Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Peste des Petits Ruminants Among Ovine and Caprine in Selected Districts of Afar Region, Ethiopia

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1949435/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Peste des Petits Ruminants Among Ovine and Caprine in Selected Districts of Afar Region, Ethiopia

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1949435/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: Peste des petits ruminant (PPR) is an acute, highly contagious and economically important transboundary viral disease of small ruminants. Despite the fact that FAO and OIE plan to eradicate the disease by 2030, some studies indicated an increasing seropositivity of the PPR infection in sheep and goats in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was employed to estimate the seroprevalence of PPR and to assess risk factors during the study period, February to April, 2020. A total of 384 serum samples were collected from apparently healthy sheep and goats. Competitive Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay was used to detect the presence of antibodies against PPR at national veterinary institute. Descriptive statistics, Pearson’s chi‑square (X²) and logistic regression analysis were used is this study.

Results: The overall animal level seroprevalence of PPR virus was found to be 60.15% (n=231/384) and species level prevalence rate was found to be 38.18% (n= 42) in sheep and 68.98% (n= 189) in goats in the study areas. Among the associated risk factors considered; species, sex, age and herd sizes were significantly associated (P<0.05) with PPR disease occurrence. Among the associated risk factors considered in this study, species, sex, age and herd size were found to be statistically associated with the seropositivity of PPR infection. There was no statistically significant difference in the seroprevalence of the disease between study areas and body condition score in this study.

Conclusion: The present study finding revealed that a higher seroprevalence of PPR virus infection and this confirms PPR virus is widely prevalent in small ruminants and circulating in Afar region. Further studies should be carried out on the entire region to determine PPR seroprevalence and to develop appropriate control and eradication strategies of PPR disease.

Afar

Associated Risk factors

C-ELISA

PPRV

Seroprevalence

Small ruminants

Ethiopia, endowed with huge livestock population, ranks first in Africa with estimated number of 59.5 million heads of cattle, 31.3 million sheep, 32.74 million goats and 54.5 million chickens [1]. The livestock sector in Ethiopia is an important contributor in the livelihood of majority of human population as a source of meat, milk, drought power and income, particularly for pastoral and agro-pastoral areas [2]. Small ruminants are important asset of livestock keepers as owing to their faster growth rates, require small investments, have high fertility (shorter production cycles) and better adaptability even in harsh environments as compared to large ruminants [3, 4]. In spite of having such huge small ruminant resources, the country could not utilize the sector as a result of extremely rampant livestock diseases, absence of appropriate disease management strategy and less attention given from the government side [5, 6]. Among those infectious diseases of small ruminants, peste des petits ruminants (PPR), sheep pox (SPP) and goat pox (GTP) are major problems of small ruminants and widely distributed in all regions of the country [7].

Peste des petits ruminant (PPR) is an acute, highly contagious, remarkable and economically important transboundary viral disease of small ruminants, which is listed by world organization for animal health (OIE) as notifiable disease and affecting both wild and domestic small ruminants [8, 9]. The disease is caused by PPR virus (PPRV), RNA virus belongs to order Mononegavirales, the a member of genus morbillivirus of family Paramyxoviridae [10]. Peste des petits ruminant (PPR) is the next priority small ruminants disease targeted for global eradication campaign by Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) [11, 12]. Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) is a rinderpest-like disease of goats and sheep having many common names, such as ovine rinderpest, goat plague and plague of small ruminants or Kata [13].

Clinically, the disease is characterized by high fever, severe pyrexia, ocular and nasal discharge, pneumonia, necrotizing and erosive stomatitis, ulceration of the mucous membrane and inflammation of gastro-intestinal tract leading to severe diarrhea [14, 15]. In epidemic areas, the morbidity rate of PPR is estimated from 80%-90% and mortality rate ranges from 50%-80% [16]. The disease is transmitted primarily through direct contact with infected animals through interactions with infected mucosal or fecal secretions [17]. An overall seroprevalence record of PPR from sheep and goat in pastoral and agro-pastoral area of Ethiopia has been reported 30.9% [18]. In Ethiopia, most recent PPR seroprevalence have been reported as 47.5%, 48.43% and 37.6% in Tigray, Oromia and Somalia regions of Ethiopia respectively [19].

Peste des petits ruminant (PPR) is regarded as the most economically significant widespread and highly contagious viral disease of small ruminant species, particularly goats in areas where these animals are intensively reared. It continues to cause the death of millions of sheep and goats annually and is a constant threat to the livelihoods of subsistence farmers in many agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia ([20, 21]. The disease spreads quickly in susceptible ruminant species, and the highest number of outbreaks occurs in sheep and goats [21]. The disease is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates in naïve populations [22], significant economic losses, reduced production and productivity as well as high control costs [20, 23]. It has devastating consequences on families and communities in particular and countries in general. This disease is categorized as notifiable trasboundary disease by the World Animal Health Organization (OIE) due to its potential for rapid spread and associated restrictions on the international trade of animals and animal products [24].

Peste des petits ruminant (PPR) causes economic losses of up to USD 2.1 billion per annum; 30 million of animals affected every year globally; 70 countries are infected and 60% of them are from Africa. Approximately, 5.4 billion people live in PPR infected area and more than 330 million families are at risk of losing their livelihoods, food security, and employment opportunities. Additionally, small ruminants and their products are internationally traded commodities, particularly in Africa and Middle East; PPR considerably affects export earnings and creates supply shortages [25]. The disease is currently considered as one of the main trans-boundary and notifiable disease that constitutes an emerging or re-emerging threat in many countries of the world. Considering the disease impact, March 2015, PPR was targeted as a high priority disease for progressive control by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) to eradicate the disease at 2030. Despite the huge economic consequences and threats to trade, information on the sero-prevalence and associated risk factors of PPR infection in the study districts in particular and afar region in general is insufficient. A better understanding of its seroprevalence and associated factors would lead to improve disease control measures. Therefore, the current study was intended to estimate the seroprevalence and to assess associated factors of PPR infection in the study districts of afar region, Ethiopia.

In the current study, out of 384 sera collected from the study population and tested using competitive ELISA (c-ELISA), 60.15% (n=231/384; 95% CI of 55.15-64.95) were found to be positive for the presence of antibodies against PPR virus (PPRV) infection. The demographic characteristics of study population were presented in table 1. Majority of study population, 81.51% (n = 313) were females while about 18.49 % (n =71) of them were males.

Table 1: The demographic characteristics of the tested animals

Seroprevalence of PPR infection

Out of 384 sheep and goats sera tested, 60.15% (95% CI of 55.15-64.95) samples were positive against PPR antibodies as depicted in (figure 2). In this study, the seroprevalence of PPR virus among the species level was 38.18% in sheep and 68.98% in goats in the study districts of Afar region. From the total sera tested, 23 samples were from males and 208 serum samples were from females with a prevalence of 32.39% (n = 23/71) and 66.45% (n = 208/208), respectively.

Associated Factors of PPR Infection

Associated risk factors such as species, sex, age, herd size, district and body condition score (BCS) were assessed using structured questionnaire for every sampled herd for the occurrence of PPRV infection seroprevalence as depicted in (table 2). In the current study, the result of PPR infection seroprevalence across the geographical areas in each district was found to be 69.27%%, and 52.43% in Asayita and Mille, respectively. In different age groups, the seroprevalence in the study population between six months to 1 year (young age group) was 72.97%, from 1 year to 2.5 years (adult age group) was 63.48% and above 2.5 years old 20.83% (old aged group). The seroprevalence of PPR infection between sex groups showed that it was 66.45% in female and 32.39% in male and it was statistically significant variation between sex groups.

In the present study, the chi-squre (X²) analysis result indicated that among the associated risk factors with PPRV seroprevalence occurrence; species, sex, age, and herd size were found to be statistically significant as depicted (table 2).

Table 2: Chi-square analysis results of associated factor of PPRV seroprevalence

Hypothesized Associated Factor		Sample size	Seropositive	X²Value	P-value
Species	Ovine	110	42	31.0576	0.000
Species	Caprine	274	189	31.0576	0.000
Sex	Male	71	23	28.0093	0.000
Sex	Female	313	208	28.0093	0.000
District	Mille	207	126	0.0953	0.758
District	Asayita	177	105	0.0953	0.758
Age	Young (6months-1.5 year)	178	113	55.5311	0.000
	Adult (1.5<X<2.5 year)	148	108
	Old ( >2.5 Year)	48	10
BCS	Good	263	157	0.0738	0.786
BCS	Poor	121	74	0.0738	0.786
Herd size	Small (<50)	94	54	12.9241	0.002
	Medium(50<X<100	100	47
	Large(>100)	190	130

Univariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to reduce the non-important hypothesized risk factors with a critical P-value of = 0.25. Univariate logistic regression analysis result revealed that the associated risk factors that had a significant association with c-ELISA sero-positivity were species (P = 0.000), sex (P = 0.000), age group (P = 0.000) and herd size (P = 0.000). Whereas, the study areas (P = 0.758) and body condition score (P = 0.786) had not significant association with c-ELISA sero-positivity of the disease as depicted (table 3).

Table 3: Univariable analysis results of associated factors for PPR seroprevalence

Associated factors		Positive samples	Prevalence	P-value	COR (95% CI)
Species	Ovine	42	38.18%	-	Ref
Species	Caprine	189	68.98%	0.000	3.6 (2.27-5.71)
Sex	Males	23	32.39%	-	Ref
Sex	Females	208	66.45%	0.000	4.1 (2.39-7.16)
Age	Young (6m-1year)	113	63.48%	0.000	12.96(5.99-28.04)
	Adult (1-2.5 years)	108	72.97%	0.000	8.3 (3.96-17.60)
	Old (2.5<X<4 years)	10	20.83%	-	Ref
BCS	Poor BCS	74	61.16%	0.786	1.06 (0.68-1.65)
BCS	Good BCS	157	59.69%	-	-
District	Asayita	124	69.27%	0.758	0.9 (0.62-1.41)
District	Mille	108	52.43%	-	Ref
Herd size	Small herd size	94	57.45%	-	Ref
	Medium herd size	100	47%	0.146	0.7 (0.37-1.16)
	Large Herd Size	190	68.42%	0.0489	1.6 (0.96-2.67)

As a rule of thumb, variables whose p-value less than 0.25 along with the variables of clinical importance would be selected. Accordingly, species, age, sex and herd size were found to be statistically significant variables in univariable logistic regression and were fitted to the final multivariable logistic regression model to check the real significant contribution of these associated risk factors without compounding effect on the other as depicted in (table 4) with adjusted odds ratio (AOR) and hence, species, sex, age and herd size of animals were identified as associated factors for the occurrence of sheep and goat PPRV infection. The odds of sero-positivity in female animals were 3.9 times higher than male animals (AOR= 3.9; 95% CI= 2.09-7.39%). The odds of being caprine were 4.4 (AOR= 4.4; 95% CI= 2.57-7.65%) times more likely to be seropositive than ovine species. The odds of young and adult sheep and goats were 12.34 (AOR= 12.34; 95% CI= 5.31-28.64%) and 5.0 (AOR = 5.0; 95% CI = 2.24-11.20%) times more likely to be seropositive than old aged animals, respectively. The odds of large-sized flocks of sheep and goats were 1.92 (AOR= 1.92; 95% CI= 1.19-3.13%) times more likely to be seropositive than small-sized flocks as shown in (table 4) which means the study population that were found in large herd size 1.92 times more likely to develop PPR virus infection as compared to animals found in small herd size (<50 animals).

Table 4: Multivariable logistic regression analysis of associated risk factors and PPR seropositivity in sheep and goats.

Associated risk factors		No of animals tested	Positive samples	P-value	AOR (95% CI)
Species	Ovine	110	42	-	Ref
Species	Caprine	274	189	0.000***	4.4(2.57-7.65)
Sex	Males	71	23	-	Ref
Sex	Females	313	208	0.000***	3.90(2.09-7.39)
Age	Young (6m-1year)	178	113	0.000***	12.34(5.31-28.64)
	Adult (1-2.5 years)	148	108	0.000***	5.0(2.24-11.20)
	Old (2.5<X<4 years)	48	10	-	Ref
Herd size	Small herd size	94	54	-	Ref
Herd size	Large Herd Size	190	130	0.008*	1.9 (1.19-3.13)

Peste des petits ruminants (PPR) continue to claim the lives of billions of sheep and goats annually and pose a continuous threat to the livelihoods of various pastoral and agro-pastoral areas of Ethiopia. Despite the fact that PPR is one of the diseases that the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) plan to eradicate by 2030, study results showed increasing seropositivity of the disease in sheep and goats in different regions of Ethiopia. The present study revealed that an overall seroprevalence of 60.15% of which 38.18% of sheep and 68.18% of goats were exposed to PPR viruses’ infection, indicated that the PPR virus is widely prevalent in small ruminants and circulating in the study areas. This overall seroprevalence of PPRV infection was relatively in agreement with previous study reports such as; 64.5% from eastern Amhara region [30], 54.8% in Gambella region [31], 61.8% in Sudan [32], 55% in Nigeria [33], 55.2% in Uganda [34] and 55.95% in Saudi Arabia [35]. On the contrary, the current study result was slightly higher than previous study findings in Ethiopia such as; 36.6% study report before 10 years in Awash Fentale, afar region [36], 48.43% in Eastern Showa and Arsi Zones of Oromia Region and 43.6% in Adigudam and Chercher of Tigray [37], 22.4% in Turkey [38], 33% in India [39], 26% in Bangladish [40], 22.1% in Tanzania [41] and 34.2% in Pakistan [42]. This variation in the seroprevalence results of PPRV infection in different regions as well as countries could be attributed to differences in a number of factors including the husbandry practice within diverse geographical regions, levels of immunity, agro-ecology, diagnostic test, sampling procedures used, technical know-how of the researchers, socio-economic status of individual farmers, variation in veterinary service including vaccination program, uncontrolled animal movement and frequent contact between flocks and migration of livestock within and between countries [39].

Among the risk factors considered in the current study; species, sex, age and herd size were found to be statistically significant (P<0.05) in multivariate logistic regression analysis model. In Ethiopia, several studies indicated that goats are more severely affected by PPR virus exposure than sheep, and they show prominent clinical symptoms while sheep only experience milder forms of the disease [43]. In the present study, the seropositivity of PPR virus infection in goats was found to be (68.98%) and 38.18% in sheep. Hence, this study revealed a difference in species susceptibility to PPR virus infection because the result of the multivariate regression analysis showed that goats were 4.4 times more likely to be seropositive to PPR infection as compared to sheep. This study is in agreement with previous epidemiological studies of [44-46], who reported a higher seroprevalence in goats than in sheep and associated it to higher fertility in goats compared to sheep. This indicates that PPR disease predominantly affects goats than sheep. Moreover, the seroprevalence of PPR between the species showed high prevalence of 34% in goats and 24.2% in sheep which was statistically significant (P = 0.000) [43]. Furthermore, it could be females are kept longer than the males in a herd or flock, for reproduction purposes, which increases the likelihood of female animals being exposed to PPRV over time and being sampled. On the contrary, our study disagrees with previous studies, who reported higher seroprevalence in sheep than goats [47-49].

In this study the seroprevalence of PPR infection among sex groups was 66.45% in females and 32.39% in males. This relative seroprevalence variation was statistically significant, which means being female animals are more likely to develop PPR virus infection as compared to male animals (P = 0.000) and this study finding is consistent with previous studies [33, 37, 50, 51]. In the current study, the higher prevalence in females than in males may be due to physiological differences where females reveal some degree of predominance infection as a result of production and reproduction stress which makes females more prone to infection [31]. Moreover, it may also be due to livestock breeding pattern of Nepalese farmers in which females are kept longer for reproduction while most of the males are castrated and sold for meat purpose. The longer the females are kept for herd maintenance the more chances of exposure to the environment they get may result into more seroprevalence [52].

The association of age groups with PPR seroprevalence occurrence showed that age factor was found to be significantly associated risk factor (P=0.000).

The current study revealed the higher PPR seropositivity in adult sheep and goats (72.97%) as compared to young animals (63.48%). In this study, higher prevalence among adults followed by young animals was observed. This statement is consistent with earlier studies [53-55] reporting a declining seroprevalence rate as age decreases, and it is due to the higher likelihood of older animals being exposed to PPRV than younger animals. In addition, the higher seroprevalence among adults may be because long life time allowing more exposure to PPRV. On the other hand, passive immunity from dam to the young animals might have effect on the result to some extent. However, the current study result contradicts with those of other previous studies [56, 57] that showed young animals were more susceptible than adults and had a higher seroprevalence incidence than older animals.

In the present study finding, seroprevalence of PPR was also significantly affected by herd size. In the present study, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that herd size and seropositivity of PPR virus infection were statistically significant (P=0.000). Large herd sized of sheep and goats were 1.9 times more likely to develop PPR infection as compared to those animals from small herd size keeping the other factors constant (OR= 1.9; 95% CI=1.19-3.13%). This study result is consistent with previous reports of [58, 59]. This direct association might be an indication of the contagious nature of the disease and mode of transmission, which is attributed to crowding of animals that can facilitate the frequency of direct contact and hence escalating chances of transmission.

The only factors that were not shown to have a significant association with seropositivity to PPRV in the current study are study areas and body condition score. According to the current study's multivariate regression analysis, there was no statistically significant variation in seropositivity among the study districts. This statement is supported by previous study finding [60]. This could be probably because of PPR is persistent and evenly distributed in the study areas. These results could indicate that PPR is endemic and extensively circulating within these districts. Moreover, the study areas have more or less similar agro-ecological conditions.

The present study finding revealed that a higher seroprevalence of PPR virus infection and this confirms PPR virus is widely prevalent in small ruminants and circulating in Afar region, Ethiopia, which is an alarming problem, particularly from FAO and OIE plan point of view to eradicate the disease by 2030. Among the associated risk factors considered in this study, species, sex, age and herd size were found to be statistically associated with the seropositivity of PPR infection. Further studies that cover entire region and nationwide to determine seroprevalence and titer level of PPR antibodies are strongly recommended which aid design appropriate control and eradication strategies of PPR disease. The ongoing strategy for eradication of PPR in Ethiopia should also take into consideration the various seroprevalence reports of the disease in different regions of the country as presented in this study.

Description of Study Area

The study was conducted from February to April, 2020 in two districts namely (Asayita and Mille), which are located in the administrative zone one of afar region, Ethiopia. The afar pastoral region is located in northeast of Ethiopia between 39°34’ to 42°28’E longitude and 8°49’ to 14° 30’ N latitude (Figure 1). The region shares common international boundaries with Eritrea in the northeast and Djibouti in the east and it is characterized by an arid and semi-arid climate with low and erratic rainfall. Rainfall is bi-modal throughout the region, with a mean annual rainfall below 500 mm in the semi-arid western escarpments and decreasing to 150 mm in the arid zones to the east. The altitude of the Region ranges from 120 m below sea level in Danakil depression to 1500 m above sea level. Temperatures vary from 20°C in higher elevations to 48°C in lower elevations. The human population of Afar region is 1.5 million in which the majority are pastoralists who largely depend on livestock production for their livelihood. The study populations were managed under pastoral husbandry which allows high mobility of animals and these animals are usually mixed with other animal species. Sheep and goats that were kept under the extensive farming system [1].

Study Population

The study populations were sheep and goats aged greater than 6 months were considered for estimation of seroprevalence of PPR virus infection in the study areas. Blood samples were collected from non-vaccinated sheep and goats and age group of the study population was classified as young (6 months to 1 year); Adult (1 year ≤ 1.5years) and old age (>1.5 years) [26].

Study design and sampling strategy

A cross-sectional study design was employed to estimate the seroprevalence of PPR and to assess associated risk factors from study districts of Afar region as of February to April, 2020. There is no serological test available to differentiate animals vaccinated with PPR vaccine from animals that had recovered from a natural PPR in Ethiopia. Therefore, questionnaire was deemed to gather the best source of information regarding vaccination status of sheep and goats to aid in sampling. The sampling method was three stage random sampling to collect the sample since the study districts were purposively selected based on higher study population, access to transportation, history of no vaccination for the last six months, absence of outbreak cases and willingness of pastoralists to participate in this research work. Then, the first stage was pastoral association, the second stage was the herd and the third stage was animals (target population). Finally, simple random sampling technique was employed to select individual animals during sample collection.

Sample size determination

Although sheep and goats are two species, they can be considered as one study population due to the management practices and the similar course of the diseases in both species. So, the sample size was determined according to the formula given by [27], using 50% expected prevalence (since there is no previous seroprevalence report of PPR infection in the study areas), 5% desired absolute precision and 95% confidence interval as below:

Where: n = required sampling units

Z = Multiplier from normal distribution at 95% Confidence interval (1.96)

P^exp= Estimated (expected) prevalence 50% (0.5)

(1-P) = Probability of having no disease 50% (0.5)

D = Desired absolute precision 5% (0.05)

Sampling was proportionally distributed based on the total small ruminants’ population in the study districts’ kebeles. The number of sheep and goats sampled is proportional to the herd sizes as well as within the district. Accordingly, a total of 384 sheep and goats from twenty four herds and eight kebeles or peasant associations and two districts were included in this study.

Sample Collection and transportation

Whole blood samples approximately 6-8ml was collected from the jugular vein of non-vaccinated sheep and goats using plain 10 ml vacutainer tubes and 19 gauge sterile needles. The samples were labelled to allow identification of each animal. The associated risk factors (such as species, age, sex, herd size, body condition score and study areas) were recorded during sampling. Collected samples were kept in slant position overnight at room temperature to allow serum separation. Then, serum was decanted and aliquoted into cryovials and stored in a freezer (-20°C) at microbiology laboratory of Samara University, and transported to National Veterinary Institute (NVI) in order to detect for antibodies against natural PPR infection exposure using serological analysis. All sera samples were transported to NVI laboratory in icebox and stored at -20°C until processed.

Serological analysis

Antibody detection against PPR Infection

Serum samples were analyzed at the National veterinary Institute (NVI, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia) using a competitive ELISA kit (c-ELISA kit) according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, UK) [28] . The ELISA micro-plates were read with an immunosbent reader with an inference filter of 492 nm. The reader was connected to a computer loaded with ELISA Data Information (EDI) software, which is used to automate the reading and calculation of the competitive percentage values (S/N%). The samples result with competitive percentage (S/N%) ≤50% was considered as positive. (Sample/Negative control×100) S/N%=OD sample/ODNc×100. Then, according to this calculation samples presenting a S/N%:

Less than or equal to 50% are considered positive result.
Less than and greater or equal to 60% is doubtful and
Greater than or equal to 60% are considered as negative result.

Administration of Questionnaire Survey

A structured questionnaire format was prepared to interview individual sheep and goat owners. Respondents from each district were randomly selected and interviewed to assess associated factors of PPR disease such as; species, sex, age, herd size and study areas. All necessary epidemiological information was collected on individual animal bases.

Data Management and StatisticalAnalysis

All collected data generated from field and laboratory analysis was entered in to the Microsoft excel sheet data management and analysis Window® 2007 and then it was analyzed using Stata version 14 software. Descriptive statistics was employed to quantify the results of seroprevalence of PPR antibodies. The seroprevalence of PPR virus infections was calculated as the number of PPR positive animals divide to the total population at risk of acquiring the disease [29] . The association of associated factors such as different location, species, sex, herd size and age to the results of seroprevalence of PPR infection was analyzed using Univariable and multivariable logistic regression model. A statistically significant association between variables was said to exist if the calculated P-value is less than 0.05 at 95% confidence interval (CI).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Samara University, Research and Community Service office for its financial support to this study. Moreover, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to the National Veterinary Institute of Ethiopia for offering laboratory facilities and space for this research, as well as to livestock owners and district animal health staff for their cooperation and technical support during field sample collection.

Author Contribution Indication

TD: Contributed to conception of the research idea, designing and data collection, data analysis, interpretation of data, writing and editing of the manuscript.

BD: Contributed to conception of the research idea, data collection, Methodology, writing and review of the manuscript.

EG: Contributed to data collection, methodology, writing and review of the manuscript.

WN: Contributed to conception of the research idea, data analysis and supervision

FH: Contributed to conception of the research idea, data analysis and supervision

MW: Contributed to conception of data analysis and supervision

Funding

This research work was financially supported by Samara University, Research and Community Service office. However, the funder had no role in the design and execution of this study, sample collection, data analysis and interpretation and manuscript writing.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the confidentiality agreements made all authors, but could be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

All methods of this study were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations or Declaration of Helsinki.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written ethical approval and informed consent for this study was obtained from Samara University, Research Ethics and Review committee (reference REC029/2020). Written informed consent was also obtained from the herd owners to take samples from their small ruminants and for further research use purpose. The reason for this written informed consent is that, participants were required for interview and the individual participant was not subjected to any harm as much as their privacy is kept confidential. Confidentiality of collected data and the scientific honesty during write up was considered. These written informed consents were documented.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing Interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Authors Details

¹College of Veterinary Medicine, Samara University, P.O. Box 132, Samara, Ethiopia.

CSA FDRoE: Central Statistical Agency: Agricultural Sample Survey 2018, CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. In.; 2017.
Ayelet G, Mahapatra M, Gelaye E, Egziabher G, RufealT, Sahle M: Genetic characterization of foot-and-mouth disease viruses Ethiopia 1981-2007. J Emerg Infect Dis 2009, 16(9):1409-1417.
Gizaw S, van Arendonk, JAM., Komen, H., Windig, J.J., Hanott, O.: Population structure, genetic variation and morphological diversity in indigenous sheep of Ethiopia. Animal Genetics 2007, 38:621-628.
Abebe R, Tatek M, Megersa B, Sheferaw D: Prevalence of Small Ruminant Ectoparasites and Associated Risk Factors in Selected Districts of Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Global Veterinaria 2011, 7:433-437.
Abdela N: Sero-prevalence, risk factors and distribution of foot and mouth disease in Ethiopia. Vet Med Int 2017, 169:125-132.
Ayelet G, Mahapatra M, Gelaye E, Egziabher BG, Rufeal T, Sahle M, Ferris NP, Wadsworth J, Hutchings GH, Knowles NJ: Genetic characterization of foot-and-mouth disease viruses, Ethiopia, 1981-2007. Emerg Infect Dis 2009, 15(9):1409-1417.
Tsegaye D BB, Haile A: Prevalence of Major Goat Diseases and Mortality of Goat in Daro-Labu District of West Hararghe, Eastern Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific and Innovative Research 2013, 2:665-672.
Kinne J, Kreutzer R, Kreutzer M, Wernery U, Wohlsein P: Peste des Petits Ruminants in Arabian Wildlife. Epidemiology & Infection 2010, 138:1211-1214.
OIE: Office International des Epizooties: Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Chapter 2.7.11: Peste des Petits Ruminants. 2012.
Zahur AB, Ullah, A., Irshad, H., Farooq, M. S., Hussein, M. and Jahangir, M. : Epidemiological investigations of a peste des petits ruminants (PPR) outbreak in Afghan sheep in Pakistan. Pakistan Veterinary Journal 2009, 29:174-178.177.
Albina E, Kwiatek O, Minet C, Lancelot R, Servan de Almeida R, Libeau G: Peste des petits ruminants, the next eradicated animal disease? . Vet Microbiol 2013, 165:38-44.
Anonymous: OIE adopts a global control strategy for peste des petits ruminants. Vet Record 2014, 174:567.
Abubakar M, Manzoor S, Wensman JJ, Torsson E, Qurban A, and Munir M: Molecular and epidemiological features of Peste des petits ruminants outbreak during endemic situation Hosts and Viruses 2016, 3(4):123-129.
OIE: Infection with peste des petits ruminants virus. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Office International Des Epizooties 2016:1-12.
Gibbs EPJ TW, Lawman MPJ, Bryant J Classificationof the pestedes petits ruminants’ virus as the fourth member of the genus Morbillivirus. Intervirology 1979, 11:268-274.
Ezeibe M.C.O., Okoroafor O.N., Ngene A.A., Eze J.I. EIC, Ugonabo J.A.C: Persistent detection of peste des petits ruminants antigen in the faeces of recovered goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2008, 40:517-519.
Senyael SE KA, Kivaria F, Tinuga D, Joshua G, et al. : Prevalence and distribution of Peste des petitis Virus in various districts in Tanzania. Vet Res Commun 2009, 10:927-936.
Megersa B BD, Belina T, Debela E, Regassa A, et al.: Serological investigation of Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) in small ruminants managed under pastoral and agro-pastoral systems in Ethiopia. Small Rumin. Res.97 2011, 134-138.
Afera B HD, Amsalu K Seroprevalence of Peste des Petits Ruminants in Goats of Southern Parts of Tigray Region. Global Veterinaria 2014, 12(512-516).
Njue S, Saeed K, Maloo S, Muchai J, Biaou C, Tetu K: Sero-prevalence study to determine the effectiveness of Peste de Petits Ruminants vaccination in Somalia. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice 2018, 8:17.
Lembo T, Oura C, Parida S, Hoare R, Frost L, & , Fyumagwa R: Peste des petits ruminants infection among cattle and wildlife in northern Tanzania. 19(12), 2037.Emerging Infectious Diseases 2013, 19(12):2037.
Kaukarbayevich KZ: Epizootological analysis of PPR spread on African continent and in Asian countries Available online at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 287718287_Epizootological_analysis_of_PPR_spread_on_African_continent_and_in_Asian_countries. African Journal of Agricultural Research 2009, 4(9):787-790.
FAO: Deadly animal virus peste des petits ruminants threatens to spread to Southern Africa. Goal Geology, viewed 16 January 2011, from -animal-viruspeste-des-petits-ruminants-threatens-to-spread-to-southern-africa/8302/. 2010.
Albina E, Kwiatek O, Minet C, Lancelot R, de Almeida RS, G. L: Peste des petits ruminants, the next eradicated animal disease?Veterinary microbiology 2013, 165(2):38-44.
WAHID: World animal health information data base. Disease information-PPR disease. http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Diseaseinformation/statusdetail (accessed on October, 2020). 2020.
Tsegaw Fentie, Nigusie Fenta, Samson Leta, Wassie Molla, Birhanu Ayele, Yechale Teshome, Seleshe Nigatu, Assefa A: Sero-prevalence, risk factors and distribution of sheep and goat pox in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. BMC Veterinary Research 2017, 385.
Thrusfield MV M: Veterinary epidemiology, 3rd ed. Singapore, Blackwell Science, 233. 2007.
Libeau G PC, Lancelot R, Coles F, Guerr L, et al. : Development of a competitive ELISA for detecting antibodies to the peste des petitis ruminants’ virus using a recombinant nucleoprotein. Res Vet Sci 1995, 58:50-55.
Thrusfield M: Veterinary epidemiology 3rded.veterinary clinical studies royal (dick) school of veterinary studies university of Edinburgh. Pp: 233.; 2005.
Alemu B: Epidemiology and Identification of Peste Des Petits Ruminants (PPR) Virus Circulating in Small Ruminants of Eastern Amhara Region Bordering Afar, Ethiopia. 2014.
Megersa B, Biffa D, Belina T, Debela E, Regassa A, Abunna A: Serological investigation of Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) in small ruminants managed under pastoral and agro-pastoral systems in Ethiopia. Small Ruminant Research 2011, 97:134–138.
Abdela N: Sero-prevalence, risk factors and distribution of foot and mouth disease in Ethiopia. Acta Trop 2017, 169:125-132.
Dahiru. A, baba. S, Egwu. O: Seroprevalence of peste des petits ruminants among domestic small and large ruminants in semi-arid region of north-eastern Nigeria. Veterinary World 2013, 10(10):807-811.
Mulindwa. B, Ayebazibwe. C, Mwiine. F, Muhanguzi. D, Mukani. W: Peste des Petits Ruminants serological survey in Karamoja sub region of Uganda by competitive ELISA. Veterinary World 2011, 4(4):149-152.
Elshemey. T, Mahmoud. M: Seroprevalence of antibodies against peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus in sheep and goat in Kingdom Saudia Arabia. Alexandria J Vet Sci 2011, 32:175-182.
Delil. A, Asfaw. A, Gebreegziabher. B: Prevalence of antibodies to peste des petits ruminants virus before and during outbreaks of the disease in Awash Fentale district, Afar, Ethiopia. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012, 44(7):1329-1330.
Afera. B, Hussien. D, Amsalu. K: Seroprevalence of Peste Des Petits Ruminants in Goats of Southern Parts of Tigray Region. Global Veterinaria 2014, 12(4):512-516, .
Ozkul A, Akca, Y., Alkan, F., Barrett, T., Karaoglu, T., Dagalp, S. B., Anderson, J., Yesilbag, K., Cokcaliskan, C., Gencay, A. and Burgu, I.: Prevalence, distribution, and host range of Peste des petits ruminants’ virus, Turkey. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2002, 8:708-712.
Singh. R, Saravanan. P, Sreenivasa. B, Singh. R, Bandyopadhyay S: Prevalence and distribution of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus infection in small ruminants of India. Scientific and Technical Review of the Office International des Epizooties 2004, 23(3):807-819.
Banik. S, Podder. S, Samad. M, Islam M: Sero-surveillance and immunization in sheep and goats against peste des petits ruminants in Bangladesh. Bangladish Journal of Veterinary Medecine 2008, 6(2):185-190.
Balamurugan. V, P. Saravanan. P, Bhanuprakash. V, Krishnamoorthy. P, Singh. R: Sero-epidemiological study of peste des petits ruminants in sheep and goats in India between 2003 and 2009. Rev sci tech Off int Epiz 2011, 30(3):889-896.
Aziz-ul. R, Muhammad. A, Muhammad. H, Shumaila. M, Muhammad. S, Muhammad. R: Evaluation of Risk Factors for Peste des Petits Ruminants Virus in Sheep and Goats at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface in Punjab Province. BioMed research international 2016, 2016:1-6.
Taylor. W: “The distribution and epidemiology of PPR virus. preventive veterinary medicine 2004, 4:157–166.
Al-Majali. A, Hussain. N, Amarin. N, Majok. A: Seroprevalence of, and risk factors for PPR in sheep and goats in Northern Jordan. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2008, 85:1-8.
Swai. E, Kapaga. A, Kivaria. F, Tinuga. D, Joshua. G, Sanka. P: Prevalence and distribution of PPRV antibodies in various districts of Tanzania. Veterinary Research Communication 2009, 33:927-936.
Rahman. A, Abubakar. M, Rasool. M, Manzoor. S, Saqalein. M, Rizwan. M, Munir. M, Ali. Q, Johansson. W: Evaluation of risk factors for peste des petits ruminants virus in sheep and goats at the wildlife–livestock interface in Punjab Province, Pakistan. BioMedical Research International 2016.
Saeed. I, Ali. Y, Khalafalla. A, Rahman-Mahasin. E: Current situation of peste des petits ruminants (PPR) in the Sudan. Tropical Animal Health and Production 2010, 42:89-93.
Khan. H, Siddique. M, Abubakar. M, Arshad. M, Hussain. M: Prevalence and distribution of PPRV infection in small ruminants. , .Small Ruminants Research 2009, 79:152-157.
Abraham G, Sintayehu. A, Libeau. G, Albina. E, Roger. F, Laekemariam. Y, Abayneh. D, Awake. K: Antibody seroprevalence against PPR virus in camel, cattle, goats and sheep in Ethiopia. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2005, 70:51-57.
Farougou. S, Gagara. M, Mensah. G: Prevalence of peste des petits ruminants in the arid zone in the Republic of Niger. Onderstepoort Journal of veterinary science 2013, 80:6.
Senthilkumar. A, Balamurugan. P, Sribalaji. N, Srinivasan. G, Murugesan. S: Outbreak of PPR in an Organised Goat Farm in Theni District of Tamilnadu. Research Journal Chemistry and Environmental Science 2018, 6:64-67.
Krishna. P, Shankar. P, Narayan. A: Cross-sectional sero-prevalence study of Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) in goats of Syangja and Kaski districts of Nepal. Virus Disease 2018, 29(2):173–179.
Abdalla AS, Majok AA, El Malik KH, AS. A: Sero-prevalence of peste des petits ruminants virus (PPRV) in small ruminants in Blue Nile, Gadaref and North Kordofan States of Sudan. Journal of Public Health and Epidemiololgy 2012, 4:59-64.
Mahajan. S, Agrawal. R, Kumar. M, Mohan. A, Pande. N: Risk of seroconversion to peste des petits ruminants (PPR) and its association with species, sex, age and migration. Small Ruminant Research 2012, 104:195-200.
Salih. H, Elfadil. A, Saeed. I, Ali. Y: Seroprevalence and risk factors of Peste des Petits Ruminants in sheep and goats in Sudan. Journal of Advanced Veterinary Animal Research 2014, 1:42-49.
Sarker. S, Islam. H: Prevalence and risk factor assessment of peste des petits ruminants in goats in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Veterinary World 2011, 4:546-549.
Bello. A, Lawal. J, Dauda. J, Wakil. Y, Lekko. Y, Mshellia. E: Research for peste des petits ruminants (PPR) virus antibodies in goats, sheep and gazelle from Bauchi and Gombe states, North Eastern Nigeria. Direct Research Journal of Agriculture and Food Science 2016, 4:193-198.
Munir. M, Siddique. M, Shehzad. A, Zohari. S, Stahl. K: Seroprevalence of antibodies to peste des petitsruminants at various governmental livestock farms of Punjab, Pakistan. Asian Journal of Epidemiology & Infection 2008, 1:82-90.
Selvaraju. G: Epidemiological measures of causal association between Peste des Petits Ruminants (PPR) and its determinants in small ruminants. International Journal of Development Research 2014, 4(7):1411-1413.
Fikru. G, Olana. M, Fikre. Z, Hailegabriel. B, Mu’uz. G, Reta. D: Sero-Prevalence and Socioeconomic Impacts of Peste Des Petits Ruminants in Small Ruminants of Selected Districts of Afar, Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Science & Technology 2018, 9(1).

No competing interests reported.

Download PDF

Editorial decision: Major revision
28 Sep, 2022
Reviews received at journal
13 Sep, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
29 Aug, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
28 Aug, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
23 Aug, 2022
Editor invited by journal
23 Aug, 2022
Submission checks completed at journal
23 Aug, 2022
First submitted to journal
10 Aug, 2022

You are reading this latest preprint version

Seroprevalence and Associated Risk Factors of Peste des Petits Ruminants Among Ovine and Caprine in Selected Districts of Afar Region, Ethiopia

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Results

Seroprevalence of PPR infection

Discussion

Conclusions

Materials and Methods

Description of Study Area

Study Population

Study design and sampling strategy

Sample size determination

Sample Collection and transportation

Administration of Questionnaire Survey

Declarations

References

Additional Declarations

Status:

Version 1