Sulfonation reactions were carried out at different reaction times (60, 120, 180 min) to produce three different polymer matrices with different DS. Sulfonation processes formed sulfonic acid groups in the PEEK polymer backbone. The effect of IL amount on proton conductivity and thermal/mechanical behavior was investigated by adding IL to the formed sulfonic acid groups in equimolar and doubling (n = 1.0 and 0.5). The basic idea in the use of sPEEK and IL is that the ionic interaction between the sulfone groups in the polymer matrix and the cation group imidazole in the IL structure improves proton conductivity. The ionic interaction between the sulfone groups and imidazole also prevents the migration of IL observed in blend membranes to which IL are doped [39].
After the sulfonation processes, IEC values were determined to calculate the DS of sPEEK materials depending on the way mentioned above. The relevant results are depicted in Table 2.
Table 2
Ion exchange capacity (IEC) and degree of sulfonation (DS) values of sPEEK samples [38].
Sample
|
t (Sulfonation time, min)
|
IEC
(Ion exchange capacity, meq/g)
|
DS
(Degree of sulfonation, %)
|
PEEK
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
sPEEK-1
|
60
|
1.00
|
32.10
|
sPEEK-2
|
120
|
1.72
|
60.20
|
sPEEK-3
|
180
|
2.19
|
81.44
|
As seen in the table, the IEC values of sPEEK-1, sPEEK-2 and sPEEK-3 polymer matrices were determined as 1.00, 1.72 and 2.19, respectively, indicating that the capacity enhanced with sulfonation time. The improvement in the IEC values resulted in increasing DS. The highest DS (81.44%) was achieved with the three-hour sulfonation process. That is to say, the amount of the sulfonic acid groups attached on PEEK backbone increased with longer reaction time [38].
3.1. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR)
In order to confirm the chemical structures and functional groups of the as-obtained sPEEK, IL and sPEEK/IL composites, the samples were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy and the spectrums are illustrated in Fig. 1a-b.
Figure 1a confirms the presence of sulfonic acid groups in the sulfonated polymers, resulting successful sulfonation process. The spectrums of sPEEK materials were observed a wide peak at 3400 cm− 1 corresponding to the vibrations of O-H groups. This broad band of the sPEEK polymer matrix appearing at 3400 cm− 1 could be assigned to O-H vibration from sulfonic acid groups interacting with molecular water. The peaks observed in the wavelengths at 1020 and 1312 cm− 1, reflecting the presence of S-O bonds in the structures. Besides, the signals at 1080 and 1218 cm− 1 demonstrated the presence of S = O and O = S = O bonds. Additionally, the vibration detected at 1640 cm− 1 was attributed to the presence of the carbonyl group present in all samples [41]. The active groups of the as-synthesized IL sample were depicted in Fig. 1b. The highest intensity was observed at 1048 cm− 1, indicating the stretching vibration of the BF4¯ anion in the IL structure. The peak at 840 cm− 1 was assigned to the C-N stretching. Moreover, the peaks occurred at 2957 and 2880 cm− 1, which were attributed to the symmetric and asymmetric stresses of CH3, respectively. The characteristic peaks of C = N and C = C stretching modes were observed at 1590 and 1633 cm− 1, respectively. In addition, the peaks attributed to C-H plane bending and symmetric C-H stretching vibration were placed at 760 cm− 1 and 3156 cm− 1 [42, 43]. Then, as mentioned above sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite membranes of each polymer matrix were produced with different mole ratios of HSO3/imidazole (n = 0.5 and n = 1.0) depending on the purpose of the study. The formation of sPEEK/IL composite membrane was controlled with the FT-IR technique of sPEEK1.0-1 and the spectrum were given in Fig. 1a. As seen in the figure, the peak observed at the wavelength of 3150 cm− 1 was attributed to the amide groups of the imidazolium structure. Furthermore, the peak at about 2980 cm− 1 indicated the presence of aliphatic methyl vibration of the [Hmim][BF4]. The vibration at 1064 cm− 1 evidenced the presence of the anion groups of IL (BF4¯). Additionally, the absorption bands at 1486, 1590 and 1640 cm− 1 showed the presence of aromatic rings in the sPEEK structure. All results statements showed that sPEEK polymer matrices, IL, and sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] were successfully synthesized in this study.
3.2. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis
The morphological structures of sulfonated polymer matrix and composite polymer electrolytes formed with IL additive were performed by SEM analysis. In Fig. 2, cross-sectional micrographs of the sPEEK-2 polymer matrix and composite membranes prepared by SPEEK-2 (sPEEK1.0-2 and sPEEK0.5-2 ) are given.
As seen from Fig. 2a the honeycomb micro-voids were formed in the membrane cross section with sulfonic acid groups formed in the pure PEEK backbone with the sulfonation process. Chain mobility in the polymer backbone increases as the IL contribution increases (Fig. 2b-2c). Branched structures are more concentrated in IL-doped polymer electrolytes compared to sulphonated polymer matrix. This functional mobility also enabled the IL-doped membranes to be more flexible, soft and mobile. In addition to sulfonation, these increasing branching and mobility increase the distance between polymer chains, and thus the proton conductivity.
3.3. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
One of the important criteria for polymeric membranes to be used in fuel cells is the thermal resistance. In addition, it has been desirable that the membranes produced in this study have high thermal resistance at high temperatures (above 100 ℃). For that, TGA analysis of sPEEK polymer matrices and sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite membranes were performed in the temperature range of 25–800 ℃ under the nitrogen atmosphere. Considering to sPEEK products, the TGA results are presented in Fig. 3 and Table 3.
As shown in Fig. 3, the pristine PEEK membrane showed the single polymer main chain degradation behavior, while the sulfonated membranes showed three degradation steps. In terms of the pure PEEK, the only thermal decomposition phase starting at 550 ℃ was attributed to the degradation of the polymer master chain. In case of the sulfonated PEEK products, the initial weight loss was observed at about 100 ℃ due to the evaporation of adsorbed moisture in the polymers. Moreover, the second weight loss zone of sPEEKs occurred in the temperature range of 150 ℃ to 250 ℃, corresponding to the degradation of the sulfonic acid groups in the composite membrane structure. Additionally, the third weight loss starting at 450 ℃ was assigned to the degradation of the PEEK polymer main chain. Notably, it can be said that the increase in the DS promoted the formation of different degradation phases and the initial temperature of the thermal decomposition phase where the second weight loss was seen decreases as the DS increased [41, 44].
5%, 10% and 50% weight loss of pure PEEK and sPEEK products were presented in Table 3.
Table 3
Thermal degradation values of pure PEEK and sulfonated PEEK polymer matrices (sPEEK-1,2,3).
Sample
|
T5 (℃)
|
T10 (℃)
|
T50 (℃)
|
PEEK
|
571
|
578.4
|
790.3
|
sPEEK-1
|
188.8
|
228.2
|
575.9
|
sPEEK-2
|
171.5
|
215.9
|
524.4
|
sPEEK-3
|
164.7
|
215.8
|
541.4
|
T5: The temperature where 5 wt.% weight loss has occurred; T10: The temperature where 10 wt.% weight loss has occurred; T50: The temperature where 50 wt.% weight loss has occurred. |
The weight loss of 5% in the pure polymer was observed at very high temperature values (above 570 ℃). At the same time, 50% weight loss of the pure polymer was observed at about 800 ℃. As the DS increased, the weight loss carried out at lower temperature values. The weight loss of the sPEEKs was close to the observed temperatures. The weight loss of 5% was recorded in the temperature range of 165–190 ℃ while the 50% weight loss was observed in the 540–580 ℃ temperature range for sPEEKs.
In terms of sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite membranes, the TGA spectrums are shown in Fig. 4. Obviously, more than one degradation step was observed in all membranes like the sulfonated polymer matrices.
The first degradation step starting at around 100 ℃ could be attributed to the deterioration of the moisture trapped on the membrane structures. Degradation steps starting at ~ 200 ℃ were attributed to sulfonic acid groups in composite membrane structures. Furthermore, the thermal stabilities of IL doped composite membranes prepared from sPEEK-1 product (sPEEK0.5 -1 and sPEEK1.0 -1), which have the lowest DS values, were higher than that of other membranes. It can be therefore indicated that the increase in sulfonic acid groups and DS in membranes reduced the thermal resistance of the membranes. Regarding the effect of IL amounts, it was observed that the addition of the excess amount IL decreased thermal strength. This could be due to the IL residues which remained without binding to the sulfone groups. In Table 4, 10% and 50% weight loss of sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite membranes are presented.
Table 4
Thermal degradation values of sPEEK/IL composite polymer electrolytes.
Sample
|
T10 (℃)
|
T50 (℃)
|
sPEEK0.5-1
|
238.9
|
552.6
|
sPEEK1.0-1
|
240.3
|
556.8
|
sPEEK0.5-2
|
225
|
359.3
|
sPEEK1.0-2
|
223.1
|
519.9
|
sPEEK0.5-3
|
204.7
|
355.8
|
sPEEK1.0-3
|
187.6
|
419.2
|
T10: The temperature where 10wt.% weight loss has occurred; T50: The temperature where 50wt.% weight loss has occurred. |
As the DS increased in IL doped composite membranes, thermal strength limited depending on the density of sulfonic acid groups in the structure. It was observed that the excess IL (n = 0.5) significantly decreased the thermal resistance, and 50% weight loss was observed at 356 ℃ for IL doped composite membranes, having the highest DS (sPEEK0.5 -3). Similarly, the composite membrane (sPEEK1.0-2) consisting of sPEEK and an equimolar IL with a DS of 60.20%, had a 50% weight loss at 520 ℃, while the sample with an excess of IL (sPEEK0.5-2) had a 50% weight loss at 360 ℃. In the case of thermal endurance, this negative effect observed with an increase in the DS and the IL amount was not significant when considering the high temperature fuel cell operating conditions. All membranes showed sufficient thermal stability for HT-PEMFC operation (100–180 ℃).
3.4. Proton conductivity tests
Proton conductivities of sPEEK and sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite was presented in Fig. 5. In terms of sPEEKs, it was indicated that the increasing DS improved the proton conductivity. This behavior showed that sulfonic acid groups formed in the membrane structure by sulfonation processes contributed to proton jumping zones [36, 45]. For sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composites, it could be said that the addition of IL increased proton transfer, resulting higher conductivity. The motivation of the addition of IL to sPEEK matrices was to increase the ionic conductivity of the membranes at high temperature under anhydrous conditions. The doped IL was expected to behave as proton carrier media in the membrane instead of water in proton conductive membranes operated below 100 ℃. That is, the addition of IL could provide proton jump zones leading to higher conductivity.
However, it was seen that the conductivity decreased in membranes where excess IL was used (n = 0.5), and the conductivity values were improved in products where imidazole was taken as equimolar to sulfonic acid at line with the studies [39, 46]. It was observed that IL doped membrane prepared with sPEEK-2 showed higher conductivity values than that of IL doped composite membranes prepared with sPEEK-1 and sPEEK-3 polymer matrices. sPEEK1.0 -2 sample showed almost unchanged conductivity values (2.50×10− 1 Sm− 1 − 3.51×10− 1 Sm− 1) at high temperatures, while surprisingly the conductivity decreased in all other samples. As stated in the literature, DS has a superior effect over temperature on sPEEK conductivity. Herein, sPEEK membranes having a DS of around 40% did not show any conductivity development by increasing the operating temperature, but rather decreased. Some examples showed that the conductivity of a sPEEK with DS (48%) could increase up to 85 ℃ and then sharply fell to very low values. In the meantime, for a DS about 70–75%, the sPEEK membrane showed an increase in conductivity and it was indicated to decrease gradually only was observed in anhydrous conditions [35, 47]. With the addition of equimolar IL to the sulfonic acid groups of sPEEK-1 membrane matrix (sPEEK1.0-1), the conductivity was increased, and higher values were observed in the excess IL addition (sPEEK0.5-1). These results are compatible with the motivation of the work. With the addition of equimolar IL in the sPEEK-2 membrane matrix (sPEEK1.0-2), the conductivity increased and displayed the highest conductivity values among all samples. In the case of IL excess (sPEEK0.5-2), the conductivity was even lower than the membrane without IL (sPEEK-2). A similar trend was observed in the samples with the highest DS (sPEEK-3). The decrease in conductivity of sPEEK-2 and sPEEK-3 samples with the excess amount of IL could be attributed to the self-condensation of the IL anion in the membrane matrix [48]. In future studies, DS, the type of IL (different anion-cation pairs) and the amount of IL should be optimized to obtain higher conductivity in HT-PEMFC applications, indicating that both temperature and DS play an active role in proton conductivity. In this study, it was seen that conductivity value of composite membrane prepared with DS of 60.20% was acceptable for HT-PEMFC applications (3.40×10− 1 Sm− 1 − 3.51×10− 1 Sm− 1, at the temperature range of 420–450 K).
3.5. Dielectric constant (ε')
Following the proton conductivity measurements, dielectric constant measurements of the sPEEK1.0-2 membrane series, which show the highest proton conductivity values, were performed. The dielectric curves of the related series are shown in Fig. 6a-c as a function of frequency at different temperatures (300–440 K).
As seen from Fig. 6a-c, higher ε' values were observed at low frequencies for all samples. As known, dipoles need much more time to orient themselves into the external electric field and high values of ε' at low frequency confirm this judgment. The dielectric values decreased sharply with increasing frequency and also showed slight decreases in the higher temperature range. This decrease in dielectric values observed under the effect of temperature can be explained by the rearrangement of the sulfonic acid groups with increasing temperature. It can also be concluded that decreases in dielectric constant with increasing temperature are relatively less effective in applying external electric field at higher frequency [49, 50].
As mentioned before, as the temperature increased, the dielectric constant values of samples decreased. These reductions could be explained by the evaporation of molecular water attached to the sulfonic acid groups in the membrane structure and the restriction of the polymer chain movement by cross-linking by sulfonation process. On the other hand, sPEEK1.0-2 membrane has higher ε' values compared to other samples. When the amount of IL was equimolar to the sulfonic acid groups in the polymer structure, the plasticizing effect of the IL facilitated the orientation of the electric dipoles and consequently increased the dielectric constant values. When the amount of IL increased, the lowest dielectric constant values were seen in SPEEK0.5-2 sample. This result can be explained by the fact that the excess IL remaining unbound to the sulfonic acid groups disrupts the dipole orientation.
3.6. Dynamic mechanic analysis (DMA)
The mechanical properties of sPEEK and sPEEK/[Hmim][BF4] composite membranes were investigated by DMA. Proton exchange membranes used in HT-PEMFCs are expected to exhibit good mechanical strength with high proton conductivity and thermal stability. For this purpose, the storage (E’) and loss (E’’) modulus of sPEEK-2 and sPEEK1.0-2 composite membranes were analyzed, and the DMA plots were given in Fig. 7.
As shown in Fig. 7, the storage (E’) and loss (E’’) modulus values of the sPEEK membrane were higher compared to IL doped composite membrane. This result could be due to the plasticizing effect of the presence of IL in the composite membrane structure. The IL could facilitate the chain segment movements of the polymer by reducing the viscosity of the composite membrane [39, 51]. The storage moduli of sPEEK-2 and sPEEK1.0-2 composite membranes were found to be 1.50 GPa and 0.22 GPa, respectively. These maximum stress values are similar to those given in the literature with trifluoromethanesulfonate-based IL doped sPEEK membranes (2220.5 and 53.92 MPa for sPEEK and sPEEK/IL, respectively) [46]. When the sulfonated polymers and IL doped sulfonated polymers presented in the literature were considered, it could be said that the sPEEK-2 and sPEEK1.0-2 products had reasonable maximum stress at high temperature values [51].
In Fig. 8, changes in tanδ values of sPEEK-2 and sPEEK1.0-2 composite membranes were illustrated depending on temperature. From the tanδ graph, it is possible to determine the glass transition temperatures (Tg) of the products depending on the temperature values at which maximum tanδ values are observed. Considering the statement, it was presented that Tg of the sPEEK-2 membrane was 188 ℃ while the sPEEK1.0 -2 composite membrane had a decreased Tg value of 157 ℃ with the addition of IL. Similar behavior was seen in the storage modulus trend. This behavior could be explained by the disruption of polymer chain regularity due to the plasticizing effect of the IL. In case of Tg values, it was observed that the Tg of the sPEEK-2 membrane was similar to the other studies presented in the literature, whereas in this study, the high proton conductive composite membrane obtained by IL doping process (sPEEK1.0 -2) showed a higher Tg value than the IL doped membrane electrolytes presented in the literature (~ 70–90 ℃) [51].