Genome characterization of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus infecting cucurbits reveals the presence of a new genotype in Trinidad & Tobago in the Caribbean region

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-203018/v1

Abstract

Zucchini yellow mosaic virus is a potyvirus, which is becoming a serious pathogen of pumpkin and other cucurbits in Trinidad and Tobago and the entire Caribbean region. In this study, four Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) isolates infecting pumpkin in Trinidad and Tobago were characterized by complete genome sequencing for the first time. Phylogenetic analyses of the isolates showed variability of 5.9–6.0 % nt and 7.7–7.9 % aa sequences with the most closely related isolates NAT and AG (Israel) and SE04T (Slovakia). Based on the variations in complete genome as well as gene sequences, a new genotype designated ZYMV-Trini is proposed for these isolates. Among the gene sequences of ZYMV-Trini isolates, maximum variations were noticed in HC-Pro gene with 20.8 % aa sequence divergence from their closest relatives whereas the least variations were with the NIb, P3 and CP genes (1.8 to 2.2 % aa divergence). This study also proved that transmission of ZYMV can also occur through seeds (2 %), but this was less common than transmission via the aphid species Aphis gossypii. The progression of ZYMV in pumpkin seedlings was quantified by RT-qPCR which showed a rapid surge in viral load after 37 days. From the recombination analyses, it could be concluded that isolates SE04T from Slovakia, NAT from Israel and AG from Israel have major contributions in the genome architecture of ZYMV-Trini isolates.

1. Introduction

Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) is a member of the genus Potyvirus within the Potyviridae family. ZYMV was first reported in Italy in 1973 [27] and then subsequently spread worldwide, causing devastating epidemics in tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions. Members of the Cucurbitaceae are the primary hosts of ZYMV and disease symptoms include severe mosaic, yellowing, distortion of leaves, stunting in plant growth, severe fruit deformation and color cracking [8]. The symptoms can render fruits unmarketable and cause yield loss up to 94% [1, 19]. Transmission of ZYMV occurs both horizontally and vertically by aphids and seeds respectively, although horizontal transmission by aphids in a non-persistent manner is predominant [37]. Up to 26 species of aphids have been reported to transmit ZYMV experimentally, but only a few of them are commonly found in the field associated to transmission [18].

The ZYMV genome is ~ 9.6 kb in size and contains a positive sense single-stranded RNA molecule. The genome has one open reading frame (ORF) encoding for a single polyprotein precursor which is subsequently processed by three virally-encoded proteases into ten functional small mature proteins; P1 (protease), HC-Pro (helper component/protease), P3, 6K1, CI (cylindrical inclusion), 6K2, NIa (nuclear inclusion a), VPg (viral protein linked genome), NIb (nuclear inclusion b) and CP (coat protein) [26]. In addition, another short ORF has been found embedded within the P3 cistron (PIPO) which is translated in the + 2 reading frame [4]. The ZYMV’s 5’ untranslated region (UTR) is thought to contain two regulatory regions that are believed to direct cap independent translation [34] via interactions with the poly-A tail [11].

Cucurbits are major food crops of the Caribbean region, accounting for 27% of cultivated fields in Trinidad and Tobago with an average production of ∼2,750 tons (pumpkin, squash, and gourds) per year (http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E). The complete genome sequences of ZYMV isolates infecting cucurbits have been reported from several countries [7, 21, 26, 29, 41, 42] but not yet for the Caribbean region. A detailed survey conducted in pumpkin fields between 2014 and 2016 in six major cropping zones of Trinidad showed maximum ZYMV incidence (74 %) in dry season. Further, the infection of ZYMV along with the coinfection of Squash mosaic virus (SqMV) was also confirmed in cucurbits from Trinidad and Tobago [3].

In this study, the complete genome of ZYMV isolates from Trinidad and Tobago was sequenced for the first time. Phylogenetic and recombination analysis with the available ZYMV isolates from different geographical regions was carried out to study their evolutionary relationship and genetic diversity. The progression of ZYMV infection following aphid/seed transmission was also quantified.

2. Materials And Methods

2.1. Sample collection and RNA extraction

ZYMV infected pumpkin leaf samples collected from farmers’ fields (10 from each location) from Barrackpore, Macoya, Las Lomas and Orange Groove in the island of Trinidad [3] were used for complete virus genome sequencing in this study. Total RNA was extracted from leaf samples (1 g) using TRI reagent (Sigma, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.2. RT-PCR and sequencing

Diagnosis of ZYMV was carried out by PCR using CP-forward (5’-GCTCCATACATAGCTGAGAC-3’) and CP-reverse

(5’-AACGGAGTCTAATCTCGAGC-3’) primers targeting a partial coat protein region (1100-bp) of ZYMV. Ten different sets of primers targeting overlapping fragments of ZYMV-polyprotein were designed (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1) to derive the complete genome of the Trinidad isolates. ImProm-II™ Reverse Transcription System (Promega, USA) was used for the synthesis of complementary DNA using 1 µg of RNA. PCR reactions were performed in a thermocycler (Techne, USA) for all primer pairs. Each PCR reaction (25µL) contained 100 ng of cDNA, 1 unit of Pfu DNA Polymerase, 10X Buffer with MgSO4, 0.5 µl of 10 mM dNTP mix, 50 pmol of primer pairs and sterile milliQ water to the final volume. The PCR conditions were, an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; 30 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 54–60 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 1 min; and a final primer extension step for 10 min at 72 °C. Amplicons were visualized by electrophoresis on 1.5 % agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide. Three replicates of all the PCR amplicons were gel purified using Gen-Elute Gel Extraction Kit (Sigma, USA) and cloned in pGEM®T vector (Promega, USA) before Sanger sequencing (Macrogen Inc, USA) of both strands. Complete genomes of ZYMV isolates from Trinidad were constructed by aligning all partial overlapping fragments of ZYMV polyprotein sequences with reference genome sequences of ZYMV from NCBI-GenBank using bioinformatics software Mega X [20].

2.3. Phylogenetic analysis

All the nucleotide (nt) and amino acid (aa) sequence fragments targeting the polyprotein of ZYMV were separately aligned with reference sequences from GenBank (Supplementary Table 2) using Clustal W and MAFFT [22, 29]. The Genome Annotation Transfer Utility (GATU) [38] was then used to annotate the complete genome sequences of the Trinidad isolates using the reference isolate TW-TN3 (AF127929.2) obtained from RefSeq database. Phylogenetic analysis was carried out with the ZYMV Trinidad isolates and 63 complete genome sequences obtained from GenBank representing different geographical regions of the world (Supplementary Table 2). Maximum Likelihood trees were generated using the Tamura-Nei model for complete nt genome sequences of ZYMV and aa sequences of individual genes P1, HC-Pro, P3, CI, NIb and CP in Mega X software [20] with 1000 bootstrap replications. Similarity matrices revealing the percentage identities among nt and aa sequences of all the clusters in phylograms were also generated in Mega X.

2.4. Aphid transmission and RT-qPCR quantification of the virus

In order to confirm the transmission of ZYMV through aphid vectors, sterile pumpkin seedlings were grown in a greenhouse. Single adult aphids (Aphis gossypii) from a virus-free colony were transferred to pumpkin seedlings infected with ZYMV (and confirmed by PCR reactions) for acquisition feeding for 48 h. The viruliferous aphids were then transferred on to 15 sterile pumpkin seedlings individually for 48 h for inoculation feeding in a netted greenhouse box. After inoculation, the aphids were killed using malathion treatment. After seven days, the total RNA was extracted from leaf samples (1 g of 3rd leaf) of inoculated and control seedlings using TRI reagent (Sigma, USA). The RNA was reverse transcribed and PCR amplification of the cDNA carried out using ZYMV-specific primers (CR-for/CP-rev) as before. Amplification of a 1,100-bp fragment in 12 out of 15 receptor seedlings confirmed the presence and transmission of ZYMV in pumpkin. The PCR products were subjected to Sanger sequencing for cross checking identity by BLAST (NCBI) which validated infection by ZYMV. Leaf samples from 10 out of 12 ZYMV positive seedlings were collected every 10 days, after the initial sampling, until flowering and RNA was extracted. The virus titres were quantified from 10 samples with three replicates by RT-qPCR to assess the progression of infection at different growth stages.

In addition, 40 fruit samples were collected from 40 different ZYMV PCR-positive pumpkin plants from the field. All seeds were separated from the fruits and surface sterilized in 70% ethanol for one minute and 5% sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes and then washed 4 times with distilled water to ensure safe removal of all contaminants. All the surface sterilized seeds were pooled together and one-hundred seeds were randomly collected and planted in individual pots. Leaf samples were collected after 7 days of germination. PCR reactions confirmed ZYMV infection in 2 out of 100 seedlings raised from the seeds. Leaf samples from those 2 positive seedlings were collected every 10 days thereafter for viral quantification as before.

For cDNA synthesis, RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed using the Multiscribe Reverse Transcriptase Kit (Invitrogen, USA), primed with 40 nmol of ZYMVRT- R1 (5’- GGCCAAACAACCTTGAAGAAACATTGC − 3’) primer in a 20-µL reaction following the manufacturer protocol using thermocycler (Techne, USA). Real-time quantitative PCR was performed with three replicates of each sample with 500 ng of cDNA template, 12.5 uL of SYBRR Green JumpStart™ Taq ReadyMix™ (Sigma, USA), 50 nM of primer pairs ZYMVRT- F1 (5’- GAGAAATGCAGAGGCACCATACATGCCG − 3’) and ZYMVRT- R1 (5’- GGCCAAACAACCTTGAAGAAACATTGC − 3’) targeting a 181 nt region of the ZYMV coat protein gene. RT-qPCR (25 uL) was carried out in an Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast Real Time PCR system (Life Technologies Corp., USA). A region of the 18S rRNA gene was used as an endogenous control in all the samples. The optimised RT-qPCR conditions were; 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 sec and 60 °C for 1 min. Melt curve analysis was performed at 60 °C for 15 sec to ensure that a homogenous amplification product was produced. ZYMV infected samples from greenhouse pots were used as a positive control.

Relative standard curve analysis was done using 500 ng of cDNA from the ZYMV-positive control; a 10-fold serial dilution was performed to generate the standard curve. The threshold cycle number (CT) of each dilution were plotted against standard concentrations of cDNA and standard curve was constructed. The regression line generated in the standard curve was used to quantify the titre of ZYMV from the respective samples at each sampling time.

In addition, expression level of ZYMV-CP target was assessed by relative quantification method using 2−(∆∆Ct) values. ∆Ct was derived by subtracting Ct of endogenous control (18S rRNA) from Ct of test samples (ZYMV-CP). ∆∆Ct was derived by subtracting ∆Ct of negative control from ∆CT of samples. Greenhouse grown pumpkin plants were used as positive and negative control (PCR confirmed) for the qPCR analysis.

2.5. Recombination analysis

Recombination analysis was performed with all the 63 complete genome nt sequences of ZYMV isolates (Supplementary Table 2) from different geographical regions around the world to detect the presence of recombination sites using the RDP, GENECONV, BOOTSCAN, MAXIMUM CHISQUARE, CHIMAERA, SISTER SCAN and 3SEQ non-parametric recombination detection methods as implemented in RDP5 software [31, 32]. A multiple comparison corrected P-value cut-off of 0.05 and default settings were used throughout the analysis, and only events detectable with three or more different methods were retained for further analysis.

3. Results

RT-PCR analysis with the diagnostic primers CP-for/ CP-rev confirmed ZYMV infection in all the samples collected from Barrackpore, Macoya, Las Lomas and Orange Groove. All fragments of ZYMV-polyprotein were amplified specifically using newly designed primer pairs (Supplementary Table 1) and sequenced. Overlapping sequences were aligned with multiple reference isolates collected from the GenBank (Supplementary Table 2) and the complete genome was constructed for four Trinidad isolates that were designated as ZYMV-Trini isolates. The complete genome of the four ZYMV-Trini isolates was 9594 nts long, encoding a polyprotein of 3,081 aa residues comprising 10 different genes. The genes encoded in polyprotein of ZYMV-Trini isolates were P1 (930 nt), HC-Pro (1368 nt), P3 (1038 nt), 6K1 (156 nt), CI (1902 nt), 6K2 (159 nt), VPg (570 nt), NIa (729 nt), NIb (1551 nt), Coat protein (CP) (837 nt) and PIPO (201 nt). The 5’ and 3’ UTR regions were 139 and 212 nt in size, respectively. The complete nucleotide sequences of all four new Trinidad isolates were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers as ZYMV-Trini1 (MF072712), ZYMV-Trini2 (MF072713), ZYMV-Trini3 (MF072714) and ZYMV-Trini4 (MF072715).

The pairwise identities among the nt sequences of ZYMV-Trini isolates were 99.9-100 %. A phylogram constructed based on the complete genome nt sequences with 63 reference isolates from around the world showed that ZYMV-Trini isolates formed a separate cluster (Figure 2; Table 1). The ZYMV-Trini isolates were most closely related (nt similarity = 94.0 to 94.1) to reference isolates that included NAT (Israel), AG (Israel) and SE04T (Slovakia). The polyprotein region of ZYMV-Trini isolates showed 93 variable amino acids with their closest relatives; NAT (Israel), AG (Israel) and SE04T (Slovakia) (Supplementary Table 3, 4). The isolates Per-1 (Australia), Knx-25 (Australia) and ZYMP13PREP (Reunion Island) were found to have the least aa similarities (23.2-23.6 % nt variations) with the ZYMV-Trini isolates (Table 1).

Phylogenetic analyses of the aa gene sequences of the ZYMV-Trini and reference isolates showed the four local isolates formed a separate and distinct cluster for the HC-Pro, CI, and NIb genes (Supplementary Figure 1). Pairwise comparison with all the reference P1 genes showed the Trini sequences were closely related to isolate TW-TN3 (Taiwan) with 97.6 to 97.7 % nt identities. Similar analyses for the HC-Pro and NIb genes showed that Z5-1 (Japan) was the most closely related isolate to the ZYMV-Trini isolates with nt similarities of 90.7 % and 94.6 %, respectively. Pairwise comparison with reference sequences for the P3, CI and CP genes showed that the Trini isolates were highly related to the isolate Z-104 (Italy) with nt similarities of 97.6, 98.0 and 97.2 %, respectively (Table 1; Figure 2, Supplementary Figure 1).

The isolate ZYMP13PREP (Reunion Island) was found to have the lowest nt similarity to the Trini isolates for the genes CI (81.4 %) and NIb (82.9 %). Whereas, the isolate WM (China) showed the least nt similarity with CP gene (82.7 %) and the isolate Singapore (Singapore) showed the least similarity with the P1 (62.8-62.9 %) and HC-Pro (80.7 %) gene sequences (Table 1).

3.1. Progression of virus titre

The transmission of ZYMV through aphids was confirmed through PCR in 12 out of 15 inoculated pumpkin seedlings. Subsequently, those 10 positive seedlings were used for the quantification of ZYMV-CP targets by qPCR. In the case of seed transmission, only 2% of seedlings (2 out of 100 seedlings) were found positive by diagnostic PCR reactions which were further analysed for qPCR quantification.

A standard curve generated using known quantities of cDNA from the positive control and plotted against the threshold cycles (CT) values of each dilution resulted in the linear equation y = 4.034x + 12.066 and correlation, r2 = 0.9927. cDNA quantities representing the progression of ZYMV-RNA targets for the Ct mean of all samples with three replicates (10 different seedlings in aphid transmission studies and two different seedlings in seed transmission studies) collected in 10 days’ intervals were quantified using the standard curve and, the mean values are represented in Figure 3. Melt curve analysis also confirmed the specificity of the primers in RT-qPCR.

Relative gene expression studies based on 2–(∆∆Ct) showed that the titre of ZYMV-CP were minimum in samples collected between 7 to 27 days and it increased rapidly after 37 days. The maximum titre was observed after 50 days in all the plant samples after aphid and transmission (Table 3).

3.2. Recombination analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of ZYMV based on the complete genome nt sequences revealed differences to the maximum of 23.6 % among isolates reported around the world. In silico recombination analyses using seven different detection methods with all the isolates in this study detected recombination sites throughout the genome of ZYMV. Twelve recombination sites were detected in eight different isolates from seven countries (Figure 4).

In ZYMV-Trini isolates, the first recombination site was detected with partial P3, complete 6K1, C1, 6K2, VPg and partial NIa gene sequences, with the isolates SE04T (Slovakia), NAT (Israel), AG (Israel) as a major parents and WM (China) as a minor parent. The second recombination site in ZYMV-Trini isolates was found with partial P1 gene sequences and isolate SB-02 (India) found to be a major parent. The hypothetical parental and daughter sequences which would fix the patterns of recombination sites were assigned using seven non-parametric methods as implemented in RDP5 software. Isolates ZYMV-WS from China, ZYMV-Trini from Trinidad, and Z-104 from Italy recorded two recombination sites in their genome. It was noteworthy that ZYMV-Trini isolates were found as a major parent for three different isolates Z5-1 (Japan), Z-104 (Italy) and ZYMV-WS (China), and also as a minor parent for ZYMV-WS (China) for its second recombination site (Table 2).

4. Discussion

ZYMV is becoming a serious pathogen in most cucurbit growing regions of the world where the infection rates of at least 40% has been reported in tropical and sub-tropical regions. Disease surveys in pumpkin have indicated ZYMV disease incidence levels reported up to 75 % in dry season in Trinidad [3].

Natural populations of RNA viruses rapidly generate genetic diversity because of a combination of high mutation rates, rapid replication, recombination events, high frequency of occurrence and a variety of strains [9]. In this study, phylogenetic analysis revealed that Trinidad isolates form a new genotype ‘ZYMV-Trini’ since they have variations of 5.9-6.0 % in complete nt sequences as compared to their closest known relatives, including isolates NAT and AG (Israel) and SE04T (Slovakia). The within-virus species genotype classification system adopted a neutral nomenclature involving letters of the alphabet and Latinized numerals that avoid potentially misleading names [29, 30]. Phylograms of aa sequences also showed the ZYMV-Trini isolates forming a separate cluster for HC-Pro, CI, and NIb genes in this study. In case of the phylogram of the P1 gene sequences, the isolate TW-TN3 (Taiwan) was closely related to the Trini isolates, with 2.3–2.4 % nt variation level.

The capsid protein (CP) gene of potyviruses is widely used as a valid typing tool to differentiate among isolates [36]. However, comparison of complete genome sequences allows for a more complex analysis of virus variability and may provide information on the evolutionary history and existence of major evolutionary events, such as recombination, as was demonstrated for various potyviruses [14, 41]. Among the gene sequences in the polyprotein of ZYMV-Trini isolates, NIb and CP are highly conserved but the HC-Pro gene had the maximum variation in aa sequences, as compared to the closely related isolates. In a phylogram constructed based on coat protein aa sequences, all previously reported ZYMV-coat protein sequences from Trinidad and Tobago and ZYMV-Trini isolates from this study get grouped together and this may suggest that all the ZYMV isolates from Trinidad and Tobago belongs to the same genotype (data not given). Among the other reference isolates, ZYMP13PREP from Reunion Island had maximum variations from the Trini isolates, viz., 23.6 % with complete nt genome, and 18.6 % with CI and 7.1 % with NIb aa sequences (Table 1).

Aphids are the most successful vectors of potyviruses, due to an array of generic and specific features they possess [15], including precision delivery of viral particles via the stylet, parthenogenetic mode of reproduction within a short span of time, diverse range of host plants, survival in adverse conditions and the ability to disseminate over long distances [28, 33]. Katis et al. [18] reported the most abundant aphid vectors of ZYMV in a study in Greece included M. persicae, Aphis gossypii and Aphis spiraecola. We also reported A. gossypii as a vector of ZYMV in Trinidad in our earlier preliminary study [3] and it was reconfirmed in the current study. The relative standard curve method through RT-qPCR effectively detected the incremental increase of ZYMV-RNA targets in pumpkin seedlings following transmission through A. gossypii. Vector transmission occurs as a result of interaction between the aphid stylet, and viral proteins of ZYMV such as coat protein (CP) and helper component proteinase (HC-Pro). Specifically, the DAG motif on the CP interacts with the PTK region of the HC-Pro, and a secondary motif on the HC-Pro (KLSC) interacts with the aphid stylet [40]. Volunteer cucurbitaceous crop and weed plants also act as infection sources for ZYMV spread to cucurbit crops [5, 6, 23].

Generally, ~ 20% of viral plant pathogens are known to be seed-transmitted. Seed to seedling transmission rate was earlier reported for ZYMV at a low level (1.6%) [17, 37]. A similar trend was also observed in this study, with only 2% seed transmission rate. The vertical transmission of ZYMV by seed is less common than horizontal transmission via aphids and also many studies support the hypothesis that the insect vector is an important factor in inducing virus variation [35]. In both aphid and seed transmission experiments, ZYMV increments in the plant were steady up to 37 days but a rapid surge was observed by RT-qPCR analysis between 37 and 57 days in this study.

Through recombination, viruses gain pathogenicity or virulence, and the ability to invade new hosts [13, 16]. Recombination is advantageous for RNA viruses as it can create high fitness genotypes more rapidly than mutation alone [2]. This study also supports the hypothesis that recombination is a dominant feature of ZYMV evolution as in other RNA viruses. Recombination sites detected in silico using RDP5 software suggested that the entire ZYMV genome is prone to recombination, though hotspots are concentrated in P1, HC-Pro, P3 and CP gene sequences in several isolates. Recombination breakpoints in the ZYMV-Trini isolates were noticed in P1 and between P3 and NIb gene sequences. Maina et al. [29] earlier reported the same pattern of recombination breakpoints in ZYMV populations from East Timor and northern Australian cucurbit crops. Natural recombinants may emerge in virus populations only if they maintain relatively good fitness that includes preserving the functionality of each viral protein and the functional interactions between proteins [25, 31]. For plant viruses, the recombination rate might be much higher than expected, whereas rates for potyviruses may be up to ~ 25 % although only a small fraction of the generated variants emerge in the population due to strong selection pressure [10].

Isolates SE04T (Slovakia), AG (Israel) and NAT (Israel) were determined to be major parental contributors, circumstantially, for the genome architecture of ZYMV-Trini isolates. These parental isolates have 98.0-98.4 % nt identities among themselves and 93.4–94.1 % similarities with ZYMV-Trini isolates. Cucurbit cultivation in the Caribbean islands including Trinidad and Tobago is mainly dependent on imported seeds from different countries, and seed producing countries such as Israel, and China play a significant role in seed transfer. ZYMV can also move to new locations in ZYMV-infected fruit from which aphids can acquire and spread the virus [24]. Introductions could also occur from migrating birds carrying virus-infected seed in their intestines or discarded infected cucurbit fruit left behind by fishermen from neighbouring countries camping on the shore [12]. Maina et al. [29] reported the absence of genetic connectivity between ZYMV sequences from Papua New Guinea (PNG) and those from Australian or East Timor. The highest nucleotide similarity between a ZYMV sequence from PNG and elsewhere was 92.8% and the authors suggested the divergence could be due to a single introduction of ZYMV into PNG with subsequent evolution to adapt in this new environment.

It is also interesting to know that ZYMV-Trini isolates may have contributed as a major parent for isolates such as Z5-1 (Japan), Z-104 (Italy) and ZYMV-WS (China) for various genome fragments. However, more data need to be generated from the Caribbean island countries to study the genome dynamics of ZYMV-Trini isolates and their genetic connectivity among the isolates from neighbouring countries.

This study provides the first report of the complete nucleotide sequence of ZYMV from Trinidad and Tobago and further also highlights that recombination is a major driving force in the evolution and emergence of new variants of ZYMV. It is also noteworthy to understand the complexity of the variability of ZYMV isolates in order to derive effective field control measures.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to ACP-EU (Grant No. FED/2011/281 − 139) for the funding and support to carry out the research work. Logistical assistance provided by the collaborating institutions and Agriculture Ministries of the Caribbean states is duly acknowledged. Thanks for the ACP-EU project research group from the Department of Life Sciences, UWI, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago for assistance in plant sampling.

References

  1. Blua MJ, Perring TM (1989) Effect of zucchini yellow mosaic-virus on development and yield of cantaloupe (Cucumis-Melo). Plant Dis 734:317–320.
  2. Chare ER, Gould EA, Holmes EC (2003) Phylogenetic analysis reveals a low rate of homologous recombination in negative-sense RNA viruses. J Gen Virol 84:2691–2703.
  3. Chinnaraja C, Ramkissoon A, Rajendran R, Tony ST, RamsubhagA, Jayaraj J (2016) First Report of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus and Squash mosaic virus Infecting Cucurbits in Trinidad. Plant Dis 100(4):866.
  4. Chung BY, Miller WA, Atkins JF, Firth AE (2008) An overlapping essential gene in the Potyviridae. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:5897-5902.
  5. Coutts BA, Jones RAC (2005) Incidence and distribution of viruses infecting cucurbit crops in the Northern Territory and Western Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 56:847-858.
  6. Coutts BA, Kehoe MA, Webster CG, Wylie SJ, Jones RAC (2011) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus: Biological properties, detection procedures and comparison of coat protein gene sequences. Arch Virol 156:2119-2131.
  7. Desbiez C, Gal-On A, Girard M, Wipf-Scheibel C, Lecoq H (2003) Increase in Zucchini yellow mosaic virus symptom severity in tolerant zucchini cultivars is related to a point mutation in P3 protein and is associated with a loss of relative fitness on susceptible plants. Phytopathology 93:1478-1484.
  8. Desbiez C, Lecoq H (1997) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Plant Pathol 46:809–829.
  9. Duffy S, Shackelton LA, Holmes EC (2008) Rates of evolutionary change in viruses: patterns and determinants. Nat Rev Genet 94:267-276.
  10. Froissart R, Roze D, Uzest M, Galibert L, Blanc S, Michalakis Y (2005) Recombination very day: abundant recombination in a virus during a single multi-cellular host infection. PLoS Biol 3:389–395.
  11. Gallie DR (2001) Cap-independent translation conferred by the 5’ leader of tobacco etch virus is eukaryotic initiation factor 4G dependent. J Virol 7524:12141–12152.
  12. Gibbs AJ, Mackenzie AM, Wei K, Gibbs MJ (2008) The potyviruses of Australia. Arch Virol 153:1411-1420.
  13. Gibbs AJ, Ohshima K (2010) Potyviruses and the digital revolution. Ann Rev Phytopathol 48:205-223.
  14. Glasa M, Palkovics L, Kominek P, Labonne G, Pittnerova S, Kudela O, Candresse T, Subr Z (2004) Geographically and temporally distant natural recombinant isolates of Plum pox virus (PPV) are genetically very similar and form a unique PPV subgroup. J Gen Virol 85:2671–2681.
  15. Harris KF, Maramorosch K (1997) Aphids as Virus Vectors, first ed. Academic Press, Cambridge. ISBN 978-14-8327-388-4.
  16. James D, Sanderson D, Varga A, Sheveleva A, Chirkov S (2016) Genome sequence analysis of new isolates of the Winona strain of Plum pox virus and the first definitive evidence of intrastrain recombination events. Phytopathology 106:407-416.
  17. Johansen E, Edwards MC, Hampton RO (1994) Seed transmission of viruses: current perspectives. Annual review of phytopathology 32:363–386.
  18. Katis NI, Tsitsipis JA, Lykouressis DP, Papapanayotou A, Margaritopoulos JT, Kokinis GM, Perdikis DC, Manoussopoulos IN (2006) Transmission of zucchini yellow mosaic virus by colonizing and noncolonizing aphids in Greece and new aphid species vectors of the virus. J Phytopath 1545:293–302.
  19. Khanal V, Ali A (2019) Complete genome sequence of a Zucchini yellow mosaic virus isolated from pumpkin in Oklahoma. Microbiol Resour Announc 82:e01583-18.
  20. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547-1549.
  21. Kwon SW, Kim MS, Choi HS, Kim KH (2005) Biological characteristics and nucleotide sequences of three Korean isolates of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. J Gen Plant Pathol 71:80-85.
  22. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 20. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948.
  23. Lecoq H, Desbiez C (2008) Watermelon mosaic virus and Zucchini yellow mosaic virus Encyclopedia Virol 5:433-440.
  24. Lecoq H, Desbiez C, Wipf-Scheibel C, Girard M (2003) Potential involvement of melon fruit in the long-distance dissemination of cucurbit potyviruses. Plant Dis 87:955-959.
  25. Lefeuvre P, Lett JM, Reynaud B, Martin DP (2007) Avoidance of protein fold disruption in natural virus recombinants. PLoS Pathogens 3:1782–1789.
  26. Lin SS, Hou RF, Yeh SD (2001) Complete genome sequence and genetic organization of a Taiwan isolate of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Bot Bull Acad Sin 424:243-250.
  27. Lisa V, Boccardo G, D'Agostino G, Dellavalle G, D'Aquilio M (1981) Characterization of a potyvirus that causes zucchini yellow mosaic. Phytopathology 71:667-672.
  28. Lovisolo O, Hull R, Rosler O (2003) Coevolution of viruses with hosts and vectors and possible palaeontology. Adv Virus Res 62:325–379.
  29. Maina S, Barbetti MJ, Edwards OR, Minemba D, Areke MW, Jones RAC (2019) Zucchini yellow mosaic virus Genomic Sequences from Papua New Guinea: Lack of Genetic Connectivity with Northern Australian or East Timorese Genomes, and New Recombination Findings. Plant Dis 103:1326-1336.
  30. Jones RA, Kehoe MA (2016) A proposal to rationalize within-species plant virus nomenclature: Benefits and implications of inaction. Arch Virol 161(7):2051-2057.
  31. Martin DP, Varsani A, Roumagnac P, Botha G, Maslamoney S, Schwab T, Kelz Z, Kumar V, Murrell B (2020) RDP5: A computer program for analysing recombination in, and removing signals of recombination from, nucleotide sequence datasets. Virus Evolution, veaa087, https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/veaa087.
  32. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B (2015) RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes, Virus Evolution 1(1), vev003, https://doi.org/10.1093/ve/vev003.
  33. Ng JC, Perry KL (2004) Transmission of plant viruses by aphid vectors. Mol Plant Pathol 5:505–511.
  34. Niepel M, Gallie DR (1999) Identification and characterization of the functional elements within the tobacco etch virus 5’ leader required for cap-independent translation. J Virol 7311:9080–9088.
  35. Power AG (2000) Insect transmission of plant viruses: a constraint on virus variability. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:336–340.
  36. Rybicki EP, Shukla DD (1992) Coat protein phylogeny and systematics of potyviruses. Arch Virol Suppl 5:139-170.
  37. Simmons HE, Holmes EC, Gildow FE, Bothe-Goralczyk MA, Stephenson AG (2011) Experimental verification of seed transmission of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. Plant Dis 956:751–754.
  38. Tcherepanov V, Ehlers A, Upton C (2006) Genome Annotation Transfer Utility (GATU): rapid annotation of viral genomes using a closely related reference genome. BMC Genomics 7:150. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-7-150
  39. Tomimura K, Gibbs AJ, Jenner CE, Walsh JA, Ohshima K (2003) The phylogeny of Turnip mosaic virus: comparisons of 38 genomic sequences reveal a Eurasian origin and a recent “emergence” in east Asia. Mol Ecol 128:2099-2111.
  40. Urcuqui-Inchima S, Haenni AL, Bernardi F (2001) Potyvirus proteins: a wealth of functions. Virus Research 74(1-2):157–175.
  41. Wisler GC, Purcifull DE, Hiebert E (1995) Characterization of the P1 protein and coding region of the Zucchini yellow mosaic virus. J Gen Virol. 76:37-45.
  42. Zhao MF, Chen J, Zheng HY, Adams MJ, Chen JP (2003) Molecular analysis of Zucchini yellow mosaic virus Isolates from Hangzhou, China. Journal of Phytopathology 151:307-311.

Tables

Table 1 Nucleotide (Nt) and Amino acid (Aa) identities (%) of ZYMV- Trini isolates with other clusters in phylograms

Gene/ Genome

Cluster 1 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 2 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 3 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 4 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 5 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 6 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 7 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 8 (Nt/Aa)

Cluster 9 (Nt/Aa)

Complete genome 

99.9-100 / 99.9-100

93.1-94.1/ 90.7-92.3

93.6-93.7/ 91.9-92.0

93.6-93.7/ 91.6-91.7

91.0/86.6

92.1-92.8/ 91.2-91.7

90.8-91.9/ 88.7-89.4

89.4-90.8/ 88.3-90.0

76.4-78.2/ 77.3-79.0

P1

85.0-89.4 / 71.0-77.6

86.6-88.2 / 72.0-76.4

95.6-100 / 91.6-100

92.1-92.4 / 83.9-86.6

90.7-92.3 / 81.7-85.3

88.9-89.7 / 77.2-79.5

62.9-65.3 / 52.4-54.6

-

-

HC-Pro

89.0-90.2 / 73.1-75.3

85.9-90.3 / 70.4-75.7

90.7-90.8 / 74.7-74.9

89.9-90.5 / 74.9-76.7

89.6-90.7 / 75.2-78.2

99.9-100 / 99.7-100

80.7-82.5 / 78.2-80.1

78.5 / 70.2

-

P3

77.9-95.2 / 63.8-97.3

89.4-100 / 93.3-100

91.9-95.1 / 95.0-97.3

90.4-91.4 / 94.5-95.3

83.0-84.0 / 88.7-89.3

-

-

-

-

C1

90.1-91.5 / 87.1-88.5

98.0-100 / 96.8-100

96.4 / 94.6

91.3-96.4 / 83.1-94.1

96.0-96.5 / 94.1-95.2

93.3 / 90.7

92.4-93.2 / 89.6-92.0

81.4-81.6 / 72.8-74.7

85.3 / 77.4 (AF014811)

NIb

91.1-93.6 / 91.8-98.0

93.4-94.0 / 98.0-98.4

92.1-94.1 / 97.8-98.4

100 / 100

94.5-94.6 / 98.6-98.8

90.5-92.0 / 96.9-98.6

91.0-91.5 / 96.9-97.4

82.9-84.0 / 94.9-95.9

-

Coat Protein

82.7-89.4 / 89.2-93.5

91.9-92.1 / 94.6-94.9

91.7 / 94.9

92.4-100 / 95.6-100

91.8-94.8 / 96.4-97.1

92.1-94.9 / 94.6-95.6

94.6-95.1 / 94.2-95.6

92.8-94.8 / 95.3-96.4

84.8-87.3 / 90.3-91.0

Table 2 Recombination sites detected in ZYMV genomes using seven non-parameteric methods showing the parental and recombinant sequences

Recombinant Sequence

Recombinant genome position

Gene/region

 *Minor Parental Sequence(s)

*Major Parental Sequence(s)

**Detection methods

Begin

 End

AB369279.1- RDA (South Korea)

82

2624

Partial 5' UTR, complete P1, HC-Pro and partial P3 gene

MK956829.1-isolate Z-104 (Italy)

Unknown

1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

AB188115.1-isolate: Z5-1 (Japan)

215

890

 Partial P1 gene

Unknown

MF072714.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7

MF072714.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

226

914

 Partial P1 gene

Unknown

MG967620.1- isolate SB-02 (India)

4, 5, 6

KX499498.1-isolate Vera (Spain)

284

1238

 Partial P1 and HC-Pro gene

MF684760.1-isolate Kurdistan (Iran)

AF127929.2- isolate TW-TN3 (Taiwan)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

MK956829.1-isolate Z-104 (Italy)

295

626

 Partial P1 gene

Unknown

MF072714.1- isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

KX664482.1-ZYMV-WS (China)

888

2648

Partial P1, complete HC-Pro and partial P3 gene

MF072714.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

KF976713.1- isolate SE04T (Slovakia)

4, 5, 7

AB188116.1-isolate 2002 (Japan)

2624

3744

Partial P3, complete 6K1 and partial C1 gene

Unknown

MK956829.1-isolate Z-104 (Italy)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

MK956829.1-isolate Z-104 (Italy)

2626

6490

Partial P3, complete 6K1, C1, 6K2, VPg and partial NIa gene

KF976712.1-isolate H (Czech Republic)

MF072714.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

4, 5, 6

KX664482.1-ZYMV-WS (China)

7196

9354

Partail NIb and partial Coat protein gene

AY188994.1-strain B  (Israel)

MF072714.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini3 (Trinidad and Tobago)

4, 5, 6, 7

MF072712.1-isolate ZYMV-Trini1 (Trinidad and Tobago)

7257

2618

Partial P3, complete 6K1, C1, 6K2, VPg, NIa and partial NIb gene

AJ515911-Isolate WM (China)

KF976713.1-isolate SE04T (Slovakia), EF062582-isolate NAT (Israel), EF062583-isolate AG (Israel)

1, 4, 5, 6, 7

KU528623.1-isolate IKA (Iran)

8482

8657

Partail NIb and partial Coat protein gene

AF127929.2-isolate TW-TN3 (Taiwan)

Unknown

1, 2, 3, 6

KU528623.1-isolate IKA (Iran)

8658

8972

Partial Coat protein gene

Unknown

JN183062.1-isolate ZYMV-Fars (Iran)

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

*‘Minor’ and ‘Major’ parents refer to the parental isolates contributing the smaller and larger fractions of the recombinant’s sequence, respectively.                       

**Detection methods RDP (1), GENECONV (2), BOOTSCAN (3), MAXIMUM CHISQUARE (4), CHIMERA (5), SISTER SCAN (6), 3SEQ (7)         

 

Table 3 Relative gene transcript levels of ZYMV-CP in seedling samples after aphid and seed transmission.

Aphid transmission*

Ct mean (samples)

Ct mean     (18S rRNA)

 ∆Ct

∆∆Ct

Relative gene expression level (2–(∆∆Ct))

Day 7

33.32 ± 1.94

16.32 ± 0.76

17.00

-5.57

47.50

Day 17

31.82 ± 0.89

16.57 ± 0.92

15.25

-7.32

159.79

Day 27

31.12 ± 1.86

16.89 ± 0.99

14.23

-8.34

324.03

Day 37

28.62 ± 0.92

16.79 ± 0.69

11.83

-10.74

1710.26

Day 47

23.72 ± 0.77

16.57 ± 0.86

7.15

-15.42

43841.21

Day 57

21.45 ± 0.67

16.88 ± 0.71

4.57

-18.00

262144.00

Seed transmission**

 

 

 

 

 

Day 7

34.75 ± 0.92

16.88 ± 0.87

17.87

-4.70

25.99

Day 17

32.25 ± 1.57

16.79 ± 0.72

15.46

-7.11

138.14

Day 27

29.5 ± 1.02

16.94 ± 0.91

12.56

-10.01

1031.12

Day 37

27.5 ± 0.98

16.08 ± 0.89

11.42

-11.15

2272.40

Day 47

24.15 ± 0.86

16.29 ± 0.84

7.86

-14.71

26801.01

Day 57

19.32 ± 1.42

16.56 ± 0.55

2.76

-19.81

919187.72

Positive control

20.78 ± 0.37

16.69 ± 0.42

4.09

-18.48

365623.68

Negative control

39.46 ± 0.29

16.39 ± 0.38

22.57

0.00

1.00

Ct mean; *n = 30, **n=6 (Includes three replicates of each sample), 18S rRNA; Endogenous control.

Supplementary Table 1 List of primers used for diagnosis and amplification of ZYMV partial genome fragments

S. No.

Primer name

Primer sequence (5' - 3')

Target Size

Target fragment (F) in genome

1

ZF1

AATCAACGAACAAGCAGACGA

971

F1; Partial 5' UTR and partial P1 gene

2

ZR1

CCTCGAATCACCAAATGTGGC

3

ZF2

TGTAGTGGGTGGGTGTTAGGCA

1093

F2; Partial P1 gene and partial HC-Pro gene

4

ZR2

GCTCCTATAACTAGGTGCCTCTTCGT

5

ZF3

GTGTCTCCAAACAGAATGG

1189

F3; Partial HC-Pro gene and partial P3 gene

6

ZR3

GCTCTTCGCATGTACTCGGG

7

ZF4

GCGATTGAAGCAATTCTCGAT

1043

F4; Partial P3, complete 6K1 and partial C1 gene

8

ZR4

GGATCGCCTGCCAACTGTCTAC

9

ZF5

CAACGAGCTTGCCCGCACATCTTGCCAA

1142

F5; Partial C1 gene

10

ZR5

GCACTCCAATGCGTTCATACTCAC

11

ZF6

ATGCACCCATTGATACACGAAG

1161

F6; Partial C1 gene, complete 6K2 gene and partial VPg

12

ZR6

GTGCTTCTTCAGTGCCCTTGCCC

13

ZF7

CGTTAGTGCAGGAGGAGTTTGG

1060

F7; Partial VPg gene, complete Nia gene and partial NIb gene

14

ZR7

GTTCCCTTCACAGCTTTCGTAGACC

15

ZF8

GATGAACAACCAGGGCCTGAAT

1101

F8; Partial NIb gene

16

ZR8

TCTCAATCTCCTCGCAGTTCCAACC

17

ZF9

GTGGGCAACCCTCAACGGTGGTGG

1176

F9; Partial NIb gene and partial Coat protein gene

18

ZR9

CTCATTTCTATGTATGCCTCCGC

19

ZF10

AAAATGCAAAGCCAACGCTGCG

571

F10; Partial Coatprotein gene and 3' UTR

20

ZR10

AGGCTTGCAAACGGAGTCTAATCTCG

21

CP-fwd

GCTCCATACATAGCTGAGAC

1100

Partial NIb gene and complete Coat protein gene and 3' UTR

22

CP-rev

AACGGAGTCTAATCTCGAGC

23

ZYMVRT - F1

GAGAAATGCAGAGGCACCATACATGCCG

183

Partial Coat protein gene

24

ZYMVRT - R1

GGCCAAACAACCTTGAAGAAACATTGC

Supplementary Table 2 List of isolates used in phylogenetic and recombination analyses in the study

S. No

GenBank

Acc No

Isolate name

Crop

Country

S. No

GenBank

Acc No

Isolate name

Crop

Country

1

KT598222

10itSDE

Cucurbita maxima

Argentina

33

MF072713

ZYMV-Trini2

Pumpkin

Trinidad and Tobago

2

MN598574

Knx-25

Citrullus lanatus

Australia

34

MF072714

ZYMV-Trini3

Pumpkin

Trinidad and Tobago

3

MN598577

Per-1

Cucurbita pepo

Australia

35

MF072715

ZYMV-Trini4

Pumpkin

Trinidad and Tobago

4

MN598579

Qld-5

Cucumis melo

Australia

36

KJ875864

USA

Cucurbita pepo

USA

5

MN364667

Brazil

Watermelon cv. Manchester

Brazil

37

JN192428

1st

Cucurbita pepo

USA

6

AJ307036

CU

Cucumber

China

38

JN192426

3rd

Cucurbita pepo

USA

7

AJ515911

WM

Watermelon

China

39

JN192424

5th

Cucurbita pepo

USA

8

AJ316229

WG

Benincasa hispida

China

40

JN192422

7th

Cucurbita pepo

USA

9

KF976712

H

Cucurbita pepo

Czech Republic

41

JN192419

E71

Cucurbita pepo

USA

10

MG967620

SB02

Soybean

India

42

JN192420

E72

Cucurbita pepo

USA

11

JN183062

ZYMV-Fars

Cucurbita pepo

Iran

43

JN192412

E81

Cucurbita pepo

USA

12

KU198853

SANRU

Cucurbita pepo

Iran

44

JN192413

E82

Cucurbita pepo

USA

13

KU528623

IKA

Squash

Iran

45

JN192409

F71

Cucurbita pepo

USA

14

EF062582

NAT

Cucurbits

Israel

46

JN192410

F72

Cucurbita pepo

USA

15

EF062583

AG

Cucurbits

Israel

47

JN192411

F73

Cucurbita pepo

USA

16

MK956829

Z-104

Cucurbita pepo

Italy

48

JN192406

F82

Cucurbita pepo

USA

17

AB188115

Z5-1

Cucumber

Japan

49

JN192407

F83

Cucurbita pepo

USA

18

AB188116

2002

Cucumber

Japan

50

JN192408

F84

Cucurbita pepo

USA

19

MH700748

15B

Cucumber

Papua New Guines

51

KC665630

FG2

Cucurbita pepo

USA

20

MH700750

16B

Cucumber

Papua New Guines

52

KC665628

FG4

Cucurbita pepo

USA

21

L29569

Reunion Island

-

Reunion Island

53

JN192414

G61

Cucurbita pepo

USA

22

AF014811

Singapore

-

Singapore

54

JN192416

G71

Cucurbita pepo

USA

23

DQ124239

Kuchyna

Cucurbita pepo

Slovakia

55

JN192417

G72

Cucurbita pepo

USA

24

KF976713

SE04T

Cucurbita pepo

Slovakia

56

JN192418

G73

Cucurbita pepo

USA

25

AB369279

RDA

Cucurbita pepo

South Korea

57

KJ923767

leaf1

Cucurbita pepo

USA

26

AY278998

KR-PA

Cucurbita moschata

South Korea

58

KJ923769

leaf23

Cucurbita pepo

USA

27

AY278999

KR-PE

Cucurbita moschata

South Korea

59

KC665633

SG3

Cucurbita pepo

USA

28

AY279000

KR-PS

Cucurbita moschata

South Korea

60

KC665634

SG4

Cucurbita pepo

USA

29

KX499498

Vera

Cucurbita pepo

Spain

61

KC665635

SG5

Cucurbita pepo

USA

30

AF127929

TW-TN3

Luffa cylindrica Roem.

Taiwan

62

L31350

ZYMPRO POLR

Cucurbita pepo

USA

31

AM422386

begonia

Begonia

Taiwan

63

JQ716413

ZYMV_ PA_2006

Cucurbita pepo

USA

32

MF072712

ZYMV-Trini1

Pumpkin

Trinidad and Tobago

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplementary Table 3 List of variable amino acids in the polyprotein region of ZYMV between ZYMV-Trini isolates and their close relative isolates NAT (Israel), AG (Israel), SE04T (Slovakia)

Amino acid position

Variable amino acids*

Amino acid position

Variable amino acids*

Amino acid position

Variable amino acids*

Amino acid position

Variable amino acids*

4

I/././V/V/V/V

272

H/././P/P/P/P

960

E/./K/K/K/K/K

2580

A/././T/T/T/T

14

A/./T/./././.

276

K/././G/G/G/G

965

A/./T/./././.

2658

S/././C/C/C/C

15

K/././Q/Q/Q/Q

283

H/././Y/Y/Y/Y

980

V/././A/A/A/A

2745

K/././R/R/R/R

16

T/././P/P/P/P

333

L/./P/P/P/P/P

981

H/././Y/Y/Y/Y

2775

D/././E/E/E/E

17

E/././A/A/A/A

352

I/././T/T/T/T

1037

N/././K/K/K/K

2803

G/././D/D/D/D

19

C/././Y/Y/Y/Y

396

D/./N/./././.

1038

T/././N/N/N/N

2806

P/././T/T/T/T

24

V/././A/A/A/A

407

I/./V/V/V/V/V

1119

V/./I/I/I/I/I

2811

T/./A/A/A/A/A

41

L/././P/P/P/P

414

A/././S/S/S/S

1127

V/././I/I/I/I

2817

D/./N/./././.

47

M/././T/T/T/T

416

Q/././R/R/R/R

1171

S/././N/N/N/N

2818

K/./N/./././.

68

H/./N/N/N/N/N

431

V/./A/./././.

1381

F/././Y/Y/Y/Y

2828

V/./A/./././.

96

V/./I/./././.

470

M/././L/L/L/L

1394

Q/././H/H/H/H

2834

S/./G/G/G/G/G

101

S/././N/N/N/N

490

I/R/R/R/R/R/R

1652

S/././G/G/G/G

2838

V/./M/./././.

165

T/././K/N/K/K

503

L/./F/./././.

1662

I/././V/V/V/V

2839

A/././V/V/V/V

167

A/././V/V/V/V

527

L/././././V/.

1682

V/./I/./././.

2841

V/././A/A/A/A

171

I/././T/T/T/T

545

V/././I/I/I/I

1717

A/././G/G/G/G

2842

T/././K/K/K/K

173

Q/././L/L/L/L

572

T/./I/./././.

1745

D/././N/N/N/N

2917

E/././D/D/D/D

196

I/././M/M/M/M

578

S/./N/./././.

1793

R/././K/K/K/K

2945

V/././F/F/F/F

214

C/././Y/Y/Y/Y

589

V/././I/I/I/I

1796

M/./V/V/V/V/V

2951

Q/./E/E/E/E/E

252

E/./K/./././.

638

A/./T/./././.

1816

R/././Q/Q/Q/Q

2958

K/././I/I/I/I

253

Q/./R/R/R/R/R

679

V/././I/I/I/I

1953

S/././N/N/N/N

2959

P/././L/L/L/L

255

C/././R/R/R/R

756

M/./L/L/L/L/L

2073

M/././T/T/T/T

3053

T/././I/I/I/I

264

S/././G/G/G/G

768

T/././S/S/S/S

2381

F/./V/V/V/V/V

 

 

265

G/././R/R/R/R

788

L/././I/I/I/I

2395

F/././Y/Y/Y/Y

 

 

267

V/././G/G/G/G

825

V/././I/I/I/I

2516

D/./N/./././.

 

 

*Isolates AG/NAT/SE04T/ZYMV-Trini1/ZYMV-Trini2/ZYMV-Trini3/ZYMV-Trini4. '.' representing identical amino acids.

Supplementary Table 4 Amino acid composition in the polyprotein region between ZYMV-Trini isolates and their close relative isolates NAT (Israel), AG (Israel), SE04T (Slovakia)

Amino Acid

Numbers*

Mol %

Ala  A

189/189/189/189/189/189/189

6.13/6.13/6.13/6.13/6.13/6.13/6.13

Cys  C

54/54/54/52/52/52/52

1.75/1.75/1.75/1.69/1.69/1.69/1.69

Asp  D

160/160/157/160/160/160/160

5.19/5.19/5.1/5.19/5.19/5.19/5.19

Glu  E

219/219/218/218/218/218/218

7.11/7.11/7.08/7.08/7.08/7.08/7.08

Phe  F

156/156/156/154/154/154/154

5.06/5.06/5.06/5/5/5/5

Gly  G

179/179/180/183/183/183/183

5.81/5.81/5.84/5.94/5.94/5.94/5.94

His  H

90/90/89/87/87/87/87

2.92/2.92/2.89/2.82/2.82/2.82/2.82

Ile  I

173/172/175/175/175/175/175

5.62/5.58/5.68/5.68/5.68/5.68/5.68

Lys  K

219/219/220/220/219/220/220

7.11/7.11/7.14/7.14/7.11/7.14/7.14

Leu  L

272/272/271/273/273/272/273

8.83/8.83/8.8/8.86/8.86/8.83/8.86

Met  M

93/93/92/89/89/89/89

3.02/3.02/2.99/2.89/2.89/2.89/2.89

Asn  N

154/154/160/159/160/159/159

5/5/5.19/5.16/5.19/5.16/5.16

Pro  P

103/103/104/105/105/105/105

3.34/3.34/3.38/3.41/3.41/3.41/3.41

Gln  Q

117/117/115/114/114/114/114

3.8/3.8/3.73/3.7/3.7/3.7/3.7

Arg  R

168/169/170/172/172/172/172

5.45/5.49/5.52/5.58/5.58/5.58/5.58

Ser  S

197/197/195/192/192/192/192

6.39/6.39/6.33/6.23/6.23/6.23/6.23

Thr  T

194/194/195/193/193/193/193

6.3/6.3/6.33/6.26/6.26/6.26/6.26

Val  V

211/211/208/207/207/208/207

6.85/6.85/6.75/6.72/6.72/6.75/6.72

Trp  W

38/38/38/38/38/38/38

1.23/1.23/1.23/1.23/1.23/1.23/1.23

Tyr  Y

94/94/94/100/100/100/100

3.05/3.05/3.05/3.25/3.25/3.25/3.25

*Isolates AG/NAT/SE04T/ZYMV-Trini1/ZYMV-Trini2/ZYMV-Trini3/ZYMV-Trini4.