Morphological, structural, and electronic properties of the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure
For the development of ReS2/WS2 memristor, the properties of ReS2/WS2 heterostructure are studied at first. The heterostructure is prepared through an alignment transfer of CVD grown ReS2 and WS2 monolayers (detailedly in Methods). The optical microscopy in Fig. 1a shows a clear surface all around the sample, and the heterostructure area is vertically stacked with triangular WS2 on top of hexagonal ReS2. The crystal and electronic structures of the ReS2/WS2 region are characterized through the Raman and photoluminescence (PL) measurements. As shown in Fig. 1b, the Raman spectrum of heterostructure region is coincident with the combination of characteristic peaks from the two monolayers, where the peaks located at 164 cm− 1 and 216 cm− 1 respectively correspond to the in-plane (E12g) and out-of-plane (A1g) vibrational modes from ReS2,11 and the two peaks at 359 cm− 1 and 420 cm− 1 are identified as from monolayer WS2.23–25 Different from the superposition of the Raman peaks, the PL spectrum for the heterostructure demonstrates an obvious intensity decay and a 5 nm blue shift with respect to the monolayer WS2 (625nm), as shown in Fig. 1c, which suggests an interlayer charge transfer and stress interaction.26,27 The intensity mappings of Raman and PL peaks further reveal the good uniformity of the structures (Figure S1a-c in SI). Accordingly, we infer that a type II heterostructure may be formed between ReS2 and WS2.28 The atomic force microscope (AFM) image (Figure S1d in SI) also indicates an existence of interlayer interaction.29
Interlayer interaction related to the band alignment of WS2 and ReS2 monolayers is closely associated with the electronic property of the heterostructure. To gain an insight into their band alignment, KPFM is employed to detect the work function (φs) of a 60° stacked ReS2/WS2 heterostructure on an Au-plated SiO2/Si substrate. As shown in Fig. 1d and Figure S2a,b in SI, a clear variation of φs between ReS2, WS2, and the heterostructure areas is observed, in well agreement with the optical contrast. By measuring the potential change in ReS2/Au and WS2/Au steps, the φs difference is determined to be about − 21 mV between ReS2 and Au, and about − 66 mV between WS2 and Au, which indicates a higher Fermi energy level of WS2 than that of ReS2 (seeing detail in Figure S2c,d in SI). HRTEM characterization (detailedly in the Methods) is further performed to investigate the lattice and stacking structures of the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure. As measured in Fig. 1e, the space between two Re atoms in the Re4-chain (0.27 nm) is smaller than that of adjacent two Re atoms (0.32 nm), consistent with a 1T'-ReS2 structure, while the distance between neighboring W atoms (0.29 nm) corresponds to 2H-WS2.30 The FFT image (insert in Fig. 1e) and SAED patterns (Fig. 1f) contain two set of six-fold symmetrical lattices, corresponding to the lattice spacings of 5.5 Å and 2.8 Å, respectively. The lattice structures are identified to the (010) planes of monolayer WS2 and ReS2, respectively, confirming a 60° vertical stacking of the heterostructure.
Photoinduced interfacial charge behavior is studied through the TRPL measurements (Fig. 1g). The heterostructure area exhibits a significantly faster intensity decay than that of pristine WS2. Fitting the TRPL curves by the multi-exponential function:
$$\text{D}\left(\text{t}\right)\text{=}{\text{A}}_{\text{1}}{\text{e}}^{\text{-}\frac{\text{t}}{{\text{τ}}_{\text{1}}}}\text{+}{\text{A}}_{\text{2}}{\text{e}}^{\text{-}\frac{\text{t}}{{\text{τ}}_{\text{2}}}}\text{+}{\text{A}}_{\text{3}}{\text{e}}^{\text{-}\frac{\text{t}}{{\text{τ}}_{\text{3}}}}$$
1
where D(t) is the exciton concentration, τi (i = 1, 2, 3) are the time constants, and A1, A2, A3 symbolize the changes in exciton density due to surface states recombination, radiative recombination, and charge transfer, respectively,31 the lifetime of ReS2/WS2 heterostructure (about 134 ps) is found significantly shorter than that of monolayer WS2 (about 700 ps) (seeing detail in Table S1 in SI). Further considering the intensity decay in the PL spectrum (Fig. 1c and Figure S1c), the type II band alignment is confirmed for the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure. Accordingly, the band structure is schematically shown in Fig. 1h, where the conduction band minimum and valence band maximum locate in WS2 and ReS2, respectively. The facilitated interlayer charge transfer strongly predicts a possibility for electrical modulation for the heterostructure.
Resistive switching behavior of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor
Based on the understanding of the electronic properties, the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor is constructed on a SiO2/Si substrate using Au as the source and drain electrodes. Each electrode is in contact with both the ReS2 and WS2 monolayers simultaneously, as the schematic diagram and the optical image shown in Fig. 2a,b. The I-V measurements of the device exhibit a typical resistive switching behavior, as shown in the blue curve of Fig. 2c. A compliance current is set at 50 µA, followed by a voltage sweeping from 0 V to 4 V. At an applied voltage of about 3 V, the current increases abruptly, completing the "SET" process from high resistance state (HRS) to low resistance state (LRS); after a voltage sweeping from 4 V to 0 V, the device remains LRS. As removing the compliance current setting and performing a voltage sweep from 0 V to 2 V, the device shifts from LRS to HRS at an increasing current, corresponding to the "RESET" process; and the device maintains HRS at the reversed sweep from 2 V to 0 V. Similar performance of the device is found under the negative voltages, as shown in Figure S3 in SI. This electrical property confirms a typical unipolar resistive switching behavior. Different from the previous reported ReS2 memristor that only exhibited bipolar resistive switching behavior,14,32,33 the ReS2/WS2 unipolar memristor predicts higher switching ratio, higher integration density, and more simplified control circuit. Good reliability is demonstrated during the repeated 100 times switching cycles (the brown cycle curves in Fig. 2c). The set voltage (Vset) is extracted and depicted in the histogram in Fig. 2d. A Gaussian fit suggests that the Vset generally distributes around 2.90 V.
For comparison, the electrical properties of the planar memristors based on pristine monolayer ReS2 and WS2 are also studied and shown in Figure S4 and S5 in SI, respectively. The ReS2-based device exhibits a typical unipolar memristive property that, the resistance jumps from HRS to LRS at a statistical Vset of about 3.19 V, as depicted in the histogram in Fig. 2e. While for the WS2-based device, the HRS is maintained without significant change even when the voltage exceeds 7.0 V. Obviously, the ReS2 plays a key role in the resistive switching for the heterostructure, since the ReS2 and WS2 layers are in parallel connecting to the Au electrons. By comparison, the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor has a decreased and a more stable Vset value than that of monolayer ReS2.
Except for the Vset, another crucial factor determining the overall performance of a memristor is the memory window that reflected as RON/ROFF ratio between HRS and LRS. As shown in Fig. 2f, the ReS2/WS2-based memristor exhibits a notable RON/ROFF ratio higher than 106, which is superior to most of the existing 2D memristors. 14,29,34−36 This value is more than an order of magnitude larger than that of pure ReS2 (105), indicating a larger memory window when forming the heterostructure. Moreover, the ReS2/WS2-based device possesses multiple adjustable resistance states within 5x102 ~ 8x104 Ω by varying the compliance current from 1 µA to 100 µA, as shown in Fig. 2g, demonstrating its great potential for multi-level data storage and multi-state neuromorphic computing.37 Subsequently, a switching cycling test of the heterostructure memristor is conducted over 200 times (Fig. 2h), which shows a reliable resistive switching performance with a clear memory window. A desirable stability of the memristor is also evidenced by the retention time of over 104 s for each HRS and LRS state, as seen in Fig. 2i.
Gate modulation and its mechanism of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor
Furthermore, the electrical modulation capability is examined by the three-terminal FET configuration (Fig. 3a). The I-V curves measured under different gate voltages (Vg) are shown in Figures S6 and S7 in SI, and the Vg dependent Vset is summarized in Fig. 3a. As is shown, opposite variation trends for the Vset are found under different Vg directions. For a positive gating (Vg > 0), the Vset increases from 2.9 V to 3.5 V when increasing the Vg from 0 V to 2 V. As the positive Vg increases to 3 V, 4 V, and 5 V, the device is always in a HRS state within the voltage sweep range of 0 ~ 5 V, as shown in Fig. 3b, i.e., the device is blocked from turning on. To be more specific, a negative gating (Vg < 0) significantly reduces the Vset of the device, which is decreased from 2.9 V to 1 V when changing the Vg from − 5 V to − 8 V. While in the Vg range of 0 ~ − 5 V, the Vset is relatively stable. Therefore, the ReS2/WS2-based memristor not only possesses a high RON/ROFF ratio, multiple adjustable resistance states, good endurance and desirable retention, but also demonstrates a significant gate controllability.
The mechanism of resistive switching and gate modulation in the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor is described in Fig. 3c. Monolayer ReS2 and WS2 grown by the CVD method have been demonstrated to possess n-type conductivity with intrinsic S vacancies and additional electrons. When forming the heterostructure, the electrons will transfer from WS2 to ReS2 owing to the type II band alignment (the top panel in Fig. 3c). By applying a forward bias and a compliance current, electrons in the ReS2 layer transport to the conducting channel to form a current. When the bias voltage reaches a threshold, the conducting channel meets the condition for rapid migration of electrons between electrodes, and the device jumps from HRS to LRS ("SET" process, the middle panel in Fig. 3c). Hence, the formation of conducting filaments by S vacancies is the primary conduction mechanism in the memristor.14 As grown ReS2 generally possesses a lower stoichiometric ratio than that of WS2, and thus has greater possibility to generate S vacancies.12,38 As such, the resistive switching is dominant by the ReS2 layer during the device working, while the WS2 layer maintains HRS. The large accumulation of electrons near the head of the conducting channel causes a noticeable reduction of interface electrons in the ReS2 layer. Therefore, more electrons will transfer from WS2 to ReS2, which explains the faster conductance change of ReS2/WS2-based device than that of ReS2. Simultaneously, owing to the addition of electrons, the resistance at LRS of ReS2/WS2-based device is an order of magnitude lower (Fig. 2f), resulting in its higher RON/ROFF ratio. When the voltage with the same polarity is scanned again with no applied compliance current, the effect of Joule heating is greater than that of the voltage between electrodes. As a result, the conducting channel breaks and the S vacancies gradually return to their original state.39 The device resistance jumps back to the HRS ("RESET" process).
When applying a positive Vg during the “SET” process, some electrons in the device are attracted to the interface of ReS2 and SiO2 substrate due to the electrostatic equilibrium effect (the bottom panel in Fig. 3c). Fewer electrons could jump around the conducting channel made up of S vacancies, causing an increased Vset threshold required for the resistive switching (Fig. 3a). As the Vg increases further, the consumption of electrons finally blocks out the device from turning on (Fig. 3b). In contrast, by applying a negative Vg, the electrostatic equilibrium effect causes the holes to accumulate at the interface near the SiO2 substrate. In a small gating range of 0 ~ − 5 V, the consumed holes in ReS2 may be supplemented by those transferred from WS2, leading to a relatively stable Vset. Further consumption of holes results in more left electrons for the conduction. The left electrons are active to the conducting channel formed by S vacancies, and the required Vset threshold thus gradually decreases (Fig. 3a).
Simulated synaptic properties of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor
The superior electronic performance of the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor sheds light on exploring of its potential applications. We demonstrate that it can simulate partial neuron-based biological synaptic functions, as shown in Fig. 4a. When a presynaptic neuron is stimulated and conducted to a synaptic vesicle, the synaptic vesicle fuses tightly with the presynaptic membrane and causing a rupture. The neurotransmitters within the synaptic vesicles are released into the synaptic space, diffuse to reach the postsynaptic membrane, and thereby induce excitatory or inhibitory modifications in the postsynaptic membrane. For the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor, the S vacancies are comparable to neurotransmitters in biological synapses.
To simulate the biological synaptic plasticity, conductance of ReS2/WS2-based memristor is modulated by applying a pulse voltage, with the pulse parameters such as amplitude, width, and interval varied to adjust the synaptic weights. As shown in Figure S8 in SI, at a 1 V reading voltage and a fixed 5 V amplitude, the device current tends to saturate with the continuous application of pulse, when the pulse width and interval increase in equal proportion. This performance exhibits a typical memristor characteric.40 Accordingly, the device property is analyzed by acquiring the conductance at the saturated currents for different pulse amplitudes, widths, and intervals. As the results shown in Fig. 4b, the conductance is increased when simultaneously increasing the pulse width and interval from 0.5 s to 5 s, indicating a positive response to a continuously longer stimulation. The conductance can also be modulated by individually adjusting the pulse width or interval. An enlarged pulse width increases the upward trend of the conductance, while an opposite trend is found when increasing the pulse intervals, as shown in Fig. 4c,d. Modulating the memristor characteristics by adjusting pulse width and interval is recognized as the biological synapse SRDP.41 In addition, the impact of voltage amplitude is shown Fig. 4e, where the device conductance is increased with the enhancing pulse voltage for all the four setting pulse widths and intervals.
PPF representing the STP is an important physiological phenomenon. It is manifested as the temporal sum of biological synaptic inputs, and can be estimated from the change of synaptic weights as responding to the stimuli of two consecutive pulsed voltages.42,43 Fig. 4f shows the PPF behavior of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor, and the inset illustrates the applied pulse. The PPF can be quantitatively expressed as:44
$$\text{PPF=}\frac{\left({\text{B}}_{\text{2}}\text{-}{\text{B}}_{\text{1}}\right)}{{\text{B}}_{\text{1}}}\text{×100%}$$
2
where B1 and B2 are the conductance corresponding to the first and second pulses, respectively. The fitting relationship between PPF data and pulse is as follows:45
$$\text{y=}{\text{C}}_{\text{1}}{\text{e}}^{\text{-}\frac{\text{t}}{{\text{α}}_{\text{1}}}}\text{+}{\text{C}}_{\text{2}}{\text{e}}^{\text{-}\frac{\text{t}}{{\text{α}}_{\text{2}}}}$$
3
which gives α1 = 0.05 s and α2 = 2.9 s, corresponding to the fast and slow decay terms, respectively. The enhancement of conductance under successive pulses stimulation tends to decay exponentially with the increasing pulse intervals, consistent with the behavior of biological synapses.
The above studies have demonstrated the effective simulation of biological synaptic function and plasticity in ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor, which are all electrical memristor characteristics. While benefiting from the interlayer coupling and charge transfer mechanisms, ReS2/WS2 also displays unique photoresponsive behavior as a type II heterostructure,46 thus the optoelectronics-inspired memristor characteristics can also be expected. Since the interlayer charge transfer results in a diminution of Vset in the ReS2/WS2-based memristor compared with that of the ReS2-based device (Fig. 2d,e), a light modulation is further performed on the two memristors under different excitation wavelengths (532 nm and 690 nm) and with various powers. The I-V curves for all the cases are acquired, as shown in Figures S9 - S12 in SI, respectively, and the extracted Vset values are illustrated in Fig. 4g. The results for ReS2/WS2-based memristor show an interesting wavelength-dependent conductance controllability. Under a 532 nm excitation, its Vset drops from about 3 V to below 1 V, exhibiting a negatively correlated with the luminous power. While a 690 nm excitation basically does not affect the Vset that is almost stable at 3 V even when the luminous power increases to 8 mW. Different from the wavelength-dependent performance for heterostructure memristor, the Vset of ReS2-based device is basically stable at around 3.1 V under illumination with different powers at both wavelengths. The obtained Vset values are essentially coincident with that measured without the excitation, and larger than that of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor with the same conditions. This strongly suggests that, the variation of Vset originates from the property of ReS2/WS2 rather than the inherent characteristics of ReS2. Compared with the single layer, the formation of type II heterostructure enables the optical modulation over its electrical performance. Beyond the most existing memristors which based on only electrical modulation,47,48 the above results demonstrate an exciting behavior for the optoelectronic memristor based on the ReS2/WS2 heterostructure.
The light-tunable synaptic plasticity is then investigated by applying a pulse under 532 nm excitation at different luminous powers. As shown in Fig. 4h, the conductance at all luminous powers maintains an increase trend with the pulse number, and exhibiting a considerable light-sensing behavior that increases steadily with the increasing luminous power from 0 mW to 8 mW. Such power-dependent conductance control indicates the optical tunability on the synaptic weight, predicting a potential for future visual neural applications. Figure 4i exhibits an effective control over the switching time (the time of device current to stabilize when a single pulse is applied) through the modulation of luminous power. For a pulse with a reading voltage of 1 V, an amplitude of 5 V, and a pulse width and interval of both 3 s, the switching time decreases from about 1.8 s to 0.6 s under the 532 nm excitation. This hints at the advanced sensitivity of optically modulated memristor on the neuromorphic applications.
Optical modulation and its mechanism of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor
One issue that needs to be clarified is the wavelength-dependent conductance control of the ReS2/WS2-based planar memristor. From the perspective of band structure, the mechanism can be described in Fig. 5. Without the optical modulation, the electrons transfer from WS2 to ReS2, while the holes transfer in the opposite direction, forming a build-in electric field directed from WS2 to ReS2 (Fig. 5a). Under a 690 nm (1.80 eV) laser irradiation, monolayer ReS2 with a direct bandgap of about 1.65 eV is excited, while WS2 with a 2.07 eV bandgap is out of the excitation energy (Fig. 5b). Consequently, the produced photogenerated carriers distribute mainly within the ReS2 layer. Driven by the build-in electric field, the electrons trend to transfer to WS2, which are blocked by the interfacial potential barrier between the conduction band edges. As a results, the excited electrons and holes mostly will recombine through a radiative or nonradiative process, which essentially does not alter the net carrier distribution in the system. As a result, the Vset of the ReS2/WS2-based memristor is essentially unaffected as well as that of the ReS2-based device, under the modulation of 690 nm illumination and with different luminous powers (Fig. 4g, red and blue lines). For a 532 nm (2.33 eV) laser irradiation, both the ReS2 and WS2 layers can be excited, as shown in Fig. 5c. Since the photon energy is closer to the resonance excitation of the optical bandgap of WS2, a higher excitation efficiency with more photogenerated carriers are produced in WS2 than in ReS2. The additional electrons will transfer from WS2 into ReS2 through the heterogeneous interface, while the transfer of additional holes can be blocked by the interfacial potential barrier. The increased electrons in ReS2 make a positive contribution to the composition of the conductive channel by S vacancies. Consequently, the excited electrons increase with increasing luminous power under the 532 nm excitation, and thus reduces the applied voltage required for forming conducting channel in ReS2/WS2 heterostructure (Fig. 4g, yellow line).