Penetrating abdominal trauma involves external objects/ballistics violating anterior abdominal wall into the peritoneal cavity(4). The increase in violence among the civilian populations has increased the spectrum of trauma injuries resembling those seen in war zones. (5), thus making the urban trauma surgeon working in civilian populations facing similar trauma cases as his colleague in war zones. This has been due to the availability of weapons, and presence of military conflicts(4)(5). However spectrum of injuries in war zones is different as most assaulting objects are high velocity ballistics(6)The trauma surgeon is facing a wider spectrum of intra-abdominal injuries due to a wide range of instruments/weapons available among the civilian population. Nyongole et al found 69% of penetrating abdominal trauma patients were due to assaults(2).The most common causes of penetrating abdominal injuries faced by the trauma surgeon are stab wounds (31%), gunshot wounds(64%), shotgun wounds (5%)(4)(5) and industrial accidents(4), with gunshot wounds having a wider spectrum of intra-peritoneal organ injuries and most often require exploration (5). The four cases presented ranged from gunshot injury, stab wounds by knife, screw driver and broken bottle. All cases were results from assaults and conflicts.
The pattern of intra-peritoneal organs injury involves small bowel (50%), colon (40%), liver (30%), and intra-peritoneal vasculature (25%) injuries(4)(5). Close contact trauma inflicted wounds have greater kinetic energy thus inflict wider spectrum of intra-peritoneal injury(4)(5). Magnitude of injury depends on viscera affected, nature of assaulting object and the quantity of energy transmitted(4). Spectrum of injuries can be increased by injuries from patients own bone fragments or bullets fragments(4)(5). The pattern of injuries from the cases presented ranged from Inferior Vena Cava injury, small bowel, gastric and large bowel traumatic perforations. The spectrum of injuries seen, vasculature trauma was diagnosed intra-operative as seen in case one as the pre-operative diagnostic radiological modalities such as Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma (FAST) are limited in diagnosis of vessel injury. Advanced imaging technology increases diagnostic accuracy of injuries(5).
Diagnosing full extent of intra-peritoneal injuries from clinical assessment is difficult as injuries are concealed as peritonism and hypovolemic shock may still occur in conscious individuals(4). Standard pre-operative radiological assessment includes x-rays, CT scans, and MRI due to the wide spectrum of injuries(4)(5).
However even with clinically stable patients without any signs of peritonism might still require advance radiological investigations to diagnose concealed intra-peritoneal viscera injury(4). Preferred radiological diagnostic tool is the triple contrast CT scan(4). This is not always available in all limited resource centers.
The standard management protocol for penetrating abdominal trauma is laparotomy(5). From a clinical standpoint surgical indications for exploration are hemodynamic unstable patient, development of signs of peritonism and unresolving diffuse abdominal pain(4). However for patients who are haemodynamically stable, with no signs of peritonism and have been evaluated with triple contrast CT scan, laparotomy maybe withheld and observed(5)(11). Care should be taken as medication may affect blood pressure values with patients with higher pain threshold withstanding clinical signs and symptoms of peritonitis(7) .However there is a high incidence of intra-peritoneal viscera injury with patients presenting with bowels eviscerations thus mandating exploration(12)(13)(14)(15)(9). This was the observation in all the four cases presented as all had intra-peritoneal organs eviscerations and had accompanying viscera injuries which needed theraupetic surgical repair (Fig. 1–4). Bowel eviscerations occurs post recent laparotomy in wound dehiscence and penetrating abdominal trauma due to slash or stab wounds to the anterior abdominal wall(16). Kong et al found the most commonly eviscerated organs were small bowel (70%), large bowel (26%), and Gastrium 3%(13). In our cases three patients had small bowel evisceration with other intra-peritoneal viscera injury. Only (1%) of the patients by Kong et al had combined evisceration of more than one intra-peritoneal viscera(13). One case in our cases series had combined omentum and transverse colon evisceration. He had sustained anterior abdominal wall umbilical area broken beer bottle stab wound. However combined omental and viscera evisceration post anterior abdominal stab wound is uncommon(9).
Prognosis of intra-peritoneal injuries depends on extent of trauma, time of presentation, intestinal contents peritoneal cavity contamination, haemorrhage, wide spectrum of organ injury, female sex(5), accompanying brain trauma, or bleeding disorders increases the mortality rate(4).
Inferior vena cava injuries are rare vascular injuries due to its retro-peritoneal location and buffer from intra-peritoneal organs. In our case the assaulting weapon was a long 10 inch screw driver which could transverse through the anterior abdominal wall and cushioning intra-peritoneal organs to reach the inferior vena cava.
It is however the most injured intra-abdominal vascular structure constituting to 25% of abdominal vascular injuries(17). The most often injured segment of the inferior vena cava is the infra-renal segment (39%)(18). Mortality rates are high (65%) due to insufficient fluid replacement, challenges in diagnosis and skillset in management(18), with little improvements over the last four decades(17).
Inferior vena cava injuries are generally diagnosed intra-operatively and are accompanied with other peritoneal organs injuries with retro-peritoneal haematoma(19). This was also the observation in our case as the IVC lesion was concealed by a huge retroperitoneal haematoma. They are normally overlooked when accompanied with other intra-peritoneal injuries.