Silicon (Si), the second most abundant element in the Earth’s crust after oxygen, is released through the weathering of minerals, and some fractions contribute to biogeochemical cycles across long time sclaes (Struyf et al. 2009). Si can also regulate global CO2 concentrations through plant-induced silicate weathering (Struyf et al. 2009, Keller et al. 2012) and occluding carbon within phytoliths resistant to decomposition (Conley 2002, Song et al. 2013). Higher plants can accumulate Si as a non-essential but beneficial element, which differs greatly between plant species because of differences in Si uptake by the roots (Ma and Yamaji 2006). Active, passive, and exclusive mechanisms if Si uptake in plant species, therefore, are classified as high-, intermediate-, and non-accumulators, respectively (Cornelis et al. 2010).
Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) is a Si-accumulating plant and deposits richer phytoliths in tissues compared to trees (Lux et al. 2003, Umemura and Takenaka 2014). Indeed, Liu et al. (2022) found that bamboo can actively uptake dissolved silicic acid [Si(OH)4] from soil via specific Si transporters in abundant fine roots, which contributed to improving its strength and resistance to biotic or abiotic stresses. In addition, bamboo has enormous potential to expand into neighboring (secondary) forest ecosystems and shift plant community composition, due to a strong leptomorphic (running) rhizome system (Isagi and Torii 1998, Ding et al. 2006, Lima et al. 2012). Bamboo expansion is a widespread phenomenon in subtropical regions. It has been reported that bamboo expansion altered Si pools and fluxes in forest ecosystems, particularly Si availability in soil (Liu et al. 2022). However, impacts of altering Si availability on the growth and stoichiometry of bamboo and other trees in forests following bamboo expansion are still unknown.
Generally, Si availability is determined by the concentration of non-crystalline Si in soil, which is dissolved relatively easily and the form most easily absorbed and utilized by plants; uptake of Si in this form can play an important role in plant development (Sauer et al. 2006, Klotzbücher et al. 2016). Si supply can also improve Si availability in agricultural and grassland ecosystems (Haynes 2017), which can impact plant production. For example, Si was associated with high growth rates of rice and wheat (Greger et al. 2018, LI et al. 2018). Other studies found that Si promotes plant growth and increases the number of branches, resulting in higher production of aboveground biomass (Liu et al. 2012). Indeed, Si improved the dry matter, nutrient accumulation, and grain yield was observed in some crop plants (Chen et al. 2002, Jinger et al. 2022).
Si can also play an important role in improving plant photosynthesis and modifying C:N:P stoichiometry. For example, Si can mitigate some stressors in plants, promoting photosynthetic capacity and improving physiological processes due to nutrient accumulation and investment to strength and rigidity (Epstein 2009, Maghsoudi et al. 2016). Photosynthetic capacity is generally closely linked to leaf N and P content, because both largely affect CO2 assimilation capacity of plants through altering the concentration of enzyme and ATP (LI et al. 2018, Zhang et al. 2018). Silicon has been reported to increase net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll content (LI et al. 2018, Verma et al. 2019), with significant impacts on leaf N and P content. On the other hand, there was a partial substitution of organic C compounds by Si in some plants because Si can play a role similar to C in leaf structure (Schaller et al. 2012a, Katz et al. 2021). In fact, there would be cheaper energy cost in plant defenses structure through Si rather than C (Jonas et al. 2010, Schoelynck et al. 2010). Some studies found that Si availability modifies nutrient use efficiency, C:N:P stoichiometry, and productivity of winter wheat through expanding its root-to-canopy ratio (Schaller et al. 2012a, Neu et al. 2017, Teixeira et al. 2020), whereas Si deficiency in soil could decrease plant growth and weaken its photosynthsis. Consequently, increasing doses of Si can alter the stoichiometric composition of plants and, in turn, improve key physiological aspects, such as net photosynthetic rate, nutrients accumulation, leading to increased growth. Some studies experimental outline benefits for grass or crop plants from exogenous Si, such as increasing biomass production and modifing nutrient stoichiometry (Schaller et al. 2012b, Meena et al. 2014); however, we still do not know whether Si is advantageous for the growth of bamboo and tree species, which are rarely studied.
Despite the benefits of Si for Si-accumulating plants, including increased plant rigidity and resistance under biotic or abiotic stresses (Ma and Yamaji 2006, Mandlik et al. 2020), Si might play different role in other plants in forests (Ma and Yamaji 2006). For example, Si might not have much benifit to the growth of trees due to their passive or exclusive mechanisms with respect to Si uptake, as Si absorption is generally determined by transpiration, which is different from Si-accumulating plants like bamboo (Cornelis et al. 2010). Therefore, we suspected there would be differential performance between bamboo and trees due to their varying mechanisms of Si uptake. How variation in silicon supply affects the growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient use efficiency of some grasses and crop plants has also been investigated in some detail (Schaller et al. 2012a, Neu et al. 2017, Teixeira et al. 2020), but little is known about different effects of Si on the growth and C:N:P stoichiometry of bamboo and other trees when Si supply varies, which limits our understanding of the responses of bamboo and other trees to altered Si availability in soil following bamboo expansion.
To explore the influences of Si availability on the growth, physiological characteristics, and C:N:P stoichiometry of bamboo and other trees, we selected one- year seedlings of P. pubescens, P. bournei, S. superba, and C. lanceolata and conducted a pot experiment using three different levels of Si application. We posed two a priori hypotheses. First, we hypothesized that (H1) there would be different growth responses to silicon supply between bamboo and other trees due to their different mechanisms of Si uptake and transport. We predicted that Si supply would promote the biomass production of bamboo, which would increase with its Si supply level, whereas trees would exhibit no response to Si supply due to its passive mechanisms of Si uptake determined by transpiration. Second, we hypothesized that (H2) Si supply would improve photosynthetic gas exchange and modify C:N:P stoichiometry of both bamboo and tree seedlings, and that these effects would be stronger in bamboo. We predicted this because bamboo can take up dissolved silicic acid [Si(OH)4] from soil both actively and passively, unlike the passive mechanisms of Si uptake in other trees which was determined by transpiration. To test these hypotheses, we measured growth traits, photosynthetic gas exchange properties and C:N:P stoichiometry of seedling responses to three levels Si supply and analyzed the impacts of Si supply on growth and nutrient status of bamboo and tree saplings. Our work builds a better understanding of differences in the responses of a range of physiologically different and commercially and ecologically important plant species to Si supply, which helps us predict differential performance between bamboo and other trees due to altered Si availability following bamboo expansion.