Repetitive mild traumatic brain injury (mTBIs) in mice with a thinned-skull cranial window
Mice were randomly divided into male and female groups (Fig. 1A). To determine the effect of repetitive mTBIs on neuroinflammation in vivo, we subjected mice to a thinned-skull cranial window procedure as described in our previous publications23,32 (Fig. 1B, C). These thinned-skull cranial windows were minimally invasive and preserved their transparency for months after preparations. Furthermore, the windows retained their integrity despite the physical impact generated following a concussive injury (Fig. 1D). Mice were first subjected to thinned-skull cranial window procedure followed two weeks later to a single mTBI event once a week for three weeks. To confirm that the concussive event did not produce fracture to the skull or cranial window preparation, we measured IOP changes in the mouse eyes before and post-injury. The closed head injury produced a pronounced bilateral increase in intraocular pressure immediately after the impact (19.40 ± 0.25 injury vs. 7.87 ± 0.12 baseline for right eyes and 20.70 ± 0.38 injury vs. 7.83 ± 0.17 baseline for left eyes, p < 0.001, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 1E). This event represented a clinical hallmark of concussion33 but did not directly affect vasculature in the underlying brain tissue (Fig. 1D). We observed significant increases in astroglyosis as demonstrated by increases in the number of GFAP positive cells in cortical tissues at day 1 and day 3 following the third injury event (94.03 ± 1.4 cells/counted region injury vs. 28.50 ± 1.50 cells/counted region sham at day 1 and 61.00 ± 2.52 cells/counted region injury vs. 25.17 ± 3.51 cells/counted region sham at 3, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA) (Fig. 1F, G). Image analysis of IBA-1 immunopositive cells yielded evidence of microgliosis as defined by increased numbers of IBA1-immunopositive cells, which was also evident at day 1 and day 3 following third injury event (73.50 ± 7.50 cells/counted region injury vs. 26.13 ± 4.002 cells/counted region sham for day 1 and 112.70 ± 10.71 cells/counted region injury vs. 14.50 ± 3.54 cells/counted region sham for day 3, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA).(Fig. 1F, G). Therefore, this outcome in the thinned-skull cranial window preparation following repeated impact injury may represent a marker of neuroinflammation events.
3x mTBIs resulted in a robust increase in caspase-1 mediated inflammatory response in multiple body areas lasted at least 1-week post-injury
Detection of inflammation states associated with diseases or injury has historically required tissue removal from sacrificed animals, preventing the real-time dynamic measurement of inflammatory or neuroinflammatory events in individual animals over time. To better understand the spatiotemporal kinetics post-brain trauma, we used a caspase-1 luciferase reporter transgenic mouse model combines with our thinned-skull cranial window preparation, which allowed us to follow the inflammatory dynamics within the same animals over time at many different areas of the body. By utilizing in vivo IVIS imaging, we found significant increase in bioluminescence intensity at 1 day after each injury compared to baseline (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1). The increase in caspase-1 signals were observed at the brain area (54.73 ± 11.89 male/ 40.74 ± 7.96 female for 1st injury, 28.08 ± 5.34 male/ 29.03 ± 2.78 female for 2nd injury, 60.48 ± 12.21 male/ 61.90 ± 16.93 female for 3rd injury vs. 7.39 ± 1.13 male/ 4.34 ± 0.56 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 2A, B), thoracic area (42.75 ± 10.59 male/ 8.96 ± 2.91 female for 1st injury, 40.44 ± 6.16 male/ 18.65 ± 7.65 female for 2nd injury, 88.33 ± 23.45 male/ 46.21 ± 27.43 female for 3rd injury vs. 0.38 ± 0.14 male/ 0.16 ± 0.1 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 1A), abdominal area (22.10 ± 6.61 male/ 10.21 ± 4.00 female for 1st injury, 42.30 ± 7.22 male/ 22.70 ± 11.29 female for 2nd injury, 31.95 ± 16.13 male/ 20.48 ± 5.84 female for 3rd injury vs. 0.8 ± 0.57 male/ 0.20 ± 0.16 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 2A, Supplementary Fig. 1B), and paws area (30.00 ± 4.49 male/ 27.78 ± 4.62 female for 1st injury, 39.43 ± 6.22 male/ 19.21 ± 6.18 female for 2nd injury, 34.47 ± 4.5 male/ 31.91 ± 2.82 female for 3rd injury vs. 0.36 ± 0.07 male/ 0.22 ± 0.05 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 2A, C). We observed these enhanced inflammatory signals in both male and female animals.
Furthermore, we continued to monitor inflammatory activity over time after the 3rd mTBI and found remarkably elevated caspase-1-mediated inflammatory response at 1 day that lasted for more than one week after injury (Fig. 3, Supplementary Fig. 2). We observed a signal increase in the brain (176.50 ± 58.79 male/ 127.90 ± 11.35 female at 3 days and 72.01 ± 19.25 male/ 46.66 ± 4.28 female at 1 week vs. 7.39 ± 1.13 male/ 4.34 ± 0.56 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 3A, B) and paws (147.10 ± 19.41 male/ 106.2 ± 12.37 female at 3 days and 39.85 ± 6.78 male/ 35.25 ± 2.24 female at 1 week vs. 0.36 ± 0.07 male/ 0.22 ± 0.05 female of baseline, p < 0.05, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 3A, C) up to 1 week after the third mTBI injury. These changes were observed to be highest at 3 days after injury and were seen in both male and female animals. To confirm that the inflammatory signals were originating from brain tissue, we also performed bioluminescence IVIS imaging on freshly prepared brain slices from thinned skull mice that had been subjected to three mTBIs at 1 day and 3 days after the 3rd injury ex vivo. We found a robust increase in caspase-1 mediated bioluminescence signals in these brain slices for both 1 and 3 days with the greatest increase at 3 days after injuries (7.57 ± 0.93 for 1 day and 9.69 ± 0.83 for 3 days vs. 3.24 ± 0.24 for sham, all values reported as x 104 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Supplementary Fig. 3). We also observed a significant bioluminescence signal increase up to at least 1 month in the abdominal (247.0 ± 97.08 male/ 77.15 ± 25.02 female at 3 days, 24.76 ± 11.01 male/ 20.72 ± 8.38 female at 1 week, and 52.82 ± 9.29 male/ 51.87 ± 8.86 female at 1 month vs. 0.8 ± 0.57 male/ 0.20 ± 0.16 female of baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 3A, Supplementary Fig. 2A) and thorax (156.3 ± 33.05 male/ 83.88 ± 30.18 female at 3 days, 94.25 ± 29.91 male/ 69.38 ± 44.40 female at 1 week, and 36.21 ± 6.27 male/ 37.41 ± 6.79 female at 1 month vs. 0.38 ± 0.14 male/ 0.16 ± 0.1 female of baseline, p < 0.05, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 3A, Supplementary Fig. 2B).
3x mTBIs induced mechanical allodynia for at least 2 months post-injuries
To better understand the degree of how repeated mTBIs affect long-term pain response, we subjected both male and female mice to Von Frey mechanical stimuli. We found a significant decrease in tactile dependent paw withdrawal threshold at 1 day after each injury compared to sham with the greatest loss at 1 day after the 3rd injury (Fig. 4). These mechanically-evoked responses were evident in both the hind paw ipsilateral and contralateral to the injured brain tissue (0.68 ± 0.15 male/ 0.49 ± 0.04 female after 1st injury, 0.55 ± 0.07 male/ 0.47 ± 0.01 female after 2nd injury, 0.62 ± 0.29 male/ 0.20 ± 0.02 female after 3rd injury vs. 1.29 ± 0.08 male/ 1.22 ± 0.1 female after 1st sham preparation, 1.48 ± 0.14 male/ 1.27 ± 0.14 female after 2nd sham preparation, and 1.45 ± 0.13 male/ 1.13 ± 0.21 female after 3rd sham preparation, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Fig. 4A) and right paws (contralateral to the injured hemisphere) (0.49 ± 0.03 male/ 0.5 ± 0.01 female after 1st injury, 0.5 ± 0.01 male/ 0.43 ± 0.12 female after 2nd injury, 0.40 ± 0.04 male/ 0.07 ± 0.02 female after 3rd injury vs. 1.31 ± 0.11 male/ 1.07 ± 0.04 female after 1st sham preparation, 1.47 ± 0.14 male/ 1.30 ± 0.07 female after 2nd sham preparation, and 1.53 ± 0.1 male/ 1.31 ± 0.1 female after 3rd sham preparation, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 4B). We then followed up at multiple time points after the 3rd injury and found this loss in paw withdrawal threshold sustained for at least two months for both left paw (0.61 ± 0.12 male/ 0.20 ± 0.12 female at 3 days, 0.84 ± 0.08 male/ 0.27 ± 0.04 female at 1 week, 1.14 ± 0.05 male/ 0.58 ± 0.15 female at 1 month, and 1.28 ± 0.12 male/ 1.08 ± 0.20 female at 2 month vs. 1.17 ± 0.10 male/ 1.24 ± 0.11 female 3 days sham, 1.37 ± 0.10 male/ 1.09 ± 0.06 female 1 week sham, 1.8 ± 0.12 male/ 1.5 ± 0.19 female 1 month sham, and 1.85 ± 0.14 male/ 1.96 ± 0.08 female 2 months sham, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 4A) and right paw (0.60 ± 0.14 male/ 0.28 ± 0.1 female at 3 days, 0.78 ± 0.12 male/ 0.2 ± 0.13 female at 1 week, 0.85 ± 0.16 male/ 0.34 ± 0.1 female at 1 month, and 1.28 ± 0.14 male/ 1.09 ± 0.06 female at 2 month vs. 1.33 ± 0.13 male/ 1.25 ± 0.16 female 3 days sham, 1.31 ± 0.17 male/ 1.26 ± 0.04 female 1 week sham, 1.52 ± 0.14 male/ 1.48 ± 0.18 female 1 month sham, and 1.9 ± 0.05 male/ 1.95 ± 0.07 female 2 months sham, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 4B). Interestingly, the heightened mechanical pain sensitivity was more prominent in female animals when compared to males (Fig. 4A, B), especially at 24 hours (0.62 ± 0.29 male vs. 0.20 ± 0.02 female left and 0.40 ± 0.04 male vs. 0.07 ± 0.02 female right), 3 days (0.61 ± 0.12 male vs. 0.20 ± 0.12 female left and 0.60 ± 0.14 male vs. 0.28 ± 0.1 female right), and 1 week (0.84 ± 0.08 male vs. 0.27 ± 0.04 female left and 0.78 ± 0.12 male vs. 0.2 ± 0.13 female right) after the 3rd injury.
NLRP3-specific inhibitor MCC-950 blocked IVIS inflammatory bioluminescence signal increases and attenuated long-term mechanical allodynia observed after 3x mTBIs
First, we directly tested the effect of MCC950, a potent NLRP3-specific inhibitor, on caspase-1-mediated inflammatory response. We treated both male and female ex vivo brain slices of caspase-1 reporter inflammasome mice with LPS to induce acute inflammatory response. As expected, we found significant increase in inflammasome bioluminescence signals, in both male and female mice brain slices, about 10 minutes after LPS treatment compared to prior treatment baseline level (6.60 ± 0.63 male/ 10.99 ± 1.23 female after LPS treatment vs. 0.86 ± 0.13 male/ 1.22 ± 0.17 female baseline, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Supplementary Fig. 4A, B). All treatment was done by adding LPS to the incubation chamber. We then treated these brain slices with MCC950 and found pronounce decrease in response signal levels 10 minutes after treatment in both male and females brain slices compared to LPS treated slices, with more prominent loss in male (2.59 ± 0.37 male/ 5.76 ± 0.5 female LPS + MCC950 treatment vs. 6.60 ± 0.63 male/ 10.99 ± 1.23 female after LPS treatment, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Supplementary Fig. 4A, B). These results indicate the robust inhibitory effects of MCC950 towards NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation and its subsequent inflammatory signals.
We next determined if preventing NLRP3 activation would influence mTBI-induced inflammatory responses. In these experiments, we treated mice with MCC950, a potent and NLRP3-specific inhibitor34 intraperitoneally, at 1 hour and 24 hours after each injury (total 6 treatments). MCC950 is known to cross the blood-brain barrier, enabling us to assess its effect on the brain injury-induced peripheral and central caspase-1 mediated inflammatory responses. Using the IVIS imaging, we observed a significant reduction in inflammasome bioluminescence signals at 1 day and 3 days after the 3x injuries in the brain and paws of MCC950 treated compared to saline treated groups for male animals (31.56 ± 9.31 of 1 day and 26.03 ± 7.47 of 3 day with MCC950 vs. 60.48 ± 12.2 of 1 day and 176.5 ± 58.79 of 3 day with saline for male brains, 31.99 ± 5.94 of 3 day with MCC950 vs 147.1 ± 19.41 of 3 day with saline for male paws, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 5A, B, and D) and female animals (35.47 ± 3.57 of 1 day and 25.58 ± 1.89 of 3 day with MCC950 vs. 71.90 ± 16.93 of 1 day and 127.9 ± 11.35 of 3 day with saline for female brains, 9.39 ± 1.82 of 3 day with MCC950 vs. 77.15 ± 25.01 of 3 day with saline for female paws, all values reported as x 107 p/cm2/sr, p < 0.05, repeated ANOVA; Fig. 5A, C, and E). There were also decreases in thoracic and abdominal inflammatory IVIS signals of both male and female MCC950-treated animals at 1- and 3-days post injury compared to vehicle saline treated groups (Supplementary Fig. 5A-D). Immunoblotting, of cortical brain tissue at 24 hours after the third injury, revealed a significant increase in caspase-1 protein level of the ipsilateral cortices after injuries (Fig. 6A, B). This enhancement in caspase-1 expression, however, attenuated remarkably in the group that received MCC950 treatment (Fig. 6A, B). Furthermore, we also assessed the effect of MCC950 on mTBIs-induced mechanical allodynia. With the same treatment paradigm, we injected 3x injured animals with either vehicle (saline) treatment or MCC950 treatment. Through Von Frey testing, we found a pronounced recovery of paws response threshold to tactile stimulus, bilaterally, at 24 hours after each injury in both left paw (1.64 ± 0.21 male/ 1.67 ± 0.11 female after first injury TBI + MCC950, 1.43 ± 0.15 male/ 1.56 ± 0.15 female after the second injury TBI + MCC950, 1.04 ± 0.45 male/ 1.16 ± 0.18 female after the third injury TBI + MCC950 vs. 1.26 ± 0.24 male/ 1.08 ± 0.05 female after first TBI + saline, 0.69 ± 0.17 male/ 0.71 ± 0.1 female after second TBI + saline, and 0.31 ± 0.21 male/ 0.29 ± 0.09 female after TBI + saline, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 7A) and right paw (1.68 ± 0.12 male/ 1.40 ± 0.16 female after first injury TBI + MCC950, 1.32 ± 0.21 male/ 1.54 ± 0.10 female after second injury TBI + MCC950, 0.62 ± 0.24 male/ 0.90 ± 0.13 female after third injury TBI + MCC950 vs. 1.04 ± 0.05 male/ 1.27 ± 0.16 female after first TBI + saline, 1.06 ± 0.05 male/ 0.82 ± 0.14 female after second TBI + saline, and 0.28 ± 0.03 male/ 0.40 ± 0.08 female after TBI + saline, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 7B). These reduction in pain sensitivity sustained up to one month in both left paw (0.47 ± 0.22 male/ 0.7 ± 0.21 female at 3 days TBI + MCC950, 0.7 ± 0.19 male/ 0.83 ± 0.14 female at 1 week TBI + MCC950, and 0.83 ± 0.2 male/ 1.09 ± 0.13 female at 1 month TBI + MCC950 vs. 0.09 ± 0.01 male/ 0.34 ± 0.13 female 3 days TBI + saline, 0.06 ± 0.02 male/ 0.03 ± 0.02 female 1 week TBI + saline, and 0.21 ± 0.11 male/ 0.36 ± 0.15 female 1 month TBI + saline, respectively, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 7A) and right paw (0.88 ± 0.18 male/ 0.83 ± 0.18 female at 3 days TBI + MCC950, 0.75 ± 0.25 male/ 0.85 ± 0.16 female at 1 week TBI + MCC950, and 0.96 ± 0.05 male/ 0.83 ± 0.18 female at 1 month TBI + MCC950 vs. 0.02 ± 0.01 male/ 0.56 ± 0.21 female 3 days TBI + saline, 0.02 ± 0.01 male/ 0.05 ± 0.02 female 1 week TBI + saline, and 0.17 ± 0.088 male/ 0.37 ± 0.15 female 1 month TBI + saline, respectively, p < 0.05, one-way ANOVA; Fig. 7B). However, the pain response threshold of MCC-950 treated injured animals was still trending lower than non-injured sham group for the left paw (0.47 ± 0.22 male/ 0.1 ± 0.21 female at 3 days TBI + MCC950, 0.7 ± 0.19 male/ 0.83 ± 0.14 female at 1 week TBI + MCC950, and 0.83 ± 0.2 male/ 1.09 ± 0.13 female at 1 month TBI + MCC950 vs. 1.17 ± 0.10 male/ 1.24 ± 0.11 female 3 days sham, 1.37 ± 0.10 male/ 1.09 ± 0.06 female 1 week sham, 1.8 ± 0.12 male/ 1.5 ± 0.19 female 1 month sham, respectively) and right paw (0.88 ± 0.18 male/ 0.83 ± 0.18 female at 3 days TBI + MCC950, 0.75 ± 0.25 male/ 0.85 ± 0.16 female at 1 week TBI + MCC950, and 0.96 ± 0.05 male/ 0.83 ± 0.18 female at 1 month TBI + MCC950 vs. 1.33 ± 0.13 male/ 1.25 ± 0.16 female 3 days sham, 1.31 ± 0.17 male/ 1.26 ± 0.04 female 1 week sham, 1.52 ± 0.14 male/ 1.48 ± 0.18 female 1 month sham, respectively). Together, with the trend of recovery with MCC950 treatment, these data provide a therapeutic target and time window opportunity to approach brain injury-induced long-term pain.