This is a preprint, a preliminary version of a manuscript that has not completed peer review at a journal. Research Square does not conduct peer review prior to posting preprints. The posting of a preprint on this server should not be interpreted as an endorsement of its validity or suitability for dissemination as established information or for guiding clinical practice.
Research Article
Benjamin Mwondwe Gituku
Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-5914
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The conversion of biomass to make charcoal fuel is an inefficient process that leads to immense energy losses along the value chain. We compared the energy efficiency and emissions of Gastov206, a natural draft TLUD gasifier cookstove using two sizes of wood pellets, as an alternative to two contemporary charcoal stoves in Kenya.
A laboratory test showed that more energy in the fuel was lost by the charcoal cookstoves (69%) compared to the pellet gasifier cookstove (31%). The pellet gasifier cookstove had high thermal efficiency and cooking power (65–73%, 0.95–1.13 kW) compared to the charcoal cookstoves (27–35%, 0.68–0.89 kW). During the test, Gastov206 converted pellets-to-char at a ratio of 25% and a rate of 3 g/min. These findings indicate that when biomass is converted to pellets rather than charcoal, and cooking continues over the burning char generated by the gasifier cookstove, energy currently being wasted converting wood-to-charcoal can be avoided.
Gastov206 using pellets showed lower CO emission (4.46–5.47 g/MJd and 0.27–0.39 g/min) compared to charcoal cookstoves (20.82–24.36 g/MJd and 0.89–1.35 g/min). PM2.5 emission by Gastov206 (52.35–61.50 mg/MJd and 3.21–4.37 mg/min) was not significant different compared to charcoal stoves (40.81–41.13 mg/MJd and 1.69–2.35 mg/min).
Laboratory results show that natural-draft gasifier cookstoves using pellets can be studied further in kitchens as an alternative to charcoal cookstoves since they are potentially more energy-efficient.
Keywords
Natural-draft gasifier, biomass pellets, charcoal cookstoves, woodfuel, energy efficiency, emissions
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
This is a list of supplementary files associated with this preprint. Click to download.
Loading...
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 03 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Metrics
Comments: 0
PDF Downloads: ...
HTML Views: ...
Subject Areas
Energy Engineering
Learn more about our company.
This is a preprint. It has not completed peer review.
Research Article
Benjamin Mwondwe Gituku
Kenya Industrial Research and Development Institute
Corresponding Author
ORCiD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4325-5914
Badges
Prescreen
This manuscript passed our Prescreen assessment
Complete author information
Appropriate declaration statements
Potential risks to human health
Prescreen
History
CURRENT STATUS: Posted
Version 1
Posted 03 Mar, 2021
No community comments so far
Subject Areas
Energy Engineering
License:
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License. Read Full License
The conversion of biomass to make charcoal fuel is an inefficient process that leads to immense energy losses along the value chain. We compared the energy efficiency and emissions of Gastov206, a natural draft TLUD gasifier cookstove using two sizes of wood pellets, as an alternative to two contemporary charcoal stoves in Kenya.
A laboratory test showed that more energy in the fuel was lost by the charcoal cookstoves (69%) compared to the pellet gasifier cookstove (31%). The pellet gasifier cookstove had high thermal efficiency and cooking power (65–73%, 0.95–1.13 kW) compared to the charcoal cookstoves (27–35%, 0.68–0.89 kW). During the test, Gastov206 converted pellets-to-char at a ratio of 25% and a rate of 3 g/min. These findings indicate that when biomass is converted to pellets rather than charcoal, and cooking continues over the burning char generated by the gasifier cookstove, energy currently being wasted converting wood-to-charcoal can be avoided.
Gastov206 using pellets showed lower CO emission (4.46–5.47 g/MJd and 0.27–0.39 g/min) compared to charcoal cookstoves (20.82–24.36 g/MJd and 0.89–1.35 g/min). PM2.5 emission by Gastov206 (52.35–61.50 mg/MJd and 3.21–4.37 mg/min) was not significant different compared to charcoal stoves (40.81–41.13 mg/MJd and 1.69–2.35 mg/min).
Laboratory results show that natural-draft gasifier cookstoves using pellets can be studied further in kitchens as an alternative to charcoal cookstoves since they are potentially more energy-efficient.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Loading...