Effect of NEs in the enhancement of cypermethrin bioactivity
The insecticidal activity of the NEs formulated in this work (ingredient active:surfactant ratio from 1:2 and ultrasound parameters: ultrasound power = 65 W, sonication time = 2 min and cycles = 30 on/20 off.) were tested on T. castaneum and S oryzae adults and Cx. p. pipiens larvae.
The results from the bioassay in T. castaneum showed that the LD50 values from β-CP alone and the combination of peppermint EO + β-CP were not significant different (P > 0.05). The values after 24 h of exposure were 0.767 and 0.412 µg insects − 1, respectively (Table 2). These LD50 values were significantly higher than those for NEs (0.176 µg insects − 1) at 24 h (P < 0.05). This result showed that NEs significantly potentiated the insecticidal activity of β-CP 4.35-folds (P < 0.05) (Table 3). The improved β-CP bioactivity produced by NEs was similar in S. oryzae (4.22-folds) (P < 0.05) (Table 3). In this insect, after 24 h exposure, the LD50 values from β-CP alone and the combination of peppermint EO + β-CP were 0.882 and 0.412 µg insects− 1, respectively (Table 2). The LD50 value of NEs at 24 h was significantly lower (0.209 µg insects − 1) (P < 0.05). Table 2 also showed the toxicity effect of β-CP alone or combine with peppermint EO and their NEs in Cx. p. pipiens after 24 h of exposure. The toxicity order based on LC50 values was NEs (0.018 ppm) > β-CP + peppermint EO (0.030 ppm) > β-CP alone (0.288 ppm) (P < 0.05). The NEs significantly potentiated the toxic effect of β-CP (16-folds) (P < 0.05). Briefly, except for T. castaneum, peppermint oil significantly increased the bioactivity of β-CP (P < 0.05). Moreover, for all insect pest, NEs toxicity was approximately two-fold higher than β-CP + peppermint EO treatment (P < 0.05).
Table 2
LD50 or LC50 values (± confidence intervals) of β-cypermethrin, β-cypermethrin + peppermint essential oil and its single nanoemulsion against adults of Tribolium castaneum and Sithophilus oryzae (µg insects− 1) and larvae of Culex pipiens pipiens (ppm).
| β-CP alone | β-CP + EO | Nanoemulsion (1 day) | Nanoemulsion (30 day) | Nanoemulsion (60 day) |
T. castaneum | 0.767 (0.567–0.946) a | 0.412 (0.306–0.572) a | 0.176 (0.152–0.206) b | 0.169 (0.141–0.201) b | 0.195 (0.165–0.232) b |
S. oryzae | 0.882 (0.701–1.166) a | 0.472 (0.366–0.576) b | 0.209 (0.193–0.261) c | 0.257 (0.206–0.301) c | 0.314 (0.257–0.374) c |
Cx. p. pipiens | 0.288 (0.254–0.328) a | 0.030 (0.026–0.040) b | 0.018 (0.016–0.021) c | 0.025 (0.021–0.029) bc | 0.036 (0.032–0.042) b |
For each row, different letters indicate significant statistical differences (P < 0.05). |
Table 3
Potentiation effect between β-cypermethrin, β-cypermethrin + peppermint essential oil and its single nanoemulsion in Tribolium castaneum, Sithophilus oryzae and Culex pipiens pipiens at 1 day of exposure.
T. castaneum | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | NS | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 1.86 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 4.35 | 2.34 | - |
S. oryzae | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | * | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 1.86 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 4.22 | 2.25 | - |
Cx. p. pipiens | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | * | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 9.6 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 16 | 1.66 | - |
“*” indicated significant differences (p < 0.05) and “NS” not significant differences (p > 0.05). |
Table 4 informed the biological activity of β-CP alone or combine with palmarosa EO and their NEs in T. castaneum after 24 h of exposure. The results showed that not significant different were found between the LD50 value of β-CP alone (0.767 µg insects− 1) and the combination of β-CP + palmarosa EO (0.436 µg insects− 1) (P > 0.05). The LD50 value of NEs was 0.089 µg insects− 1, which indicated that nanoformulation significantly potentiated the toxicity effect of β-CP 8.62 times (P < 0.05) (Table 5). In S. oryzae, after 24 h of exposure, the toxicity order based on LD50 values was NEs (0.226 µg insects− 1) > β-CP + palmarosa EO (0.313 µg insects− 1) > β-CP alone (0.882 µg insects− 1) (P < 0.05) (Table 4). It was observed that the NEs significantly enhanced 3.9-folds the toxic effect of β-CP (P < 0.05) (Table 5). In Cx. p. pipiens, after 24 h of exposure, the toxicity order based on LC50 values was NEs (0.027 ppm) > β-CP + palmarosa EO (0.156 ppm) > β-CP alone (0.288 ppm) (P < 0.05) (Table 4). NEs potentiated 10.6-folds the toxic effect of β-CP (P < 0.05) (Table 5). Summarizing, except for T. castaneum, palmarosa oil significantly increased the bioactivity of β-CP (P < 0.05). Moreover, for all insect pest, NEs enhanced the insecticidal activity of β-CP + palmarosa EO between 1.38 and 8.66 folds (P < 0.05).
Peppermint and palmarosa EO demonstrated insecticidal activity in different insect pest such as S. oryzae, T. castaneum, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae), Spodoptera frugiperda Walker (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), Cx. p. pipiens, Musca domestica L. (Diptera, Muscidae) and Blatella germanica L. (Blattodea, Blattellidae) (Devi, et al. 2020; Jesser et al., 2020c; Mohafrash et al., 2020; Sinthusiri, J., & Soonwera, 2013; Sousa-Barbosa et al. 2018; Yeguerman et al., 2020; 2022). It is known that EO can enhance or synergize the insecticidal activity of synthetic insecticides (Ruttanaphan et al., 2019). It was probed that EO inhibit detoxifying enzymes and improve the overall toxicity of synthetic insecticides by increasing their bioavailability and their interaction with the target site in the insect (Norris et al., 2019). Particularly, some works informed about the use of EO or plant extract as synergists of CP against arthropods pest (Bullangpoti, et al., 2012; Islam and Aktar, 2013; Ismail, 2021; Jesser et al., 2020 a,b; Khalequzzaman et al., 2006; Ruttanaphan et al., 2019; Tavares et al., 2022). However, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the elaboration of a single NEs which combine EO and CP in the same formulation using Tween 80 and ultrasound. In our work, the NEs showed an enhancement of bioactivity of CP. Probably, this phenomenon could be attributed to the interaction between EO and CP and the nanometric size of NEs. It is important to emphases that, at nanoscale, the materials have unique chemical, physical and biological properties that are not observed in their bulk forms (Chhipa, 2017). For example, it was demonstrated that nanometric size facilitate the adhesion of NEs to insect body part promoting irritation and serious damage of cuticle, increasing their penetration (Hashem et al., 2018). It is important to emphases that NEs reduce organic solvent content in conventional insecticides formulation.
Finally, when the insecticidal activity of β-CP enhanced by peppermint or palmarosa oil was compared, it was observed that just in Cx. p. pipiens the treatment β-CP + peppermint EO was significantly higher than β-CP + palmarosa EO (P < 0.05). In addition, just in T. castaneum the NEs of β-CP + palmarosa EO was significantly more effective than the other NEs. In this regard, several studies reported that insecticidal activity of EO compounds is species-dependent (Alkan, 2020; Benelli et al., 2018; Bett et al., 2016;2017; Saleem et al., 2014). Recently our research group reported that the major compounds of peppermint oil were menthol and isomenthone and for palmarosa EO, geraniol (Yeguerman et al. 2020). Probably, these compounds could be involved in the insecticidal activity of the oils.
Table 4
LD50 or LC50 values (± confidence intervals) of β-cypermethrin, β-cypermethrin + palmarosa essential oil and its single nanoemulsion against adults of Tribolium castaneum and Sithophilus oryzae (µg insects− 1) and larvae of Culex pipiens pipiens (ppm).
| β-CP alone | β-CP + EO | Nanoemulsion (1 day) | Nanoemulsion (30 day) | Nanoemulsion (60 day) |
T. castaneum | 0.767 (0.567–0.946) a | 0.436 (0.236–0.626) a | 0.089 (0.073–0.111) b | 0.231 (0.122–0.322) a | 0.267 (0.195–0.341) a |
S. oryzae | 0.882 (0.701–1.166) a | 0.313 (0.275–0.412) b | 0.226 (0.147–0.255) c | 0.323 (0.275–0.378) b | 0.403 (0.342–0.484) b |
Cx. p. pipiens | 0.288 (0.254–0.328) a | 0.156 (0.132–0.184) b | 0.027 (0.017–0.043) c | 0.035 (0.032–0.038) c | 0.041 (0.037–0.046) c |
For each row, different letters indicate significant statistical differences (P < 0.05). |
Table 5
Potentiation effect between β-cypermethrin, β-cypermethrin + palmarosa essential oil and its single nanoemulsion in Tribolium castaneum, Sithophilus oryzae and Culex pipiens pipiens at 1 day of exposure
A | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | NS | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 1.76 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 8.62 | 4.89 | - |
B | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | * | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 2.81 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 3.90 | 1.38 | - |
C | β-cypermethrin alone | β-cypermethrin + EO | Nanoemulsion |
β-cypermethrin alone | - | * | * |
β-cypermethrin + EO | 1.84 | - | * |
Nanoemulsion | 10.6 | 8.66 | - |
“*” indicated significant differences and “NS” not significant differences. |
Insecticidal activity of NEs over time.
Table 2 showed the insecticidal activity of NEs containing peppermint EO + β-CP for 2 months in different insect pest. It was observed that in T. castaneum and S. oryzae, the NEs maintained the bioactivity for 2 months and no significant changes in LD50 values were detected (P > 0.05). However, in Cx p. pipiens, LC50 value at 2 months had a slightly increase compared to NEs at 1 day (P < 0.05). In addition, no significant differences were observed in LC50 value between 1 and 2 months (P > 0.05).
Table 4 presented de bioactivity of NEs elaborated with palmarosa EO + β-CP for 2 months in different insect pest. In T. castaneum and S. oryzae, the NEs at 1 month were slightly less toxic than NEs at 1 day (P < 0.05). However no significant differences were observed in LD50 values between 1 and 2 months (P > 0.05). In the other hand, in Cx p. pipiens, the NEs maintained the larvicidal activity for 2 months and no significant changes in LC50 values were observed (P > 0.05).
In literature, there is a lack of information about this topic. The NEs developed in this work showed a better insecticidal activity over time compared with other NEs elaborated with EO or synthetic insecticide. Almadiy et al. (2022) evaluated the residual activity of NEs formulated with Deverra tortuosa DC (Apiales, Apiaceae) EO and Tween 80 in treated grains at values LC95 against Callosobruchus maculatus Fabricius (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae). These NEs showed a lethal time 50 (LT50) = 29.4 ± 2.4 days. Faustino et al. (2020) evaluated the toxicological effect of NEs of Protium heptaphyllum Marchand (Sapindales, Burseraceae) and Tween 80 against Aedes aegypti Meigen (Diptera, Culicidae). At 20 µg mL− 1 theses nanosystems caused mortality for 96 h. NEs elaborated with Cinnamomum zeylanicum J.Presl (Lauraceae) or Myrtus communis L. (Myrtales, Myrtaceae) EO (0.5% w/w) and Tween 80 and Span 20 showed larvicidal activity for 8 days on Anopheles stephensi Liston (Diptera, Culicidae) (Firooziyan et al., 2021; 2022). Feng et al. (2021) evaluated the residual activity of NEs with pyriproxyfen, methyl oleate (solvent) and polyoxyethylene castor oil ether (surfactant) in M. domestica. These NEs showed insecticidal activity for 14 days.
Despite the fact that both NEs of peppermint or palmarosa oils + β-CP had a slightly increase of particle size for 2 months, these nanosystems demonstrated an excellent insecticidal activity in all insect pest over time.
As is known, green chemistry tends to minimize human health and environmental risks at the time to maximize efficiency throughout the chemical production process (Mulvihill et al., 2011). NEs elaborated in our work could be thought an innovation in this area since they produce a high insecticidal activity with low synthetic insecticide amount, as a result of the potentiation improved by the incorporation of EO in the NEs. Moreover, organic solvents are commonly used when synthetic insecticides are applied at field. In this sense, our NEs eliminate the hazards of organic solvent due to they are aqueous systems that could be directly applied. Finally, it is important to note that ultrasonic technique is considered a green method attributable to its energy-efficiency, low production cost, ease of system manipulation and better control over formulation (Jesser et al., 2020b).