Field experiments to determine microbial responses, including soil respiration, microbial activity, and N mineralization were conducted from fall 2018 through spring 2021 as part of a crop sequence study located at the Montana State University, Central Agricultural Research Center, Moccasin, MT, USA (47.059931, -109.950159). The soil type at this site is a Danvers-Judith clay loam, a complex of well-drained fine, smectitic, frigid Vertic Argiustolls. Plots were established in 2004, with a 4-year rotation introduced in 2017, to evaluate diverse crop sequences under no-till and conventional-till management. The crop sequences consisted of (1) winter wheat (WW)-fallow; (2) WW-spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) (SB)-spring pea (SP); (3) WW-SB-lentil (Lens culinaris Medik); (4) SP-proso millet (MIL)-safflower (SAF)-spring wheat (SW); and (5) WW-SW. All crop phases were in place each year for a total of 14 plots arranged in a Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design with 4 replicates.
Evaluation of the microbial response to a crop sequence was focused on comparing continuous wheat (WW-SW) and the SP-MIL-SAF-SW (referred to as the diverse sequence hereafter) to assess the effects of incorporating a warm season crop (e.g., MIL) and full season crop (e.g., SAF) into a diverse wheat-based crop sequence. Soil sampling and respiration measurements were collected in the SW phase of the rotation each year. Spring wheat was planted 22 May 2018, 15 May 2019, and 18 May 2020 and harvested 22 Sept 2018, 7 Sept 2019, and 24 Aug 2020. All plots were managed using standard regional practices for fertility and weed management. Monthly total precipitation and mean air temperature are shown in Table S1.
Soil sampling was performed monthly throughout the growing season. Soil cores (0–15 cm) were collected with a 2.54-cm soil probe. Soils were air dried for enzyme analysis or dried at 55°C for 3 days for biomass determination. Subsamples of fresh soil were stored at -80°C for DNA sequencing. Dried soils were passed through a 2-mm sieve before analysis. NO3-N and NH4-N were extracted following the methods of (Kolberg et al. 1999; Wienhold 2007). Briefly, 4 g dry wt equivalent of soil was combined with 40 mL of 2M KCl and incubated 1 hour at room temperature shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and the resulting supernatant submitted to the MSU Environmental Analytical Lab for NO3-N and NH4-N analysis via Cd reduction on a Lachat QuickChem8500 (Hach, Loveland, CO). Samples were also submitted to Ward Laboratories (Kearney, NE) for pH (1:1 in H2O), organic matter (OM; loss on ignition, 2 hours at 360°C), total C (combustion method), total N, phosphorus (P, NH4acetate extraction), potassium (K, Mehlich III extraction), sulfur (sulfate-S, Mehlich III extraction), and cation exchange capacity (CEC) analysis.
Soil respiration
Soil respiration was measured with CFLUX-1 (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA) automated respiration chambers. The chambers were programmed to take hourly measurements. Respiration chambers were initially deployed 1 Nov 2018 and remained in the field until nighttime temperatures were below the operational temperature limits of the instruments (-20°C). Chambers were redeployed in early spring once nighttime temperatures were above the operational temperature limits of the instruments. Chambers were removed for planting and then redeployed for the growing season. The chambers were removed for harvest and then deployed for the fall and remained in operation until average nighttime temperatures reached the lower operation limits of the instrument. Soil water content and temperature were recorded simultaneously with flux data using Stevens HydraProbes (Stevens Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA).
N mineralization
In situ N mineralization was performed as described by Kolberg and Wienhold (Kolberg et al. 1999; Wienhold 2007). Metal tubes measuring 4.76 cm in diameter were inserted 17 cm into the soil and removed with intact soil cores. Approximately 2 cm of soil was removed from the bottom of the core with a stainless steel laboratory spatula and replaced with a nylon bag containing 10 g Lewatit NM-60 DI Resin ion exchange resin beads (Lanxess, Cologne, Germany). The nylon bags were secured with a spring clip and tubes were reinserted into the original holes. Six tubes were inserted into each plot and a soil core (0–15 cm) was collected with a 2.54-cm soil probe next to each tube to measure initial NO3-N and NH4-N concentrations. Each month from March-August, a tube was removed, and the resin was recovered for quantifying inorganic N. NO3-N and NH4-N were extracted following the methods of (Kolberg et al. 1999; Wienhold 2007). Briefly, 2 g wet weight resin beads were combined with 40 mL 2M KCl and incubated 1 hr at room temperature shaking at 250 rpm. Samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min and the resulting supernatant was submitted to the MSU Environmental Analytical Lab for NO3-N and NH4-N analysis on a Lachat QuickChem8500 (Hach, Loveland, CO). Inorganic N was calculated on a kg ha− 1 basis using the soil bulk density (1.7 g cm− 3) and the soil column depth of 17 cm. Net N mineralized was calculated as the average of five cores per treatment using the combined amounts of NO3-N and NH4-N following the approach of Kolberg (Kolberg et al. 1999) where:
$$\mathbf{N}\mathbf{e}\mathbf{t} \mathbf{N} \mathbf{m}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{e}\mathbf{r}\mathbf{a}\mathbf{l}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{z}\mathbf{e}\mathbf{d} \left(\mathbf{k}\mathbf{g} {\mathbf{h}\mathbf{a}}^{-1}\right)=\mathbf{F}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{a}\mathbf{l} {\mathbf{N}}_{\mathbf{s}}+\mathbf{F}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{a}\mathbf{l} {\mathbf{N}}_{\mathbf{r}}-\mathbf{I}\mathbf{n}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{t}\mathbf{i}\mathbf{a}\mathbf{l} {\mathbf{N}}_{\mathbf{s}}$$
Where Ns is soil inorganic N (kg ha− 1) and Nr is resin inorganic N (kg ha− 1). N fixation, deposition, immobilization, volatilization, and denitrification were assumed to be minimal. Previous work has shown that denitrification is minimal at < 60% water filled pore space and immobilization is reduced when residues remain on the surface instead of being incorporated (Aulakh et al. 1991; Ambus et al. 2002).
A laboratory column assay was performed to assess potential N mineralization as previously described (Deng and Tabatabai 2000; Tabatabai et al. 2010). A 20 g (oven dry basis) sample of field moist soil was combined with 40 g silica sand. Fifteen g of the soil-sand mixture was transferred to a leaching column (2.5 cm x 15 cm PVC tube) which contained glass wool to retain the soil-sand mixture. Three technical replicate columns were established with soil from each field plot. Columns were weighed and the soil was maintained at 50% field capacity by watering every two days to adjust them to their initial weights. Columns were loosely covered with aluminum foil to minimize evaporation. Columns were leached by adding 100 mL 5 mM CaCl2 and then placing them on a suction flask and applying vacuum to remove the leachate. The recovered leachate was adjusted to a final volume of 100 mL using DI water. Leaching was performed every 2 weeks for 14 weeks. Cumulative mineralized N was calculated as the sum of NO3-N and NH4-N recovered from each leaching event.
Enzyme activities
N-acyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAGase) and β-glucosidase activities were measured following the methods of Tabatabai (Tabatabai 1994) and Acosta-Martínez and Tabatabai (Acosta-Martínez and Tabatabai 2000). All assays were performed with 1 g of air-dried soils that were passed through a 2-mm sieve. Assays were performed in 0.1 M THAM buffer (Tabatabai 1994). Substrates and reagents used for each enzyme are shown in Table 1. Assays were performed in 0.1 M THAM buffer. Substrates and additional reagents used for each enzyme are shown in Table 1. Soils were placed in a 150 mL flask with appropriate substrates and reagents from Table 1 and incubated at 37°C for 1 hour. The reaction was then stopped, and the samples were centrifuged at 15,000 x g for 1 min and absorbance measured at 405 nm. Controls were performed without the addition of substrate and a p-nitrophenol standard curve was prepared to quantify products released from NAGase and β-glucosidase activity.
Table 1
Enzyme substrates, reagents, and reaction conditions used in enzyme assays.
Enzyme | Substrate | Reaction Conditions | Reaction Stop |
N-acyl-β-D-glucosaminidase | ρ-nitrophenyl-N- acetyl-β-D-glucosaminide | 0.1M acetate buffer | 0.5M CaCl2 0.5M NaOH |
β-glucosidase | p-Nitrophenyl-β-D-glucopyranoside | Toluene MUB buffer | 0.5M CaCl2 0.1M THAM |
Microbial biomass
Microbial biomass was determined by the chloroform fumigation-incubation method as previously described (Voroney and Paul 1984; Franzluebbers 1999). Briefly, 50 g of soil from each plot was placed in a beaker and fumigated with CHCl3 under vacuum for 24 hrs. Soils were then transferred to 1 L jars that contained a vial with 10 mL1 M NaOH to absorb the CO2 evolved during incubation and a vial of water to maintain humidity. The jars were sealed and incubated at 21°C for 12 days. Several drops of phenolphthalein were added to the vials as a color indicator and the NaOH was titrated with 1 M HCl in the presence of excess BaCl2. The amount of HCl added was recorded and used to calculate the soil microbial biomass C based on the CO2-C evolved from the fumigated soil using an efficiency factor of 0.41 (Voroney and Paul 1984).
Microbial community analysis
DNA was extracted using a ZymoBiomics DNA mini prep kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Purified DNA was submitted to the Integrated Microbiome Resource (IMR, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS) for sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). The universal V4-V5 region of the 16S gene was targeted for bacterial amplification and ITS2 primers were used for fungal amplification and sequenced using the Illumina reagent kit (2 x 300bp).
Sequence reads were processed using the QIIME2 bioinformatics pipeline (Bolyen et al. 2019). Quality control was performed using FastQC. Quality-filtered paired end reads were assembled into error-corrected amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) using DADA2 (Callahan et al. 2016). ASVs represent unique bacterial taxa and exhibit fewer false positives and real rare taxa that are undetected by OTU-based approaches (Callahan et al. 2016). Taxonomic assignment was performed using a naive Bayes classifier pre-trained on the weighted Silva 138 database with a 99% identity threshold for bacterial and the UNITE version 8.3 ITS database with a 99% identity threshold for fungi (Quast et al. 2013; Kõljalg et al. 2020). Files generated in QIIME2 were imported into R (Team 2021) using the package Qiime2R (Bisanz 2018) for additional analysis. Data were filtered to remove taxa occurring fewer than five times or in less in 20% of the samples. ASV counts were center log ratio (clr) transformed using the R package Phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes 2013).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses for soil respiration, enzyme assays, and soil chemistry were conducted in R v. 4.1.1 (Team 2021). Missing points in the respiration data caused by power failure or instrument errors were gap-filled using flux gap analysis as implemented in the R package FluxGapR as described by Zhao (Zhao et al. 2020). Mean respiration rates were calculated for pre-planting (March-early May), growing season (mid-May-July), and post-harvest (September-December) from fall 2018 through spring 2021 since autotrophic respiration during the growing season can provide a significant contribution to soil respiration (Ryan and Law 2005). Linear mixed effects models were developed with the R package lme4 (Bates et al. 2015) to evaluate differences in respiration for each period. The model included treatment, soil temperature, and soil water content as fixed effects and block and year as random effects. Mean daily respiration values were natural log transformed to meet assumptions of normality. Potential relationships between explanatory and response variables were assessed using Type III Analysis of Variance with Satterthwaite’s method (Kuznetsova et al. 2017). Models were refined with a step-down approach to remove model terms with p > .05 as implemented in the step function of the lmerTest R package (Kuznetsova et al. 2017). Step-down analysis showed year was not a significant random effect and this factor was subsequently removed from the model. Analysis of variation (ANOVA) was performed to compare mean respiration rates between crop sequences for each period using the function aov in the stats package (version 3.6.2) in R (Team 2021).
Relationships between soil NO3-N and enzyme activity and between NH4-N, NO3-N, enzyme activity, and soil respiration were evaluated based on Pearson’s correlation using the R package ggpubr (Kassambara 2020). Differences in enzyme activities were determined by means separation using the least significant difference (LSD) test as implemented in the R package agricolae (de Mendiburu 2021). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
The phyloseq and vegan packages were used for statistical analysis of the microbial community sequencing results (McMurdie and Holmes 2013; Oksanen et al. 2018), while ggplot2 was used for data visualization (Wickham 2016). Alpha, or within community diversity, analysis was performed using the Chao1 diversity index. Beta diversity (unweighted unifrac distance) was performed at the phylum level using a 1% relative abundance threshold to remove rare ASVs. Differences between treatments were determined at the phylum level using a Kruskal–Wallis test (p < 0.05).