ANIMAL MODEL
Adult mdx mice and C57bl/6 (wt) mice were used in their adult phase (50 days of life). The C57bl/6 wild type animals were supplied by the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC); and, the mdx animals came from the University of São Paulo (USP). The study was conducted at Lanex and at the Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Unisul, Palhoça, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Approval for conducting this study was obtained from the Animal Use Ethics Committee (CEUA) of Unisul under the number 16.051.4.01IV.
The animals were kept in polypropylene boxes of adequate dimensions, with wood shavings, in an acclimatized room (22°C ± 2°C), with a 12-hour timer-controlled light/dark cycle; they were given water and a standard ad libitum diet throughout the experiment period.
The number of animals per group was set at n=8. The formula used for the calculation was the equation n /group=2[(Zα/2 +Zβ) x d/∆]2., for the comparison of two means, considering a test power of 80% , a 5% significance level, a 12.5 % standard deviation based on the records of previous studies and the value of the difference to be detected equal to 18%.
Upon completing 50 days of life, the animals were divided into four experimental groups: wt+DC, wt+DCet, mdx+DC, mdx+DCet and fasted for 8 hours before the beginning of the procedures. After this period, they were exposed to two types of diet for 14 days [8,14,16,17]: ketogenic diet (DCet) or control diet (CD).
Regarding the diets offered, two diets with different nutritional compositions were used: pelleted CD containing 22% proteins, 10% total fat and 68% carbohydrates (Nuvilab® CR1 Nuvital Nutrientes S/A, Brazil); DCet, not pelleted, with 10% protein, 90% total fat and 0.1% carbohydrates (PragSoluções®, Brazil) (Table 1).
Table 1 - Nutritional composition of the diets under study, per 100g portion.
Estimated minimum1
|
Control diet2
|
Dketogenic diet3
|
Calories (kcal)
|
360
|
398
|
|
676
|
|
%
|
g
|
%
|
g
|
%
|
Proteín
|
14
|
22
|
22,1
|
17,6
|
10,4
|
Lipids
|
10
|
4,5
|
10,2
|
67,2
|
89,5
|
Carbohydrates
|
76
|
67,3
|
67,7
|
0,2
|
0,1
|
(1)AIN-93M107. (2)Control diet = standard ration. (3)Ketogenic diet = test feed (PragSoluções®).
On the 14th and 15th day, the animals underwent behavioral tests, followed by painless assisted death (PAD) on the 15th day.
Measuring body mass feed consumption
Body mass was measured twice a week during the diet therapy period, at the same time of day by trained investigators using a digital scale. The mass gain control was performed by simple variation (final – initial) and by the rate of mass gain following the formula: Δ% = [(final mass - initial mass/initial mass)x100].
The amount of feed offered was estimated according to the number of animals in each box and considering the average amount of feed consumed per animal per day of approximately 6g (+ 10% waste)[18]. The animals from the same group were randomly distributed, separated by gender, at 1< n ≤5, as social isolation modifies the biochemical profile and consumption pattern of experimental animal models [19].
Memory and learning
Inhibitory Avoidance
The assessment of avoidance memory consisted of two steps: training and testing, performed at an interval of 24 hours to assess long-term aversive memory. The assessment was carried out by the same investigators using a specific equipment for such assessment: the passive avoidance box. In the training session, the animals were placed on the platform and the time that the animal took to descend with all four paws from the platform was measured. This period of time is called latency. Immediately after coming down from the platform (with all four paws), the animal received a shock of 0.2 mA for 2 seconds. In the test session, the animal was again placed on the platform and the time taken to descend (latency) was measured, but without shock administration. Latency is a classic memory retention parameter [20].
Open-field habituation
The assessment of open field habituation took place in two stages: training and testing. It was performed at an interval of 24 hours, by two trained researchers using specific equipment and observation techniques. In the training session, one animal at a time was carefully placed in the left posterior quadrant by one of the investigators, from which the exploratory behavior of the setting was observed freely for 5 minutes. In the test session, the animals were placed individually in the exploratory box again for the same assessment. The number of crossings across the quadrants (crossing: motor activity) and the number of rearings (exploratory activity, in which the animal stands on two paws) were evaluated in both sessions[20].
Collection of biological material
Immediately after PAD by anesthetic deepening (intraperitoneal application), samples of structures were removed: from the brain tissue which are associated with learning and memory and where they present greater expression of dystrophin [21].(prefrontal cortex, cerebellum, hippocampus, striatum and total cortex) by surgical dissection; blood, by cardiac puncture to assess ketonemia; and, of muscle tissue (gastrocnemius) with the objective of control as it is a neuromuscular pathology also by surgical dissection. Samples were kept at negative 80ºC for subsequent biochemical analyses.
Biochemical determinations
Cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β IL-6 and IL-10) concentrations were analyzed by the ELISA method using specific standard kits, following the manufacturer's recommendations and using replicate dosing.
Thus, in short, 96-well plates were sensitized with 100 μl of captured antibody diluted in a coating buffer and incubated under refrigeration overnight for antibody adhesion. After that period, the wells were washed three times with 250 μl buffer. Subsequently, the plate was blocked with 100 µl of blocking solution (1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.2) to avoid unspecific binding and was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. . At the end of this period, the wells were washed again, as described above.
After blocking, 100 µl of the samples diluted 1:3 in dilution reagent (1% BSA in sterile PBS, pH 7.2) were added and placed again in a moist chamber and incubated overnight at room temperature. The samples were plated in duplicate and 100 µl of the dilution solution was placed in a well for blank characterization. After this period the plates were washed as previously described.
After washing, 100 µl of detection antibody previously diluted in 1:3 reagent (1% BSA in sterile PBS, pH 7.2) was added to each well. The plate was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. The wells were washed again as described above. Subsequently, 100µl of streptoavidin-HRP was added in each well. The plate was incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 minutes. Afterwards, the wells were washed once more. Subsequently, 100 µl of the substrate solution (color reagent A-H2O2 and color reagent B-OPD 1:1) were added in each well, and incubated for 30 minutes protected from light at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with 50 µl of H2SO4(2N) per well. Absorbance was measured by spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 490nm.
Myeloperoxidase assay
The presence of tissues neutrophils was indirectly measured through the quantification of the MPO enzyme activity. Hence, the selected tissues were first homogenized in a PBS-HTAB buffer solution (100 µL for each 50 mg of tissue). The samples were centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4000 rpm at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and centrifuged again at 4000 rpm for another 15 min. A 50 µL homogenizing solution (PBS, 5 µM diaminotetraacetic acid (EDTA), 0.5% HTAB) was pipette as well as 50 µL of the supernatant and 50 µL of 0.68 mg/mL o-dianisidine (1 tablet of o-dianisidine 10 mg, 14.7 mL milli-q water) in duplicate in the 96-well plate. The plate was incubated at 37°C in the reader for 15 min and after this period 50 µL of H2O2 solution was added. The incubation process was repeated for another 10 min at 37ºC and then read in a spectrophotometer at 460 nm. For the blank, only 200 µL of substrate buffer were used. To determine the MPO value, a standard curve was drawn, using predetermined concentrations, in the equation: y = 1.2358x+ 0.252 where y is the concentration of MPO in ng/mL and x is the value found from the final reaction derived from the cell suspension.
Measurement of substances reactive to thiobarbituric acid (TBARS)
The lipid peroxidation rate was evaluated by measuring the substances reactive to TBARS. For this analysis, the protocol described by Draper and Hadley (1990) [22] was followed. This method is based on the reaction of two molecules of thiobarbituric acid with one of malondialdehyde (MDA), producing a pink color complex that can be quantified in a spectrophotometer. This reaction occurs at acidic pH and at temperatures between 90 and 100ºC. An aliquot of 100 µL of brain and muscle tissue was homogenized with 200 to 1000 µL of a solution of trichloroacetic acid (10%) - thiobarbituric acid (0.067%), heated for 15 minutes in boiling water and cooled in ice water, centrifuged for 10 minutes. The supernatant was used to quantify the TBARS using the spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 535nm. The results obtained were compared with a MDA standard curve. The TBARS concentration was determined using 1.56x105xM-1cm-1 as the molar extinction coefficient of MDA. Values were expressed in ng of TBARS/mL of tissue [22].
Measurement of oxidative damage in proteins
Oxidative damage to tissue proteins was determined, spectrophotometrically, by measurement of the carbonyl groups according to the standard protocol described by Levine et al. (1990) [23]. The samples obtained were precipitated by adding 20% trichloroacetic acid and the proteins dissolved with DNPH. The absorbance of the carbonyl groups content was spectrophotometrically measured at 280 nm. The concentration of carbonylated proteins was expressed in nmol/milligram of protein [23].
Total content of free thiols
In order to analyze the levels of free thiols, the samples were precipitated with trichloroacetic acid (10%), centrifuged and the supernatant was added to 5.5' Dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic-1,7 (DTNB) and tris-HCl buffer (30 mM , containing 3 mM EDTA, pH 8.9), generating a yellow-colored derivative and read in the spectrophotometer at 412nm. This technique aims to evaluate the non-oxidized sulfhydryl (SH) group. The results were expressed in free thiols nmol/mg of protein [24].
Activity of mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes
To determine the activity of the enzymatic complexes of the respiratory chain, the brain structure was homogenized (1:10, w/v) in buffer pH 7.4. The homogenate was centrifuged at 800xg for 10 minutes and the supernatant stored at 80°C negative to determine the enzymatic activity.
Complex I activity was evaluated by the method described by Cassina and Radi (1996) [25] by the NADH-dependent rate of ferricyanide reduction at 420 nm. CK activity was determined according to Hughes methodology (1962)[26] and measured at 550 nm. The activity of the complex was expressed in nmol/min.g per protein, while the CK activity was expressed in mg/protein.
Quantification of BDNF levels
BDNF levels were measured by an anti-BDNF ELISA sandwich kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. In short, for this analysis, the samples were homogenized in phosphate buffer solution with 1mM of phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and 1mM of glycol diaminetetraacetic acid (EGTA). The 96-well of the microtiter plates (flat bottom) were coated for 24 hours with samples diluted 1:2 in sample diluent and using the standard curve ranging from 7.8 to 500pg/ml BDNF. The wells were then washed four times with sample diluents, and a rabbit anti-BDNF monoclonal antibody diluted 1:1000 in sample diluent was added to each well and incubated for 3 hours at room temperature.
PROCESSING AND DATA ANALYSIS
For statistical analysis, the Prism program, GraphPad Software was used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was previously applied to check the data normality. Data from the open field habituation test and biochemical assessments were considered parametric and expressed as mean and standard deviation of the mean. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Tukey's test. Statistical comparisons between two factors were analyzed by the t test for paired samples. Data referring to the inhibitory avoidance test were considered non-parametric and were expressed as median and interquartile range; statistical comparisons between two factors were performed using the Mann-Whitney test. For all the analyses, differences were considered statistically significant when p<0.05.