Cotton, an important industrial crop, has been applied by mankind for thousands of years (Cai et al., 2017; Song et al., 2020; Wang, Shihao et al., 2021). Since it can bring huge economic benefits to the planting area, it is widely cultivated worldwide, accounting for approximately 2.5% of the total arable land in the world (Wang et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2021). Cotton fibers are the products from the cotton crop, whose growth includes four overlapping stages: initiation, cell elongation, secondary cell wall synthesis, and maturation (Song et al., 2020). It is comprised of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, wax, protein, ash, and so on. Among these components, cellulose is a leading ingredient in its secondary cell wall (Hao et al., 2017; Stana-Kleinschek and Ribitsch, 1998).
Cotton fiber, as a biomass fiber, has the advantages of excellent hygroscopicity (Wang, Shihao et al., 2021), biocompatibility (Sykam et al., 2021), air permeability (Haddar et al., 2014), renewability (Bergel et al., 2021), and biodegradability (Dissanayake et al., 2019). To obtain products with high added value, dyeing processes of cotton fibers are required. Reactive dyes are well known for their low price (Zhang et al., 2020), wide color range (Shu et al., 2018), and good colorfastness (Pei et al., 2021), making them the most widely applied dyes for dyeing of cotton fibers. However, conventional reactive dyeing of cotton consumes large amounts of water and inorganic salts, leading to the hydrolysis of reactive dyes during the dyeing process (Fernandez Cid et al., 2005). Therefore, the conventional reactive dyeing of cotton fibers may result in the discharge of dyeing effluents with high concentrations of unfixed dyes and inorganic salts (Dong et al., 2019).
To alleviate the above issues, many approaches have been proposed, including cationization of cotton fibers (Arivithamani and Giri Dev, 2017), supercritical carbon dioxide dyeing (Abou Elmaaty et al., 2022), foam dyeing (Chen et al., 2016), reversed micelle dyeing (Yi et al., 2012), solvent–water (H2O) dyeing (Fu et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2019), all-solvent dyeing (Chen, L. et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2018), and other dyeing technologies (Han et al., 2022; Liyanapathiranage et al., 2020). Among these dyeing technologies, solvent–H2O dyeing of cotton is considered as a popular method for producing colored cotton products (Mu et al., 2019b). Fortunately, current technologies developed have yielded some promising results. For instance, dichloromethane–H2O system (Lim et al., 2001), soybean oil–H2O system (Mu et al., 2019a), cottonseed oil–H2O system (Mu et al., 2019b), spent cooking oil–H2O system (Liu et al., 2019), and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane–H2O system (Fu et al., 2015) were proposed for reducing hydrolysis of dyes and effluent discharges. Compared with the conventional aqueous dyeing method, these alternative dyeing technologies could realize high exhaustion and fixation of reactive dyes.
To reduce the inorganic salts and hydrolyzed dyes in the dyeing effluents, we exploited an ethanol (EtOH)–H2O mixture for eco-friendly dyeing of cotton fibers (Xia et al., 2021; Xia et al., 2018). Nevertheless, this method of producing colored cotton products may involve long dyeing time and high dyeing temperature. Therefore, we further developed an EtOH–carbon tetrachloride (CCl4)–H2O mixture to indicate the potential in realizing rapid, salt-free, and low-temperature production of colored cotton products (Wang et al., 2020). This dyeing approach can make full use of the investigated reactive dyes for achieving low discharge. However, since there are various of reactive dye chemistries, such as monochlorotriazine based reactive dye chemistry, dichlorotriazine based reactive dye chemistry, and vinyl sulphone based reactive dye chemistry, the dyeing process has to be validated for almost types of reactive dyes to meet the requirements of industrial production. Therefore, it is worth examining the relationship between the dye structure and dyeing properties of cotton in the developed EtOH–CCl4–H2O mixture. Considering that the developed solvent assisted dyeing technology is a promising approach for the cleaner production of cotton, when the dyeing performance of reactive dye in the ternary solvent system is comparable to or better than that in water system, the dye can be regarded as suitable for the solvent assisted dyeing method (Wang et al., 2020).
Herein, to provide insight on the adaptability of salt-free reactive dyeing for sustainable environmental development, the effect of dye chemistry on the dyeing property of cotton fibers in the proposed EtOH–CCl4–H2O ternary solvent system was investigated in detail. A range of commonly applied and representative reactive dyes were selected for the dyeing experiments according to their reactive groups, molecular weights, chromophores and sulfonate groups. The relative solubility, particle size distributions (PSDs) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of the reactive dyes with various structures were tested accordingly. These dyes were used to dye cotton yarns in the conventional aqueous system and the developed EtOH–CCl4–H2O ternary solvent system. The K/S values, exhaustion, total fixation, and dyeing evenness of the dyed cotton samples in the absence of salt were estimated and compared with those conventional aqueous dyed samples. This study may provide a theoretical strategy for the industrial-scale production of cotton fibers using the developed solvent assisted dyeing technology.