Pure SWCNTs and DSPE-PEG (5000)-COOH were purchased from NanoCs Company (USA) and NOF-Sunbright Company (USA), respectively. Amphotericin B (Amb), ethylenediamine (EDA) and Poly-L-lysin hydrobromide were purchased from Sigma-aldrich, (USA). 1-ethyl-3[3-dimethylaminopropyl] carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (sulfo-NHS), 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES) buffer saline, and phosphate buffer saline (PBS) were all purchased from Thermo Scientific Company (USA). Escherichia coli DH5α was used to propagate the reported CMS-EGFP plasmid (5.5 kb, PlasmidFactory, Germany), named pEGFP. Then, according to manufacturer´s instructions, the pEGFP was purified using the Qiagen endotoxin-free plasmid purification Maxi-prep kit (Qiagen, Santa Clarita, CA, USA). The final pEGFP’s concentration was quantified by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm, using a SimpliNano™ device (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK). Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8; Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 0.25% trypsin-EDTA (Gibco, San Diego, CA, USA), serum-free Opti-MEM solution (Gibco, California, USA), lipofectamine™ 2000 transfection reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,CA,USA) and propidium iodide (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) were procured. HEK-293 (ATCC CRL-1573) cell lines were purchased from ATCC (manassas VA, USA). Cells were grown in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM, 30-2003, ATCC-Manassas, VA, USA) supplemented with 10% of fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) and 1% of antibiotic/antimycotic solution (A/A) (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK). Milli-Q water was used in all experiments.
2 − 1. Preparation of CNT and conjugation to Amb and EGFP plasmid
2-1-1. Functionalizing SWCNT with DSPE-PEG (5000)-COOH
In the first step, based on the modification of the procedure described by Hadidi and coworkers51, pure SWCNT was functionalized non-covalently with DSPE-PEG(5000)-COOH with a SWCNT/DSPE-PEG-COOH weight ratio of 0.2, and the product was called functionalized single wall carbon nanotube (FSWCNT). In other words, the FSWCNT was also made from dissolving 10 mg SWCNT in 5 mL Milli-Q water and 50 mg DSPE-PEG (5000)-COOH in 5 mL Milli-Q water. Pure SWCNT was dispersed completely through prob-sonicator (about 20 min). The dispersion process was performed in an ice-bath sonicator for 60 min due to heat sensitivity of phospholipid DSPE-PEG (5000)-COOH. In the next step, the dispersed SWCNT and DSPE-PEG (5000)-COOH solutions were mixed together, and sonicated in an ice-bath sonicator for 5 h. The resulting product of this step was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 minutes at 5°C. The supernatant portion of this product is the FSWCNT (Fig. 1, step 1).
2-1-2. Conjugation of EDA to FSWCNT
In this step, 1.6 mg of EDC was added to 10 mL of FSWCNT with a concentration of 1 mg/mL. EDC is a carboxyl and amine-reactive zero-length cross-linker. The conjugation of carboxylic acid group of FSWCNT to amine groups of EDA is helped by formation of amid bonds between them. Then, 5 mL of EDA was added to the above solution, and sonicated in an ice-bath sonicator for 5 h. Next, this mixture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 30 min, and finally dried through lyophilization. The product of this step is called double functionalized single wall carbon nanotube (DFSWCNT), due to being functionalized originally with DSPE-PEG-COOH, and then functionalized again with EDA (Fig. 1, step 2).
2-1-3. Attachment of Amb to DFSWCNT
In the final step, based on the procedure by Vosoughi and coworkers 52, the Amb drug was attached to DFSWCNT as a nanovector. 2 ml of Amb (250 µg/mL) was dispersed in 0.2 mL MES buffer (0.5M), and 0.46 mL of NHS aqueous solution (50 mg/mL) was added, and mixed completely by a stirrer. Then, 0.24 mL EDAC solution (10 mg/mL) was added to the above suspension and stirred at 350 rpmfor 40 min at room temperature. On the other hand, DFSWCNT was re-dispersed in 9 mL of MES buffer solution (0.05M) with pH∼6.1, and added to the Amb suspension. The final product was mixed on a shaker (350 rpm, 60 min) and centrifuged (5000 rpm, 20 min). Finally, the product was washed three times with 0.05M MES buffer to remove excess Amb. The product of this step is DFSWCNT-Amb (Fig. 1, step 3).
2-1-4. Conjugation of EGFP plasmid to DFSWCNT
Complexes were obtained by adding an appropriate volume of EGFP plasmid stock solution to DFSWCNT solution based on 6 different DFSWCNT/EGFP plasmid mass ratios (w/w). These complexes were incubated for 30 min at room temperature before application, to promote the electrostaic interaction between the amine groups of DFSWCNT and phosphate groups of EGFP plasmid DNA, and obtain the desired complexes (Fig. 1, step 4).
2–2. Physicochemical Characterization of nanocarrier
2-2-1. UV-visible assay
UV-visible spectrophotometry (Infinite M200, TECAN, Spain) was applied to determine: FSWCNT concentration at wavelength 256 nm, the percentage of Amb loading on DFSWCNT system and draw the calibration curves of Amb in Milli-Q water/PBS at pH values 5.5 and 7.4. The calibration curve of P7-SWCNT as standard CNT, which is described with the adjacent Eq. 1 (Absorbance = 13.07 x Concentration (mg/mL) − 0.0452) 51, was used for determination of FSWCNT concentration. In order to draw Amb’s calibration curve, different concentrations of pure Amb (in Milli-Q water, PBS with pH values 5.5 and 7.4) were made, and their absorbance values were read at 410 nm wavelength. Finally, the absorbance values were plotted versus concentrations, and linear curves were obtained by linear regression analysis of the corresponding plot points, and used for relevant calculations. All experiments included three replications.
2-2-2. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
In order to obtain the mass contents of impurities in SWCNT, DSPE-PEG-COOH, EDA and Amb; TGA analyses of pure SWCNT, FSWCNT, DFSWCNT and DFSWCNT-Amb were performed by TGA/DSC3+ (Mettler Toledo) equipment under N2 atmospheric condition in an alumina cell with a flow rate of 30 mL/min and a temperature rate of 10°C/min. The molar functionality of carbon atoms in all the samples can be determined by Eq. 2 53.
$$\text{M}\text{o}\text{l}\text{a}\text{r} \text{f}\text{u}\text{n}\text{c}\text{t}\text{i}\text{o}\text{n}\text{a}\text{l}\text{i}\text{t}\text{y}=\frac{\text{t}\text{o}\text{t}\text{a}\text{l} \text{m}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s} \text{l}\text{o}\text{s}\text{s}\times 12}{\text{M}\text{w} \text{o}\text{f} \text{S}\text{W}\text{C}\text{N}\text{T} \times \text{m}\text{a}\text{s}\text{s} \text{l}\text{o}\text{s}\text{s} \text{r}\text{e}\text{l}\text{a}\text{t}\text{e}\text{d} \text{t}\text{o} \text{D}\text{S}\text{P}\text{E}-\text{P}\text{E}\text{G}-\text{C}\text{O}\text{O}\text{H}}\times 100 \left(2\right)$$
2-2-3. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) assay
Surface characteristics (such as chemical functional groups, chemical bonds and the percentage of atomic concentrations) of pure SWCNT, FSWCNT, DFSWCNT and DFSWCNT-Amb structures can be obtained by XPS analysis. In this study, the XPS measurements were obtained by a SPECS system (Berlin, Germany) equipped with a Phoibos 150 1D-DLD analyzer and monochromatic radiation source Al Kα (1486.7 eV). An initial analysis was carried out to determine the elements in the sample (wide scan: step energy 1 eV, dwell time 0.1 s, pass energy 80 eV) and the detailed analysis of the detected elements was carried out (detail scan: step energy 0.08 eV, dwell time 0.1 s, pass energy 30 eV) at an electron take-off angle of 90º. The spectrometer had been previously calibrated with Ag (Ag 3d5/2, 368.26 eV). The spectra were adjusted using the CasaXPS 2.3.16 software, which models the Gauss-Lorentzian contributions after background subtraction (Shirley). The concentrations were calculated by correcting the values with relative atomic sensitivity factors (Scofield).
2-2-4. Size, zeta potential and polydispersity determination
The hydrodynamic diameter, which includes particle size, reported as mean particle intensity, and the polydispersity index (PDI) of nanocarriers were measured by Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), and the Zeta potential was measured by Lasser Doppler Velocimetry (LDV) in a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instrument, UK) 54. To carry out the measurements, 50 µL of each sample was diluted in 950 µL of 0.1 mM NaCl solution. The particle’s hydrodynamic diameter was obtained by cumulative analysis. The Smoluchowski approximation supported the calculation of Zeta potential based on electrophoretic mobility. All measurements were carried out in three replicates.
2-2-5. Raman spectroscopy assay
The measurements were carried out by using a Renishaw InVia Raman spectrometer, attached to a Leica DMLM microscope. The spectra were acquired with a Leica 50x N Plan (0.75 aperture) objective. Additionally, to visualize and focus, another Leica 5x N Plan (0.12 aperture) and a 20x N Plan EPI (0.40 aperture) object were also used. The spatial resolution for the 50x objectives is 2 microns. The microscope is equipped with a Prior scientific motorized stage (XYZ) with a joystick to facilitate focusing on or searching the points of interest. The excitation wavelength was 514 nm (ion-argon laser, Modu-Laser) with 50 mW of nominal power at the source, and 20 mW of maximum power directed to the sample. A holographic net of 1800 lines/mm was employed. The power of the laser was reduced by neutral density filter in all of the measurements to avoid photo-decomposition of samples (burning). Each spectrum took 20 seconds, and 5 scans were accumulated with 10% of the maximum power of the 514 nm laser in the 150–3500 cm− 1 spectral window.
2-2-6. Morphological studies (SEM, TEM)
Morphologies of pure SWCNT, FSWCNT, DFSWCNT and DFSWCNT-Amb were assessed by transmission and scanning electron microscopy analyses (TEM, SEM). Solid pure SWCNT was suspended in ethanol, sonicated, and one droplet of it was deposited on a Cu TEM grid with Holley carbon film. Likewise, one droplet from each of the remaining samples was also deposited on individual Cu TEM grids with Holley carbon film. TEM bright field images were obtained with a Philips (Eindhoven, The Netherlands) CM200 TEM, operating at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. For SEM analysis, samples of FSWCNT, DFSWCNT and DFSWCNT-Amb were diluted in Milli-Q water at a 1:10 ratio, and deposited on an Au coated glass cover. Secondary electron images were obtained with a JEOL (Tokyo, Japan) JSM-7000-F SEM, equipped with a Schottky field emission gun. The microscope was operated at 10 kV, and an applied probe current of about 0.01 nA.
2–3. Release of Amb from DFSWCNT
As time goes on, Amb particles will detach from nanocarrier and diffuse to the release medium. The amount of Amb in release medium was quantified by measuring Amb’s absorbance in release medium by UV-visible analysis at 410 nm wavelength, and Amb’s release percentage and its releasing mechanism can be determined with the help of a calibration curve. So, 2 mL of DFSWCNT-Amb formulation was poured into a dialysis bag and put in a 20 ml PBS solution at two pH settings (5.5 and 7.4), and placed on a shaker operating at 100 rpm for a period of 48 h at 37°C. 3 mL of the PBS solution was withdrawn at specific time intervals during a 48 h time span, and analyzed directly through a UV-visible spectrophotometer. In order to keep the sink conditions constant, 3 mL of fresh PBS was added frequently to the release medium at specific points of time during all of the in vitro release studies. In order to investigate the effect of pH on Amb releasing process, two release PBS mediums with different pHs were studied. All experiments were performed in three replicates.
2–4. Cell culture
HEK-293 cells were maintained as monolayer culture in EMEM medium with Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution (BSS) and 2 mM l-glutamine supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% A/A. The cells were incubated at 37° C under 5% CO2 atmosphere and sub-cultured every 2–3 days.
2–5. Viability assay
The cells were seeded using EMEM media without A/A, at a density of 15,000 cells per well in 96 well plate, and allowed to adhere overnight to reach 70–80% confluence for the biocompatibility assay. The CNT stock solution was diluted in EMEM media without A/A to achieve a concentration of 1mg/mL, and sonicated for 30 min. At those conditions, cells were exposed to pure SWCNT, FSWCNT and DFSWCNT at concentrations ranging from 0.075 to 1 mg/mL for a period of 24 h at 37°C under appropriate controls. Then, 10 µL/well of CCK8 reagent was added to each well and incubated for 4 h, and the absorbance was read with a microplate reader at 450 nm (Infinite M200, TECAN, Spain). Furthermore, in order to compare the cytotoxic Amb and Amb loaded on the surface of DFSWCNT, appropriate amounts of both Amb and (DFSWCNT-Amb) solution were lyophilized to obtain different concentrations of Amb and DFSWCNT-Amb compounds in EMEM media without A/A. To achieve this, HEK-293 cells were exposed to pure Amb and DFSWCNT-Amb at concentrations ranging from 1.431 to 37.5 µg/mL for a period of 24 h at 37°C under appropriate controlling conditions. Finally, the cytotoxic analyses of pure Amb and DFSWCNT-Amb were performed by CCK8 assay as described before. At least four wells were placed for each cocentration.
2–6. Gene delivery efficiency
To evaluate the transfection efficiency, HEK-293 cells were seeded using EMEM media without A/A into 24 well plates previously pre-treated with poly-lisin, at an initial density of 20×104 cells per well, to reach 70–80% of conflunece at the time of transfection assay. Next, the cells were exposed to DFSWCNT-EGFP complexes at different mass ratios in OptiMEM medium and incubated for 4 h at 37°C (5% CO2). Then, the transfection medium was discarded and the cells were washed with PBS. Afterwards, 500 µL of fresh EMEM medium containing 10% FBS per well was added and the cells were allowed to grow for 48 h. Commercially available Lipofectamine™ 2000 transfection reagent was used as a positive control 55.
FACSCalibur flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson Bioscience, San Jose, USA) was used to perform flow cytometry analysis to quantify the percentage of live cells, after satining with propidium iodide (FL3 channel, 650 nm), and transfected with DFSWCNT-EGFP plasmid complexes (FL1 channel, 525 nm). For this purpose, at the end of the incubation time, the cells were washed with PBS and detached from the 24 wells with 0.25% trypsin/EDTA (200 µL per well). Then, trypsin activity was neutralized with supplemented EMEM growth medium without A/A and the cells were prepared and analyzed by flow cytometry as described before 55,56.