Considerable efforts have devoted to come-out with a highly effective as well as long-lasting vaccine. Several gene candidates were explored and well-studied. A great advancement has been achieved through different vaccine development approaches varying from a genetically or chemically attenuated vaccines as well as vector-borne by utilizing adenovirus or subunit vaccines [5, 6], interestingly, all these vaccines are under clinical trial ranging from pre-clinical to stage four clinical trials.
Despite the improvement in acquiring potential vaccine candidate, major scientific obstacles remain as significant challenges for malaria vaccine design and development. This includes: short-term protection, the route of administration either intravenously or intradermally, and the appropriate dosage that will elicit an effectively controlled immunity without harming the immunized individual, however, the most tedious issue is antigenic diversity which acts as a major obstacle toward vaccine development [6]. Antigenic polymorphism within the central region of the RTS,S has been considered as the most threatening element for its efficacy [8, 9, and 10]. Therefore, the current study was aiming to identify the most prominent molecular variant within central repeat region along with their distribution for P. falciparum among the study participants of selected malaria patient in Omdurman, Sudan.
As the preliminary investigation for the parasite occurrence was achieved using two different diagnostic techniques a comparison has established between them, out of 50 positive P. falciparum mono-infection and co-infection only 20 samples were confirmed positive by nested PCR indicating for ICT test inefficiency, and this was comparable with study conducted in India where many cases were misdiagnosed by RDT [1]. Overall, this false positive result could be attributed to a recent antimalarial uptake and the presence of serum rheumatoid factor [12]. In this study, we postulated that many of the study participants might have received un-prescribe treatment as it is a common phenomenon among the study population, and also spontaneous resolution of untreated infections along with the persistent HRP2 in the circulation is relatively proposed as causative factor of this result, additionally, false positive could be due to heterophilic antibodies [12, 13]. Also, storage condition could have a remarkable impact on the accuracy of the ICT performance [14], furthermore, PCR accuracy in identifying Plasmodium spp is directly rely on the quality of the extracted DNA, the reagents, and amplification condition [15].
In contrast, nested PCR showed high sensitivity over the ICT test as six out of nine negative ICT have been detected positive by nPCR, and this might be attributed to the low level of parasitemia [16], also little expression of the target gene might decrease the threshold of the circulating antigen thus hinder their detection [14, 16]. Conversely, hyperparasitemia would have a negative impact by causing antigenic overload which possibly influences parasite diagnosis [14]. Additionally, one sample was misdiagnosed as co-infected specimen by malaria ICT but confirmed as P. falciparum mono-infection when nPCR was applied, this observation is in line with the study conducted in India where ICT based in HRP2 failed to identify and distinguish between mono-infected P. falciparum cases and co-infected cases [1].
Likewise, the deletion within already applied gene segment for ICT diagnostic kits, which has been reported in different geographical regions such as; Eriteria [17], Peru [18], Colombia [19] for hrp2 will contributed to its inefficiency for malaria diagnosis [14], however, this could not be considered as main causes of false negative result in this study, due to the lack of information about the distribution of this phenomenon within the study area.
For cs central repeat region, only 14 amplicons were obtained with no clear variation was observe between them as illustrated with gel image in (Figure 4) this finding indicates for possibly no variation within repeat number among study participants which contradicts with several studies that showed a variable number of repeats based on nucleotide sequence analysis [8, 9, 10]. However, as the study is ongoing more details are prospected after achieving the sequence analysis that will give exact information about the sequence of the already obtained amplicons; Consequently, this result gives no clear explanation about the genetic diversity within this region for Sudanese selected isolates. However, this study has raised many questions expected to be answered in near future. As the study is progressing, the limitations such as a few sample size and DNA sequencing analysis will be covered for more insights about the studied region.