This study adopted the desk research review method. In this method, an internet search engine was utilized to search for published articles and journals relevant to the theme of the study – e-hailing and shared urban mobility. After the search, a total of 25 articles were found, out of which 20, which met the eligibility criteria for the study, were used for the review. Eligibility criteria were published articles on e-hailing mobility and urban public transport between 2014 and 2022. Articles which did not meet these criteria were excluded from the review. The review cut across the mode of operations of e-hailing mobility services, issues, policies, regulations, and strategies to enhance sustainable e-hailing mobility services in Nigeria's cities.
1.5 Mode of Operations of E-hailing Mobility Platforms in Nigerian Cities
E-hailing, or ride-sourcing, services have been a major innovation in the transport sector in the past decade and are rapidly changing how we travel – especially in urban areas, Nigerian cities inclusive. E-hailing refers to the process of ordering a car, taxi, or any other mode of transportation by way of a computer or mobile device. "E" here refers to "electric" and "hail" means the traditional process of signaling an approaching taxi cab to stop (11). These E-hailing service providers, also known as Transportation Network Companies (TNCs), use an online, information technology-enabled, and smart phone-based platform to connect available car or taxi drivers and potential passengers in real time, resulting in an efficient, convenient, quick, and transparent procurement of the passenger ride service (10).It is a form or type of ridesharing that makes use of websites and mobile apps to match passengers with drivers of vehicles for hire that, unlike taxicabs, cannot legally be hailed from the street (5).
Generally, the service is accessed via a mobile app. Users set up a personal profile with a name, phone number, other information, and payment preference, which could be a credit card, e-commerce payment system, or, in some cases, cash. After the service is complete, the customer may be given the option to provide a gratuity to the rider, which is also billed to the customer's payment method (6), (7), & (8).
Most drivers are independent contractors under the e-hailing mobility services platform. Drivers provide a vehicle, which could be owned, rented, or leased. Drivers should meet requirements for age, health, car age and type, have a valid driver’s license and a smartphone or tablet, and may be required to pass a background check in order to be deemed eligible to operate (7) or (8).
Drivers pay a commission as a proportion of the trip fee to the e-hailing provider. Fare systems are dynamic and are adjusted by an algorithm based on demand and supply for trips. Simply put, if demand outstrips supply at a given time in a given location, drivers will be charged more — and drivers will earn more. After each trip/transaction, drivers and customers may rate each other, and users with low ratings may be deactivated (1).
E-hailing mobility platforms in Nigerian cities can be grouped into two categories. This includes a ‘‘service entity" and a "taxi and app operator." Service entities are entities that only provide the platform for users and drivers to connect, while taxi and app operators are service providers who own and operate both the vehicle and the hailing platform (13) (see Table 1). E-hailing mobility services come in different forms in Nigerian cities. Two-wheel motorcycles (Okada) and three-wheel tricycles (keke NAPEP) are popular alternatives to the more conventional taxi services. Other includes cabs, taxis, bus services, etc. (2). Nigeria’s e-hailing market is dominated by three major players, which service the bulk of users in the country. These are Uber, GIGM, and Bolt, and they presently control over 90% of the e-hailing market share across Nigerian cities.
Table 1
E-hailing Mobility Platforms in Nigerian Cities
S/N | E-hailing Mobility Platforms | First appearance (year) | Cities of operations | Business Model |
1 | Uber | 2014 | Lagos, Abuja and Benin City | Service entity |
2 | Jekalo | 2015 | Lagos | Service entity |
3 | Afro | 2015 | Lagos | Service entity |
4 | Gomyway | 2015 | Lagos | Service entity |
6 | Holy cab | 2016 | Lagos | Service entity |
7 | Palmdrive | 2016 | Lagos | Service entity |
8 | GIG Mobility | 2016 | Lagos, Abuja, Port Harcourt etc. | Taxi and app operator |
9 | Oga Taxi | 2016 | Lagos | Service entity |
10 | Bolt (taxify) | 2017 | Lagos, Ogun, Ibadan, Benin City, Owerri | Service entity |
11 | Mycabman | 2016 | Abuja, Enugu and Calabar | Service entity |
12 | Gokada | 2017 | Lagos | Service entity |
13 | Max | 2017 | Lagos | Service entity |
14 | SafeBoda | 2017 | Lagos, Ogun, Ibadan | Service entity |
15 | Oride | 2017 | Lagos, Ogun, Ibadan | Service entity |
16 | Smartcab | 2017 | Lagos | Service entity |
17 | RideMe Taxi | 2018 | Lagos | Service entity |
18 | GidiCab | 2019 | Lagos | Service entity |
19 | Carxie | 2019 | Lagos | Service entity |
20 | Naijacab | 2019 | Benin City | Service entity |
21 | Plenty waka | 2019 | Lagos | Taxi and app operator |
22 | Ekocab | 2020 | Lagos | Service entity |
23 | LagosRide | 2021 | Lagos | Taxi and app operator |
24 | Africar | 2022 | Ibadan | Taxi and app operator |
Source: Ojekere, Ojo and Mkpandiok (2022). |
1.6 Issues in E-Hailing Mobility Services in Nigerian Cities
Policy Regulation
E-hailing mobility services are relatively new in Nigeria compared to other developed countries that have evolved policies to guide the operation of e-hailing service providers. One of the initial policy debates about e-hailing mobility services was whether the latter should be addressed as a public or private sector service, with (14) describing it as an individual sector. However, regulatory bodies in Nigeria see e-hailing as a public transport system. To this end, e-hailing operators are required to obtain the following registrations in Lagos state: A Lagos State Drivers’ Institute (LASDRI) card and a rider badge; a hackney permit; and other regular government papers for car registration issued by the Department of Public Transport and Commuter Services of the Lagos State Ministry of Transportation. All of these registrations are expected to cost about N200, 000 (about 525 USD) (15). On the e-hailing company side, they are to part with N20 per trip and pay operating and renewal license fees of 10 million NGN ($25,814) for every 1,000 e-hailing taxis and an annual renewal fee of 5 million NGN ($12,907) (16). Similarly, taxi and app operators with 50 or fewer cabs are expected to pay a 5 million license fee, while those with more than 50 cabs are expected to pay a 10 million license fee. The former will pay an annual renewal of 1.5 million (approx. US$3,870), while the latter will renew at 3 million (approx. US$7,700) (11). In other states in Nigeria, they are yet to come up with a blue print on e-hailing mobility services. Besides, on the side of e-hailing companies, there are no clear policies on how they administer drivers, as the drivers complain of taking unilateral decisions, fixing inequitable commissions for themselves, having unhealthy trip fares, and denying them the right to belong to a union. More so, e-hailing service providers blocked drivers at will without regard to their hiring status, showed no empathy to drivers in times of emergency, lost lives while on active trips, and engaged in numerous other unethical business practices (17). Another issue policy should address is the area of training, sensitization, and accountability systems for drivers. This issue, though, was initially addressed when the number of drivers was still limited. However, with an exponential daily increase in the number of drivers added to the e-hailing platform, it is becoming increasingly difficult to keep up with a robust training, sensitization, and accountability system for drivers (20).
Technology
The e-hailing mobility services are powered by mobile applications enabled by internet connectivity. One of the major challenges is poor and unstable internet connectivity in Nigerian cities (18). The work of the app is to connect drivers and drivers together. The internet is frequently insufficient to support the heavy graphic mapping applications used by e-hailing service providers. Hence, services are either not rendered or not satisfactorily rendered. In 2020, Nigeria had 99.05 million internet users, which amounted to 46.6 percent of the population in 2020. Technology has basically excluded about 54.4% of Nigerians who do not have access to the internet (18).
Unhealthy rivalry among competitors
Apart from similar e-hailing company platforms, in Nigeria, the e-hailing industry is up against the long-established National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW), which sees itself as having exclusive rights to every passenger on the road. There were reported cases of National Union of Road Transport Workers (NURTW) officials at bus stops preventing e-hailing cars, tricycles, motorcycles, and buses from making stops for pickups at some bus terminals along their routes (3).
Unethical driver’s behavior
The attitudes and behavior of some of the e-hailing drivers are impolite. With the expansion and growth of e-hailing businesses, there has been a corresponding increase in rider misconduct and bad behavior. This was noticed by dredging up cases that range from simple misconduct to outright life-threatening; fare manipulation, rudeness, assault, theft, abuse; the list is seemingly endless (19).
Multihoming
Multihoming refers to the practice where one rider is found to operate on more than one ride hailing platform at a time. "Most times, it’s the drivers that you find on Uber that are still on Taxify." Most of them were forced onto these platforms by the harsh economy to make ends meet, and then they ended up taking out their frustration and anger on passengers (19).
Payment gateway and trust issues
With increasing incidences of internet fraud, this has brought about trust issues among drivers who are skeptical about registering their debit or credit card details on e-hailing platforms. The effect of this is the negation of the advantage of electronic payment, as most drivers prefer to pay cash (2).
Safety
1.7 The e-hailing mobility service was designed to be safe and secure. However, with the incursion of many drivers into the system and the inability of the e-hailing companies to properly scrutinize them, we began to hear about unwholesome experiences, including sexual molestation, kidnapping, etc. (3).