2.1.1 Materials and chemicals
The High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) system, Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000, equipped with a binary pump, an auto-sampler, a column oven, and a diode array UV/VIS detector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA). HPLC-grade acetonitrile and methanol were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) and ACS reagent grade formic acid was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultrapure water used for the HPLC analysis was purified by Puris-Evo UP Water system with Evo-UP Dio VFT and Evo-ROP Dico20 (Mirae ST Co., Ltd., Anyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Reference standard compounds, amentoflavone and quercetin were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Quercitrin was obtained from ChemFaces (Wuhan, China). The purity of all reference standard was above 95%.
2.1.2Preparation of standards and sample solution
Stock solutions of amentoflavone, quercetin and quercitrin were prepared by dissolving in methanol at a concentration of 1000 µg/mL. Then, three stock solutions were diluted to a final concentration of 100 µg/mL of each compound to prepare a mixed working solution. The water extract of Thuja orientalis Folium (TOF), an analytical sample, was prepared by dissolving it in methanol at a concentration of 10 mg/mL. All solutions of standards and sample used for analysis were filtered using 0.22 µm PTFE membrane filters (Whatman International ltd., Maidstone, UK), and were stored at 4°C until analysis.
2.1.3 HPLC-UV/Vis analysis
In order to achieve identify three components, amentoflavone, quercetin and quercitrin in Thuja orientalis Folium (TOF), HPLC-UV/Vis analysis was performed via HPLC system, Thermo Dionex UltiMate 3000. The analysis conditions were conducted by referring to and modifying the method of the reported literature[17]. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a Thermo Acclaim® 120 C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm), and the mobile phase composition was consisted of 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in water (A) and acetonitrile (B). To improve chromatographic separation capacity, the gradient elution system was programmed at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min as follows: 10% B, 0.0 min; 10–60% B, 0.0–40.0 min; 60% B, 40.0–45.0 min; 60–100% B, 45.0–50.0 min; 100% B, 50.0–55.0 min; 100 − 10% B, 55.0-55.5 min; 10% B, 55.5–65.0 min. The temperature of the column was maintained at 30 oC, and the injection volume of each sample was 5 µL. The detection wavelengths for all analytes, amentoflavone, quercetin and quercitrin were set at 365 nm. Data acquisition and analysis were performed via Dionex Chromelon software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
2.2 Cells and Viruses
RAW 264.7 cells (Mouse Leukemic Monocyte Macrophage cell line; ATCCTIB-71) were acquired originally ATCC and were passaged in Le Roswell Park Menorial Institute medium (RPMI; Hyclone, Logan, UT), and cell culture flasks supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) and antibiotic/ antimycotic solution (Gibco) at 37℃ and 5% CO2. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged Influenza A (A/PR8/34(H1N1))-GFP and A/PR/34/(H1N1) viruses were provided by Dr. Jong-Soo Lee (Chungnam National University, Daejeon, South Korea). Stock viruses were prepared in the allantoic flu;id of 10-d-old chicken embryos.
2.3 Cell Cytotoxicity
The Cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to evaluate the cyototoxicity of TOF in the cells, according to the manufacturer’s recommendation (Dojindo, Rockville, MD, USA). RAW 264.7 cells were seeded into 24-well plates at a density of 1 x 105 cells/well and cultured overnight before the TOF treatment. TOF was added to the wells at various concentrations (0, 10, 50 ,100, 200, 500 and 1000 µg/mL). After 24hr of incubation, 10 µLCCK-8 was added to the cells, and they were then incubated for 2 h at 37℃, after which the absorbance at 450 nm was measured using spectrophotometer (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA).
2.4 Anti-viral activity against influenza viruses
The influenza PR8-GFP and H1N1 viruses were mixed with TOF and incubated for 1 h at 4 ℃ and the mixtures were then added to RAW 264.7 cells for 2 h at 37 ℃. After washing with PBS, the cells were further incubated for 24 h until GFP expression. To investigate the effects of TOF, the levels of GFP expression in the cells infected with PR8-GFP IAV were observed under fluorescence microscopy (Nikon ECLOPSE Ti-U, Nikon Co., Japan) and photographed or assessed using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis.
2.5 Time of addition Assay
Time of addition assays were used to assess the attachment, entry, and virucidal stages. In the attachment stages, RAW 264.7 cells were infected with TOF 200 µg/mL and PR8-GFP IAV at 4℃ for 30 min. After washing, the cells were incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. In the virucidal stages, PR8-GFP IAV and TOF were incubated at 4℃ for 30 min, and then the mixture was added to the cells and incubated at 37℃ for 30 min, and after washing. The cell were incubated at 37℃ for 24 h. All stages were analyzed using a fluorescence microscope and FACS.
2.6 Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis
TOF was incubated with PR8-GFP IAV for 1 h at 4℃ and then treated with the RAW 264.7 cells for 24 h at 37℃. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15 000 rpm for 10 min at 4℃, washed thrice with cold PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. The cells were resuspended in PBS and analysed for GFP expression using a CytoPLEX flow cell counter (Beckman Coluter Inc., Pasadena, CA, USA)
2.7 Western Blotting analysis
Western blotting analysis was performed to determine the induction of viral protein (NP, NS1, PA, HA, M2, M1, NA, PB1, PB2) with a bicinchoninic acid reagent (Thermo Scientific). Equal protein (approximately 20µg) amounts were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulfate gels using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to 0.45-mm polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore). After blocking in 5% BSA for 1 h, the membranes were reprobed with each primary antibody overnight at 4℃. The membranes were then washed three times using 0.05% PBST and incubated for 1 h with the respective HRP-conjugated secondary antibody. Western blots were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Thermo Scientific), and GAPDH was used as the control.
2.8 Immunofluorescence staining
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described. RAW 264.7 cells (1 × 105) grown on 4-well tissue culture slides, were incubated at 37℃ for 12 h. The medium was then removed, and the cells were washed with cold PBS three times and infected with A/PuertoRico/8/34 (MOI 1) for 2 h. The virus and medium were then removed and the cells were washed with PBS three times. Complete medium was then added to the cells, and the cells were incubated at 37℃ with 5% CO2 for 24 h, cells were washed with cold PBS and fixed with cold absolute methanol for 10 min and 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at RT and permeabilized with 1% Triton X-100 in TBS for 15 min at RT. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), the cells were subjected to blocking with 1% BSA-PBS for 30 min and incubated with antibodies against influenza viral protein for 1 h at room temperature. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST), the cells were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-tagged secondary antibody in PBST for 1 h in the dark, followed by incubation with Hoechst 33342 for 5 min. The images of the red viral proteins and blue nuclei were visualized under fluorescent microscopy.
2.9 Hemagglutination(HA) assay
The influenza A (H1N1) viruses were incubated with TOF for 1 h at 4℃, and the mixture was added to RAW 264.7 cells for 2 h at 37℃. After washing with PBS they were incubated for another 24 h, then the supernatants were collected for the HA assay. Briefly, the supernatant was subjected to a serial two-fold dilution and added to a round-bottom 96-well-plate. The blank medium was used as a negative control. Each sample was mixed with 1% chicken RBCs (Innovative Research, Inc., Southfield, MI, USA) in PBS buffer. After incubation for 1 h at room temperature, the incubated plates were photographed.
2.10 Statistical analysis
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Statistically significant differences among the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by post-hoc multiple comparisons with Fisher’s LSD t-test using IBM SPSS statistics 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL). Differences at p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.