Craniopharyngioma is a rare benign tumor originating from remnants of the pouch of Rathke, which can lead to increased intracranial pressure, optic nerve compression, and pituitary stalk compression, thus presenting clinical symptoms such as headache, vomiting, visual impairment, pituitary dysfunction, etc [5]. Regardless of the type of craniopharyngioma, surgery is always the first choice. The EETA is not only suitable for the treatment of skull base lesions but also has an excellent view, which makes it a standard method for the removal of craniopharyngiomas [6–8]. For cystic craniopharyngiomas, intracapsular debulking is the most commonly used surgical strategy, and the specific steps are as follows: first, the tumor capsule is opened, then the cystic fluid is aspirated, and finally, the tumor capsule and neurovascular structure are separated and aspirated. The surgical strategy of intracapsular debulking has many advantages of simple operation, large operation space, protection of blood vessels and surrounding tissues, etc., which has been widely used and recognized by surgeons.
Table 1 shows the cases of cystic craniopharyngioma resected by surgery combined with intracapsular debulking of surgical strategy in recent years, including the number of patients, tumor location, surgical approach, and GTR rate, follow-up time, recurrence, postoperative complications, adjuvant therapy, etc [9–32]. It can be seen from Table 1, most of the cystic craniopharyngiomas were located in the sellar and suprasellar regions, and occasionally in the intraventricular, orbital cavity, and foramen magnum. The surgical approaches for craniopharyngioma are the endoscopic transorbital eyelid approach (ETEA), endoscopic transcortical transventricular approach (ETTA), endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETA), fronto-basal interhemispheric approach (FBIA), sublabial-transseptal approach (STA), microsurgery pterional approach (MPA), microsurgery transsphenoidal approach (MTA) and subfrontal approach (SA), etc. The GTR rate ranged from 35.2–100%, and the recurrence rate ranged from 0 to 82.0% [11, 21]. Im et al. reported that GTR was achieved in all 6 patients, but one patient relapsed, which may be due to a small amount of residual cyst wall of the tumor not found by intraoperative endoscopic images and postoperative cranial MRI [29]. More residual cyst wall leads to a higher recurrence rate and reflects the fact that the surgical strategy of intracapsular debulking brings a higher risk of residual tumors and tumor recurrence. However, Zhu et al. reported 8 patients (72.7%) who obtained GTR, but no patients relapsed, which may be due to the short follow-up period (18.5 months) [14]. To prevent the recurrence caused by residual tumor, postoperative radiotherapy has also become a necessary adjuvant treatment and is widely used [12, 17, 26, 27, 30]. Unfortunately, although postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy has been performed, there will still be tumor recurrence. Therefore, some patients must undergo reoperation or multiple operations [13, 24], which brings huge pain and economic burden to patients. The main postoperative complications were cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL), diabetes insipidus (DI), cerebral meningitis, hydrocephalus, hyposmia, intracranial infection, etc. Among them, CSFL and new onset DI were relatively high [14, 33], which may be caused by surgery and the deficiency of the pituitary hormone. In addition, the occurrence of meningitis and intracranial infection may also be attributed to the release of cystic fluid. Considering the GTR, residual cyst wall, recurrence, and postoperative complications, intracapsular debulking is not a perfect surgical strategy. The main problem of intracapsular debulking is that once the tumor capsule is opened, the tension of the tumor capsule wall disappears, making it difficult for the tumor capsule to completely separate from the surrounding normal tissues, resulting in the residual and recurrence of the tumor capsule wall. Therefore, we propose a surgical strategy of total cyst wall decollement, that is, the tumor around the cyst wall is completely separated from the surrounding tissues, without destroying the cyst wall, and maintaining the tension of the cyst wall, which is conducive to the separation of the tumor from the surrounding tissues.
In this paper, a 45-year-old male with suprasellar cystic craniopharyngioma who underwent EETS with total cyst wall decollement. During the operation, the tumor wrapped in the capsule wall is completely stripped off without destroying the tumor capsule and maintaining the tension of the tumor capsule. Finally, the tumor was cut from the pituitary stalk to achieve total tumor resection. After the operation, the visual acuity and pituitary function were greatly improved. There was no CSFL, meningitis, and other serious complications. Only transient DI appeared and was relieved later. There was no adjuvant radiotherapy after the operation. During the 33-month follow-up, there was no tumor recurrence. These results show that the EETS with total cyst wall decollement is a safe and effective surgical method for suprasellar cystic craniopharyngiomas or even other cystic tumors with an intact capsule.
Table 1
Reported cases of cystic craniopharyngioma treated by surgery
Year | Authors | No. cases | location | Surgical approach | GTR (%) | Mean follow-up (months) | Recurrence (%) | Complications | Adjuvant therapy | Ref. |
2022 | Vitulli et al. | 1 | Orbital cavity | ETEA | 1(100%) | 3 | 0 | No | No | [9] |
2021 | Noureldine et al. | 1 | Sellar and suprasellar | ETTA | 1(100%) | 24 | 0 | No | No | [10] |
2021 | Chen et al. | 2 | Foramen magnum | Hole | 2(100%) | 54 | 0 | No | No | [11] |
2019 | Frio et al. | 11 | / | Hole | / | 41.4 | 3(27.3%) | CSFL, HCP | RO, RT | [12] |
2017 | Lauretti et al. | 8 | / | Hole | / | 56 | 2(20%) | CSFL | RO | [13] |
2017 | Zhu et al. | 11 | / | FBIA | 8(72.7%) | 18.5 | 0 | DI | No | [14] |
2017 | Moore et al. | 2 | Suprasellar | Hole | 2(100%) | 24 | 0 | No | No | [15] |
2016 | Ichikawa et al. | 4 | Sellar and suprasellar | FBIA | 4(100%) | 33 | 1(25%) | No | No | [16] |
2015 | Takano et al. | 9 | Sellar and suprasellar | Hole | / | 72.9 | 1(11.1%) | No | RO, RT | [17] |
2015 | Shukla et al. | 3 | Suprasellar | ETTA | / | 9 | 0 | No | RT | [18] |
2015 | Prabhu et al. | 1 | Suprasellar | EETA | 1(100%) | / | / | No | / | [19] |
2011 | Park et al. | 13 | / | Hole | / | 32 | 7(53.8%) | No | RT | [20] |
2009 | Schubert et al. | 17 | / | MPA | 6(35.2%) | 66 | 14(82%) | / | RO, RT | [21] |
2009 | Filis et al. | 1 | Sellar and suprasellar | MPA | 1(100%) | 24 | 0 | No | No | [22] |
2008 | Cappabianca et al. | 1 | Intraventricular | Hole | 1(100%) | 36 | 0 | No | No | [23] |
2006 | Rudnick et al. | 1 | Sellar | STA | / | 28 | 0 | No | RO | [24] |
2006 | Berlis et al. | 1 | / | Hole | / | 6 | 0 | No | No | [25] |
2005 | Kamikawa et al. | 1 | Suprasellar | Hole | / | / | / | No | RT | [26] |
2004 | Nakahara et al. | 5 | Suprasellar | Hole | / | 10.8 | 1(20%) | No | RT | [27] |
2004 | Locatelli et al. | 5 | / | EETA | / | 48 | 1(20%) | No | No | [28] |
2003 | Im et al. | 6 | Sellar | MTA | 6(100%) | 26 | 1(16%) | DI | RO | [29] |
2002 | Joki et al. | 1 | Sellar | Hole | 0 | 6 | 0 | No | RT | [30] |
2001 | Nakamizo et al. | 1 | Intraventricular | Hole | / | 24 | 0 | No | No | [31] |
2001 | Buhl et al. | 1 | Infrasellar and suprasellar | SA | / | 12 | 0 | No | No | [32] |
CSFL, cerebrospinal fluid leakage; DI, diabetes insipidus; ETEA, endoscopic transorbital eyelid approach; ETTA, endoscopic transcortical transventricular approach; EETA, endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach; FBIA, fronto-basal interhemispheric approach; HCP, hydrocephalus; MPA, microsurgery pterional approach; MTA, microsurgery transsphenoidal approach; RO, re-operation; RT, radiotherapy; STA, sublabial-transseptal approach; SA, subfrontal approach. |