The changes in microenvironment after thermal ablation were complicated. First, heat-ablated lesions in tissue can be thought of as having three zones: the central zone, which is immediately beyond the application tip and which undergoes ablation-induced coagulative necrosis; the peripheral or transitional zone of sublethal hyperthermia, which mostly occurs from thermal conduction of the central area that is either undergoing apoptosis or recovering from reversible injury; and the surrounding tissue that is unaffected by ablation [18]. In the transitional zone, which occurs adjacent to the central area of coagulative necrosis, studies have reported inflammatory infiltrates that include neutrophils, macrophages, dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, as well as B cells and T cells that are specific to the ablated tissue[10–12]. Besides, the systemic response also happens after thermal ablation [19]. Evidence indicates that hyperthermic destruction causes the release of a large population of inflammatory cytokines, which may elicit immune responses against tumor [20].
In this study, inflammatory responses were observed after thermal ablation in all three groups. The level of pro-inflammatory cytokine (TNF-α) increased gradually after ablation. However, there are some differences among different ablation technologies. One week after ablation, the level of TNF-αin TPLA group being the highest, the MWA group being the lowest, and the RFA group being in the middle, which was similar to the results of previous ablation studies on liver [21]. Further observation showed that the level of TNF-α decreased after one week in both RFA and MWA groups, while it still continued to increase in TPLA group. The level of TGF-β1, which is an anti-inflammatory cytokine was decreased in the TPLA group at different time points, while it decrease in the RFA group immediately after ablation, and then increased after one week. The results of IHC in the border of ablation lesions showed that the TPLA group was dominated by M1-like macrophages, while the RFA and MWA groups were dominated by M2-like macrophages.
The status of microenvironment may explain the differences dynamic change of ablation lesions’ volume in the three groups. The volume of in TPLA group increased gradually with the prolonging of time in one month. While the volume in RFA and MWA group shrank at one month after ablation. Although there some similar reports about the change of volume after thermal ablation in other organs [21–25], the exact mechanism has never been clear. We have previously reported that vascular permeability of microcirculation and micro vascular thrombosis around the ablation lesions may be involved in the progress of tissue damage, and then volume of coagulated necrosis gradually expanded with time[15]. Besides, maybe the changes of mircroenvironemt and inflammatory response were involved in the volume change. Pro-inflammatory cytokines stimulated sublethal or active cells in the transitional zone to further release inflammatory response factors, which further led to the expansion of necrosis range[19]. TGF-β1 is produced by M2-like macrophage cells and played an important role in anti-inflammatory repair [26], which increased in RFA and MWA groups.Besides, TGF-β1 was considered a central mediator of injury repair and fibrosis, inducing extracellular matrix production and proliferation of myofibroblasts. So the anti-inflammatory repair play a role in the volume shrank.
Combined with the changes of serum inflammatory cytokines in the blood of the three groups and the results of immunohistochemistry, the inflammatory response after TPLA was the most severe and lasted the longest, and the main pro-inflammatory response was within one month. However, in the RFA and MWA groups, anti-inflammatory repair was the main inflammatory response after one week, TPLA, RFA and MWA all belong to thermal ablation technology, why induced such a difference? A prior study has reported that there was greater periablational rim thickness and serum IL-6 levels for hepatic RFA (20W/2–3minutes) versus MWA (10W/7–12 minutes) performed with variable ablation protocols in animals [27]. For the same ablation device, different parameters of RFA in normal liver which can result in similarly-sized ablation zones (6.1 ± 0.1mm) induced different degrees of inflammatory response and different width of the inflammatory response zone [28]. The lower power and longer duration(60℃/10min ) induced more sever inflammatory response than high power and short duration (90℃/2min) [29]. For the MWA, previous literature reported that the high power and short duration (20w/15s) induced fewer macrophage cells in the peripheral ablation lesions than the low power and long duration (5w/2min) [30]. So, for the some approaches, such as lower power ablation with longer heating to achieve greater ablation sphericity, may increase periablational inflammation, as we demonstrate [31]. One potential explanation for this difference between different parameters is that the duration. For the higher power, heat is being generated throughout the target zone from the interaction of application with tissues directly. However, for the lower energy, long duration was needed, and heat is being generated near the application, so heating in the surrounding of the ablation zone is achieved by thermal conduction. This thermal tissue gradient may create a wider rim of periablational tissue that is exposed to lower nonlethal levels of heating and induced more serves inflammatory response [32, 33]. In this animal experiment, the duration of three types of ablation were different, which was longer in TPLA group (200s and 400s) than that in RFA and MWA group (60s and 120s). So this may be the reason of the serves inflammtory response in TPLA group. This suggests that the attention should be paid to the inflammatory response and anti-inflammatory drugs should be added appropriately to prevent the harm of excessive inflammatory reaction to the body and avoid the enlargement of the ablation lesions in the clinical application of TPLA. This is only an animal experiment, and whether there is similar situation in specific clinical application has not been studied yet. However, recent literature on TPLA treatment of BPH has reported that anti-inflammatory drugs represented by dexamethasone have been applied after surgery [5, 6]. In addition, studies have shown that inflammation is accompanied with the activation of a large number of immune cells in the body [34]. So, in the case of laser ablation of tumor patients, whether the inflammatory response in the body indicates that the "cold tumor" will be stimulated to the "hot tumor" and then sensitive to immunotherapy, or whether the TPLA combined with immunotherapy will have better clinical effects. So all these speculations need to be clinically verified and further studied.
There were some limitations to this study. Firstly, the sample size of animals in each group is small. Secondly, the observation time is only up to one month, which cannot predict the changes over longer period. Thirdly, this study only observed the normal beagles, not the tumor model underwent thermal ablation. So, further investigation is needed.