3.3 Transitional phase inversion induced by Hofmeister cations
From our previous studies, we had established the possibility of forming stable vegetable oil/water emulsions using CMC particles (Sodeinde et al., 2021). The preferred emulsion type was o/w and emulsions were stable to coalescence for more than two months of storage. The stability of the emulsions to coalescence and creaming increased with CMC concentration and only 0.5 wt.% CMC particles were required to produce emulsions stable to coalescence. Here, we studied the effect of Hofmeister cations on the properties of Pickering emulsion stabilized by CMC. For this purpose, four different Hofmeister cations viz: Na+, NH4+, Mg2+ and Ca2+ (having the same anion; Cl−) were selected. Emulsions were prepared using the powdered particle method using equal volumes of oil and water but at different concentrations of Hofmeister cations in the aqueous phase. Figure 3(i) depicts the photos of vessels containing vegetable oil-water emulsions at different cation concentrations taken after two weeks. The result of the drop test indicates that emulsions in Fig. 3(i) are o/w at all concentrations of Na+ whereas both types of emulsions are formed in the other three systems (NH4+, Mg2+ and Ca2+) as the cation concentration increases. These systems phase invert from o/w to w/o emulsions upon increasing the concentration of the cations. Depending on the Hofmeister cations, phase inversion takes place at different salt concentrations and the position of inversion is indicated by the vertical broken lines in Figs. 3(i) (b-d). In systems containing Na+, an aqueous layer is seen below emulsions and a little oil layer is above. For systems that phase invert, an aqueous layer is seen below before inversion takes place, whereas little or no aqueous phase is seen after inversion. Also, little or no oil is seen above emulsions before phase inversion but oil is seen above all the systems after inversion. We assessed the stability of the emulsions by measuring the amount of oil ejected due to either sedimentation of w/o emulsions or coalescence of o/w emulsions and the amount of water released due to coalescence of w/o emulsions or creaming of o/w emulsions through phase inversion (Binks and Olusanya, 2018).
The fractions of oil and water resolved after 4 weeks are displayed in Fig. 4. In emulsions containing Na+ (Fig. 4a), the fraction of oil ejected by the systems decreases slightly as Na+ concentration increases whereas the fraction of water remains constant all through. The coalescence stability of the o/w emulsions increases upon increasing the salt concentration. For systems containing NH4+, Mg2+ and Ca2+, the fraction of oil released increases slightly towards the inversion point and decreases slightly after the inversion point as the salt concentration increases. On the other hand, the fraction of water resolved decreases all through as the concentration of the salt is increased. The stability of the o/w emulsions to both coalescence and creaming decreases slightly towards inversion composition, whereas the stability to coalescence and sedimentation of the w/o emulsions increases away from the inversion point. We have probed the microstructure of the emulsions using an optical microscope, and digital images of the emulsions taken immediately after preparation are shown in Fig. 5 for both inverting and non-inverting emulsion systems at different cation concentrations. As seen in Fig. 5, the droplets are spherical, polydisperse and flocculated. Interestingly, only oil droplets are formed in systems containing Na+ whereas both oil and water droplets are formed by other systems depending on the salt concentration. Oil droplets are formed at low salt concentrations, while water droplets are formed at high salt concentrations.
The variation of emulsion average drop diameter with salt concentration is shown in Fig. 6. Apart from emulsions containing Na+ (non-inverting system), the drop size of both o/w and w/o emulsions increases through inversion composition. The change in drop size with salt concentration is consistent with changes in the extent of sedimentation and creaming of o/w and w/o emulsions, respectively. This type of phase inversion of particle-stabilized emulsions had been earlier reported (Sun, Li & Ngai, 2010, Binks and Rodrigues, 2005). Binks and Rodrigues (2005) showed that emulsion of water and hexadecane stabilized by ionizable carboxy-coated polystyrene nanoparticles at pH 10.6 phase inverted upon increasing the concentration of aqueous NaCl solution in the water phase. It is well known that the type of emulsion formed by solid particles depends on particle wettability. The wettability of a solid by a liquid is a measure of the intimate contact between a liquid and solid, which can be quantified by contact angle measurement. A low θow value means there is a high wettability and vice versa. For relatively hydrophobic particles, w/o emulsions are preferred. By contrast, for relatively hydrophilic particles, o/w emulsions are produced. As mentioned earlier, the transitional phase inversion of emulsion occurs from o/w to w/o at fixed oil:water ratio as the salt concentration increases. If the average particle wettability changes upon the addition of a salt, this can induce phase inversion in the process. To correlate the propensity of the emulsion to phase invert upon increasing the salt concentration with the particle wettability, we have measured the air-liquid contact angle (θla) of a drop of salt solutions at different concentrations on the surface of a disc of CMC particles and the results are summarized in Fig. 3(ii). As seen in Fig. 3(ii), a slight increase in the value of θla upon increasing the salt concentration was observed. The contact angle increased by about 15 to 20o depending on the system except for the system containing Na+ where the value is less than 10o. The increase in θla indicates that the particle wettability is enhanced by the addition of the Hofmeister cation.
Using the surface energy components, we also calculate the oil-water contact angle (θow). The surface energy components can be expressed in various forms as:
\({\gamma }_{so}\) = \({\gamma }_{oa}\) + \({\gamma }_{sa}\) \(-\) 2 \(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}}\) \(-\) 2\(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}}\) (5)
\({\gamma }_{sw}\) = \({\gamma }_{aw}\) + \({\gamma }_{sa}\) \(-\) 2 \(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ aw \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}}\) \(-\) 2\(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ aw \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}}\) (6)
\({\gamma }_{ow}\) = \({\gamma }_{oa}\) + \({\gamma }_{aw}\)\(-\) 2 \(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ aw\end{array}}\)\(-\) 2\(\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ aw\end{array}}\) (7)
Making 𝛾𝑠𝑜 subject of the formation in Eq. 1, we have
𝛾𝑜𝑤cos θow + 𝛾𝑠𝑤= 𝛾𝑠𝑜 (8)
Equating equations 5 and 8 with little rearrangement gives
$$Cos{\theta }_{ow} =\frac{{\gamma }_{oa }- {\gamma }_{aw} + 2 \sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ aw \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}} + 2\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ aw \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}} - 2 \sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}} - 2\sqrt{ \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ oa \end{array} \gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}} }{ {\gamma }_{ow} }$$
9
where 𝛾𝑜𝑎, 𝛾𝑎𝑤 and 𝛾𝑜𝑤 are the air-oil surface tension, air-water surface tension and oil-water interfacial tension respectively. The values of surface tension for pure oil and water and the corresponding oil-water interfacial tension are 34.7, 71.1 and 22.1 mN/m respectively. The values of 𝛾𝑜𝑤 measured 5 min after addition of salt to the water phase are given in Table 1. It is noted that there is a significant lowering of the interfacial tension. Since the same type of anion is present in all the salt, the extent of lowering of the surface tension by the salt may be due to the difference in the ionic polarizability, ionic hydration, and cavity potential of the cations [33]. \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ aw \end{array}\), \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ oa \end{array}\) and \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}\) are the dispersive components of the surface tension of water, oil and solid (CMC) while \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ aw \end{array}\), \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ oa \end{array}\) and \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}\) are the polar components of the surface tension of water, oil and solid (CMC). Since the values \({\gamma }_{oa}, {\gamma }_{ow, }\) and \({\gamma }_{aw }\)are known, \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ aw \end{array}\), \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ oa \end{array},\)\(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ aw \end{array}\) and \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ oa \end{array}\) can be calculated and details can be found in the report of Binks and Clint, 2002. The values of components of solid surface energy (\(\gamma \begin{array}{c}d\\ sa\end{array}\) and \(\gamma \begin{array}{c}p\\ sa\end{array}\)) used for our calculation here were those reported by Shen (2009). These values are the average of four surface energy components obtained using the same method (sessile drop). The values of the oil-water contact angle calculated using Eq. 9 are given in Table 1. The oil-water contact angles were calculated using the values of 𝛾𝑎𝑤 and 𝛾𝑜𝑤 determined around inversion composition. For the purpose of comparison, contact angle calculation was done for systems containing no salt and a value of 66.5o was obtained. From Table 1, for those systems that undergo transitional phase inversion (i.e. NH4+, Mg2+ and Ca2+), the value 𝜃𝑜𝑤 increased from 66.5o to around 90o whereas for the system containing Na+, 𝜃𝑜𝑤 increased to around 80o. These results show that the presence of Hofmeister cations in the aqueous phase has a significant effect on the overall wettability of the particles depending on the nature of the cations and concentration.
Table 1
Values of γow,γso, γsw and θow. *Cation concentration (around inversion composition) used in the determination of oil-water interfacial tension.
cation
|
[cation]/mM
|
𝛾𝑜𝑤 /mNm1
|
𝛾𝑠𝑜 /mNm1
|
𝛾𝑠𝑤 /mNm1
|
𝜃𝑜𝑤/O
|
Na+
|
30
|
12.1 ± 0.2
|
4.1
|
2.1
|
80.4 ± 2.0
|
NH4+
|
30*
|
7.8 ± 0.2
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
91.2 ± 1.0
|
Mg2+
|
15*
|
8.3 ± 0.2
|
2.1
|
2.1
|
90.0 ± 1.0
|
Ca2+
|
5*
|
8.0 ± 0.2
|
2.0
|
2.1
|
90.8 ± 1.0
|
3.4 Influence of pH on emulsion properties
Colloidal particles having groups such as − SiOH, −COOH, −OH or − NH2 on their surface would be sensitive to variation in aqueous phase pH and this can affect their aggregation at the interface (Amalvy et al., 2004; Amalvy et al., 2003; Binks and Lumsdon, 1999). Generally, at pH values far from the isoelectric point (i.e.p. where the particles are fully charged and more hydrophilic, the particles are endowed with high surface charge density. Contrarily, at pH values around the isoelectric point (i.e.p), colloidal particles are more hydrophobic because at this condition, they possess low surface charge density and thus stabilize emulsions. In this section, we studied the effect of pH on emulsions stabilized by particles of CMC chitosan and CMC-CH complex. The photos after 1 week of vessels containing vegetable-oil emulsions prepared at different pH values using CMC, chitosan and CMC-chitosan composite are shown in Fig. 7(i)-a-c. All the systems are o/w with an aqueous layer seen below emulsions. Apart from emulsion prepared at pH 2, no oil layer is seen above emulsions in CMC-stabilized emulsions. However, the reverse is the case in emulsions stabilized by chitosan particles (i.e. there is oiling off), where stable emulsion is formed at pH 2 alone. This may be due to the high positive charge on the surface of the particle (Fig. 7(ii)). In emulsions stabilized by CMC-chitosan, no oil layer is seen above the systems at pH values < 5 which may be attributed to the high residual negative charge on the surface of the CMC-chitosan complex.
The fraction of oil and water resolved after 2 weeks of preparation is shown in Fig. 8. For CMC-stabilized emulsions, all the systems are stable to coalescence for more than two weeks except emulsion prepared at pH 2, whereas in systems stabilized by chitosan, a stable emulsion is formed only at pH 2. For systems stabilized by CMC-CH complex, emulsions are only stable to coalescence at pH 2 and 4. The optical images shown in Fig. 9(a-c) reveal that the droplets are spherical and polydisperse for CMC, chitosan and CMC-CH complex stabilized emulsions. The variation in drop size with pH is shown in Fig. 9(d) for the three systems. The drop size decreases with an increase in pH for CMC-stabilized emulsion whereas there is an increase in drop size with pH in chitosan and CMC-CH complex stabilized emulsions, and a maximum value was attained at around pH 8 and 6 respectively.
3.5 Influence of weight fraction of chitosan on emulsion properties
Emulsions stabilized by both CMC and chitosan lack long-time coalescence stability at certain pH values (i.e. pH 2–4 for CMC alone and pH 4–10 for chitosan). Most natural product-based particles are inherently hydrophilic because of the presence of some polar functional groups in their molecules. Due to their hydrophilic nature, they may not spontaneously adsorb to the oil-water interface, resulting in the formation of emulsion with poor stability. Enhancing the surface activity of non-surface-active particles is an active research area in colloid science and this can be achieved through either electrostatic or covalent interaction (Jafari et al., 2020; Ghasemi, Jafari, Assadpour & Khomeiri, 2018). At a fixed pH of 4, where the two particle types are oppositely charged (Fig. 7(ii)), we study the effect of complexation of chitosan with CMC on emulsion properties by varying the weight fraction (wch) of chitosan in a mixture with CMC while the total mass of the particle in the mixture is fixed at 1 wt.%. The formation CMC-chitosan complex was confirmed by FTIR analysis (Fig. 10). A slight shift in the absorption band coupled with a decrease in intensity of peaks confirmed the formation of the complex (Zhu et al., 2021). Specifically, a slight reduction in the intensity of peak due to N − H deformation around 1641 cm− 1 and − N(CH3)3 around 1421 cm− 1 in the spectrum of chitosan was observed. The appearance of additional peaks between 1172 and 1031 cm− 1 due to C − O also attests to the formation of a complex between CMC and chitosan.
Photo of vessels containing emulsions (ϕw = 0.5) stabilized by mixtures of CMC and chitosan at varying wch values taken after 10 min is shown in Fig. 11(a). All emulsions are oil-in-water. From Fig. 5, no aqueous layer is seen below in all the emulsions and no oil layer is seen above the emulsion at all wch. Improvement in the stability of the emulsions to both creaming and coalescence was observed compared to the system stabilized by either CMC or chitosan. This is because both biopolymers synergistically interact to form a complex with improved surface activity, adsorbing at the oil − water interface to form emulsions with excellent coalescence stability. The stability to coalescence and creaming of the emulsions stabilized by the CMC-chitosan composite at different wch was assessed by measuring the amount of oil and water ejected after three weeks of preparation (Fig. 11(b)). As observed in Fig. 11(b), emulsions stabilized by either CMC or chitosan at pH 4 lack long-term coalescence stability whereas emulsions stabilized by a combination of the biopolymers (composite) exhibit excellent coalescence stability. The emulsion stability might be attributed to increased steric hindrance, electrostatic interaction, etc, associated with the CMC-chitosan composite thus preventing aggregation of droplets.
The influence of the composition of the particles on the morphology of the droplets was studied as well. Figure 11(c) shows the optical micrographs of emulsions stabilized by the complex at different wch at pH 3. The droplets are spherical, discrete and polydisperse. The variation of average emulsion drop size with wch is shown in Fig. 11 From Fig. 11(d), a minimum droplet size was attained at intermediate composition (wch = 0.5). This shows that more particles of the complex are available at the interface to stabilize more interfacial areas created during homogenization. This further reveals that the complex is a more effective emulsion stabilizer than the individual biopolymer (i.e. CMC and chitosan). Given that both particle types interact together to form a complex with enhancing emulsification performance, a maximum number of particles of the complex is expected to be produced at intermediate compositions. Since, the particles of the complex are more effective at the oil-water interface, a minimum drop size at the intermediate composition is expected.