Clinical features.
We characterized a four-generation extended Chinese family with DUH in Zhaoyang, Hubei, China; the disease was found to be transmitted in an autosomal dominant manner (Fig. 1A). The proband (III-6) was a woman in her early 30s who had normal skin at birth. The lesions occurred in a symmetrical pattern and were most obvious on the face, neck, trunk, and dorsa of her hands and buttocks. Hyperpigmented macules appeared initially on her face as a toddler, the hyperpigmented macules became larger as evenly distributed freckles, and the color of these macules deepened. Hypopigmented macules began to appear on her neck, elbows, knees, and phalangeal joints of the proband in early adolescence. Her palms and soles, oral mucosa, hair, nails, and teeth were normal. In adulthood, irregularly shaped, asymptomatic hyper and hypopigmented macules were present over her face, neck, abdomen and back, dorsal aspects of the hands and arms, thighs, calves and hips (Fig. 1B and Table 1).
Affected individuals in the pedigree, including her grandmother (I-2), father (II-3), fifth aunt (II-10), sixth uncle (II-11) , younger brother(III-9) and younger female cousin (III-12), all showed sporadic or disseminated hyperpigmented and/or hypopigmented macules on the limbs (I-2, II-3, II-10 and III-12), trunk(II-3 and III-9), back (II-3) and III-9 and auricle (II-11) (Fig. 1B-1E, and Table 1). The hypopigmented and hyperpigmented lesions of the II-3 affected individual were concentrated on his trunk, shoulder, and back, and his hyperpigmented lesions were diffusely distributed (Fig. 1C). The hyperpigmented lesions of II-10 were concentrated on both lower limbs (Fig. 1D). The hyperpigmented lesions of II-11 were focused on the auricles (Fig. 1E). The hypopigmented lesions of III-9 were diffusely distributed on right upper chest and back. The dense hyperpigmented lesions distributed on the shoulder and dorsum (Fig. 1F).
The above six affected individuals all had hypopigmented and/or disseminated hyperpigmented macules; there was no skin atrophy, telangiectasia, or inflammation, among others. These observed clinical symptoms supported the diagnosis of pigment abnormalities in these six affected individuals. DUH is characterized by asymptomatic hyperpigmented and hypopigmented macules that occur in a generalized distribution over the trunk, limbs, and sometimes face[2, 5]. Therefore, these six affected individuals were likely to have DUH. The pigmentation abnormality phenotypes of the proband were significantly more obvious than those of the six DUH-affected individuals (I-2, II-3, II-10, II-11,III-9 and III-12). The family members’ clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The DUH pedigree was ascertained by two experienced dermatology doctors of the Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University and the First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, and all of these patients were diagnosed as having the clinical phenotypes of DUH.
In general, DUH should be considered in differential diagnosis of all cases manifesting as mixed hyper and hypopigmented macules, and biopsy specimens should be obtained to confirm the diagnosis[37]. We further confirmed the phenotypes of increased melanin pigmentation in the affected skin epithelial tissues of II-3- and II-10 and the proband (III-6) of this family using melanin staining. These melanin staining assays revealed excessive melanin pigmentation in both the basal and suprabasal layers of the proband’s hyperpigmented macules (Fig. 2B). Less melanin and a mosaic-like melanin distribution were observed in the hypopigmented macules of the proband (Fig. 2C). Similar to the proband, increased melanin pigmentation and a mosaic-like melanin distribution were found for the basal and suprabasal layers of the hyperpigmented macules of II-3 and II-10 (Fig. 2D-2G).
Whole-exome sequencing identifies candidate genes in the family.
We subjected the exomes of five affected (I-2, II-3, II-10, III-6 and III-12) and five unaffected (I-1, II-1, II-4, II-13, and III-5) family members to whole-exome sequencing. Approximately 100 million bases per individual were mapped, and approximately 60 million bases were sequenced. Variants with an MAF less than 0.01 in databases including 1000 genomic data (1000g_all) and the in house Novo-Zhonghua exome database were identified. SNVs occurring in exons or splice sites were analyzed, synonymous SNVs were discarded, and variations were screened according to the scores of pathogenicity prediction programs, including SIFT[27], Polyphen[28], MutationTaster[29] and CADD software[30]. Variants were classified as pathogenic, likely pathogenic, uncertain significance, likely benign or benign according to the classification system of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)[32].
Linkage analysis was performed in the multigenerational family to determine the candidate region using merlin tools and Perl combined with high-throughput sequencing data for the family and the HapMap database of Chinese population (CHB) allele frequency using the known SNP as a marker. A candidate SNP for the disease-related pathogenic mutation was defined as one existing exclusively in the five affected family members with clinical phenotypes but not in the five unaffected individuals without clinical phenotypes. Twenty-eight variants involving multiple chromosomes were identified. According to our previous reports about DUH, the SASH1 variant rs770362998 was included for consideration (Table S2). Nevertheless, Sanger sequencing uncovered no mutation in SASH1 (data not shown). The SASH1 variants including the c.1761C>G (p.Ser587Arg) variant [10], the c.1553A > C (p.Q518P) one[11], and the c.1556 G->A(p. S519N) [12] one of SASH1 which had been reported previously to associate with genodermatosis or DUH were not indicated in the Exome sequencing results. The genetic disease testing report provided by Chigene Translational Medical Research Center Co. Ltd. (Beijing, China) regarding the exome sequencing results of the proband showed that c. 1574C>G (p.T525R) variant in exon 14 of SASH1 (NM_015278) was detected during prenatal diagnosis(Table S2). This variant did not exist in normal controls of Chinese populations as indicated in two times of exome sequencing results provided by Chigene Translational Medical Research Center Co. Ltd and Novagene (Table S2). Sanger sequencing analysis was further performed to identify the C1574G SASH1 mutation in the proband and four affected (I-2, II-3, II-10 and III-12) and five unaffected (I-1, II-1, II-4, II-13, and III-5) individuals. Based on Sanger sequencing analysis, c. 1574C>G (p.T525R) was only detected in the proband and not in the other five affected and unaffected individuals (Fig. 3C, Fig. S1). The c. C1574G SASH1 variant was also found in the aborted fetus of the proband (data not shown). Three unaffected individuals (I-1, II-1 and II-4) and four affected individuals (II-3, II-10, III-6 and III-12) carried SASH1rs208696, which suggests that this SNP does not cosegregate with the pigmented phenotype (Table S2).
The c.1067T4C (p.Leu356Pro) variant of ABCB6 , the c.508A4G (p.Ser170Gly) one, the c.1736G4A(p.Gly579Glu) one [15], the c.1358C>T ( p.Ala453Val) one and the c.964A>C ( p.Ser322Lys) one [16] , the c.1663 C>A( p.Gln555Lys) one and the c.459 delC one[17], and the c.964A>C(p.S322R) one in exon4 and the c.1270T>C (p.Y424H) [18] one were not found in the Exome sequencing results of this DUH family. The exon 1 SNP rs1109866 (c. G117A, p.L39 L) in ABCB6, a synonymous SNV, was detected in five affected individuals (I-2, II-3, II-10, III-6 and III-12); it is predicted to be harmless. ABCB6rs1109867 was also found in these five affected individuals; however, pathogenicity prediction does not support that this variant is harmful (Table S3).
A c. 517C>T (p.P173S, rs772027021) variant in exon 5 of PER3 (NM_001289861), a c. 211delC (p.L71fs) variant in exon 3 of surfactant-associated 3 (SFTA3) (NM_001101341), a c. 716C>T (p.A239V, rs199529102) variant in exon 9 of kynurenine (KYNU) (NM_ 001199241.2) and a c. 561delT variant in exon 5 of glomulin (GLMN) (NM_053274.3) were screened as potential pathogenic mutations based on pathogenicity prediction programs. The DNA of twenty-four individuals in the extended 31-member DUH family was subjected to Sanger sequencing to identify causative genes. The PER3rs772027021 SNP, which is a missense SNV, was subsequently detected by whole-exome sequencing in 7 affected individuals with hyperpigmented and/or hypopigmented phenotypes. The PER3 rs772027021 SNP is predicted to be harmful (Table S4). To analyze this SNP in more individuals in the extended DUH family, 24 individuals among the 31-member extended family agreed to blood draw to identify the PER3 rs772027021 SNP. Sanger sequencing analyses detected PER3 rs772027021SNP in seven affected members of the family, including affected individuals II-11 and III-9, but not in any of the seventeen unaffected individuals (Fig. 3A and 3E, Table S4). Pathogenicity prediction of the PER3 rs772027021 SNP was performed with the VarSome tool (https://varsome.com/). PER3 rs772027021 SNP is predicted to be damaging or deleterious by six CADD predication software tools, and one individual prediction software tool and one Meta score and pathogenicity score support that the SNP is harmful (Table S5).
The c. 211delC (p.L71fs) variant in exon 3 of SFTA3 was found in six affected individuals (I-2, II-3, II-10, II-11, III-6 and III-12) with hyperpigmented and hypopigmented phenotypes whose DNA was analyzed by whole-exome sequencing. An unaffected individual (II-7) was later identified to harbor SFTA3 c. 211delC (p.L71fs) by Sanger sequencing (Table S6). These results suggest that SFTA3c. 211delC (p.L71fs) does not cosegregate with the pigmented phenotype in this DUH family. The SNP KYNUrs199529102 was detected in affected individuals (I-2, II-3, II-10, III-6 and III-12); however, it was also found in an unaffected individual (II-13), which indicates that this SNP does not cosegregate with the pigmented phenotype (Table S7). The c. 561delT variant in exon 5 of GLMN was detected in the affected individuals (I-2, II-3, II-10, II-11 and III-12) and in one unaffected individual (III-14), though it was not detected in the proband. Thus, the c. 561delT variant of GLMN does not cosegregate with the pigmented phenotype (Table S8).
The remaining 24 variants or SNPs screened as potentially pathogenic mutation prediction programs included SNP MYOCrs74315337, SNP CELSR1rs374501629, SNP ST3GAL5rs549326241, SNP DPP10rs138159056, variant DES c. 740delT, SNP UMP rs12191789, SNP BCHErs537434945, SNP EVC2rs200140401, SNP ADAMTS6rs147540204, variant MAK c. A1598G, variant PKHD1 6:51768842-T-A, SNP PHIPrs200515013, SNP RAD54Brs114216685, variant HPS6 c. 1687dupC, variant ST14 c. C1819T, SNP Trp4rs757614572, SNP SF3B2rs201160612, SNP LRRK2rs34594498, SNP GCH1rs770547722, SNP DUOX2rs180671269, variant DUOX2 c. G943T, variant CRTC3 c. G967A, variant AP2B1 17:34036332-G-A and SNP GSSrs113191242. The remaining 24 variants or SNPs do not cosegregate with the pigmented phenotype in the affected and unaffected family members who underwent whole-exome sequencing. High conservation among species was show in Thr525 site of SASH1 but not the Pro173 of PER3 (Fig. 3B and 3D).
Increased melanin was induced by the PER3 rs772027021 SNP and/or SASH1T525R variant.
We also assessed the effects of PER3 rs772027021 SNP and/or SASH1T525R on melanogenesis in vitro. Western blot analysis indicated upregulation of mutant SASH1 in B16 cells (Fig. 5A, 5B) and SK-MEL-1 cells (Fig. 5D, 5E). Melanin quantification suggested that increased melanin synthesis was induced by the PER3 rs772027021 SNP in B16 (Fig.5C) and SK-MEL-1 (Fig. 5F) cells compared to that induced by wild-type PER3. More synthesized melanin was induced through cooperation between the PER3 rs772027021 SNP and the SASH1T525R variant compared to the SASH1T525R variant alone (Fig. 5C) in B16 cells. Moreover, enhanced melanin synthesis occurred via cooperation between PER3 rs772027021 SNP and SASH1T525R variant compared to either alone in SK-MEL-1 cells (Fig. 5F). More melanin was synthesized after overexpression of SASH1T525R compared to wild-type SASH1 in B16 cells (Fig. 5C) and SK-MEL-1 cells (Fig. 5F). Rescue assays were performed to identify the inducement of PER3 on melanin synthesis. The inducement of increased melanogenesis by PER3 rs772027021 SNP and wild type PER3 was reversed by the PER3 siRNA knockdown (Fig. 5G and 5H).
Although the KYNU c. C716T variant exhibited a distribution similar to that of PER3 rs772027021 SNP in this family (Fig. S6A), melanin quantification of B16 cells infected with KYNU ADV revealed that no melanin increase was induced by the KYNU mutation (Fig. S6B). The SFTA3 c. 211delC variant also exhibited a familial distribution similar to that of the PER3 rs772027021 SNP (Table S6). SFTA3 is an RNA Gene and is affiliated with the lncRNA class, which is now thought to do not encode a protein although previous study suggested that it encoded surfactant protein H which was part of the multifunctional surfactant gene family of the lung[38]. PER2 has been suggested to be the target gene of SFTA3 by LncRNA2Target(http://123.59.132.21 /lncrna2target/index.jsp ). So HA-SFTA3 and myc-PER3 were introduced into B16 cells to assess their combinations on melanin synthesis. However, no increase in melanin synthesis was caused by overexpression of mutant SFTA3 (Fig. S7A, S7B), and enhanced melanin synthesis was not induced by the combination of WT-PER3+WT-SFTA3 compared to that of wild-type PER3. Additionally, melanin was not increased by the combination of MT-PER3+MT-SFTA3 compared to that by mutant PER3 (Fig. S7E).
The PER3 rs772027021 SNP is essential for melanocyte proliferation and development in vivo and PER3-CREB cascade may regulate melanogenesis.
In this study, the PER3P173S SNP is first reported to induce pigmented phenotypes in DUH-affected individuals. The zebrafish is an ideal model for studying melanocyte differentiation[35, 39]. Homology analyses of the PER3 gene sequence from the Ensembl database suggested that human PER3 and zebrafish per3 are homologous genes, with collinear genes vamp3 (vamp3) and UTS2 (uts2b), among others, which indicates that human PER3 and zebrafish per3 are orthologous genes (Fig. 6A). Homology analyses of the amino acid sequence of PER3 showed 37.1% homology between humans and zebrafish (Fig. S8).
To investigate the in vivo pathogenic effects of the variant in zebrafish, wild-type and mutant PER3 were transcribed into RNA in vitro and injected into fertilized zebrafish eggs. Quantitative RT–PCR detection in fertilized eggs at 24 h postfertilization (hpf) showed significant increases in the expression levels of all injection groups, which indicated wild-type PER3 and PER3 rs772027021 SNP to be expressed in this model (Fig. 6B). A concentration of 100 ng/μl was selected as the optimum dose for further studies based on the observed expression of PER3. We selected 72 hpf as a reference time point to characterize the pigmentation phenotype of zebrafish based on previous reports [35, 36]. As anticipated, a significantly large number of proliferative melanocytes were induced by the PER3 rs772027021 SNP compared to the control group and wild-type group (Fig. 6C and 6D). These results indicate that the PER3 rs772027021 SNP plays an important role in melanocyte proliferation and development in zebrafish in vivo. In contrast, no enhanced melanin synthesis was induced by the GLMN c. 561delT variant compared to wild-type GLMN in B16 cells (Fig. S9A). Additionally, no increase in the number of proliferative melanocytes was induced by the c. 561delT variant of GLMN compared to the control group and wild-type group (Fig. S9D, S9E) in vivo. Increase in phosphorylated ERK1/2 and CREB levels is caused by mutated SASH1 alleles[9]. Western blot indicated that over-expression of wild type and mutant type of PER3 in B16 and SK-MEL-1 cells enhanced the phosphorylation level of CREB ,however downregulated that of ERK1/2 (Fig. 6E and 6F),which indicated that a PER3-CREB phosphorylation cascade may mediate melanogenesis.