We found that IOP was not stable during ocular compression. It is incorrect to assume a stable IOP when performing OCT during ocular compression.6,9 To better estimate the IOP increase during OCT, investigators should measure IOP again at the end of OCT because this IOP is lower. The average IOP values from these two measurements (initial and final) could provide better IOP estimation. For example, if IOP is measured as 50mmHg immediately after ocular compression, IOP is 40mmHg at the end of OCT. Using an average of these two values, that is 45mmHg, could better relate the compression effect on the LC. In this example, deformation of the LC could have already been achieved at 45mmHg. Relying solely on one IOP measurement at the initial stage (i.e. 50mmHg) would under-estimate the effect of IOP on LC deformation.
During the course of this project, Chen et al.12 reported a decline in IOP during a 4-min ocular compression. The dimensions of the Schlemm’s canal were monitored using SD-OCT. The Schlemm’s canal cross-sectional area was reduced from 5440.0µm² at baseline to 3947.6µm² at 38.6mmHg during ocular compression. The collapse of the Schlemm’s canal was positively associated with reduced aqueous outflow facilities, which caused an IOP increase. There was no significant difference in the trabecular meshwork thickness.
We found a faster IOP drop during ocular compression in low myopes than in high myopes. The differences approached statistical significance. Johnstone13 suggested that IOP rise induced by ocular compression through ophthalmodynamometry or the water drinking test was regulated by pulsatile aqueous outflow. From the current study, it appears that low myopes have better regulation of aqueous outflow and IOP during ocular compression. When the compressive force was released, the IOP dropped below the baseline level and gradually returned to the baseline IOP. Lower myopes had a faster recovery rate than high myopes. Johnstone13 also suggested that pulsatile aqueous flow could stop when the IOP is reduced below its physiological point.
It would be interesting to observe different IOP profiles between the two myopic groups. A recent study demonstrated genetic influences between high myopia and POAG as well as the causal effect of myopia on POAG.14 The study of aqueous humour dynamics would be useful to better understand the pathophysiology of POAG in patients with high myopia. If high myope has poor IOP regulation, it could be a risk factor for the development of glaucoma.
Can IOP variation during and after ocular compression be used as an indicator of aqueous outflow facilities? Aqueous outflow facilities are not routinely measured in clinical practice. It requires placing a weighted tonometer on the eye, such as the Schiötz tonometer. A pneumatonometer is also used and rate of IOP recovery is measured for several minutes while maintaining the pneumatonometer on the eye.15 The aqueous outflow facility coefficient C can be determined using the following equation:
F = (PIOP − PEPI ) × C + FUVEO
where F is the aqueous perfusion rate, PIOP is the IOP, PEPI is the episcleral venous pressure, and FUVEO is the uveoscleral outflow. Aqueous perfusion rate demonstrated diurnal variation and also an age-related reduction.16
Clinically, the water drinking test may indicate outflow facility.17 Fluorophotometry is a more common method for measuring outflow facilities. A high dose of fluorescein is applied topically at mid-night, followed by continuous fluorophotometric measurements the following morning.18,19 This method is still used in research work nowadays but is difficult to conduct routinely in clinical practice.20,21 A more invasive method for measuring outflow requires a manometric tonographic technique. Karyotakis et al.22 found that the outflow coefficient decreased with a high IOP. The aqueous outflow facility coefficient at 40mmHg was more than double that at 20mmHg. We further evaluated the usefulness of ocular compression and IOP changes in indicating aqueous outflow facilities in another study.
Our study has several limitations. Our sample size was small and only healthy young adults were included. Older adults, particularly POAG patients, should be recruited in future study. Measurement of the Schlemm’s canal was not included and the change of Schlemm’s canal dimension and IOP variation was based on the previous study by Chen et al.12
Investigators using ocular compression to study LC shape should measure IOP at both the initial and final stages of ocular compression.