All methods were carried out in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.
Reagents
The following reagents were purchased from the indicated sources: doxorubicin (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan), N-(2-methoxy-2-oxoacetyl)glycine methyl ester (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and CAY10585 (Abcam Biochemicals, Cambridge, UK).
Animals
All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University and were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines (approval number: A2018316). All mice were allowed unrestricted activity and given access to standard rodent food pellets (Labo MR Stock, Nosan, Tokyo, Japan) and tap water ad libitum. Sirt6f/+ mice (FVB.129S6(Cg)-Sirt6tm1.1Cxd/J) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Dmp1-Cre (B6N.FVB-Tg(Dmp-1-Cre)1Jqfe/BwdJ) mice were kindly supplied by Dr. Shu Takeda from the Endocrine Center, Toranomon Hospital. Sirt6f/f mice were backcrossed for at least ten generations with C57/BL6J mice (CLEA Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and then crossed with Dmp-1-Cre mice to generate Dmp-1-Cre::Sirt6f/+ mice, and their progeny were intercrossed to obtain cKO mice. PAI-1+/- mice (C57BL6/J background) were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. PAI-1+/- mice were crossed with Dmp-1-Cre::Sirt6f/? mice to obtain Dmp-1-Cre Sirt6f/+::Pai-1+/- mice. cPKO mice were obtained by crossing Dmp-1-Cre::Sirt6f/+::PAI-1+/- mice. Male mice were euthanized at 20 weeks of age using an overdose of isoflurane inhalation followed by cervical dislocation. Male PAI-1-/- mice and their littermates were grown for 72 weeks, and their samples were analyzed by micro-CT and qPCR analysis following euthanasia. None of the mice died during the experimental period.
Histological and histomorphometric analysis
Calcein (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was injected subcutaneously for bone labeling five and two days prior to euthanasia. Blood and bone samples were collected at the time of euthanasia. The undecalcified samples of the spinal bone were sectioned, and the third and fourth lumbar vertebrae were stained using von Kossa and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining, as previously described49. The OsteoMeasure Analysis System (OsteoMetrics, Decatur, GA, USA) was used for static and dynamic histomorphometric analyses following the nomenclature defined by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research, as previously described50.
Immunohistological analysis
Protein expression of FGF23, sclerostin, and PAI-1 was determined by immunohistochemistry using anti-FGF23 (R&D systems; catalog Number: MAB26291), anti-sclerostin (R&D systems; catalog Number: AF1589), and anti-PAI-1 (Abcam Biochemicals; catalog number: ab66705) antibodies, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The signals were visualized using secondary antibodies conjugated with fluorescent dyes, such as Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L), Mouse/Human ads-FITC (Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA; Catalog Number: AB_2795952), donkey anti-goat IgG (H+L) Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor 594 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA, Catalog Number: A-11058), and anti-Rat IgG2a Antibody Conjugate FITC (Bethyl Laboratories Inc., Montgomery, AL, USA, Catalog Number: A110-109F) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Micro-CT analysis
Two-dimensional images of the distal femur and lumbar spine were obtained through micro-CT analysis (Comscan, Yokohama, Japan). The following three-dimensional morphometric parameters were determined using TRI/3D-BON software (RATOC, Tokyo, Japan): bone morphometric analysis of femoral bones performed at a region of 0.2 to 1 mm above the distal growth plates of the femora, bone volume/tissue volume (BV/TV), trabecular bone thickness (Tb.Th), Tb.N, Tb.Sp, and Tb.Spac for trabecular bone analyses51. The mineralized tissue volumes were measured using a calibration curve obtained from the BMD phantom.
Cell culture and gene knockout with the CRISPR/Cas9 system and small interfering RNA (siRNA)
The mouse osteocyte-like MLO-Y4 cell line was purchased from RIKEN Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan). MLO-Y4 cells were cultured in alpha minimal essential medium (αMEM) containing 2.5% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 2.5% calf serum (CS; Gibco Bovine Serum, Thermofisher scientific, Massachusetts, USA) with medium change every 3 days as described previously52. MLO-Y4 cells were transferred to 6-well plates and, at 70% confluency, were transfected with 50 nM Sirt6 siRNA or scrambled siRNA with HiPerFect (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) in medium supplemented with 10% FBS for 24 h. The target sequence of Sirt6 siRNA was 5′-GAAGCUCCCAAUGCAAUAAAU-3′ (forward) and 5′-UUAUUGCAUUGGGAGCUUCUG-3′ (reverse).
The CRISPR/Cas9 knockout (catalog number: sc-424467-KO-2), HDR (catalog number: sc-424467-HDR-2), and control (catalog number: sc-418922) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX, USA). Sirt6 knockout was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Senescence induction
For senescence induction by long-term confluency, MLO-Y4 cells were grown at confluency for 21 days without subculture53,54. αMEM medium supplemented with 2.5% FBS, 2.5% CS (Gibco Bovine Serum), and 1% antibiotics (Gibco Antibiotic-Antimycotic (100X); catalog number: 15240062) was used to grow MLO-Y4 cells. For DNA damage-induced cellular senescence, MLO-Y4 cells were treated with 50 nM doxorubicin, and 48 h later, mRNA was harvested for qPCR55. SA-β-gal activity was detected using the Senescence Detection Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (BioVision, CA, USA, catalog number: K320-250).
Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay
The EpiQuik ChIP kit (Epigentek Group Inc., NY, USA) was used for the ChIP assay, and it was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To evaluate the binding of HIF-1α to the Fgf23 enhancer29, PCR was carried out using a Thermal Cycler 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) according to a standard procedure. The primer sequences used were
5′-GTCAAGTGAGTCCGGCTTCA-3′ (forward) and
5′-CCGAGCCAGGACTTTCCTTT-3′ (reverse).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical analyses of the quantitative measures among the three groups were performed using Dunnett’s test. To assess the significance of differences between groups, a two-tailed Student’s t-test was employed. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.