To conserve natural ecosystems, we require effective experimental methods with which to increase our understanding of them and to predict the impacts of human and other factors. Ecosystem models called microcosms are currently used to investigate material cycles and food webs in aquatic ecosystems, and the effects of chemical substances (Beyers 1993). A microcosm is a culture of a community of organisms in a controlled environment, such as a container, which also encompasses physical, chemical, and biological factors and their interactions in the ecosystem. Furthermore, microcosms can be experimentally manipulated so that the phenomenon of interest is expressed. They are divided into three main types based on the creation method, as follows:
- Gnotobiotic-type (G-type): This type involves the combination of certain species of organisms, cultivated under specific conditions, to create a stable ecosystem. Experiments that use this method are relatively easy to analyze as the species composition is known. Additionally, as ecosystems require at least one decomposer, predator, and producer species to survive (Matsui 2000), It is possible to create microcosms with various combinations of organism.
- Naturally-derived-type (N-type): This type of microcosm keeps a natural ecosystem community intact. It can also show effects that are closer to those in the real world, but the reproducibility of these experiments is difficult. Many of the ecosystem models that occur in the field and build large scale ecosystems are called mesocosms.
- Stress-selected-type (S-type): For this type of microcosm in which natural communities are collected and mixed from multiple locations, and the organisms are selected through repeated sub culturing under specific conditions and stabilized in a particular community. While the N-type shows effects that are closer to those in the real-world, the S-type does not involve an artificial element in the species composition, and the stable composition is more reproducible. The S-type microcosm was created by Kurihara (Kurihara microcosm) (1978) and has been in use for more than 30years (Sugiura 1992; Takamatsu 1997; Kakazu 2014), and has maintained, as it creates a stable ecosystem with high reproducibility and is easy to subculture.
Microcosms are especially useful when assessing the effects of chemicals on ecosystems, and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) provide guidelines for their creation, as follows:
- OECD (2004): Guidance document on simulated freshwater lentic field tests (outdoor microcosms and mesocosms). This guideline states that the media and sediments used for micro-mesocosms should be collected from the natural environment. Micro-mesocosms created using this guideline are intended to test specific hypotheses based on information obtained from existing research, allowing for a flexible design of the micro-mesocosm.
- EPA (1996): They provide the Ecological Effects Test Guidelines from the OPPTS 850.1900 Generic Freshwater Microcosm Test Laboratory. The guidelines describe how to create a standardized aquatic microcosm (SAM). The sediment in the SAM is filled with 200 g of silica sand, 0.5 g of chitin, and 0.5 g of cellulose powder. There is a T82MV medium containing 14 elements, EDTA, and 11 vitamins, and it can be used to cultivate 10 species of algae and 5 species of animals that graze on the algae or resultant detritus.
Ecosystem models range from those based on the three biological species to those at scales close to natural ecosystems. However, they must all be suitable for predicting and understanding the phenomena that occur within natural ecosystems. The importance of field studies at appropriate scales has been noted, as there are considerations that microcosms can produce different results, such as for phosphorus circulation which depends on the scale at which they are created (Carpenter 1996). However, research by Sugiura (2010), Kakazu (2014), and others has found that the Kurihara microcosm and mesocosm correlate in their toxicity test results for 11chemicals (Fig.1). The correlating equations between the mean of no-effect concentrations (mean of NOEC) in natural ecosystems (mesocosm test) and no observed adverse effect concentrations (M_NOAEC) in the Kurihara microcosm is expressed as follows:
log [mean of NOECs] = 1.08log [M_NOAEC] − 1.22
It is to be noted that a high correlation of the mesocosm test results was obtained despite various factors such as diversity and differences in the constituent species of the natural environment. However, there are some chemicals that were found to fall well outside the above correlation equation. The NOEC of γ-BHC (Lindane) in the mesocosm test was reported to be 0.2µg/L (Mitchell 1993) and using the correlating equation above, the M_NOAEC of the Kurihara microcosm was found to be 3 µg/L. However, it has been reported that even 5mg/L of γ-BHC had no effect on the constituent species of the microcosm (Sugiura 1992). Alachlor also showed that 1 mg/L had no effect on the Kurihara microcosm (Kakazu 2013), although the NOEC of the mesocosm was 10µg/L (Lina 2005) and the M_NOAEC was 100µg/L. Thus, there are chemicals that do not affect the constituent species of the Kurihara microcosm and are not correlated. This may be due to the fact that y-BHC is an insecticide and Alachlor is a herbicide, which inhibit only specific biochemical reactions. This means that if a chemical is harmless to the organisms that make up the ecosystem, it will not contribute to the correlation equation. Therefore, even if a toxicity test is performed with the Kurihara microcosm and the effect is small, it will be difficult to determine whether the chemical is not affecting the constituent species or whether it is a low toxicity chemical.
Thus, the Kurihara microcosm is a microbial ecosystem that includes only seven species, excluding bacteria, and this is not sufficient to predict the effects on natural ecosystems. However, it is impossible to construct an ecosystem model that includes all organisms, and the challenge is how to create a microcosm in which diverse species coexist and identify which kinds of species should coexist in a microcosm is appropriate.
1.1 Diversification of species coexisting in a microcosm
To diversify the species coexisting in a microcosm, the following two points must be considered:
(1) That an inorganic medium that contains all the essential elements for the organism is required.
(2) That a diverse living space for the organisms, created using bottom sediments with materials that can be reproduced, is provided.
1) Microcosms need to include all essential elements
Elements are substances that cannot be produced by living organisms themselves. For example, if an organism is deficient in phosphorus, an essential element, it cannot convert nitrogen atoms into phosphorus atoms, and consequently this deficiency results in growth inhibition. All elements that are currently known to be essential for living organisms must thus be included in the medium. All other nutrients (amino acids, vitamins, proteins, etc.) that are necessary for the growth of living things are made up of combinations of essential elements. By creating a medium that contains all the essential elements, the factors that inhibit the growth of the organisms in the microcosm due to nutritional deficiencies will depend on whether the necessary nutrients can be produced in the microcosm. Thus, it is important for the ecosystem model that all the essential elements are circulating in an ecosystem by changing their forms. This investigation has aimed to create a microcosm in inorganic medium that contains all essential elements.
- All essential elements should be placed in the medium as inorganic substances and the other nutrients such as vitamins and organic substances should not be placed in the medium unless reproducing a specific environment. For example, the T82MV medium used for SMA contains 11 types of vitamins, but this is not useful if trying to see the effects of chemicals that inhibit the processes involved in vitamin production. In a natural ecosystem, the inability to produce vitamins would be fatal, and would be a factor in the collapse of an ecosystem.
2) Need for a variety of living spaces
In microcosms without sediment, the constituent organisms form colonies on the bottom and separate their living spaces (Murakami 2004). The reason why organisms form colonies is to efficiently obtain the necessary nutrients or to hide from predators. In the natural environment, the existence of living spaces with a variety of bottom materials, such as soil, sand, and stones, creates a variety of biological niches and enables a variety of species to coexist. Additionally, it has been reported that vitamin B12 is continuously supplied to seawater from coastal sediments (Sugita 1994), and this sediment provides a living space for vitamin-producing bacteria and other organisms. Therefore, to produce the necessary nutrients using essential elements, bottom sediment is required, and we must understand what type of bottom space would be an ideal habitat for the bacteria that produce vitamins. One point to note is that it is possible to generate vitamins by using natural soil, but it is difficult to reproduce and to determine which factors are affecting it. This investigation has thus examined the microcosm sediments using reproducible materials including glass beads and quartz sand.
1.2 Adequacy of species coexisting in a microcosm
Identifying the kinds of species that can coexist appropriately in a microcosm was addressed, with a focus on the following points:
- The human factor in selecting the microbial communities to support an ecosystem is eliminated as much as possible by using an S-type microcosm.
For this method of creating microcosms in which, natural communities from multiple locations are collected, mixed, and then organisms are selected through repeated sub culturing and the ecosystem is maintained by a specific community of organisms. The Kurihara microcosm introduced above is cultured in a Erlenmeyer flask using a TP (Taub + polypeptone) medium, and the constituent species are stable with a combination of two species of green algae and one species of blue-green algae as producers, bacteria as decomposers, one species of protozoan ciliates, two species of metazoan rotatoria, and one species of metazoan archioligochaeta as predators (Kurihara 1978). Thus, the S-type naturally settles into a stable constituent species with repeated sub culturing and is characterized by the absence of artificial factors in species composition. Therefore, the S-type was utilized to create a microcosm in this investigation.
2. It is important to consider what organisms of visible size will coexist, as they cannot be passaged unless intentionally included in the subculture.
Currently, fish, invertebrates (mainly Daphnia), and algae are used as test organisms in the ECETOC method, which predicts the effect of no-effect concentrations of chemicals on natural ecosystems by applying an assessment factor to the most sensitive of the three species types. This was adopted as the standard test method by the OECD (ECETOC 1997). The creation of a microcosm that coexists in the ecosystem with Daphnia, which is globally accepted as a test organism for chemicals, is thus required. As vitamins (B12, B1, B7) are essential for Daphnia (Keating 1985; Elendt 1990), it can also be used to determine whether vitamins are being produced in the microcosm as explained above. Therefore, in this investigation, a microcosm in which algae and Daphnia coexisted as a first step (Hereinafter, this microcosm will be written as DMC) was developed. The creation of DMC will provide a foothold for the future creation of microcosms that include fish.
The purpose of this study was thus to find the sediment in which Daphnia can be cultured in an S-type microcosm using inorganic medium containing all essential elements. This will help us to understand what properties of the sediments that are affecting the production of vitamins and other nutrients from inorganic substances. In addition, by duplicating the nutrient production cycle of producing from inorganic substances, which also occurs in natural ecosystems, the microcosm will have a higher correlation with natural ecosystems.