Essential oil analysis
The analysis results of the components of O. vulgare and S. aromaticum essential oils used in the study were shown in Table 1. A total of 16 compounds were identified in O. vulgare essential oil. The compounds above 1% were carvacrol (54.17%), dipropylene glycol (30.07%), linalool (3.86%), para-Cymene (2.59%), gamma-Terpinene (2.04%), Thymol (1.33%), and beta-Bisabolene ( 1.13%) (Table 1; Fig. 1). Similarly, 5 components were found in S. aromaticum essential oil. These were eugenol (65.31%), dipropylene glycol (25.44%), beta-Caryophyllene (6.58%), alpha-Humulene (1.80%) and Caryophyllene oxide (0.70%), respectively (Table 1; Fig. 2).
Table 1 Essential oils and their components
|
Essential Oil Compounds
|
|
|
|
|
KI
|
Peaks
|
Origanum vulgare
|
Rt
|
MC
|
MM
|
m/z
|
Ri1
|
Ri2
|
1
|
alpha-Pinene
|
13,16
|
0.30
|
136
|
93,1
|
1027
|
1025
|
2
|
alpha-Thujene
|
13,30
|
0.47
|
136
|
93,1
|
1030
|
1027
|
3
|
Myrcene
|
19,37
|
0.84
|
136
|
93,1
|
1167
|
1161
|
4
|
alpha-Terpinene
|
20,22
|
0.58
|
136
|
121,1
|
1186
|
1178
|
5
|
gamma-Terpinene
|
23,12
|
2.04
|
136
|
93,1
|
1252
|
1245
|
6
|
para-Cymene
|
24,22
|
2.59
|
134
|
119,1
|
1278
|
1270
|
7
|
cis-Sabinene hydrate
|
31,27
|
0.21
|
154
|
71
|
1464
|
1460
|
8
|
Linalool
|
33,85
|
3.86
|
154
|
71
|
1541
|
1543
|
9
|
Terpinen-4-ol
|
35,97
|
0.58
|
154
|
71,1
|
1611
|
1601
|
10
|
beta-Caryophyllene
|
36,21
|
0.70
|
204
|
93,1
|
1616
|
1599
|
11
|
Borneol
|
38,95
|
0.86
|
154
|
95,1
|
1711
|
1700
|
12
|
beta-Bisabolene
|
39,73
|
1.13
|
204
|
69,1
|
1735
|
1728
|
13
|
Dipropylene glycol
|
42,21
|
30.07
|
134
|
45,1
|
1842
|
|
14
|
Caryophyllene oxide
|
47,06
|
0.11
|
220
|
79,1
|
2013
|
1986
|
15
|
Thymol
|
51,16
|
1.33
|
150
|
135,1
|
2184
|
2164
|
16
|
Carvacrol
|
51,99
|
54.17
|
150
|
135,2
|
2216
|
2211
|
|
Syzygium aromaticum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
beta-Caryophyllene
|
36,21
|
6.58
|
204
|
93,1
|
1616
|
1599
|
2
|
alpha-Humulene
|
38,42
|
1.80
|
204
|
93,1
|
1690
|
1667
|
3
|
Dipropylene glycol
|
42,20
|
25.44
|
134
|
45,1
|
1825
|
|
4
|
Caryophyllene oxide
|
47,06
|
0.70
|
220
|
79,1
|
2013
|
1986
|
5
|
Eugenol
|
51,07
|
65.31
|
164
|
164
|
2180
|
2163
|
Rt=Retention Time; MC=Mean Composition (% Area); MM=Molecular Mass; m/z= Mass to Charge Ratio; KI=Kovats Retention Indices; Ri=Retention Indices (Ri1=Relative to Standard Mixture of n-alkanes in the Same Sample’s Analytical Conditions; Ri2=from literature)
Effects of the essential oils on adult females and protonymphs of Tetranychus urticae
Table 2 shows the LC50 and LC90 values obtained after 24 h of exposure to O. vulgare and S. aromaticum essential oils on adult females and protonymphs of T. urticae in the bean and tomato populations. These essential oils caused toxicity by showing a fumigant effect on adult females and protonymphs of T. urticae. For the bean population, LC50 values of O. vulgare essential oil applied to protonymphs and adult females were 1.676 (1.471-1.884) and 2.052 (1.825-2.293) µl L−1 air, respectively, and the difference between protonymphs and adult females was not significant according to the fiducial limits. LC50 values of S. aromaticum essential oil were 16.576 (15.169-17.767) and 17.456 (15.457-19.299) µl L−1 air for protonymphs and adult females, respectively, and the difference was not significant according to the fiducial limits, as is the case with O. vulgare essential oil (Table 2). For the tomato population, the obtained LC50 values of O. vulgare essential oil applied to protonymphs and adult females were 1.877 (1.621-2.138) and 3.076 (2.572-3.646) µl L−1 air, respectively, while the recorded LC50 values of S. aromaticum essential oil were 22.375 (20.763-23.995) and 29.601 (27.218-32.196) µl L−1 air (Table 2). O. vulgare essential oil showed the highest fumigant toxicity to protonymphs in the bean population with a concentration of 1.676 µl L−1 air. The difference in toxicity between protonymphs and adult females in the tomato population was statistically significant for both essential oils applied. S. aromaticum essential oil showed lower toxicity on protonymphs and adult females than O. vulgare essential oil on both bean and tomato populations (Table 2). T. urticae protonymphs in both populations treated with either essential oil were found to be more sensitive than adult females. In this experiment, the mortality rate in the control was less than 1%.
Table 2 Toxicity of Origanum vulgare and Syzygium aromaticum essential oils against protonymphs and adult females of the bean and tomato populations of Tetranychus urticae after 24 hours
Essential oils
|
Stage
|
na
|
Slope ± SEb
|
LC50 (95% FLc) [µl L−1 air]
|
LC90 (95% FLc) [µl L−1 air]
|
χ2 (dfd)
|
Bean population
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. vulgare
|
protonymphs
|
450
|
3.215 ± 0.314
|
1.676 (1.471–1.884)
|
4.197 (3.575–5.212)
|
3.238 (10)
|
|
adult females
|
443
|
3.398 ± 0.308
|
2.052 (1.825–2.293)
|
4.890 (4.181–6.017)
|
4.834 (10)
|
S. aromaticum
|
protonymphs
|
530
|
7.136 ± 0.809
|
16.576 (15.169–17.767)
|
25.065 (23.301–27.608)
|
8.831 (13)
|
|
adult females
|
524
|
6.131 ± 0.510
|
17.456 (15.457–19.299)
|
28.246(25.241–33.005)
|
25.281 (13)
|
Tomato population
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. vulgare
|
protonymphs
|
539
|
2.691 ± 0.241
|
1.877 (1.621–2.138)
|
5.618 (4.722–7.049)
|
5.588 (13)
|
|
adult females
|
537
|
2.554 ± 0.208
|
3.076 (2.572–3.646)
|
9.768 (7.665–13.758)
|
19.020 (13)
|
S. aromaticum
|
protonymphs
|
530
|
4.676 ± 0.408
|
22.375 (20.763–23.995)
|
42.056 (37.917–48.224)
|
6.439 (13)
|
|
adult females
|
678
|
3.515 ± 0.272
|
29.601 (27.218–32.196)
|
68.538 (59.851–81.658)
|
7.478 (18)
|
anumber of mites; bstandard error; cfiducial limits; ddegrees of freedom
Determination of repellent activity
The results of repellency data for O. vulgare and S. aromaticum essential oils are shown in Table 3. In the bean population of T. urticae at tested concentrations, O. vulgare essential oil showed a repellent effect of 51.83%, 31.77%, and 5.33% at 5% concentration, while the same oil showed a repellent effect of 40.20%, 16%, and -7.3%, at the concentration of 2.5%, after 1, 24, and 48 hours, respectively. In the same population, the repellent effects of S. aromaticum essential oil at 5% concentration were 61.22%, 40.81%, and 18%, and was 58.90%, 38.35%, and 15.82% at 2.5% concentration, after 1, 24, and 48 hours, respectively. In the bean population, both oils provided different percentages of repellency to female mites of T. urticae for 48 hours, which decreased with time. S. aromaticum essential oil showed a higher repellent activity on the bean population, as compared to O. vulgare essential oil at both concentrations (Table 3). In the tomato population, repellence activity of O. vulgare essential oil was again measured after 1, 24, and 48 hours and it was 0%, -20.83%, and -15.95% at 2.5% concentration, and 10.34%, -10.41%, and -3.80% at 1% concentration, respectively. In the same population, the repellent effects of S. aromaticum essential oil at 2.5% concentration were -27.27%, -47.47%, and -41.09%, respectively, while it was -37.27%, -38.00%, and -32.98% at 1% concentration, after same time intervals, respectively (Table 3). Except for the repellent activity obtained after 1 hour at 1% concentration of O. vulgare essential oil in the tomato population, both essential oils did not show any repellent effect in either concentration in contrast to the bean population (Table 3).
Table 3 Repellent effect (%) (1, 24, and 48 hours after treatment) of Origanum vulgare and Syzygium aromaticum essential oils on adult females of Tetranychus urticae in tomato and bean populations
Essential oil
|
Populations
|
Concentration (%)
|
Repellency (%) and means of mites on the host leaves after exposure time (1, 24, and 48 hours)
|
|
|
|
1 h
|
|
24 h
|
|
48h
|
|
|
|
untreated
|
treated
|
t ratio
|
P-value
|
repellency
|
|
untreated
|
Treated
|
t ratio
|
P-value
|
repellency
|
|
untreated
|
treated
|
t ratio
|
P-value
|
repellency
|
Origanum vulgare
|
Bean
|
5
|
7.56 ± 0.14
|
2.40 ±0.14
|
−24.53
|
<0001*
|
51.83
|
|
6.56 ± 0.14
|
3.40 ±0.14
|
−15.04
|
<0001*
|
31.77
|
|
5.26 ± 0.18
|
4.73 ±0.18
|
−2.03
|
=0.04*
|
5.33
|
|
|
2.5
|
6.80 ± 0.20
|
2.90 ±0.17
|
−14.66
|
<0001*
|
40.20
|
|
5.80 ± 0.20
|
4.20 ±0.20
|
−5.65
|
<0001*
|
16
|
|
4.63 ± 0.21
|
5.36 ±0.21
|
2.45
|
=0.01*
|
−7.3
|
|
Tomato
|
2.5
|
4.80 ± 0.21
|
4.80 ±0.27
|
0
|
=0.50
|
0
|
|
3.80 ± 0.22
|
5.80 ±0.27
|
5.74
|
<0001*
|
−20.83
|
|
4.13 ± 0.20
|
5.63 ±0.22
|
4.99
|
<0001*
|
−15.95
|
|
|
1
|
5.33 ± 0.31
|
4.33 ±0.35
|
−2.12
|
=0.03*
|
10.34
|
|
4.30 ± 0.31
|
5.30 ±0.35
|
2.11
|
=0.03*
|
−10.41
|
|
4.63 ± 0.29
|
5.00 ±0.33
|
0.82
|
=0.41
|
−3.80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Syzygium aromaticum
|
Bean
|
5
|
7.90 ± 0.18
|
1.90 ±0.13
|
−25.70
|
<0001*
|
61.22
|
|
6.90 ± 0.18
|
2.90 ±0.13
|
−17.13
|
<0001*
|
40.81
|
|
5.90 ± 0.18
|
4.10 ±0.18
|
−25.70
|
<0001*
|
18
|
|
|
2.5
|
7.73 ± 0.15
|
2.00 ±0.18
|
−23.94
|
<0001*
|
58.90
|
|
6.73 ± 0.15
|
3.00 ±0.18
|
−15.59
|
<0001*
|
38.35
|
|
5.73 ± 0.15
|
4.16 ±0.16
|
−6.96
|
<0001*
|
15.82
|
|
Tomato
|
2.5
|
3.60 ± 0.26
|
6.30 ±0.26
|
7.22
|
<0001*
|
−27.27
|
|
2.60 ± 0.26
|
7.30 ±0.26
|
12.57
|
<0001*
|
−47.47
|
|
2.86 ± 0.19
|
6.87 ±0.19
|
14.42
|
<0001*
|
−41.09
|
|
|
1
|
2.30 ± 0.20
|
5.03 ±0.13
|
11.25
|
<0001*
|
−37.27
|
|
3.10 ± 0.17
|
6.90 ±0.17
|
15.33
|
<0001*
|
−38.00
|
|
3.33 ± 0.25
|
6.60 ±0.27
|
8.65
|
<0001*
|
−32.98
|
Means with ‘*’ are significantly different between treated and untreated by t-test (mean ± SE, P < 0.05); SE means the standard error.
Effects of the essential oils on survival and reproduction of Tetranychus urticae
The mean mortality rates (%) of two essential oils at different concentrations in both T. urticae populations after 1, 4, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours are shown in Tables 4 and 5. In the bean population of T. urticae, mortality rates after the application of both essential oils increased as the applied concentration and time increased (Table 4). O. vulgare essential oil caused a death rate of 31.66% after 1 hour at 5% concentration in the bean population, while mortality rates gradually increased to 100% mortality at 72 hours. Mortality rates at the end of 120 hours were statistically significant between the lowest (0.05%) and the highest concentration (5%) applied and ranged from 19.60% to 100%, being significantly higher compared to the control (df= 5, 54; F=1341.208; P<0001) (Table 4). In the control group, although no mortality was observed in the first 24 hours, 4.90% and 8.10% mortality rates were observed after 72 and 120 hours, respectively. When S. aromaticum essential oil was applied to the bean population at the same concentrations, higher mortality rates were observed after one hour at concentrations of 0.10%, 1%, 2.5%, and 5% compared to O. vulgare essential oil (Table 4). Moreover, after 120 hours at the same concentrations, mortality rates varied from 17.60% to 100% and were significantly higher for S. aromaticum essential oil compared to control (df= 5, 54; F=1152.72; P<0001) (Table 4). The mean number of eggs laid on leaf discs on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day in both populations of T. urticae after the application of essential oils and the mean number of larvae hatched are given in Table 6. The toxicity of O. vulgare and S. aromaticum essential oils also resulted in a reduction in the number of F1 progeny (Table 6). The egg-laying function of T. urticae decreased with increasing concentrations of both essential oils. While there was no death on the first day at 0.1%, 1%, and 2.5% concentrations of O. vulgare in the bean population (Table 4), approximately 2.15, 3.69, and 5.05 times fewer eggs laid on the 5th day in the same group, compared to the control. The progeny was inhibited due to 100% deaths on the 3rd and 5th days at the concentration of 5% (Table 6). At 5% and 2.5% concentrations of S. aromaticum essential oil in the same population, the difference between the number of eggs laid by adult females on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day was not statistically significant, but the difference was significant compared to the control (Table 6). As compared with the lowest concentration (0.1%), the number of larvae emerging in control was statistically significant and on average approximately 2.55 and 2.09 times lower in O. vulgare and S. aromaticum, respectively (Table 6).
In the tomato population of T. urticae, mortality rates for both essential oils also increased over time depending on the concentration (Table 5). O. vulgare essential oil caused death rates in the first 1 hour at 2.5% and 1% concentrations, and 100% mortality was observed after 120 hours at these concentrations. Additionally, the mortality rates at the end of 120 hours were significantly different at the lowest (0.125%) and the highest concentration (2.5%), being 65.60% and 100% (df=5, 54; F=1295.99; P<0001), respectively. The rates also showed statistical significance for S. aromaticum essential oil (df=5, 54; F=1409.549; P<0001), and the values between 34.80% and 100% were recorded (Table 5). When O. vulgare essential oil was applied to the tomato population of mites at concentrations as low as 0.125%, 0.25%, and 0.5%, the mortality rates in the first 8 hours were not statistically significant, as compared to the control. From the 24th hour, significantly different mortality rates were recorded at the 0.125% concentration, compared to the control (Table 5). When S. aromaticum essential oil was applied to the tomato population at low concentrations (0.125% and 0.25%), mortality rates in the first 4 hours were not significantly different, compared to control, while the percentage mortality at 0.25% concentration was seen after 8 hours (Table 5). While no mortality rate was observed in the first 24 hours in the control group for both essential oils in the tomato population, a mortality rate close to 10% was observed at the end of 120 hours. Considering the tomato population, statistically, significant differences between control and any concentration of O. vulgare and S. aromaticum essential oils on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day were recorded. The number of eggs laid by T. urticae was approximately 1.60 and 1.68 times less at the concentration of 0.25% on the 5th day of O. vulgare and S. aromaticum, respectively (Table 6). No larvae emerged at the highest concentration (2.5%) for both essential oils and a 1.80- and 1.84-fold decrease were observed in the number of larvae at the lowest concentration (0.25%) of O. vulgare and S. aromaticum, respectively, compared with control treatment.
Table 4 Mean mortality rates of Origanum vulgare and Syzygium aromaticum essential oils on the bean population of Tetranychus urticae adult females after 1, 4, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours
Treatment % essentail oil (v/v)
|
Mean mortality (%) after
|
Bean population
|
1 h
|
4 h
|
8 h
|
24 h
|
72 h
|
120 h
|
|
|
O. vulgare essential oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
0 ± 0.00 b
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
4.90 ± 1.26 e
|
8.10 ± 1.46 e
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
0 ± 0.00 b
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
7.90 ± 0.67 e
|
19.60 ± 0.61 d
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
0 ± 0.00 b
|
9.1 ± 0.69 d
|
12.50 ± 0.71 d
|
17.36 ± 1.88 d
|
29.99 ± 1.44 d
|
59.00 ± 1.39 c
|
|
|
1
|
|
0 ± 0.00 b
|
19.30 ± 0.55 c
|
29.12 ± 3.08 c
|
36.23 ± 4.65 c
|
55.10 ± 1.26 c
|
87.30 ± 1.28 b
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
0 ± 0.00 b
|
43.20 ± 2.71 b
|
54.90 ± 1.51 b
|
70.90 ± 1.05 b
|
86.40 ± 0.96 b
|
90.50 ± 0.83 b
|
|
|
5
|
|
31.66 ± 2.11a
|
68.80 ± 2.30 a
|
85.40 ± 1.95 a
|
88.37 ± 2.00 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
|
|
df
|
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
|
|
F
|
|
224.62
|
335.29
|
430.16
|
273.02
|
1444.69
|
1341.208
|
|
|
P
|
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
|
|
S.aromaticum essential oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
10.50 ± 0.42 e
|
10.70 ± 0.39 f
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
13.10 ± 0.69 e
|
17.60 ± 1.08 e
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
8.26 ± 0.77 c
|
9.60 ± 0.81 c
|
10.70 ± 0.63 d
|
30.20 ± 0.87 d
|
50.90 ± 0.65 d
|
59.20 ± 1.47 d
|
|
|
1
|
|
10.34 ± 0.64 c
|
12.10 ± 0.83 c
|
19.00 ± 1.01 c
|
41.30 ± 0.95 c
|
64.60 ± 1.15 c
|
73.60 ± 1.11 c
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
20.80 ± 0.61 b
|
24.40 ± 0.88 b
|
33.20 ± 1.21 b
|
53.50 ± 1.05 b
|
70.50 ± 1.68 b
|
82.80 ± 1.41 b
|
|
|
5
|
|
35.71 ± 1.10 a
|
57.60 ± 1.72 a
|
69.80 ± 2.60 a
|
88.32 ± 1.42 a
|
92.06 ± 1.21 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
|
|
df
|
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
|
|
F
|
|
435.43
|
571.2
|
434.68
|
1416.51
|
950.51
|
1152.72
|
|
|
P
|
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
Means in columns followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer Test, P > 0.05) df=degrees of freedom
Table 5 Mean mortality rates of Origanum vulgare and Syzygium aromaticum essential oils on the tomato population of Tetranychus urticae adult females after 1, 4, 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours
Treatment % essentail oil (v/v)
|
|
|
Mean mortality (%) after
|
Tomato population
|
|
1 h
|
4 h
|
8 h
|
24 h
|
72 h
|
120 h
|
O. vulgare essential oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 f
|
6.10 ± 1.44 f
|
8.60 ± 1.43 e
|
|
0.125
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
26.10 ± 0.48 e
|
38.70 ± 0.66 e
|
65.60 ± 1.46 d
|
|
0.25
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
31.40 ± 0.33 d
|
43.80 ± 0.62 d
|
70.90 ± 0.52 c
|
|
0.5
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
40.10 ± 0.73 c
|
54.80 ± 1.30 c
|
78.20 ± 0.86 b
|
|
1
|
|
3.20 ± 0.29 b
|
8.90 ± 0.27 b
|
14.50 ± 0.65 b
|
50.60 ± 0.77 b
|
69.00 ± 0.39 b
|
100.00 ± 0.83 a
|
|
2.5
|
|
7.60 ± 0.65 a
|
13.40 ± 0.40 a
|
38.10 ± 0.52 a
|
62.60 ± 1.15 a
|
74.90 ± 0.50 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
|
df
|
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
|
F
|
|
114.01
|
891.82
|
2.045.413
|
994.52
|
731.88
|
1295.99
|
|
P
|
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
S.aromaticum essential oil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
0 ± 0.00 f
|
10.10 ± 0.98 e
|
10.90 ± 1.10 f
|
|
0.125
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
0 ± 0.00 e
|
12.70 ± 0.81 e
|
31.20 ± 0.62 d
|
34.80 ± 0.77 e
|
|
0.25
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
0 ± 0.00 d
|
7.50 ± 0.65 d
|
22.30 ± 0.80 d
|
52.40 ± 0.93 c
|
60.20 ± 0.66 d
|
|
0.5
|
|
0 ± 0.00 c
|
8.70 ± 0.47 c
|
12.20 ± 0.71 c
|
32.60 ± 1.55 c
|
52.40 ± 0.74 c
|
72.30 ± 1.34 c
|
|
1
|
|
5.00 ± 0.21 b
|
22.20 ± 0.72 b
|
34.40 ± 1.19 b
|
55.20 ± 1.06 b
|
77.40 ± 1.30 b
|
86.30 ± 0.78 b
|
|
2.5
|
|
9.10 ± 0.48 a
|
31.10 ± 0.87 a
|
56.50 ± 1.38 a
|
80.40 ± 1.92 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
100.00 ± 0.00 a
|
|
df
|
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
5, 54
|
|
F
|
|
323.89
|
707.67
|
713.073
|
608.19
|
1361.102
|
1409.549
|
|
P
|
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
Means in columns followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer Test, P > 0. 05) df=degrees of freedom
Table 6 Means the number of eggs laid by Tetranychus urticae females after the 1st, 3rd, and 5th day and the number of emerged larvae in the bean and tomato populations
Treatment % essentail oil (v/v)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bean population
|
Means of the total number of eggs laid
|
O. vulgare essential oil
|
|
1 day
|
3 days
|
5 days
|
Means of emerging larvae
|
|
Control
|
13.00 ± 1.26 a
|
25.16 ± 2.15 a
|
34.50 ± 2.17 a
|
32.33 ±1.89 a
|
|
0.1
|
4.80 ± 0.65 b
|
10.83 ± 0.94 b
|
16.00 ± 1.21 b
|
12.67 ± 1.67 b
|
|
1
|
2.83 ± 0.30 bc
|
6.00 ± 0.73 c
|
9.33 ± 0.66 c
|
6.00 ± 1.03 c
|
|
2.5
|
2.33 ± 0.33 bc
|
4.16 ± 0.40 cd
|
6.83 ± 0.94 cd
|
4.33 ± 1.08 cd
|
|
5
|
1.00 ± 0.44 c
|
0.00 ± 0.00 d
|
0.00 ± 0.00 d
|
0.00 ± 0.00 d
|
|
df
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
|
F
|
47.07
|
75.96
|
84.17
|
94.23
|
|
P
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
S.aromaticum essential oil
|
Control
|
16.16 ± 1.30 a
|
29.80 ± 0.60 a
|
35.67 ± 1.74 a
|
32.50 ±1.78 a
|
|
0.1
|
15.16 ± 1.13 ab
|
18.83 ± 1.07 b
|
23.50 ± 0.71 b
|
15.50 ± 1.38 b
|
|
1
|
11.33 ± 0.95 bc
|
15.00 ± 0.68 c
|
19.50 ± 0.76 b
|
14.50 ± 1.38 b
|
|
2.5
|
10.00 ± 0.85 cd
|
10.00 ± 0.85 d
|
11.33 ± 1.11 c
|
7.16 ± 1.13 c
|
|
5
|
6.50 ± 0.61 d
|
7.00 ± 0.36 d
|
8.00 ± 0.51 c
|
4.50 ± 0.34 c
|
|
df
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
|
F
|
15.43
|
138.89
|
105.26
|
70.92
|
|
P
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
Treatment % essentail oil (v/v)
|
|
|
|
|
Tomato population
|
Means of the total number of eggs laid
|
O. vulgare essential oil
|
|
1 day
|
3 days
|
5 days
|
Means of emerging larvae
|
|
Control
|
14.00 ± 0.63 a
|
25.50 ± 2.23 a
|
32.83 ± 2.93 a
|
29.83 ± 2.85 a
|
|
0.25
|
11.50 ± 0.67 b
|
15.16 ± 0.47 b
|
20.50 ± 0.56 b
|
16.50 ± 1.36 b
|
|
0.5
|
8.16 ± 0.30 c
|
11.00 ± 0.36 b
|
14.50 ± 0.56 c
|
10.00 ± 0.93 c
|
|
1
|
2.50 ± 0.22 d
|
2.50 ± 0.22 c
|
2.00 ± 0.25 d
|
0.50 ± 0.22 d
|
|
2.5
|
1.00 ± 0.25 d
|
1.00 ± 0.25 c
|
0.66 ± 0.33 d
|
0.00 ± 0.00 d
|
|
df
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
|
F
|
F = 148.33
|
F = 91.52
|
F = 95.20
|
F = 70.52
|
|
P
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
S.aromaticum essential oil
|
Control
|
15.00 ± 0.47 a
|
28.00 ± 1.75 a
|
37.00 ± 2.93 a
|
33.16 ± 2.66 a
|
|
0.25
|
13.17 ± 0.67 b
|
16.50 ± 0.42 b
|
22.00 ± 0.57 b
|
18.00 ± 0.93 b
|
|
0.5
|
3.00 ± 0.00 c
|
6.17 ± 0.60 c
|
7.83 ± 0.79 c
|
4.00 ± 0.51 c
|
|
1
|
1.50 ± 0.20 d
|
2.67 ± 0.21 cd
|
2.83 ± 0.16 cd
|
2.00 ± 0.25 c
|
|
2.5
|
0.50 ± 0.20 d
|
0.80 ± 0.17 d
|
0.00 ± 0.00 d
|
0.00 ± 0.00 c
|
|
df
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
4, 25
|
|
F
|
601.65
|
174.86
|
124.06
|
119.11
|
|
P
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
<0001
|
Means in columns followed by the same letters are not significantly different (Tukey-Kramer Test, P > 0.05) df=degrees of freedom