Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Hainan, China

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.10997/v1

Abstract

Background: There have been no reports regarding the molecular characteristics, virulence features, and antibiotic resistance profiles of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) from Hainan, the southernmost province of China. Methods: 227 S. aureus isolates, consisting of 76 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and 151 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA), were collected in 2013-2014 and 2018-2019 in Hainan, and investigated for their molecular characteristics, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance profiles. Results: Thirty-four sequence types (STs) and 79 spa types were identified based on multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and spa typing, respectively. ST398 (14.1%, 32/227) was found to be the most prevalent, and moreover, the prevalence of ST398-MSSA increased significantly from 2013-2014 (5.5%, 5/91) to 2018-2019 (18.4%, 25/136). Seventy-six MRSA isolates were subject to staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) typing. SCCmec-IVa was the predominant SCCmec type, and specifically ST45-SCCmec IVa, an infrequent type in mainland China, was predominant in S. aureus from Hainan. Eleven virulence genes, including the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl) and eta, were determined, and the positive rates of eta and pvl were found to be 57.3% and 47.6%. Such high prevalence has never been seen in mainland China before.

Background

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is an important gram-positive pathogen causing various infectious diseases including pneumoniae and bacteremia. One study found that compared with matched uninfected patients, patients with healthcare-associated S. aureus infections had an excess one-year mortality of 20.2%[1]. The genotype of S. aureus has been reported to influence the complications, severity, and mortality of infection. One study showed that the strains clonal complex 5 (CC5) and CC30 exhibited a significant trend toward increasing levels of hematogenous complications[2]. Another study found that patients with S. aureus sequence type 121 (ST121) infections often needed longer hospitalization and prolonged antimicrobial therapy[3], whereas bloodstream infections by CC398, a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), are associated with high mortality[4]. Therefore, analysis of the molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of S. aureus is important for prognosis of infection.

The molecular characteristics of S. aureus vary with region. In many Asian countries including China and Thailand, ST239 has been found to be the most prevalent type[5-8], whereas in the United States, ST8 (USA300) and ST121 are the most frequently observed[3, 9]. Even within China, the molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates differ among cities; the predominant types in Wenzhou are ST188 and ST7[10], the major type in Dalian and Shenyang is ST5[11], whereas in Chengdu, ST59 is prevalent[12]. The molecular characteristics of S. aureus are also reported to have varied over time. Since 2000, ST239-t030-SCCmec III has rapidly replaced ST239-t037-SCCmec III, becoming the major clone of S. aureus isolates in Chinese tertiary hospital care[2], whereas ST239-t030-MRSA, which in 2013 was the predominant genotype among all methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains in China, had been replaced by ST59-t437-MRSA by 2016[13]. Therefore, when monitoring the molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates, it is preferable to focus on a specific region of interest at a particular time.

Hainan, the southernmost province of China, is surrounded by the South China Sea, and has a uniquely tropical monsoon and marine climate that is significantly different from that in the mainland. The island has been called a “natural large greenhouse,” and the hot and humid climate is conducive to bacterial growth. Studies of the molecular characteristics and antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates from China have been carried out in various provinces in the last 10 years, such as Zhejiang, Guangdong, and Guangxi[14-17]. To date, however, no study has focused on the molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of S. aureus isolates in Hainan, and no hospital in Hainan has been included in any multi-center studies concerned with those characteristics of S. aureus in China[13, 18, 19]. Not even the CHINET surveillance system includes any hospital from Hainan. Although the total area of Hainan is relatively small, its population has now reached 10 million, and moreover, its tropical monsoon and marine climate is unique in China. These are important motivations to investigate the molecular characteristics, virulence genes, and antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus isolates from the Hainan province.

Methods

S. aureus isolates and primers

A total of 227 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were collected from Hainan General Hospital, Haikou People’s Hospital and First Hospital Affiliated to Hainan Medical college in 2013-2014 (n=91) and 2018-2019 (n=136), respectively. These isolates were derived from diverse clinical specimens, including cutaneous abscess and wound secretion (n=110, 48.5%), sputum and pharynx swabs (n=48, 21.1%), blood (n=42, 18.5%), and others (catheter tip, marrow, pleural fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, cystic cavity fluid, drainage liquid, ascites, joint fluid, biopsy, and urine) (n=27, 11.9%). These isolates were identified by conventional microbiological methods including Gram staining, catalase, and coagulase tests, and confirmed with a VITEK 2 Compact system and a VITEK 2 AST-GP67 Test Kit (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA). All isolates were stored at -80°C for further experiments. All primers used in this study were synthesized by Tianyihuiyuan (China) (Table 1).This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hainan General Hospital. This was a retrospective study without any collection of clinical and personal information from patients, so informed consent was not required.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

A VITEK 2 Compact system and a VITEK 2 AST-GP67 Test Kit (bioMerieux, Inc., Durham, NC, USA) were used to carry out an antimicrobial susceptibility test. Twelve antibiotics were tested, including cefoxitin (FOX), clindamycin (CLI), erythromycin (ERY), gentamicin (GEN), levofloxacin (LEV), linezolid (LZD), oxacillin (OXA), penicillin (PEN), rifampicin (RIF), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), tetracycline (TET), and vancomycin (VAN). S. aureus ATCC 25923 and ATCC25913 were used as the quality control strains. In addition, MRSAs were further identified using PCR for amplification of mecA as described previously, and MRSA N315 was used as the positive control strain.

Staphylococcal protein A (spa) typing

Chromosomal DNAs were extracted from S. aureus isolatesas described previously[20]. The extracted chromosomal DNAs were stored at -20°C for spa, Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec), and multilocus sequence typing, and detection of virulence genes. For spa typing, the variable repeat region of spa was amplified using oligonucleotide primers[20, 21](see Table 1) followed by sequencing. The PCR mixture and conditions were similar to those described previously[20]. The resulting amplicons were purified and subjected to Sanger dideoxy DNA sequencing (Tianyihuiyuan, China) followed by analysis using the Ridom web server (http://spaserver.ridom.de). S. aureus isolates that could not be classified as any known spa type were defined as nontypable (NT).

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST)

MLST was carried out according to the protocol described previously[20, 22]. Seven housekeeping genes of S. aureus, namely arcC, aroE, glpF, gmk, pta, tpi, and yqil, were adopted for MLST. Seven respective PCR assays were conducted to amplify these 7 housekeeping genes. These amplicons were sequenced using Sanger dideoxy DNA sequencing (Tianyihuiyuan, China). The resulting sequences were compared with the known alleles in the MLST database (http://saureus.mlst.net), which was used to determine ST. S. aureus isolates that could not be assigned to any known ST were defined as NT. The clustering of related STs, which were defined as CCs, was determined using eBURST .

Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) typing

The MRSA isolates were subjected to SCCmec typing as previously described[23]. MRSA isolates with suspected SCCmecIV were recharacterized by additional multiplex PCR as subtypes IVa, IVb, IVc, and IVd as described by Zhang et al.[24]. MRSA isolates that could not be assigned to any above type were defined as NT. All primers are listed in Table 1.

Detection of virulence genes

Eleven virulence genes, including the Panton-Valentine leukocidin (pvl), the staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (sea, seb, sec), the exfoliative toxin genes (eta, etb), the hemolysin gene (hla, hlb), and the adhesion factor genes (fnbA, fnbB, clfA) were detected using PCR assays. The PCR mixture and conditions were similar to those described previously[20].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 24.0 for Windows. Data were analyzed using the chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. All statistical tests were two-tailed, and p<0.05 or p<0.01 (Fisher’s exact tests among three groups) was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The antimicrobial resistance profiles of the 227 S. aureus isolates are listed in Table 2. No S. aureus isolate was resistant to VAN or LZD, while a minority were resistant to GEN (14.1%), LEV (10.6%), and RIF (19.8%). Less than 50% were resistant to the remaining antibiotics, except for PEN, to which 92.5% had resistance (Table 2). Seventy-six (33.5%) S. aureus isolates, including an oxacillin susceptible-MRSA (OS-MRSA) belonging to ST120-t2613, were found to be MRSAs. The resistance rates of these MRSA isolates to FOX, PEN, OXA, ERY, GEN, CLI, RIF, and LEV were 100.0%, 100.0%, 98.7%, 75.0%, 64.5%, 18.4%, 17.1%, 15.8%, and 9.7%, respectively, which were significantly higher than those of the MSSA isolates (Table 2). However, there was no significant difference in the resistance rates to VAN, LZD, SXT, and TET between the MRSA and MSSA isolates. The rates of multidrug resistance (MDR) of the MRSA and MSSA isolates were 73.7% and 37.7%, respectively. The chi-square test showed that the prevalence of MDR was significantly higher in the MRSA isolates than in the MSSA isolates (Table 2). In addition, when comparing the S. aureus isolates collected in 2013-2014 with those from 2018-2019, the resistance rates to all antibiotics except SXT were broadly similar. Compared with those collected in 2018-2019, the S. aureus isolates from 2013-2014 had a higher resistance rate to SXT (64.8% vs. 5.9%, p<0.05) and a greater prevalence of MDR (61.5% vs. 41.9%, p<0.05) (Table 2).

MLST, spa, and SCCmec typing

Thirty-four STs belonging to 18 clonal complexes (CCs) and 3 singletons were identified by eBURST. As shown in Table 3 and Figure 1. ST398 (14.1%) was the most prevalent followed by ST188 (13.2%) and ST45 (10.1%). In addition, 7 isolates were determined to be NT (Table 3). By spa typing, 79 spa types were found. The most prevalent was t189 (12.3%) followed by t437 (7.9%), t116 (7.5%), and t011 (6.6%). Meanwhile, 8 isolates were NT (Table 3). When the STs and spa typing were combined, the predominant combinations were ST188-t189 (12.3%, 28/227), ST45-t116 (7.5%, 17/227), ST59-t437 (7.0%, 16/227), ST398-t011 (6.6%, 15/227), ST398-t034 (4.8%, 11/227), and ST7-t091 (4.8%, 11/227) (Table 3). A strong association was observed between certain STs and spa types: ST188 was primarily associated with t189 (93.3%, 28/30); ST45 was associated mainly with t116 (73.9%, 17/23); and ST59 was associated mainly with t437 (72.7%, 16/22) (Table 3).

The major types of S. aureus collected in 2013-2014 were ST188 (14.3%), ST45 (14.3%), ST59 (8.8%), and ST88 (8.8%), whereas in 2018-2019, ST398 (19.9%), ST188 (12.5%), ST59 (10.3%), ST45 (7.4%), and ST7 (7.4%)were the top five types (Table 3). Among the STs that exhibited OXA sensitivity, the two predominant types in 2013-2014 were ST188-MSSA (14.3%) and ST45-MRSA (12.1%), whereas in 2018-2019 they were ST398-MSSA (18.4%) and ST59-MRSA (8.1%). The prevalence of ST398-MSSA markedly increased from 2013-2014 (5.5%) to 2018-2019 (18.4%), and this increase was significant (p<0.05) (Table 3).

Among the 76 MRSA isolates, 6 SCCmec types or subtypes, namely types I, II, III, IVa, IVc, and V, were found. The most common SCCmec type was IVa, which was found in 43 isolates (56.6%, 43/76), while type I, II, III, IVc, and V were found in 1, 3, 6, 5, and 9 isolates, respectively. Nine isolates, including OS-MRSA, were classified as NT for SCCmec typing. When the STs and SCCmec typing were combined, the predominant combination was ST45-SCCmec IVa(8.8%, 20/227), and there was no significant difference in the positive rate of ST45-SCCmec IVa between the S. aureus isolates collected in 2013-2014 and 2018-2019 (12.1% vs. 6.6%, p>0.05) (Table 3).

Virulence gene profiles

The frequencies of the virulence genes identified in the 227 S. aureus isolates are listed in Table 4. ClfA was present inall S. aureus isolates, hla, hlb, and eta were detected in 98.7%, 70.9%, and 57.3% of these isolates, respectively, whereas the remainder were found in less than 50.0%. One hundred and twenty (52.9%) S. aureus isolates harbored 6 or more virulence genes. Of those 120 isolates, 11 contained 9 virulence genes, 31 had 8 such genes, 38 carried 7, and 40 carried 6. Compared with those in the MSSA isolates, the positive rates of fnbA, sea, and sec were significantly higher in the MRSA isolates, but there was no significant difference in the rate of harboring 6 or more virulence genes between the MRSA and MSSA isolates (56.6% vs. 51.0%, p>0.05). Compared with those collected in 2013-2014, the S. aureus isolates from 2018-2019 had higher positive rates of pvl, fnbB, hlb, seb, eta, and etb and higher rates of harboring 6 or more virulence genes (Table 4).

Characteristics of the major clones ST398, ST188, and ST45

The most abundant sequence type found in this study was ST398 (32/227, 14.1%) followed by ST188 (30/227, 13.2%) and ST45 (23/227, 10.1%). Majorities of ST398 (30/32, 93.8%) and ST188 (29/30, 96.7%) isolates were MSSA, whereas the majority of ST45 (20/23, 87.0%) isolates were MRSA, and all ST45-MRSA isolates belonged to the SCCmec IVa type (Table 3). ST45 isolates had higher resistance rates to OXA and FOX than ST398 (c2=36.318, p<0.01) and ST188 isolates (c2=38.055, p<0.01), whereas ST398 (c2=17.685, p<0.01) and ST188 isolates (p<0.01) had higher resistance rates to TET than did ST45 isolates (Table 2). In addition, there was no significant difference in resistance rate to any antibiotics between ST398 and ST188 isolates (Table 2).

Of the 11 tested virulence genes, pvl and fnbB were found to be more frequent in ST398 isolates than in ST45 (c2=22.010 and c2=30.457, respectively, p<0.01) and ST188 isolates (c2=12.790 and c2=38.027, respectively, p<0.01). The prevalence of sec in ST45 isolates was higher than that of ST398 (c2=43.487, p<0.01) and ST188 isolates (c2=32.500, p<0.01), while the prevalence of eta inST45 isolates was higher than in ST188 isolates (c2=14.339, p<0.01). However, the positive rate of hlb in ST45 isolates was lower than that of ST398 (c2=7.118, p<0.01) and ST188 isolates (c2=7.248, p<0.01). There was no significant difference in the positive rate of any other virulence genes between any two of the three STs (Table 4).

Discussion

A total of 227 S. aureus isolates were collected in 2013-2014 and 2018-2019 from three hospitals in Hainan province for investigation of their antimicrobial resistance, virulence gene profiles, and molecular characteristics. The results showed that all isolates were susceptible to VAN and LZD, in agreement with the majority of previous studies carried out in mainland China[25-27]. In addition, when comparing the S. aureus isolates collected in 2013-2014 and 2018-2019, no significant difference was found in the resistance rates to the remaining antibiotics except that to SXT. Therefore, both sets of isolates were combined for analysis, and the average resistance rates to PEN, ERY, CLI, TET, FOX, OXA, GEN, LEV, and RIF were found to be 92.5%, 48.9%, 41.4%, 37.4%, 33.5%, 33.0%, 11.9%, 9.7%, and 8.8%. For comparison, in mainland China in the first half of 2018, the corresponding average rates were reported to be 92.7%, 64.5%, 38.4%, unreported, 34.4%, 34.4%, 18.7%, 22.4%, and 5.2% (http://www.chinets.com). The resistance rate to SXT was 5.9% in the S. aureus isolates collected in 2018-2019, which was significantly lower than for those collected in 2013-2014 (64.8%), whereas the resistance rate to SXT in mainland China was 14.3% in the first half of 2018 (http://www.chinets.com). The S. aureus isolates from Hainan had similar resistance rates against the majority of antibiotics to those from mainland China, but lower resistance rates to ERY and LEV. Therefore, the antibiotic resistance profiles of the Hainan isolates were to a certain extent geographically distinct.

MLST typing, spa typing, and SCCmec typing were performed to analyze the molecular characteristics of the S. aureus isolates. ST398, ST188, and ST45 were the predominant STs among the S. aureus isolates in this study, among which ST398 and ST45 were the predominant clones in the MSSA and MRSA isolates, respectively.In addition, the most common SCCmec type was IVa, and ST45-SCCmec IVa was the most prevalent combination of ST and SCCmec typing in the MRSA isolates. ST188 and ST239 were previously reported as the predominant STs in MSSA and MRSA isolates, respectively[11, 18, 19, 28, 29]. Among these studies, two were multiple-center studies that showed that ST239-SCCmec III was the predominant MRSA genotype, but observed no ST45 clones at all[11, 19]. A recent study in Shanghai showed that ST239-t030 and ST239-t037 were being driven out by the continual growth of the ST5-t2460 clone[30]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates in Hainan province are significantly different from those in mainland China. It is reasonable to speculate that this difference is associated with the unique climate of coastal regions. Supporting our speculation, similar molecular characteristics to those of the Hainan isolates have been reported in several coastal countries and cities. For instance, ST45-SCCmec IV was the major type in Belgium and Slovenia, accounting for up to 51.2% and 21.1% of MRSA isolates, respectively[31, 32]. In addition, ST45-SCCmec IV was the second most prevalent clone in Poland and Hong Kong, accounting for 15.3% and 10.0% of MRSA isolates, respectively[33, 34].

ST398 was found to be the most prevalent in Hainan province, and moreover, in the short span of five years, the prevalence of ST398-MSSA increased from 5.5% to 18.4%. In cohorts of patients in France, ST398 MSSA was shown to increase from zero cases in 1999 to 4.6% of cases in 2010, including 13.8% of cases with S. aureus bloodstream infections[4, 35]. Another retrospective study in France found that only 1.9% of bone and joint infection (BJI) MSSA strains were screened to be ST398 in 2008, whereas in 2010-2012, 14.0% of BJI MSSA strains belonged to ST398[36]. Therefore, ST398 MSSA has emerged as an invasive pathogen causing bloodstream infections, BJIs, and potentially other conditions. Although ST398 MSSA has not been well studied, it is more closely linked with human infections than ST398 MRSA. Moreover, it was found that 30-day all-cause mortality was higher for patients with ST398 MSSA bloodstream infection than for a control group with non-ST398 MSSA infection[4]. Considering that ST398 MSSA has become the most prevalent ST in S. aureus isolates from Hainan province and may be linked to higher mortality, it is necessary to monitor the changes in the molecular characteristics of S. aureus to prevent the wider dissemination of that strain.

The virulence factors of S. aureus play an important role during pathogenesis[37, 38]. Similar to the majority of studies in mainland China[8, 39], almost all strains in our study were positive for clfA and hla, confirming that these were the most common virulence factors in S. aureus, and there was no regional difference in their distribution. Notably, the positive rates of eta and pvl were 57.3% and 47.6%, much higher than those in mainland China[10, 15, 18]. ST45, a common type of S. aureus isolate in Hainan province, was found to have an eta prevalence of95.7% in our results. Meanwhile, ST398, a clone with a low prevalence of pvl in previous studies[35, 40], was found to have a frequency of 81.3% in this study. Together, these findings indicate that S. aureus isolates in Hainan province have somewhat higher positive rates of eta and pvl. This implies that the molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates affect their virulence gene profiles, leading us to conclude that S. aureus isolates collected in Hainan have distinct virulence gene profiles compared with those collected in mainland China. In addition, compared with the 2013-2014 isolates, the S. aureus isolates collected in 2018-2019 carried more virulence genes, but their rate of MDR was lower. This trend may be related to the balance of energetic requirements[41].

Conclusions

S. aureus isolates in Hainan province have unique molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles. ST398-MSSA was the most common type of MSSA isolate and ST45-SCCmec IVa was the predominant type of MRSA isolate, neither of which had been reported in China before. Differences were also found between the antibiotic resistance and virulence gene profiles of the ST398 and ST45 isolates. ST398-MSSA showed a clear growth trend from 2013-2014 to 2018-2019, which deserves attention from public health services.

Abbreviations

S. aureus Staphylococcus aureus

MRSA Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

MSSA Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

MLST Multilocus sequence typing

SCCmec Staphylococcus chromosomal cassette mec

PVL Panton-Valentine leukocidin

CC Clonal complex

OS-MRSA Oxacillin susceptible-MRSA

MDR Multidrug resistance

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Hainan General Hospital, Haikou People’s Hospital and The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical college for providing clinical isolates and data.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81371779) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2016CFB672).

Availability of data and materials

All data supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

YL designed the studies and obtained funding; XL performed the experiments; XL and CL performed the statistical analysis; XL wrote the manuscript; YL contributed to manuscript revision; KX and TH contributed the materials. All authors read and approved the submitted version.

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hainan General Hospital. This was a retrospective study without any collection of clinical and personal information from patients, so informed consent was not required.

Authors’ information

Xuehan Li, Email: [email protected].

Kai Xu, Email: [email protected].

Chenglin Li, Email: [email protected].

Tao Huang, Email: [email protected].

Yirong Li, Email: [email protected].

References

  1. Chiu-Hsia Su, Shan-Chwen Chang, Jer-Jea Yan, Shu-Hui Tseng, Li-Jung Chien, Fang C-T. Excess Mortality and Long-Term Disability from Healthcare-Associated Staphylococcusaureus Infections: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study. PLoS One 2013; 8(8):e71055.
  2. Chen H, Liu Y, Jiang X, Chen M, Wang H. Rapid Change of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones in a Chinese Tertiary Care Hospital over a 15-Year Period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother.2010; 54(5):1842-1847.
  3. Rao Q, Rao X, Hu X, Shang W. Staphylococcus aureus ST121: a globally disseminated hypervirulent clone. J Med Microbiol.2015; 64(12):1462-1473.
  4. Bouiller K, Gbaguidi-Haore H, Hocquet D, Cholley P, Bertrand X, Chirouze C. Clonal complex 398 methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are associated with high mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect.2016; 22(5):451-455.
  5. Cheng H, Yuan W, Zeng F, Hu Q, Shang W, Tang D, Xue W, Fu J, Liu J, Liu N. et al. Molecular and phenotypic evidence for the spread of three major methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones associated with two characteristic antimicrobial resistance profiles in China. J Antimicrob Chemother.2013; 68(11):2453-2457.
  6. Htun HL, Kyaw WM, de Sessions PF, Low L, Hibberd ML, Chow A, Leo YS. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonisation: epidemiological and molecular characteristics in an acute-care tertiary hospital in Singapore. Epidemiol Infect.2018; 146(14):1785-1792.
  7. Kitti T, Seng R, Saiprom N, Thummeepak R, Chantratita N, Boonlao C, Sitthisak S. Molecular Characteristics of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci Clinical Isolates from a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Thailand. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol.2018; 2018:8457012.
  8. Peng H, Liu D, Ma Y, Gao W. Comparison of community- and healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a Chinese tertiary hospital, 2012–2017. Sci Rep.2018; 8(1):17916.
  9. O'Hara FP, Amrine-Madsen H, Mera RM, Brown ML, Close NM, Suaya JA, Acosta CJ. Molecular Characterization ofStaphylococcus aureus in the United States 2004–2008 Reveals the Rapid Expansion of USA300 Among Inpatients and Outpatients. Microb Drug Resist. 2012; 18(6):555-561.
  10. Yu F, Li T, Huang X, Xie J, Xu Y, Tu J, Qin Z, Parsons C, Wang J, Hu L, et al. Virulence gene profiling and molecular characterization of hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bloodstream infection. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012; 74(4):363-368.
  11. Liu Y, Wang H, Du N, Shen E, Chen H, Niu J, Ye H, Chen M. Molecular Evidence for Spread of Two Major Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clones with a Unique Geographic Distribution in Chinese Hospitals. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009; 53(2):512-518.
  12. Tan S, Wan C, Wang H, Zhou W, Shu M: Relationship between nasal Carrier isolates and clinical isolates in children with Staphylococcus aureus infections. Microb Pathog.2019; 233-238.
  13. Li S, Sun S, Yang C, Chen H, Yin Y, Li H, Zhao C, Wang H. The Changing Pattern of Population Structure of Staphylococcus aureus from Bacteremia in China from 2013 to 2016: ST239-030-MRSA Replaced by ST59-t437. Front Microbiol.2018; 9:332.
  14. Ding YL, Fu J, Chen J, Mo SF, Xu S, Lin N, Qin P, McGrath E. Molecular characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from children with acute otitis media in Liuzhou, China. BMC Pediatr. 2018; 18(1):338.
  15. Liu Q, Han L, Li B, Sun J, Ni Y. Virulence Characteristic and MLST-agr Genetic Background of High-Level Mupirocin-Resistant, MRSA Isolates from Shanghai and Wenzhou, China. PLoS One. 2012; 7(5): e37005.
  16. Wu D, Wang Z, Wang H, Sun L, Chen Y, Ji S, Shi K, Yu Y. Predominance of ST5-II-t311 clone among healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates recovered from Zhejiang, China. Int J Infect Dis. 2018; 71:107-112.
  17. Xie X, Bao Y, Ouyang N, Dai X, Pan K, Chen B, Deng Y, Wu X, Xu F, Li H, et al. Molecular epidemiology and characteristic of virulence gene of community-acquired and hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Sun Yat-sen Memorial hospital, Guangzhou, Southern China. BMC Infect Dis 2016, 16: 339.
  18. Liu C, Chen ZJ, Sun Z, Feng X, Zou M, Cao W, Wang S, Zeng J, Wang Y, Sun M. Molecular characteristics and virulence factors in methicillin-susceptible, resistant, and heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus from central-southern China. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2015; 48(5): 490-496.
  19. Zhang H, Xiao M, Kong F, O’Sullivan MVN, Mao L-L, Zhao H-R, Zhao Y, Wang H, Xu Y-C. A multicentre study of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections in China: susceptibility to ceftaroline and molecular epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015; 45(4): 347-50.
  20. Li X, Fang F, Zhao J, Lou N, Li C, Huang T, Li Y. Molecular characteristics and virulence gene profiles of Staphylococcus aureus causing bloodstream infection. Braz J Infect Dis. 2018; 22(6):487-494.
  21. Strommenger B, Kettlitz C, Weniger T, Harmsen D, Friedrich AW, Witte W. Assignment of Staphylococcus isolates to groups by spa typing, SmaI macrorestriction analysis, and multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2006; 44(7):2533-2540.
  22. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38:1008-1015.
  23. K. Boye, M. D. Bartels, I. S. Andersen, J. A. Møller , Westh H. A new multiplex PCR for easy screening of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus SCCmec types I–V. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007; 13:725-727.
  24. Zhang K, McClure J-A, Elsayed S, Louie T, Conly JM. Novel Multiplex PCR Assay for Characterization and Concomitant Subtyping of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Types I to V in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2005; 43(10): 5026-5033.
  25. Li T, Yu X, Xie J, Xu Y, Shang Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Qin Z, Parsons C, Hu L, et al. Carriage of virulence factors and molecular characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates associated with bloodstream, and skin and soft tissue infections in children. Epidemiol Infect. 2013; 141(10):2158-2162.
  26. Rong D, Wu Q, Xu M, Zhang J, Yu S. Prevalence, Virulence Genes, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Genetic Diversity of Staphylococcus aureus from Retail Aquatic Products in China. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:714.
  27. Yu Y, Yao Y, Weng Q, Li J, Huang J, Liao Y, Zhu F, Zhao Q, Shen X, Niu J. Dissemination and Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus at a Tertiary Referral Hospital in Xiamen City, China. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 1367179.
  28. He W, Chen H, Zhao C, Zhang F, Li H, Wang Q, Wang X, Wang H: Population structure and characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus from bacteraemia at multiple hospitals in China: association between antimicrobial resistance, toxin genes and genotypes. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2013; 42(3):211-219.
  29. Wang Y, Liu Q, Liu Q, Gao Q, Lu H, Meng H, Xie Y, Huang Q, Ma X, Wang H, et al. Phylogenetic analysis and virulence determinant of the host-adapted Staphylococcus aureus lineage ST188 in China. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018; 7(1):45.
  30. Dai Y, Liu J, Guo W, Meng H, Huang Q, He L, Gao Q, Lv H, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Decreasing methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections is attributable to the disappearance of predominant MRSA ST239 clones, Shanghai, 2008 – 2017. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2019; 8(1):471-478.
  31. Dermota U, Mueller-Premru M, Švent-Kučina N, Petrovič Ž, Ribič H, Rupnik M, Janežič S, Zdovc I, Grmek-Košnik I. Survey of community-associated-methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Slovenia: Identification of community-associated and livestock-associated clones. Int J Med Microbiol. 2015; 305(6):505-510.
  32. Olivier Denis AD, Claire Nonhoff, Raf De Ryck, Ricardo de Mendonc¸a, Sylvianne Rottiers, Raymond Vanhoof, and Marc J. Struelens. National Surveillance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Belgian Hospitals Indicates Rapid Diversification of Epidemic Clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004; 48(9):3625-3629.
  33. Ho P-L, Chow K-H, Lo P-Y, Lee K-F, Lai EL. Changes in the epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with spread of the ST45 lineage in Hong Kong. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009; 64(2):131-137.
  34. Luczak-Kadlubowska A, Sulikowska A, Empel J, Piasecka A, Orczykowska M, Kozinska A, Hryniewicz W. Countrywide Molecular Survey of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains in Poland. J Clin Microbiol. 2008; 46(9):2930-2937.
  35. Jewell P, Dixon L, Singanayagam A, Ghani R, Wong E, Coleman M, Pichon B, Kearns A, Russell G, Hatcher J. Severe Disseminated Infection with Emerging Lineage of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019; 25(1):187-189.
  36. F. Valour, J.Tasse, S. Trouillet-Assant, J.-P. Rasigade, B. Lamy, E. Chanard, P. Verhoeven, J.-W. Decousser, H. Marchandin, M. Bes, et al. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398: high prevalence and geographical heterogeneity in bone and joint infection and nasal carriage. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014; 20:O772-O775.
  1. Diep BA and Otto M. The role of virulence determinants in community-associated MRSA pathogenesis. Trends Microbiol. 2008; 16(8):361-369.
  2. Yu F, Yang L, Pan J, Chen C, Du J, Li Q, Huang J, Zhang X, Wang L. Prevalence of virulence genes among invasive and colonising Staphylococcus aureus isolates. J Hosp Infect 2011; 77(1):89-91.
  3. Wang X, Li X, Liu W, Huang W, Fu Q, Li M. Molecular Characteristic and Virulence Gene Profiles of Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Pediatric Patients in Shanghai, China. Front Microbiol 2016, 7:1818.
  4. Uhlemann AC, McAdam PR, Sullivan SB, Knox JR, Khiabanian H, Rabadan R, Davies PR, Fitzgerald JR, FD. L. Evolutionary Dynamics of Pandemic Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus ST398 and Its International Spread via Routes of Human Migration. MBio. 2017, 8(1).
  5. He L, Zheng H-X, Wang Y, Le KY, Liu Q, Shang J, Dai Y, Meng H, Wang X, Li T, et al. Detection and analysis of methicillin-resistant human-adapted sequence type 398 allows insight into community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus evolution. Genome Med. 2018, 10(1):5.

 

Tables

Table 1  Primers used in MLST, spa, SCCmec typing, and the results of SCCmec types I–V 

Primer

Nucleotide sequence(5'-3')         

Target

Amplicon size(bp)

SCCmec type

gene

 I

 II

 III

 IV

IVa

IVb

IVc

IVd

V

β

ATTGCCTTGATAATAGCCYTCT

ccrA2-B

937

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

a3

TAAAGGCATCAATGCACAAACACT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ccrCF

CGTCTATTACAAGATGTTAAGGATAAT

ccrC

518

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

X

ccrCR

CCTTTATAGACTGGATTATTCAAAATAT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1272F1

GCCACTCATAACATATGGAA

IS1272

415

X

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

1272R1

CATCCGAGTGAAACCCAAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5RmecA

TATACCAAACCCGACAACTAC

mecA–IS431

359

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

5R431

CGGCTACAGTGATAACATCC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type IVa-F

GCCTTATTCGAAGAAACCG

 

776

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

Type IVa-R

CTACTCTTCTGAAAAGCGTCG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type IVb-F

TCTGGAATTACTTCAGCTGC

 

493

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

Type IVb-R

AAACAATATTGCTCTCCCTC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type IVc-F

ACAATATTTGTATTATCGGAGAGC

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

Type IVc-R

TTGGTATGAGGTATTGCTGG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Type IVd-F

CTCAAAATACGGACCCCAATACA

 

881

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

Type IVd-R

TGCTCCAGTAATTGCTAAAG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spa-1113f

TAAAGACGATCCTTCGGTGAGC

spa

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Spa-1514r

CAGCAGTAGTGCCGTTTGCTT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

arcC-F

TTGATTCACCAGCGCGTATTGTC

arcC

456

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

arcC-R

AGG TATCTGCTTCAATCAGCG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aroE-F

ATCGGAAATCCTATTTCACATTC

aroE

456

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

aroE-R

GGTGTTGTATTAATAACGATATC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glpF-F

CTAGGAACTGCAATCTTAATCC

glpF

465

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

glpF-R

TGGTAAAATCGCATGTCCAATTC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gmk-F

ATCGTTTTATCGGGACCATC

  gmk

417

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

gmk-R

TCATTAACTACAACGTAATCGTA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pta-F

GTTAAAATCGTATTACCTGAAGG

pta

474

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

pta-R

GACCCTTTTGTTGAAAAGCTTAA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tpi-F

TCGTTCATTCTGAACGTCGTGAA

tpi

402

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

tpi-R

TTTGCACCTTCTAACAATTGTAC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yqiL-F

CAGCATACAGGACACCTATTGGC

yqiL

516

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

yqiL-R

CGTTGAGGAATCGATACTGGAAC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PVL-F

ATCATTAGGTAAAATGTCTGGACATGATCCA

pvl

433

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PVL-R

GCATCAASTGTATTGGATAGCAAAAGC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FnbA-F

GTGAAGTTTTAGAAGGTGGAAAGATTAG

fnbA

643

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FnbA-R

GCTCTTGTAAGACCATTTTTCTTCAC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FnbB-F 

GTAACAGCTAATGGTCGAATTGATACT

fnbB

524

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FnbB-R

CAAGTTCGATAGGAGTACTATGTTC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hla-F

CTGATTACTATCCAAGAAATTCGATTG

hla

209

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hla-R

CTTTCCAGCCTACTTTTTTATCAGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hlb-F

GTGCACTTACTGACAATAGTGC

hlb

309

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Hlb-R

GTTGATGAGTAGCTACCTTCAGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sea-F

GAAAAAAGTCTGAATTGCAGGGAACA

sea

560

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sea-R

CAAATAAATCGTAATTAACCGAAGGTTC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seb-F      

ATTCTATTAAGGACACTAAGTTAGGGA

seb

 404

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seb-R

ATCCCGTTTCATAAGGCGAGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sec-F

GTAAAGTTACAGGTGGCAAAACTTG

sec

 297

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sec-R

CATATCATACCAAAAAGTATTGCCGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

eta-F

CGCTGCGGACATTCCTACATGG

   eta

 676

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

eta-R

TACATGCCCGCCACTTGCTTGT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

etb-F

CAGATAAAGAGCTTTATACACACATTAC

etb

 612

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

etb-R

AGTGAACTTATCTTTCTATTGAAAAACACTC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

clfA-F

ATTGGCGTGGCTTCAGTGCT

clfa

 292

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

clfA-R

CGTTTCTTCCGTAGTTGCATTTG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2  Antimicrobial resistance profiles of main types of S. aureus isolates.

 

Resistant isolates  n(%)

 

 

isolatesn

CLI

ERY

OXA

PEN

FOX

SXT

RIF

VAN

LZD

LEV

GEN

TET

MDR

2013-2014 (91)

44(48.4)

50(54.9)

33(36.3)

82(90.1)

33(36.3)

59(64.8)

9(9.9)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

10(11.0)

15(16.5)

32(35.2)

56(61.5)

 

2018-2019 (136)

50(36.8)

61(44.9)

42(30.9)

128(94.1)

43(31.6)

8(5.9)

11(8.1)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

12(8.8)

12(8.8)

53(39.0)

57(41.9)

 

ST398 (32)

9(28.1)

13(40.6)

2(6.3)

31(96.9)

2(6.3)

5(15.6)

2(6.3)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

5(15.6)

5(15.6)

17(53.1)

12(37.5)

 

ST188 (30)

6(20.0)

8(26.7)

1(3.3)

26(86.7)

1(3.3)

12(40.0)

1(3.3)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

2(6.7)

1(3.3)

8(26.7)

9(30.0)

 

ST45 (23)

9(39.1)

12(52.2)

20(87.0)

23(100.0)

20(87.0)

10(43.5)

2(8.7)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

12(52.2)

MRSA (76)

49(64.5)

57(75.0)

75(98.7)

76(100.0)

76(100.0)

26(34.2)

13(17.1)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

12(15.8)

14(18.4)

26(34.2)

56(73.7)

MSSA (151)

45(29.8)

54(35.8)

0(0.0)

134(88.7)

0(0.0)

41(27.2)

7(4.6)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

10(6.6)

13(8.6)

59(39.1)

57(37.7)

Total (227)

94(41.4)

111(48.9)

75(33.0)

210(92.5)

76(33.5)

67(29.5)

20(8.8)

0(0.0)

0(0.0)

22(9.7)

27(11.9)

85(37.4)

113(49.8)

P valuea

0.082

0.136

0.398

0.261

0.398

<0.01

0.639

0.589

0.081

0.561

0.004

P valueb

<0.01

<0.01

<0.01

0.002

<0.01

0.271

0.002

0.028

0.031

0.475

<0.01

CLI clindamycin, ERY erythromycin, OXA oxacillin, PEN penicillin, FOX cefoxitin, SXT trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, RIF rifampicin,  VAN vancomycin, LZD linezolid, LEV levofloxacin, GEN gentamicin, TET tetracycline. MDR multidrug-resistant.

aThe resistance rate of S. aureus isolates to antibiotics in 2013-2014 were compared with those in 2018-2019.

bThe resistance rate to antibiotics in MRSA isolates were compared with those in MSSA isolates.

 

Table 3  Molecular characteristics of S. aureus isolates collected in this study

CC (no.)

2013-2014 (91 isolates)

2018-2019 (136 isolates)

 

MLST(no.)

spa(no.)

MRSA(no.)

MSSA(no.)

SCCmec(no.)

MLST(no.)

spa(no.)

MRSA(no.)

MSSA(no.)

SCCmec(no.)

CC398(32)

ST398(5)

t011(3)

 

3

 

ST398(27)

t011(12)

 

12

 

 

 

t034(2)

 

2

 

 

t034(9)

2

7

V(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t1451(3)

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t571(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t1580 (1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NT(1)

 

1

 

CC59(30)

ST59(8)

t437(4)

1

3

IVa(1)

ST59(14)

t437(12)

9

 

IVa(5), V(4)

 

 

t441(1)

1

 

V(1)

 

t3385(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

t1212(1)

 

1

 

 

t5795(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

t2356(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

ST338(3)

t437(1)

 

1

 

 

 

t3592(1)

1

 

V(1)

 

t1751(2)

2

 

V(1),NT(1)

 

ST338(2)

t1751(2)

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST1778(2)

t437(1)

 

1

 

ST2041(1)

t13874(1)

 

1

 

 

 

t2365(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

 

 

 

CC188(30)

ST188(13)

t189(12)

 

12

 

ST188(17)

t189(16)

1

15

IVa(1)

 

 

t4950(1)

 

1

 

 

t2174(1)

 

1

 

CC45(25)

ST45(13)

t116(10)

8

2

IVa(8)

ST45(10)

t116(7)

6

1

IVa(6)

 

 

t015(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t026(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

t2131(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t157(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

NT(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t3349(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST508(2)

t1203(1)

1

 

NT(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t908(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

CC5(17)

ST5(6)

t002(3)

 

3

 

ST5(8)

t2358(2)

2

 

IVa(2)

 

 

t954(1)

 

1

 

 

t548(1)

 

1

 

 

 

t6212(1)

 

1

 

 

t777(1)

 

1

 

 

 

t2358(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t1265(1)

 

1

 

 

ST965(1)

t062(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t179(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t2980(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t9987(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST764(1)

t1084(1)

1

 

II(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST2633(1)

t010(1)

 

1

 

CC88(16)

ST88(8)

t1376(4)

1

3

II(1)

ST88(8)

t1376(3)

1

2

IVa(1)

 

 

t2592(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

t4333(2)

 

2

 

 

 

t3622(1)

 

1

 

 

NT(3)

 

3

 

 

 

t15796(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NT(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC7(15)

ST7(4)

t091(4)

 

4

 

ST7(10)

t091(7)

 

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t867(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t2874(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t3932(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST789(1)

t2453(1)

 

1

 

CC1(14)

ST1(4)

t127(1)

 

1

 

ST1(8)

t127(5)

1

4

NT(1)

 

 

t2207(3)

3

 

NT(3)

 

t2207(2)

2

 

NT(2)

 

ST610(1)

t2207(1)

1

 

II(1)

 

t114(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST2583(1)

t1381(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

CC8(8)

ST239(3)

t030(2)

2

 

III(2)

ST239(3)

t030(2)

2

 

III(2)

 

 

t037(1)

1

 

III(1)

 

t037(1)

1

 

III(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST630(2)

t377(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t4549(1)

 

1

 

CC2580(6)

ST2580(5)

t3351(4)

4

 

IVa(1), IVc(3)

ST2580(1)

t3351(1)

1

 

IVc(1)

 

 

t4875(1)

1

 

IVc(1)

 

 

 

 

 

CC72(6)

ST72(2)

t148(2)

 

2

 

ST72(4)

t148(3)

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t3092(1)

 

1

 

CC121(5)

ST121(4)

t269(1)

 

1

 

ST120(1)

t2613(1)

1

 

NT(1)

 

 

t162(2)

 

2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t159(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC97(3)

ST464(1)

t3992(1)

 

1

 

ST97(1)

t267(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST464(1)

t3904(1)

 

1

 

CC9(2)

ST9(1)

t899(1)

 

1

 

ST9(1)

t899(1)

1

 

I(1)

CC15(2)

ST15(1)

t1492(1)

 

1

 

ST15(1)

t085(1)

 

1

 

CC509(2)

 

 

 

 

 

ST509(2)

t375(2)

1

1

IVa(1)

CC1281(2)

 

 

 

 

 

ST1281(2)

t164(2)

 

2

 

CC2196(2)

 

 

 

 

 

ST2196(2)

NT(2)

 

2

 

Singletons(3)

ST6(1)

t304(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ST25(1)

t280(1)

 

1

 

 

ST944(1)

t616(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

NT(7)

NT(6)

t084(1)

 

1

 

NT(1)

t1987(1)

 

1

 

 

 

t796(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t084(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t037(1)

1

 

IVa(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t091(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

t12584(1)

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

                       

NT: non-typeable

 

Table 4  The frequencies of virulence genes among main types of S. aureus isolates

 

Virulence

genes

 

S. aureus

(n=227)n(%)

MRSA

(n=76)n(%)

MSSA

(n=151)n(%)

ST398n=32)n(%)

ST188n=30)n(%)

ST45

(n=23)n(%)

2013-2014 (n=91)n(%)

2018-2019 (n=136)n(%)

P valuea

P valueb

pvl

108(47.6)

31(40.8)

77(51.0)

26(81.3)

11(36.7)

4(17.4)

25(27.5)

83(61.0)

0.146

<0.01

fnbA

87(35.7)

36(47.4)

51(33.8)

7(21.9)

7(23.3)

10(43.5)

33(36.3)

54(39.7)

0.047

0.601

fnbB

113(49.8)

31(40.8)

82(54.3)

31(96.9)

6(20.0)

6(26.1)

19(20.9)

94(69.1)

0.055

<0.01

hla

224(98.7)

74(97.4)

150(99.3)

32(100.0)

29(96.7)

23(100.0)

91(100.0)

133(97.8)

0.542

0.405

hlb

161(70.9)

51(67.1)

110(72.8)

20(62.5)

19(63.3)

6(26.1)

44(48.4)

117(86.0)

0.369

<0.01

sea

35(15.4)

18(23.7)

17(11.3)

5(15.6)

2(6.7)

1(4.3)

13(14.3)

22(16.2)

0.014

0.699

seb

108(47.6)

38(50.0)

70(46.4)

11(34.4)

18(60.0)

8(34.8)

35(38.5)

73(53.7)

0.604

0.024

sec

63(27.8)

38(50.0)

25(16.6)

2(6.3)

5(16.7)

22(95.7)

28(30.8)

35(25.7)

<0.01

0.406

eta

130(57.3)

47(61.8)

83(55.0)

24(75.0)

14(46.7)

22(95.7)

21(23.1)

109(80.1)

0.323

<0.01

etb

43(18.9)

15(19.7)

28(18.5)

10(31.3)

6(20.0)

3(13.0)

0(0.0)

43(31.6)

0.829

<0.01

clfA

227(100.0)

76(100.0)

151(100.0)

32(100.0)

30(100.0)

23(100.0)

91(100.0)

136(100.0)

 

aThe positive rates of virulence genes in MRSA isolates were compared with those in MSSA isolates. 

bThe positive rates of virulence genes of S. aureus isolates in 2013-2014 were compared with those in 2018-2019.