Chemical analysis of yeast hydrolysate
Yeast hydrolysate was provided by Jiangmen Thealth Bioengineering Co., Ltd (Guangzhou, China). The contents of moisture, crude protein, crude fat and crude ash were measured with the reference of AOAC [24]. Gross energy was determined by an oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr instruments, Moline, IL). The soluble protein in yeast hydrolysate was extracted according to the method of Wang et al. [25] and fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) system using the previous study [26]. The gel was stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Beyotime, Shanghai, China) for 40 minutes and de-stained with deionized water for 8 hours.
Experimental animals, diet, and design
The animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at Sichuan Agricultural University. A total of twenty-four weaned piglets (21-d-old), with an average initial body weight of 7.42±0.34 kg, were randomly allotted to two groups receiving either a basal diet or YH diet (the basal diet supplementation with 5000 mg/kg yeast hydrolysate) for 21 days (Fig. 2A). The basal diet (Table 2) was formulated to meet and exceed NRC (2012) requirements. The molecular weight of yeast hydrolysate was less than 50 kDa and mostly clustered below 25 kDa (Fig. 1). Yeast hydrolysates mainly provided a rich source of crude protein (45.50%), and contributed less to crude ash (6.47%) and crude fat (2.17%). Piglets have free access to water and feed throughout the experiment.
LPS injection
After 21-day feeding trial, immunological challenge was applied to the half of piglets in each of two groups (Fig. 2A). The challenged piglets were intraperitoneally injected with Escherichia coli LPS (E. coli serotype O55: B5, Sigma Chemical Inc., St. Louis, MO, United State) at 150 μg/kg BW, and unchallenged piglets were administrated the same volume of sterile physiological saline. The dose of LPS used in this study was consistent with the previous report [27]. Previous experiments have presented that LPS injection particularly caused dramatic inflammatory response and intestinal barrier dysfunction in pigs, rats and mice. And these negative effects generally occurred within 3-6 hours after LPS injection [7, 28]. Therefore, blood and intestinal samples in this study were collected 4 h following LPS or saline injection.
Growth performance
Yeast hydrolysate treatment was a main factor prior to the LPS challenge. Piglets were weighted individually on day 1 and 22 of the experiment. Daily feed consumption was recorded for each piglet. Average daily gain and the ratio of feed intake to gain were calculated as well.
Blood sample collection and analysis
Four hours following LPS and saline injection, blood samples were collected in 10 ml vacutainer tubes via anterior vena cava. Blood was centrifugated at 3500 ×g for 10 min at 4℃. Serum samples were stored at -20℃ until subsequent analysis for inflammatory markers and diamine oxidase (DAO) levels. Commercially available porcine ELISA kits (Chenglin Biological Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the following indicators: adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin (HP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) and DAO in serum.
Intestinal samples collection and analysis
Piglets were euthanized with pentobarbital sodium (200 mg/kg) in a separate sampling room away from other animals. The intestine was immediately removed. A 2-cm segment was removed from mid-jejunum and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution. Paraffin embedding was used to cut into cross sections (5 μm thick). The jejunal morphology was determined by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. Intestinal morphological images were photographed with a Nikon TS100 microscope (40 × and 100 ×). Villus height and crypt depth were analyzed and calculated by Image Pro Plus 6.0 software (Media Cybernetics, Bethesda, MD, USA). Other sections were stained using immunofluorescence for TLR4 protein. Briefly, mouse anti-TLR4 monoclonal antibody (1:100, sc-293072, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) was incubated overnight at 4℃. Corresponding secondary antibody (Cy3 conjugated Goat Anti-mouse IgG, 1:300, GB21301 from Servicebio, Wuhan, China) was incubated for 50 minutes at room temperature. The slides were washed three times with PBS, and then incubated with DAPI solution at room temperature for 10 min and stored in the dark. After immunofluorescence, microphotographs were acquired with an inverted microscope (Leica DMI400B, Germany). In addition, open the middle segment of jejunum longitudinally (about 15-cm) and wash with ice-clod saline, and then mucosal samples were scraped into sterile tube. Mucosal samples were immediately placed into liquid nitrogen and stored at -80℃ until the analysis of genes and proteins expressions. About 0.5 g of frozen jejunal mucosal scrapings were homogenized in ice-cold saline and prepared into a 10% homogenate, crushed using an ultrasonic cell crushing system at 4°C and then centrifuged (3,000 x g, 15 min, 4°C). The collected supernatant was used to analyze TNF-α and IL-1β contents.
mRNA abundance analysis
Total RNA was extracted from jejunal mucosa using the TRIZOL reagent (TaKaRa Biotechnology (Dalian) Co., Ltd., Dalian, China). RNA integrity was verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA was synthesized with PrimeScript RT kit (TaKaRa). Real-time PCR was performed using SYBR Premix Ex Taq reagents (TaKaRa) and CFX-96 RT-qPCR Detection System (Bio-Rad). The genes of intestinal barrier and inflammatory markers related primer pairs were synthesized by Invitrogen (Shanghai, China) and listed in table 3. The mRNA expression of target gene relative to housekeeping gene (β-actin) was calculated by the method of Arce et al. [29].
Western blot analysis
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described. Briefly, protein was extracted from jejunal mucosa using the lysis buffer (Beyotime, Shanghai, China). Protein concentration was measured with the BCA protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Then, protein was transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes using a wet Trans-Blot system (Bio-Rad). After blocking, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies: anti-TLR4 (sc-293072, Santa Cruz, USA), anti-ZO1 (61-7300, Invitrogen, USA), anti-OCC (ab31721, abcam, UK), anti-TNF-α (ab6671, abcam), anti-IL-1β (sc-12742), anti-NFκB-p65 (6956, CST, Cell signaling Technology, USA), anti-p-NFκB-p65 (3033, CST), and anti-β-actin (sc-47778, Santa Cruz). After washing, the corresponding secondary antibodies, goat anti-rabbit/mouse IgG -HRP secondary antibody (sc-2030 and sc-2031, Santa Cruz), were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Visualization of membranes was performed with the Clarity™ Western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad) and the ChemiDoc XRS imaging system (Bio-Rad). The β-actin was applied as a controller for the mean of protein load.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed by SAS statistical software (Version 9.4; S.A.S, Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Each piglet served as the statistical unit. The data of growth performance were analyzed by two-tailed Student’s t-test. For data from serum and jejunum, the MIXED model procedures of SAS were used for statistical analysis. The model included the following main effects: diet (0% or 0.5% yeast hydrolysate), immunological challenge (saline or LPS), and the interactions of diet and challenge. All data were expressed as means ± SEM. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant, and 0.05 < P < 0.10 indicated a trend.