Materials and Reagents
KMnO4, hydrogen peroxide, 2-methylimidazole and Zn(NO3)2·6H2O purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent (Beijing, China). Indocyanine green (ICG), 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), glutathione (GSH, reduced), cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8), 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF), [Ru(dpp)3]Cl2 (RDPP), 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA) and 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[folate (polyethylene glycol)-2000] (DSPE-PEG-FA) bought from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). Fetal bovine serum (FBS), dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM), phosphate buffer (PBS) and 1640 medium purchased from Gibco (Shanghai, China). All chemicals were used in this work without further purification.
Apparatus and Procedures
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were obtained on a transmission electron microscope (JEOL 2100, Japan). X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) measurement, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, ζ-potential measurements and mapping were performed from on an X-ray diffractometer (GBC MMA Instrument), N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (NovaWin 1000e, USA), and a NanoBrook Omni (Brookhaven, USA), respectively. Infrared thermal photos and temperature changes were recorded on the infrared thermal camera (HT-19, Guangzhou, China). 808 nm near-infrared irradiation was performed by a fiber-coupled NIR laser (MDL-N-808 nm-10W, Beijing Laserwave OptoElectronics Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM, Nikon, Japan) was performed to detect cytophagocytic behavior.
Synthesis of ZIF-8/ICG
ZIF-8/ICG nano-platform was prepared according to previous methods.24 Briefly, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (1470 mg) and ICG (100 mg) were added into the 10 mL PBS solution and stirring for 15 min to obtain homogeneous solution A. Then, 2-methylimidazole (810 mg) was also added into the 10 mL PBS stirring at 800 rpm for 15 min to obtain solution B. Finally, solution B was slowly dropped into the solution A, and then the mixed solution was continued stirring at 800 rpm for 15 min. The obtained ZIF-8/ICG was washed with PBS for three times, and the supernatant solution was kept for confirming the ICG content through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
Synthesis of MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG
10 mg ZIF-8/ICG was dispersed in 10 mL PBS solution and ultra-sonicated for 10 min to obtain homogeneous dispersion. Then, 10 mL aqueous solution of KMnO4 solution (1 mg/mL) was added dropwise and stirred at 800 rpm for 4 h. Then, the color of ZIF-8/ICG turned into brown after MnO2 successful coated into the surface of ZIF-8/ICG.25
Synthesis of FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG
Erythrocyte membrane (EM) vesicles were obtained according to the previous methods with some modification.26 Firstly, erythrocytes was collected from BALB/c mice fresh blood and washed with PBS for sever times to remove plasma and unwanted cells until the supernatant became colorless. Secondly, the obtained erythrocytes were immersed into 5mL ultrapure water at 4℃ for 2 h, during that the intracellular components inside of the erythrocytes were released. Thirdly, the products were washed with PBS for three times and followed by extrusion through polycarbonate membranes. Lastly, EM was further dispersed in PBS solution and stored at -80 ℃ before used.
To obtained the final products FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG. Briefly, DSPE-PEG-FA (10 mg) was added into the EM solution and continuous stirred at 4℃ for 12h.27 Then, the products FA modified EM (FA-EM) was collected by centrifuging (15000 rpm, 5 min) and washed with PBS for three times. Finally, the obtained FA-EM was mixed with MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG followed by stirred at 1000 rpm for 24 h; and then the products were washed with PBS for three times and centrifuged at 4000 rpm to removed free FA-EM.28
Cellular uptake
First, RAW264.7 cells (mouse macrophage cells), 4T1 cells (mouse breast cancer cells) and GES-1 cells (human gastric mucosa cells) were respectively seeded into six-well plate and incubated for 24 h. Different formulation of nano-platform (100 μg/mL) were added into each well and incubated for another 3 h. Then, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and added DAPI for 15 min to label the nucleus. Finally, cells were washed with PBS for three times and observed by a confocal microscope.29-30
Evaluation of O2 generation
The concentration of extracellular oxygen, which was generated in the FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG was quantified by a dissolved oxygen meter.31 Briefly, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG dispersion was putted into 50 mL beaker, and H2O2 (100 µL, 30 mM) was added. Then, the dissolved oxygen meter probe was inserted into the mixing solution to detect oxygen concentration with continue stirring. Then, PBS, H2O2 solution, and MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + H2O2 were applied as control. Additionally, O2 generation within the cells were monitored through RDPP, whose red fluorescence signal can be quenched by O2. Briefly, 4T1 cells were incubated with 10 µM RDPP for 4 h at 37°C. Then, 4T1 cells were treated with PBS, H2O2, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG and FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + H2O2, and incubated for another 4 h. Finally, 4T1 cells were washed with PBS for three times and observed through fluorescence microscopy.32
Releasing behavior of ICG
To investigate the ICG releasing behavior from FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG nano-platform, 10 mg FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG nano-platform was immersed into normal physiological environment (pH = 7.4) and simulate tumor microenvironment (TEM, pH = 5.5, 10 mM GSH, 30 μM H2O2,), respectively. The different FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG dispersion solution were incubated at 37℃ on a horizontal shaker with 300 rpm. At designed points, 3 mL supernatant solution was withdrawn and the ICG released content was determined by fluorescence spectroscopic instrument.14, 33
Photothermal performance measurements
The FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG dispersion solution (ICG concentration: 150 and 200 μg/mL), and MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG (ICG concentration: 200 μg/mL) were exposed under 808 nm NIR irradiation with 1.5 W/cm2 or 2.0 W/cm2 for 600 s and recorded by infrared thermal image, respectively. PBS solution was set as control group.5, 34
Cytotoxicity assay
4T1 cells and GES-1 cells were respectively seeded into 96-well plates with the density of 1 × 104 cells for each well and incubated for 12h, then treated with different concentrations (0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 μg/mL, as an equivalent dosage of ICG) of different kinds of nano-platform (ZIF-8/ICG, MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG, and FA-EM@ MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG) with NIR irradiation, or with PBS and PBS + NIR as control. After 48 h incubation, cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) were utilized to analysis the cells viability.35-36
Detection of reactive oxygen species
DPBF as the chemical probe was utilized to detect the reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation of FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG nano-platform with different treatment, which could react with DPBF to lead an irreversibly reduction in the DPBF absorbance.37-38 Typically, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG and DPBF were respectively added into 2 mL DPBF/DMSO (1:1) and exposed under 808nm NIR irradiation (2.0 W/cm2). At the designed time point, the absorbance of DPBF near 417 nm was recorded by UV-visible spectrophotometer. The absorbance value of DPBF in H2O2 solution, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + NIR, and FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + H2O2 were also recorded as the control.
Besides, ROS generation within the cells were monitored through a cell-permeable dye-DCFH-DA. As well all know, DCFH-DA was nonfluorescent signal at normal condition, which can be oxidized into stronger green fluorescent 2,7-dichlorofluorescin (DCF) by ROS.39 First, 4T1 cells were seeded into 12-well plate and treated with different approach (blank, NIR irradiation, H2O2, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + NIR, FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + H2O2, and FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG + H2O2 + NIR. After 6 h incubated, the old medium was discarded and supplanted with fresh medium and exposed under 808 nm NIR irradiation with the power of 2.0 W/cm2 for 10 min. Then, the chemical probe of DCFH-DA was added and incubated for 30 min. Lastly, 4T1 cells were washed with PBS for three times and detected by fluorescence microscopy.
In vivo therapeutic effects
5×106 4T1 cells were injected into the right back of BALB/c female mice to establish the subcutaneous 4T1 tumor model.40 All animal experiments were approved according to the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University. When the tumor volume reached for about 50 mm3, the mice were intravenously treated with PBS or different kinds nano-platform once every 3d for a total of five times accompanied with NIR irradiation. The mice were randomly divided into five groups (n=6) as the following methods: 1) PBS, 2) PBS+NIR, 3) ZIF-8/ICG+NIR, 4) MnO2/ ZIF-8/ICG+NIR, 5) FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG+NIR. For mice that received photothermal therapy, at 24 h after each injection the mice were exposed under 808 nm NIR irradiation at 2.0 W/cm2 for 10 min. Tumor volume and body weight of each mouse was monitored every three days during the whole assays. After 15 d treatment, the mice were euthanized for further investigation. The tumor volume was evaluated as following formula: Tumor volume (mm3) = 1/2 × width2 × length.41
Histological analysis
To explore the therapeutic effects and the biocompatibility of FA-EM@MnO2/ZIF-8/ICG, the tumors and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung and kidney) of the mice were dissected and sectioned for transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining and H&E staining.42 All the histological was carried out by Servicebio (Wuhan, China).
Statistical analysis
All the experiment data were analyzed by OriginPro and SPSS.17.0. All the error bars indicated mean ± standard deviation (mean ± SD). The student’s t-test was applied for statistical analysis. The p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.