Our study relates to a UV-Curing method for efficiently removing the radio-contaminants by using the UV-Curing resin recording the counts before and after decontamination. The decontamination factor (DF) is calculated individually for each sample with equation (1) (Gurau and Deju, 2014):
Where Ao is the initial activity counts recorded after contamination and Af is the final activity counts recorded after the decontamination peeled off process.
PVC was treated with radio isotopes and the Mean± SD decontamination factor for all the radioisotopes on PVC was recorded as 94±2.82, 85.6±2.88, 89± 1.87, 92.2±2.48, 81.6±3.04 for F-18, Tc-99m, Tc-99m labelled, I-131, Lu-177respectively, with p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant as visualize from Fig. 3 (a). The best result on PVC was observed by giving maximum DF with F-18 and minimum for Lu-177. As observed visually, the top layer of the PVC surface remained unchanged and there were no changes observed before and after decontamination. Further, the resin was peeled off very smoothly and easily from the surface as seen in Fig. 3 (b)
Glass when treated with different radioisotopes, reported Mean± SD for all the radioisotopes as 96±1.58, 85.4±5.12, 87.8±1.64, 97.6±0.54, 84.4±3.91 for F-18, Tc-99m, Tc-99m labelled, I-131, Lu-177respectively, with p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant as visualized in Fig. 4 (a) I-131 showed the highest DF over the glass surface, whereas Lu-177 showed the least. It was further observed visually that the glass surface became more clear and clean after decontamination was performed, with the resin getting entirely peeled off from the surface at one time as shown in Fig. 4 (b)
Steel when treated with different radioisotopes, reported Mean± SD for all the radioisotopes as 95.8±0.83, 94.8±2.16, 89.8±2.77, 88.8±2.94, 89.6±2.07 for F-18, Tc-99m, Tc-99m labelled, I-131, Lu-177respectively, with p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant as visualized from Fig. 5 (a). F-18 gave the maximum DF value while I-131 showed the minimum DF value. No significant change was observed on the surface but the peel was a little harder to peel off from the surface with more force as compared to glass and PVC Fig. 5 (b)
Ceramic tiles when treated with different radioisotopes, reported Mean± SD for all the radioisotopes as 86.8±1.30, 93.4±3.20, 93± 0.70, 84.4±4.03, 86.6±1.34 for F-18, Tc-99m, Tc-99m labelled, I-131, Lu-177respectively, with p < 0.05 considered to be statistically significant as visualized from Fig. 6 (a). Ceramic tiles provided the best results with Tc-99m labelling which provided the highest DF, on the other hand, the lowest results were obtained with Lu-177. On visual observation, no significant change was observed on the ceramic tiles with resin getting easily peeled off from the surface as seen in Fig. 6 (b)
With WOOD the Mean± SD for all the radioisotopes is reported to be 84.8±94, 85.4±3.84, 90.6± 0.54, 89.8±3.96, 92.2±31.64 for F-18, Tc-99m, Tc-99m labelled, I-131, Lu-177 respectively, which was statistically significant (p < 0.05) as visualized from Fig.7 (a). On the wood surface Lu-177 showed the maximum DF value while F-18 showed the minimum value. Surface was same before and after decontamination process showing no change in topmost layer when observed visually. Peeling off required little extra force than normal to peel off the resin as seen in Fig. 7 (b)
When comparing the overall efficacy of the DF obtained by performing decontamination by UV-Curing method, we observed outstanding results as compared to performing decontamination by conventional type of methods as swiping, adsorbent sheets, brushing, etc. This method overcomes the limitation of curing time for decontamination from 24hours to 5 minutes.
With F-18 the DF came 94% with PVC, 96% with glass, 95% with steel, 86% with tiles and 84% with wood. For Tc-99m DF was found to be about 85.6 % with PVC & glass, 94% with steel, 93% with tiles and 85% with wood. With Tc-99m labelled the DF value was 89% with PVC, 87% with glass, 89% with steel, 93% with tiles and 90% with wood. For I-131 the DF was 92% with PVC, 97% with glass, 88% with steel, 84% with tiles and 89% with wood. With Lu-177 the DF value was 81% with PVC, 84% with glass, 89% with steel, 86% with tiles and 92% with glazed wood. F-18 & I-131 are almost similar removable capability compare to 99mTc & Lu-177 for all the surfaces tested in this study except glazed wood
In some cases, low DF might have resulted due to nature of the surface material and resin on simulated work surfaces, polymerization interaction between resin & surface and activity concentration. Also, the results and technique can be improved by doing further formulations as sprayable form, to check for dry decontamination and application for large surface areas.