1. WHO. World Health Organization: World report on ageing and health: World Health Organization; 2015.
2. WHO. Multisectoral action for a life course approach to healthy ageing: draft global strategy and plan of action on ageing and health. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland. 2016:1-37.
3. Yen IH, Fandel Flood J, Thompson H, Anderson LA, Wong G. How design of places promotes or inhibits mobility of older adults: realist synthesis of 20 years of research. Journal of aging and health. 2014;26(8):1340-72.
4. Yung EH, Conejos S, Chan EH. Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal. Cities. 2016;52:114-22.
5. Pleson E, Nieuwendyk LM, Lee KK, Chaddah A, Nykiforuk CI, Schopflocher D. Understanding older adults’ usage of community green spaces in Taipei, Taiwan. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2014;11(2):1444-64.
6. Dellamora MC, Zecevic AA, Baxter D, Cramp A, Fitzsimmons D, Kloseck M. Review of assessment tools for baseline and follow-up measurement of age-friendliness. Ageing International. 2015;40(2):149-64.
7. Yung EH, Conejos S, Chan EH. Public open spaces planning for the elderly: The case of dense urban renewal districts in Hong Kong. Land use policy. 2016;59:1-11.
8. WHO. Global age-friendly cities: A guide: World Health Organization; 2007.
9. Kalache A, Gatti A. Active ageing: a policy framework. Advances in gerontology= Uspekhi gerontologii. 2003;11:7-18.
10. Michael YL, Green MK, Farquhar SA. Neighborhood design and active aging. Health & place. 2006;12(4):734-40.
11. Paisana-Morais V, Bispo S, Encantado J, Carvalho C. Acessibilidade pedonal percebida em maiores de 65 anos: instrumento de avaliação. Psicologia, Saúde & Doenças. 2014;15(1):25-35.
12. Almeida MF. Age-Friendly Walkable Urban Spaces: A Participatory Assessment Tool. Journal of Housing For the Elderly. 2016;30(4):396-411.
13. Waltz CF, Bausell BR. Nursing research: design statistics and computer analysis: Davis FA; 1981.
14. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity 1. Personnel psychology. 1975;28(4):563-75.
15. Corbin J, Strauss A, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: sage; 2014.
16. .
17. Gehl J, Svarre B. How to study public life: Island Press; 2013.
18. Schwandt TA, Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation. 2007;2007(114):11-25.
19. Mohammadi E, Allahyari T, Darvishpoor Kakhaki A, Saraei H. Determining Psychometric Properties of Iranian Active Aging Measurement Instrument. Iranian Journal of Ageing. 2018;12(4):414-29.
20. Ayre C, Scally AJ. Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development. 2014;47(1):79-86.
21. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
22. DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle‐Wright P, Ernst DM, Hayden SJ, Lazzara DJ, et al. A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. Journal of Nursing scholarship. 2007;39(2):155-64.
23. Neuendorf KA. The content analysis guidebook: Sage; 2016.
24. Lacasse Y, Godbout C, Series F. Health-related quality of life in obstructive sleep apnoea. European Respiratory Journal. 2002;19(3):499-503.
25. Pett MA, Lackey NR, Sullivan JJ. Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in health care research: Sage; 2003.
26. Wong KK-K. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin. 2013;24(1):1-32.
27. Fornell C, Lacker D. Evaluating structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transportation research part B, University of Michigan. 1981;37:1-25.
28. Smith G, Del Sala S, Logie RH, Maylor EA. Prospective and retrospective memory in normal ageing and dementia: A questionnaire study. Memory. 2000;8(5):311-21.
29. Del Greco L, Walop W, McCarthy RHJCCMAJ. Questionnaire development: 2. Validity and reliability. 1987;136(7):699.
30. Werts CE, Linn RL, Jöreskog KG. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement. 1974;34(1):25-33.
31. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory McGraw-Hill New York Google Scholar. 1978.
32. Rivard S, Huff SL. Factors of success for end-user computing. Communications of the ACM. 1988;31(5):552-61.
33. Lak A, Aghamolaei R, Azizkhani E. From segregation to integration of new developments in historic contexts: Rural texture in Iran. Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning. 2018;9(1):59-66.
34. Ruza J, Kim JI, Leung I. Sustainable, age-friendly cities: An evaluation framework and case study application on Palo Alto, California. Sustainable Cities and Society 2014;14(1).
35. Annear M, Keeling S, Wilkinson T, Cushman G, Gidlow B, Hopkins H. Environmental influences on healthy and active ageing: a systematic review. Ageing & Society. 2014;34(4):590-622.
36. Pikora T, Giles-Corti B, Bull F, Jamrozik K, Donovan R. Developing a framework for assessment of the environmental determinants of walking and cycling. Social science & medicine. 2003;56(8):1693-703.
37. Pollak PB. Liveable communities: An evaluation guide: AARP Washington, DC; 1999.
38. Panayides P. Coefficient alpha: interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology. 2013;9(4):687–96.
39. Fleiss JL. Design and analysis of clinical experiments: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.