Research Article
Adsorption modelling and fixed-bed column study on milk processing industry wastewater treatment using chitosan zinc-oxide nano-adsorbent coated sand bed
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2004838/v1
This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License
published 27 Dec, 2022
Read the published version in Environmental Science and Pollution Research →
You are reading this latest preprint version
Chitosan zinc-oxide
Fixed-bed column
Kinetic models
Milk processing industry
Nano-adsorbent coated sand and Wastewater
Table 1 Parameters considered in fixed-bed column adsorption study for adsorption BOD and COD using CZOCS
Pollutant |
Z |
pH |
C0 |
madsorbent |
Qt |
𝑉𝐵 |
Qy |
BOD |
10 |
6 |
500 |
118.00 |
51 |
30.60 |
10 |
20 |
6 |
500 |
236.00 |
||||
30 |
6 |
500 |
354.00 |
||||
40 |
6 |
500 |
472.00 |
||||
COD |
10 |
6 |
3000 |
115.18 |
43 |
25.80 |
|
20 |
6 |
3000 |
230.36 |
||||
30 |
6 |
3000 |
345.54 |
||||
40 |
6 |
3000 |
460.72 |
Z = Bed height (cm); C0= Influent concentration (mg/L); madsorbent = Mass of adsorbent (g);
Qy= Influent flow rate (mL/ min); Qt = Total flow time of influent (h); 𝑉𝐵= Total volume of influent sent (L).
Table 2 Physical and chemical characteristics of activated sand and CZOCS
Characteristics |
Activated sand |
CZOCS |
BET surface area (m2/g) |
2.87 |
6.20 |
Total zinc on coated sand (mg/g) |
- |
40.47 |
Acid-resistance [(A/B)×100] (%) |
- |
36.41 |
Alkali-resistance [(A/B)×100] (%) |
- |
3.11 |
A= Dissolved ZnO; B= Total ZnO
Table 3 Effect of CZOCS filter bed height on adsorption capacity of column for BOD and COD reductions at breakthrough and exhaustion points
Pollutant |
Z (cm) |
pH |
C0 |
m adsorbent (g) |
CB (mg/L) |
tB (h) |
CE (mg/L) |
tE (h) |
𝑞𝐵 (mg/g) |
qE (mg/g) |
|
BOD |
10 |
6 |
500 |
118.00 |
100.05 |
8.23 |
475.00 |
27.47 |
313.84 |
611.04 |
|
20 |
236.00 |
99.96 |
16.96 |
474.84 |
37.60 |
646.77 |
836.67 |
||||
30 |
354.00 |
100.00 |
20.69 |
475.13 |
45.27 |
789.18 |
1006.73 |
||||
40 |
472.00 |
99.96 |
28.28 |
475.20 |
49.00 |
1078.48 |
1089.63 |
||||
COD |
10 |
6 |
3000 |
115.18 |
599.83 |
11.86 |
2850.15 |
33.00 |
2779.58 |
4512.29 |
|
20 |
230.36 |
600.37 |
15.29 |
2850.96 |
34.20 |
3584.32 |
4675.03 |
||||
30 |
345.54 |
601.11 |
25.04 |
2850.71 |
37.17 |
5867.84 |
5081.11 |
||||
40 |
460.72 |
599.92 |
30.27 |
2850.84 |
40.97 |
7095.08 |
5600.81 |
Z = Bed height, C0 = Influent concentration (mg/L), madsorbent = Mass of adsorbent (g), CB = Break effluent concentration (mg/L) (Interpolated), tB= Time to break through (h) (Interpolated), CE = Exhaustion effluent concentration (mg/L) (Interpolated), tE = Time to exhaustion (h) (Interpolated), qB= Adsorption capacity at 20% breakthrough (mg/g), qE= Adsorption capacity at 95% exhaustion (mg/g)
Table 4 Influence of bed height on kinetic parameters of adsorption models
Pollutant |
Bed height (cm) |
Thomas |
Yoon-Nelson |
Adams-Bohart |
|||
𝐾Th × 10-4 (L/min mg) |
𝑞0 (mg/g) |
𝐾YN (min-1) |
𝜏 (h) |
KAB × 10-4 (L/mg min) |
𝑁0 (mg/L) |
||
BOD |
10 |
39.63 |
661.60 |
0.198 |
15.61 |
66.05 |
13.20 |
20 |
36.46 |
966.80 |
0.177 |
22.82 |
48.75 |
17.02 |
|
30 |
35.49 |
1256 |
0.172 |
29.65 |
27.23 |
46.99 |
|
40 |
34.43 |
1584 |
0.155 |
34.98 |
11.23 |
58.95 |
|
COD |
10 |
7.54 |
4710 |
0.226 |
18.08 |
67.08 |
29.95 |
20 |
7.07 |
5477 |
0.212 |
21.03 |
41.24 |
31.73 |
|
30 |
6.92 |
6895 |
0.207 |
26.96 |
19.07 |
33.59 |
|
40 |
5.39 |
7021 |
0.181 |
33.44 |
12.74 |
53.58 |
𝐾Th = Thomas kinetic coefficient (mL/min mg), 𝑞0 =Adsorption capacity (mg/g), 𝐾YN = Yoon-Nelson constant (min-1),
𝜏 = Time required for 50% adsorbate breakthrough (h), KAB = Kinetic constant (L/mg min), N0 = Saturation concentration (mg/L)
Table 5 Effect of CZOCS filter bed on estimated values for statistical parameters of adsorption models
Pollutant |
Bed height (cm) |
Thomas |
Yoon-Nelson |
Adams-Bohart |
|||||||||||
R2 |
Adj-R2 |
SSE |
RMSE |
R2 |
Adj-R2 |
SSE |
RMSE |
R2 |
Adj-R2 |
SSE |
RMSE |
||||
BOD |
10 |
0.9256 |
0.9241 |
26.30 |
0.7327 |
0.9256 |
0.9241 |
26.30 |
0.7327 |
0.8840 |
0.8844 |
0.670 |
0.1182 |
||
20 |
0.9942 |
0.9941 |
2.528 |
0.2271 |
0.9942 |
0.9941 |
2.528 |
0.2271 |
0.8789 |
0.8788 |
0.209 |
0.0660 |
|||
30 |
0.9791 |
0.9787 |
7.416 |
0.389 |
0.9791 |
0.9787 |
7.416 |
0.3890 |
0.8975 |
0.8971 |
0.325 |
0.0823 |
|||
40 |
0.9541 |
0.9532 |
12.87 |
0.5124 |
0.9541 |
0.9532 |
12.87 |
0.5124 |
0.8771 |
0.8769 |
2.651 |
0.2350 |
|||
COD |
10 |
0.9823 |
0.9819 |
5.355 |
0.3614 |
0.9823 |
0.9819 |
5.355 |
0.3614 |
0.8729 |
0.8722 |
1.831 |
0.2113 |
||
20 |
0.9939 |
0.9938 |
2.073 |
0.2249 |
0.9939 |
0.9938 |
2.073 |
0.2249 |
0.8719 |
0.8712 |
2.201 |
0.2317 |
|||
30 |
0.9356 |
0.9340 |
19.66 |
0.6924 |
0.9356 |
0.934 |
19.66 |
0.6924 |
0.8334 |
0.8318 |
6.439 |
0.3963 |
|||
40 |
0.8859 |
0.8831 |
27.95 |
0.8257 |
0.8859 |
0.8831 |
27.95 |
0.8257 |
0.8340 |
0.8324 |
7.464 |
0.4267 |
SSE= Sums of squared error, R2= Regression co-efficient, Adj-R2= Adjusted regression co-efficient, RMSE= Root mean square error
Table 6 Error function values of the adsorption models
Pollutant |
Bede height |
Thomas |
Yoon and Nelson |
Adams-Bohart |
||||||
ERRSQ |
HYBRID |
MPSD |
ERRSQ |
HYBRID |
MPSD |
ERRSQ |
HYBRID |
MPSD |
||
BOD |
10 |
198.30 |
1,33,852.60 |
65,587.77 |
2089.14 |
16,54,389.13 |
8,10,650.67 |
16,714.16 |
19,06,186.55 |
8,50,695.71 |
20 |
12.86 |
502.08 |
246.02 |
707.20 |
3,13,202.42 |
75,853.59 |
8,318.51 |
17,36,113.70 |
93,431.41 |
|
30 |
848.54 |
37,910.46 |
18,576.12 |
1931.54 |
14,60,925.70 |
1,53,469.18 |
29,897.77 |
1,44,36,630.01 |
70,73,948.70 |
|
40 |
1954.3 |
12,16,442.34 |
5,96,056.75 |
2618.84 |
52,32,618.67 |
25,63,983.15 |
44,029.58 |
1,46,41,044.88 |
71,74,111.99 |
|
COD |
10 |
8472.16 |
22,716.59 |
9313.8 |
26,538.78 |
2,05,793.81 |
84,375.46 |
40,852.64 |
63,81,25,658.31 |
26,16,31,519.91 |
20 |
2231.99 |
21,746.72 |
8916.15 |
7091.47 |
1,40,247.33 |
57,501.40 |
26,824.83 |
67,49,711.28 |
27,67,381.62 |
|
30 |
3380.07 |
29,125.45 |
15,272.52 |
19,265.41 |
2,11,622.24 |
86,765.11 |
31,854.07 |
1,13,74,239.64 |
46,63,438.25 |
|
40 |
11,072.40 |
37,250.04 |
11,941.43 |
27,638.67 |
10,99,665.13 |
4,50,862.70 |
1,06,918.25 |
1,70,67,97,482.55 |
69,97,86,967.84 |
Table 7 Realistic treatment of MPIW by CZOCS
Effluent characteristics |
Before treatment |
After treatment |
% RE |
CPCB Standards |
||||
TDS (mg/L) |
2533.18 |
674.24 |
73.38 |
<2100 mg/L |
||||
TSS (mg/L) |
1670.09 |
194.35 |
88.36 |
<200 mg/L |
||||
Turbidity (NTU) |
762.14 |
7.81 |
98.97 |
---------------- |
||||
EC (µS/cm) |
2.53 |
1.68 |
33.59 |
----------------- |
||||
pH |
5.28 |
8.67 |
6.5 to 8.5 |
|||||
BOD (mg/L) |
1005.16 |
93.66 |
90.68 |
< 100 mg/L |
||||
COD (mg/L) |
10737.87 |
216.8 |
97.98 |
< 250 mg/L |
||||
Sulphate (mg/L) |
217.87 |
2.22 |
98.98 |
< 2.8 mg/L |
||||
Phosphate (mg/L) |
36.9 |
4.37 |
88.15 |
< 5.00 mg/L |
||||
Ammoniacal nitrogen (mg/L) |
130.26 |
48.18 |
63.01 |
< 50 mg/L |
||||
Nitrate nitrogen (mg/L) |
365.96 |
7.01 |
98.08 |
< 10 mg/L |
||||
Chloride (mg/L) |
856.12 |
98.82 |
88.45 |
< 100 mg/L |
||||
Co-existing pollutants (mg/L) |
||||||||
Al |
1.37 |
0.2 |
85.4 |
|
||||
Cu |
0.17 |
Nil |
------ |
|||||
Fe |
1.18 |
0.34 |
71.18 |
|||||
Mg |
4.82 |
2.05 |
57.46 |
|||||
Mn |
0.74 |
0.35 |
52.70 |
|||||
Ni |
0.43 |
0.16 |
62.79 |
|||||
Sr |
0.12 |
Nil |
------ |
|||||
Zn |
0.94 |
0.22 |
76.59 |
|
published 27 Dec, 2022
Read the published version in Environmental Science and Pollution Research →
Editorial decision: Major Revision
21 Oct, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
20 Sep, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
20 Sep, 2022
Editor invited by journal
16 Sep, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
30 Aug, 2022
First submitted to journal
27 Aug, 2022
You are reading this latest preprint version