1.Bassett DR, Troiano RP, McClain JJ, Wolff DL. Accelerometer-based physical activity: total volume per day and standardized measures. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(4):833–8.
2.Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(1 Suppl 1):S68–76.
3.Pedisic Z, Bauman A. Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues. Brit J Sport Med. 2015;49(4):219-U25.
4.Trost SG, McIver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531–S43.
5.Aadland E, Ylvisåker E. Reliability of objectively measured sedentary time and physical activity in adults. PloS one. 2015;10(7):e0133296.
6.Byun W, Beets MW, Pate RR. Sedentary Behavior in Preschoolers: How Many Days of Accelerometer Monitoring Is Needed? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(10):13148–61.
7.Dillon CB, Fitzgerald AP, Kearney PM, Perry IJ, Rennie KL, Kozarski R, et al. Number of Days Required to Estimate Habitual Activity Using Wrist-Worn GENEActiv Accelerometer: A Cross-Sectional Study. PloS one. 2016;11(5):e0109913.
8.Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(10):1167–72.
9.Hart TL, Swartz AM, Cashin SE, Strath SJ. How many days of monitoring predict physical activity and sedentary behaviour in older adults? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:62.
10.Levin S, Jacobs J, D. R., Ainsworth BE, Richardson MT, Leon AS. Intra-individual variation and estimates of usual physical activity. Ann Epidemiol. 1999;9(8):481–8.
11.Mattocks C, Ness A, Leary S, Tilling K, Blair SN, Shield J, et al. Use of accelerometers in a large field-based study of children: protocols, design issues, and effects on precision. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5 Suppl 1:S98–111.
12.Ojiambo R, Cuthill R, Budd H, Konstabel K, Casajus JA, Gonzalez-Aguero A, et al. Impact of methodological decisions on accelerometer outcome variables in young children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011;35 Suppl 1:S98–103.
13.Ridgers ND, Hnatiuk JA, Vincent GE, Timperio A, Barnett LM, Salmon J. How many days of monitoring are needed to reliably assess SenseWear Armband outcomes in primary school-aged children? J Sci Med Sport. 2016.
14.Trost SG, Pate RR, Freedson PS, Sallis JF, Taylor WC. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(2):426–31.
15.Wickel EE, Eisenmann JC. Within- and between-individual variability in estimated energy expenditure and habitual physical activity among young adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60(4):538–44.
16.Barreira TV, Schuna JM, Tudor-Locke C, Chaput J-P, Church TS, Fogelholm M, et al. Reliability of accelerometer-determined physical activity and sedentary behavior in school-aged children: a 12-country study. International Journal of Obesity Supplements. 2015;5(Suppl 2):S29-S35.
17.Coleman KJ, Epstein LH. Application of generalizability theory to measurement of activity in males who are not regularly active: a preliminary report. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 1998;69(1):58–63.
18.Pitchford EA, Ketcheson LR, Kwon H-J, Ulrich DA. Minimum Accelerometer Wear Time in Infants: A Generalizability Study. Journal of Physical Activity & Health. 2017;14(6):421–8.
19.Wickel EE, Welk GJ. Applying generalizability theory to estimate habitual activity levels. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(8):1528–34.
20.Beaton GH. Approaches to analysis of dietary data: relationship between planned analyses and choice of methodology. Am J Clin Nutr. 1994;59(1 Suppl):253S–61S.
21.Gibson RS. Principles of nutritional assessment. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. 2005.
22.Bergman P. The number of repeated observations needed to estimate the habitual physical activity of an individual to a given level of precision. PloS one. 2018;13(2):e0192117.
23.Vanhelst J, Mikulovic J, Bui-Xuan G, Dieu O, Blondeau T, Fardy P, et al. Comparison of two ActiGraph accelerometer generations in the assessment of physical activity in free living conditions. BMC Res Notes. 2012;5:187.
24.Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777–81.
25.Wolak ME, Fairbairn DJ, Paulsen YR. Guidelines for Estimating Repeatability. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(1):129–137. 2012.
26.Cole TJ, Black AE. Statistical aspects in the design of dietary surveys. MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit scientific report 4 Southampton, UK. 1984:5–7.
27.Lee PH. Determining the optimal number of wearing-days given a fixed number of accelerometers in population-level study. J Epidemiol. 2018.
28.Liu K, Stamler J, Dyer A, McKeever J, McKeever P. Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31(6–7):399–418.
29.Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(9):1502–8.
30.Shephard RJ, Aoyagi Y. Seasonal variations in physical activity and implications for human health. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2009;107(3):251–71.
31.Wu Y-T, Luben R, Wareham N, Griffin S, Jones AP. Weather, day length and physical activity in older adults: Cross-sectional results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Norfolk Cohort. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177767.