateral location can be attributed to common occurrence of tears at the nerve root dural sleeve - thecal sac junction [12].

Conclusion

SEDACs are uncommon entities. MRI presents a valuable tool for both diagnosis and follow-up. The findings of this most extensive compilation of SEDAC cases to date (50 cases) are consistent with prior literature. Most SEDACs were discovered incidentally, stable over time, and most frequently located in the thoracic region, dorsal to the thecal sac. Back pain and radiculopathy constituted most of the presenting symptoms. The larger the cyst size, greater was the mass effect on the thecal sac, bone remodeling and chances of internal septations. The caudal levels had a preponderance of bigger cysts, with the largest seen in the lumbosacral and the sacral regions.

Declarations

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Garg, K. et al. (2017) Spinal arachnoid cysts – our experience and review of literature. British Journal of Neurosurgery 31 (2), 172-178.

2. Lee, S.W. et al. (2018) Spinal Extradural Cyst: Case Report and Review of Literature. World Neurosurg 116, 343-346.

3. Ogura, Y. et al. (2013) FOXC2 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cyst. PLOS ONE 8 (11), e80548.

4. Chynn, K.-Y. (1967) CONGENITAL SPINAL EXTRADURAL CYST IN TWO SIBLINGS. American Journal of Roentgenology 101 (1), 204-215.

5. Ramaswamy, V. et al. (2012) Spectrum of central nervous system abnormalities in neurocutaneous melanocytosis. Dev Med Child Neurol 54 (6), 563-8.

6. Cilluffo, J.M. et al. (1981) Idiopathic ("congenital") spinal arachnoid diverticula. Clinical diagnosis and surgical results. Mayo Clin Proc 56 (2), 93-101.

7. Fam, M.D. et al. (2018) Spinal arachnoid cysts in adults: diagnosis and management. A single-center experience. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine SPI 29 (6), 711-719 %@ 1547-5654 %U https://thejns.org/spine/view/journals/j-neurosurg-spine/29/6/article-p711.xml.

8. Nabors, M.W. et al. (1988) Updated assessment and current classification of spinal meningeal cysts. Journal of Neurosurgery 68 (3), 366-377.

9. Klekamp, J. (2017) A New Classification for Pathologies of Spinal Meninges, Part 1: Dural Cysts, Dissections, and Ectasias. Neurosurgery 81 (1), 29-44.

10. Chen, Z. et al. (2014) Dural Dissection Cyst: a More Accurate Term for Extradural Meningeal Cyst. CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 20 (6), 515-520.

11. Jian, Q. et al. (2022) Location Distribution of Fistulas and Surgical Strategies for Spinal Extradural Meningeal Cysts: A Retrospective Analysis of 30 Cases at a Single Center. Neurospine 19 (1), 188-201.

12. Fortuna, A. et al. (1977) Arachnoid diverticula: A unitary approach to spinal cysts communicating with the subarachnoid space. Acta Neurochirurgica 39 (3), 259-268.

13. Silbergleit, R. et al. (1998) Imaging of spinal intradural arachnoid cysts: MRI, myelography and CT. Neuroradiology 40 (10), 664-668.

14. Muthukumar, N. (2002) Sacral extradural arachnoid cyst: a rare cause of low back and perineal pain. European Spine Journal 11 (2), 162-166.

15. Sangala, J.R. et al. (2009) Nerve root prolapse into a spinal arachnoid cyst--an unusual cause of radiculopathy. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 111 (5), 460-4.

16. Shanbhag, N.C. et al. (2017) Symptomatic Thoracic Nerve Root Herniation into an Extradural Arachnoid Cyst: Case Report and Review of the Literature. World Neurosurg 106, 1056.e5-1056.e8.

17. Hughes, G. et al. (2008) A review of spinal arachnoid cysts. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 75 (4), 311-315.

18. Liu, J.K. et al. (2007) Spinal extradural arachnoid cysts: clinical, radiological, and surgical features. Neurosurgical Focus FOC 22 (2), 1-5.

19. Nakagawa, A. et al. (2004) Usefulness of constructive interference in steady state (CISS) imaging for the diagnosis and treatment of a large extradural spinal arachnoid cyst. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47 (6), 369-72.

20. Doita, M. et al. (2003) Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of a Thoracic Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cyst: An Alternative Suggestion for Exacerbation of Symptoms During Straining. Spine 28 (12), E229-E233.

21. Khosla, A. and Wippold, F.J. (2002) CT Myelography and MR Imaging of Extramedullary Cysts of the Spinal Canal in Adult and Pediatric Patients. American Journal of Roentgenology 178 (1), 201-207.

22. Woo, J.B. et al. (2016) Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cyst. Korean J Neurotrauma 12 (2), 185-190.

23. Gu, K. et al. (2016) Digital Subtraction Cystography for Detection of Communicating Holes of Spinal Extradural Arachnoid Cysts. Korean Journal of Radiology 17 (1), 111.

24. Hamamcioglu, M.K. et al. (2008) Intrasacral Extradural Arachnoid Cysts

—Three Case Reports&mdash. Neurologia medico-chirurgica 48 (5), 223-226.

25. Cloward, R.B. (1968) Congenital spinal extradural cysts: case report with review of literature. Annals of surgery 168 (5), 851-864.

26. Choi, J.Y. et al. (2006) Spinal extradural arachnoid cyst. Acta Neurochirurgica 148 (5), 579-585.

27. Wang, J. et al. (2017) Acquired Chiari Malformation and Syringomyelia Secondary to Space-Occupying Lesions: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 98, 800-808.e2.

28. Haber, M.D. et al. (2014) Differentiation of Idiopathic Spinal Cord Herniation from CSF-isointense Intraspinal Extramedullary Lesions Displacing the Cord. RadioGraphics 34 (2), 313-329.

29. Marrone, S. et al. (2022) Thoracic spinal extradural arachnoid cyst: A case report and literature review. Surgical Neurology International 13, 55.

30. Tyagi, H.R. et al. (2014) Scalloping Sacral Arachnoid Cyst as a Cause of Perianal Pain- A Case Report. Journal of orthopaedic case reports 4 (2), 28-32.

31. Boisserie-Lacroix, M. et al. (1990) The value of MRI in the study of spinal extradural arachnoid cysts. Comput Med Imaging Graph 14 (3), 221-3.

32. Perret, G. et al. (1962) Diagnosis and treatment of intradural arachnoid cysts of the thoracic spine. Radiology 79, 425-9.

33. Sadek, A.-R. and Nader-Sepahi, A. (2019) Spinal Arachnoid Cysts: Presentation, management and pathophysiology. Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 180, 87-96.

Tables

Table 1.  Classification of spinal meningeal cysts by Nabors et al. 1988[8]

Type

Description

I

 

Extradural Meningeal Cysts Without Spinal Nerve Fibers

IA

Extradural Meningeal Cyst (Extradural Arachnoid Cyst)

IB

Sacral Meningocele (Occult Sacral Meningocele)

II

Extradural Meningeal Cysts with Spinal Nerve Fibers (Tarlov's Perineural Cyst)

III

Intradural Meningeal Cysts (Intradural Arachnoid Cysts)


Table (2) shows imaging findings of SEDACs among study subjects (n = 50) and their association to cyst median highest diameter. 

Imaging findings

Number of cases (% among total)

Median

Diameter (IQR) (mm)

p value†

Number of cysts

Solitary

50 (100%)

36.3 (22.8-56.7)

-

Multiple

0 (0%)

-

Extraforaminal Extension

Present

41 (82%)

40.1 (26.8-65.3)

0.007

None

9 (18%)

22.4 (14.9-29)

Thecal Mass Effect

None

11 (22%)

26.4 (20-33)

Less than 0.001

Mild

25 (50%)

31 (21.7-44.6)

Moderate

7 (14%)

52.4 (40-99.8)

Severe

7 (14%)

100.1 (72-112)

Myelopathy

Present

2 (4%)

71

0.14

None

40 (80%)

31

Not Applicable*

8 (16%)

-

Bone Remodeling

Present

46 (92%)

38.3 (22.8-56.7)

0.508

None

8% (4)

29 (16.5-62.5)

Loculation/Septations

Present

31 (62%)

42 (27-65)

0.029

None

19 (38%)

25.3 (20-42.7)

Location

A/P

Anterior

4 (8%)

50.8 (33.9-65.4)

0.334

Posterior

46 (92%)

33.7 (22.3-52.7)

C/L

Central

10 (20%)

49.8 (25.1-99.8)

0.452

Lateral

40 (80%)

36.3 (22.5-50)

Region/Level

Cervical/

Cervicothoracic

0 (0)

-

0.006

Thoracic

17 (34%)

25 (18.5-33.5)

Thoracolumbar

15 (30%)

50 (31-75)

Lumbar

14 (28%)

36.5 (22.3-44.7)

Lumbosacral

2 (4%)

108.5

Sacral

2 (4%)

92.8

Other findings

None

44 (88%)

36.5 (23.5-53.5)

0.383

Tarlov cysts

3 (6%)

36.6

Cranial Arachnoid cysts

2 (4%)

42.5

Syringomyelia

1 (2%)

17

Communication with subarachnoid space

Present

6 (12%)  

51.2 (33-99.8)

0.739

None

3 (6%)

40

Not Applicable**

41 (82%)

-

Stability ‡

Unchanged/Stable

25 (50%)

31.4

-

Decreased in size

0 (0)

-

Increased in size

0 (0)

-

†Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Wallis H tests were used 

*The cyst was located inferior to the spinal cord 

**Subjects had no prior myelography, nor was there any mention of subarachnoid communication/non-communication on the operative notes. 

‡ Only 50% (25) of the subjects had follow-up MRIs. The median duration was 34 (11-95.5) months