The widely accepted traditional criteria for surgical resection of metastatic tumors provided by Thomford et al. [2] are the following: (1) the patient is a good candidate for surgical intervention, (2) the primary malignancy is controlled, and (3) there is no evidence of metastatic disease elsewhere in the body. Reddy and Wolfgang [3] suggested the following criteria for the selection of patients for pancreatic metastasectomy: primary cancer type associated with successful outcomes, control of the primary cancer site, isolation of metastases, resectability of metastases, and patient fitness to tolerate pancreatectomy. We typically follow these criteria but have recently expanded them. For metastatic tumors to the pancreas from RCC or CRC, even if several metastases to the liver exist simultaneously, we aim to resect the pancreatic as well as the hepatic metastases if there are fewer than two or three liver metastases. We use this approach because it is widely known that patients with a few metastases to the liver from RCC or CRC have a better prognosis than that of patients with metastases from other malignancies.
The 5-year actuarial survival for all patients after metastasectomy of the pancreas is commonly reported to be approximately 60%; e.g., Bahra et al.: 63.8% (n = 20) [4], Strobel et al.: 56.8% (n = 44) [5], and Konstantinidis et al.: 61% (n = 40) [6]. Likewise, in our study, the 5-year survival rate was 55.1% (n = 43). Although there was a significant difference between the < 5-year and ≥ 5-year DFI groups in our study, Choi et al. [7] reported that DFI was not associated with prolonged survival.
Survival after the resection of pancreatic metastatic lesions varies greatly among different primary tumor types. RCC has the best prognosis [7, 8], with a 5-year survival of 57%–75% [5, 9, 10]. In our study, the survival rate in patients with RCC was also the most favorable at 85.3% among the different primary surgical sites, namely the colon/rectum, lung, stomach, breast, ovary, skin, uterus, and sarcoma [3, 6, 11, 12], which generally have less favorable outcomes after metastasectomy than that of RCC [6]. Survival after pancreatic resection for metastatic lesions from CRC is somewhat favorable, with a median survival of 17 months according to Sperti et al. [13] and a 5-year survival rate of 33.3% in our study. Thus, the surgical removal of secondary tumors to the pancreas, excluding metastases from RCC, is insufficient for prognostic improvement. We found no previous reports evaluating the prognosis by metastatic patterns (hematogenous, lymphatic, and peritoneal); however, there was a convincing trend toward improved survival in the hematogenous group, in our study, with a 66.0% 5-year survival rate.
Few studies [14] have reported the microscopic invasion of vessels by metastatic lesions to the pancreas. Reddy et al. [14] reported that 13 of 37 patients (35%) had perineural or vascular invasion. In our specimens, lymphatic invasion was observed in 10 of 43 patients (23%) and vascular invasion in 11 of 43 patients (26%). Tumor extension into the MPD [15, 16] is a characteristic of metastatic tumors of the pancreas. Koide et al. [15] reported that tumor extension into the MPD was detected in 3 of 5 cases of pancreatic metastases from RCC, whereas this finding was observed in 9 of 43 cases (21%) in our study. Importantly, it is noteworthy that the MPD may extend far from the main tumor. On the basis of our histopathologic findings, wedge or partial resection of the pancreas is not usually performed for pancreatic metastasis. In contrast to pulmonary or hepatic metastasectomy, pancreatic metastases are associated with a rather high risk of incomplete metastasectomy; i.e., an incompletely excised tumor or post-operative leakage of pancreatic juice from the cut surface of the pancreatic parenchyma.
There have also been few reports on secondary or accompanying lymph node metastases adjacent to metastatic lesions to the pancreas [5, 14]. Strobel et al. [5] described lymph node involvement in 10 of 44 patients (26%); Reddy et al. [14] reported this finding in 13 of 39 patients (35%). In our study, lymph node involvement was detected in 11 of 43 patients (26%). Notably, the rate of secondary or accompanying lymph node metastasis adjacent to the pancreas was profoundly different from that of the primary tumor (4/9 (44%) in CRCs, 3/11 (27%) in MMs, and 1/23 (4%) in RCCs) in our study. These results indicate that standard pancreatectomy, including pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy, with lymph node dissection is not strictly necessary for the surgical treatment of metastatic tumors to the pancreas from RCC, whereas this approach is highly recommended for pancreatic metastases from CRC or MM.
It would be of interest to determine whether lymph node involvement arises from the main metastasis (i.e., tertiary metastasis) or whether this occurs simultaneously. Generally, lymphatic drainage for the right colon (cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon) runs along the ileocolic or middle colic vessels toward the root of the superior mesenteric artery and vein, adjacent to the head and body of the pancreas [17, 18]. Charnsangavej et al. [19] described nodal metastases that occurred from the right colon to the nodes around the head and body of the pancreas, and stated that further progression of these principal nodal metastases is likely to involve the pancreatic parenchyma. For this reason, pancreatic metastasis from the right colon may simultaneously accompany lymph node involvement. However, we consider that quite a few lymph node metastases around the metastatic lesion to the pancreas are likely secondary because the cases whose main metastasis was histopathologically classified as hematogenous frequently showed simultaneous nodal metastases, in our study. Specifically, four of our nine cases with pancreatic involvement from CRC were hematogenous metastases, of which three showed nodal metastasis (3/4, 75%); whereas five of nine cases were lymphatic metastases, of which two showed nodal metastasis (2/5, 40%).