Subjects
All consecutive subjects who underwent gastric ESD between January and March 2021 at Hakodate Municipal Hospital were enrolled. All subjects provided written informed consent before undergoing gastric ESD. Fourteen patients were enrolled in this study, and 64 vessels in gastric ESD-induced ulcers were evaluated using both WLI and RDI. The criteria for gastric ESD were established according to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association Guideline. This study was performed in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Hakodate Municipal Hospital Institutional Review Board (#2020-94).
ESD procedure
First, marking dots were made using a needle knife around the circumference of the target tumor via observation with a GIF-H290Z with EVIS X1 video system (Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). Subsequently, the endoscope was changed to the therapeutic scope (GIF-H290T with EVIS X1 video system; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan). We injected a mixture of sodium hyaluronate-based submucosal injection material (Ksmart; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with 0.5% indigo carmine and 0.1% epinephrine into the submucosal layer. A circumferential incision and submucosal dissection were performed using an electrosurgical knife (IT2 Knife; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) with a high-frequency generator (VIO3; ERBE, Tubingen, Germany).
Endoscopic treatment and observation of the ulcer after ESD
We changed the scope again to the GIF-H290Z (Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) from the GIF-H290T after dissection was completed. We first observed the ESD-induced ulcer with WLI and then with RDI. We then recorded images of ESD-induced ulcers, as visualized using WLI and RDI. When the exposed vessels were detected, they were coagulated using hemostatic forceps (RAICHO2: Kaneka Medix Corporation, Osaka, Japan) or clipped (Standard clip, HX-600-135; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) under observation with RDI.
Management after ESD
After ESD, a proton-pump inhibitor (20 mg omeprazole) was intravenously injected twice daily on days 1 and 2. Oral vonoprazan (20 mg/day) was administered from day 3 for a minimum of 8 weeks. A second-look endoscopic examination was performed on days 2 and 7, and when bleeding or exposed blood vessels were detected, hemostasis was achieved using hemostatic forceps or by clipping. We defined delayed bleeding as hematemesis, melena, or anemia (a decline in Hb of 2 g/dL compared with the day before ESD) that required endoscopic treatment.
Image processing and color analysis
The midrange images of the whole ulcer observed using each mode (WLI and RDI) were selected for each ESD-induced ulcer (Fig. 1a and 1b). Two endoscopic specialists who have experience with over 200 gastric ESD procedures, selected the target exposed vessels on ESD-induced ulcers and numbered each exposed blood vessel. The color processing and analysis were performed using Image Pro (Media Cybernetics, Inc., Rockville, Maryland, USA). The color difference was evaluated by comparing the color values of regions of interest (ROI) for an exposed vessel point and three points surrounding an exposed vessel. The three points surrounding exposed vessels were 120° apart from each other. The ROI color in the endoscopic image was assessed using the Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (CIE) 1976 L*a*b* color space. This is a three-dimensional space for presenting a color. The color values of the exposed vessels (L*v, a*v, and b*v) and the mean of three surrounding points on the mucosa (L*s, a*s, and b*s) were defined as the average of the color value in each ROI using the CIE L*a*b* color space (Fig. 2a and 2b). The color difference between the lesion and the surrounding mucosa (ΔE) is expressed using the following equation:
ΔE = (L*v − L*s)2 + (a*v − a*s)2 + (b*v − b*s)2
Visibility of exposed vessels on gastric ESD-induced ulcers
Three expert endoscopists (S.M., M.O., and M.H.) scored each image observed using WLI and RDI. The images were the same as those used for the color analysis. As previously described[11, 23, 24], the visibility of each image was rated as follows: +2 (improved visibility), + 1 (somewhat improved visibility), 0 (equivalent to white light), − 1 (somewhat decreased visibility), and − 2 (decreased visibility). We evaluate the total score of the three scores from each image. If an image earned a total score of + 3 or higher, the visibility was considered improved, whereas a score between + 2 and − 2 indicated no change in visibility. The score of − 3 or lower indicated decreased visibility. Interobserver agreement was also assessed using the kappa statistic.
Statistical analysis
The results were analyzed using Prism version 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Data are expressed as means ± standard errors of the mean and as medians (interquartile range). Parameters were compared between the two groups between WLI group and RDI group using Student’s t-test. Differences were considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. Interobserver agreement was measured using the kappa statistic.