Process of developing a cervical cancer education program for female university students in a health and physical education teacher training course: an action research

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2032049/v1

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to develop a cervical cancer education program for students and evaluate the process for female students of a Sports Science University who are training to become Japanese health and physical education teachers.

Methods

This study used the Action Research (AR) methodology. In developing the program, we analyzed the description of the teaching material development process, the lectures, and the content of the report as a process evaluation, which was the main activity in the program development. Thirtyfive third- and fourth-year students majoring in health promotion at the Women’s Sports and Science University, which trains health and physical education teachers in Tokyo, Japan, participated in this study.

Results

After a review of the prototype version of the cervical cancer education material, six out of nine reviewers determined that it can be published. In the revised cervical cancer education materials, messages from students, university lecturers, and gynecologists have been added as a column in the section on 'how to prevent cervical cancer. Analysis of the contents of the texts (16,792 characters in total) of 35 student reports resulted in the generation of 51 codes, 3 categories, and 15 subcategories.

Conclusions

This study reflects the intentions of female university students to contribute their knowledge to the development of educational materials on cervical cancer, which, alongside the lectures, have deepened the knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer. Based on this, the teaching material development process, lectures by experts, and students’ mindset after learning about cervical cancer is visualized in this study. There is a need for more educational programs on cervical cancer that are implemented through the education of female university students.

Background

Cancer accounts for a high percentage of disease burdens in the world [1], especially in Japan where one out of every two nationals is diagnosed with cancer [2]. After enacting the Cancer Control Act in 2006, the government formulated a National Cancer Control Plan in 2007, 2012, and 2017, and promoted cancer control based on consecutive five-year plans. The second and third Cancer Control Plans—2012 and 2017—focused on cancer education and raising public awareness [3, 4]. The 2017–2018 revision of the curriculum specified that cancer is taught in health and physical education courses [5–8]. It has been found that primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention measures are mainly studied for lung, stomach, and colorectal cancers. In addition, nationwide surveys have revealed that students’ awareness of cancer risk factors and their intention to undergo cancer screening is low [9, 10]. The effectiveness of an education model that uses external instructors such as cancer survivors and medical personnel have been evaluated [11].

Health and Physical Education is a compulsory subject in schools throughout Japan. Therefore, although the effectiveness of using external instructors has been shown, the main nurturers in cancer education are homeroom teachers in elementary schools and health and physical education teachers in junior and senior high schools. However, it has also been reported that teachers lack the requisite knowledge of cancer and are therefore reluctant to teach it [12]. For teachers to acquire appropriate knowledge of cancer and give guidance with confidence, it is necessary to develop educational programs that respond to this need in teacher training courses.

A common theme in elementary, junior high, and senior high school cancer education is that primary and secondary prevention measures form the core of the learning content. Regarding secondary prevention, in particular, five sites: the lungs, stomach, large intestine, breast, and cervix, have been specified in the Health Promotion Act as sites most prone to cancer in Japan [13]. Except for the cervix, four sites are recommended to be consulted about when an individual is in his or her 40s and 50s, while cervical checks are advisable at the age of 20 and above. As the recommended age group to start cervical screening includes female university students during their teacher training course, cervical cancer would be an appropriate teaching material model.

The main measures against cervical cancer are human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and the development of a cancer screening program. In Japan, the prevalence of cervical cancer is increasing for women in the 20–40 age group [14]. Under these circumstances, in 2013, the health hazards caused by the side effects of the vaccine were highlighted in the media, and the Japanese government refrained from actively recommending HPV vaccination [15–17]. The consequence of this was that schools in regions where students had previously been provided with cancer education in line with government guidelines had difficulty to teach on HPV vaccination for cancer prevention. In other words, this showed that scientific evidence-based cancer education in Japan is currently very limited due to such political controversy. Therefore, it is important for teachers to improve their health literacy and to train teachers who do not fluctuate their knowledge of cancer.

This study aims to develop a cervical cancer education program for female students of a Sports Science University who are training to become teachers of health and physical education in Japan, and to evaluate the process.

Methods

Design and setting

This study used the Action Research (AR) method. AR is called ‘participatory research’ in which researchers enter a site and those on-site also participate. Together with the participants on-site, they promote democratic activities that include academic activities and also those that influence and change society [18]. The cervical cancer education program developed in this study adopted the AR methodology because students are both recipients and collaborators in the development of the program.

In AR, it is important to visualize the activation process to evaluate it [18]. As such, in this study, the main research methods included the description of the teaching materials development process, the lectures, and the analysis of the report contents for process evaluation. These were the main activities in the program’s development.

Development of educational materials on cervical cancer for university students

The effect of dissemination of cancer knowledge using printed materials has been reported in Japan, mainly in school education [19]. Although not cancer, the effectiveness of printed materials for health education focusing on hypertension management has been demonstrated, even in occupational fields [20]. A study that distributed health education materials to employees reported that women tend to read printed materials more than men [21]. For this reason, while developing printed materials for this study, we created a twelve-member editorial committee that included five female and two male university students. The remaining members comprised two obstetricians and gynecologists specializing in gynecological oncology, one research specialist in epidemiology, and two university faculty members specializing in health promotion and public health, respectively. Based on the teaching materials compiled by the editorial committee, a prototype teaching material for cervical cancer for university students was created. After that, a review was conducted by nine specialists—two gynecological oncologists, two adult women, one adult man, two university faculty members, two female university students, and 1 cancer survivor—followed by the revision and eventual creation of the teaching materials. Regarding the review items, four options (good, need some improvement, need improvement, and could not be judged) were used to check the scientific rationale, comprehensibility, appropriateness of the content, as well as the propriety of publication. After the first edition of the review, the material was updated each year with new content, with the final edition published in 2019.

Conducting cervical cancer lectures

Figure1

In educational interventions on pregnancy and drinking for female university students in Japan, it has been reported that the dissemination of printed materials along with individual lectures is more effective than disseminating printed materials only [22]. Based on these findings, 35 students in the third and fourth year majoring in health promotion at a Women’s Sports and Science University that trains health and physical education teachers in Tokyo were recruited in June 2017 (20) and October 2018 (15) as participants. An obstetrician and a gynecologist specializing in gynecological oncology each gave one-hour-long lectures on cervical cancer (Figure 1). The lectures covered the epidemiology of cervical cancer, mechanisms of occurrence, risk factors, the effectiveness of the HPV vaccine, and methods of cancer screening. All participants in the lectures were given modified versions of the prototype cervical cancer teaching materials described earlier and were instructed to prepare and review them. Furthermore, after completing the review, the students were given the task of preparing a report that included their impressions of the lectures and their aspirations for future learning.

Analysis of the content of the reports

After the lecture, the attendance report submitted within one week was converted into text data, and the description was abstracted and coded. After that, the codes were classified by theme, and categories were generated which were further classified as subcategories. This classification operation was first performed by the lead author and then modified after consultation with the co-authors.

Results

Table 1 shows the results of the review of the prototype version of the teaching material for cervical cancer. Of the nine reviewers, six approved its publication. The remaining three, two adult women and an obstetrician-gynecologist, were undecided. Of the three viewpoints, the scientific rationale and propriety could not be determined except by obstetricians and gynecologists. All nine reviewers judged it for clarity, one judged that some improvement was required, and the others judged that it was good.

Table1

Table 2 shows the contents of the cervical cancer education materials before and after the revision. The prototype version was prepared with the contents of the teaching material divided into four main categories: ‘What type of disease is cervical cancer?’, ‘To prevent cervical cancer’, ‘What if I am told I have cervical cancer?’, and ‘Message from cervical cancer survivors. However, in the revised version, ‘Message from cervical cancer survivors’ was deleted, and messages from students, university lecturers, and gynecologists were added as columns in ‘To prevent cervical cancer’. At the moderate item level, nine items were increased to 10, and at the small item level, seven items were increased to 13.

Table2

Table 3 shows the content analysis results of the students’ reports. The total character count in the reports of the 35 subjects was 16,792 characters. From this, 51 codes were obtained, and 15 sub-categories (‘awareness of vaccines’, ‘awareness of the current state of cancer’, ‘awareness of cancer screening’, ‘feeling that cancer is close’, ‘improvement of awareness on the concept of cancer’, ‘Improvement of the willingness to learn’, ‘gratefulness’, ‘improvement of cancer knowledge’, ‘new learning’, ‘difficulty of the course content’, ‘I want to act for myself’, ‘I want to act for my family and friends’, ‘I want to disseminate knowledge on cancer’, ‘important points of communication’, and ‘using them in the future’) were generated.

Table3

Discussion

Features of this study

The use of AR methodology and female students of a Sports and Science University who are training to become Japanese health and physical education teacher as subjects, and the fact that each phase of development of the cervical cancer education program process was performed based on their participation shows that the study is original.

This study provides appropriate educational material contents (input) and the description (output) of the student reports which can aid the training of Japanese health and physical education teachers who are in a social situation where it is difficult to provide cervical cancer education. This shows how much the content is transformed if the curriculum is structured. AR focuses on collaborative problem solving aimed at creating new wisdom [23]. In this study, we showed what kind of educational content should be provided (input) and the predictability of how students will be transformed (output). Thus, we provided basic materials that can contribute to improving the reproducibility of future programs.

The review and revision of the teaching material, which is the input part of the program in this study, was conducted with the involvement of many participants. The AR organized those involved in first-, second-, and third-person and focuses on engaging others through areas of mutual interest [24]. In this study, the main instructor is distinguished as a university instructor (first person), a student as a recipient of the program (second person), and an expert who closely examines appropriate educational content (third person). Until now, health education in Japan has been based on the teaching guidelines established by the government (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology), and was guided by teachers. However, when specialized content such as cancer education is included, there is a restriction as only university teachers can teach it in the teacher training course. Thus, this study showed the process of developing an educational program while seeking the knowledge of experts and evaluating students’ responses to handling new learning content.

Appropriate cervical cancer education content

The contents shown in the prototype version in this study were primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention measures including coexistence with cancer survivors that have been made a column, and are common to Japanese cancer teaching materials [25, 26]. However, in the revised content, 'message from cervical cancer survivors' was deleted and placed as a column intended for 'the prevention of cervical cancer'. The messages from students, university lecturers, and gynecologists are predicated on the aim to transform female university students' behavior towards the prevention of cervical cancer, including acquiring HPV vaccination and undergoing screening, and to communicate that men are also person concerned. Cancer education for Japanese students focuses on proper awareness of cancer and proper understanding of cancer survivors. In cancer education for children, it was reported that after cancer prevention classes, the percentage of those who chose ‘people who overused cigarettes and alcohol’ as their image of cancer survivors was significantly higher [11].

There is also the possibility that improving cancer prevention awareness for those who equate a lung cancer patient to a smoker [27], and raising issues of cancer stigma [28], will nurture prejudices against cancer patients. In light of this, this study structured the cervical cancer education program to instigate behavioral changes in female university students, and reflect their intentions to use their knowledge to guide cancer education as teachers in the future. To optimize this program, it may be necessary to devise teaching methods, such as inviting cancer survivors as external instructors.

In the Japanese health and physical education teacher training course, knowledge of cancer can be taught in subjects such as public health and health education. However, from the results of the review of the prototype version of the teaching materials of this study, the gynecologists pointed out that cancer risk factors based on epidemiology studies and the limitations of population-based screening, including public health findings, are questionable. It is clear that Japanese cancer risk factors are smoking, infection, physical inactivity, and inadequate intake of vegetables and fruits [29]. In addition, effective guidelines for cervical cancer screening have also been developed, and they recommend that women aged 20 years and over get examined every other year [13]. On the other hand, there are limitations to providing generalized evidence on cancer prevention to the specific group of university students who are the subjects of this study, and caution is required.

Figure2

The content of the educational materials on cervical cancer that was developed in this study is not merely evidence-based knowledge. The revised version of the teaching material content contains illustrations of the brushes used for cervical cancer screening and clothing to put on when going for the screening. It also has a column describing students’ experiences of the medical examination (Figure 2) [30]. It has been found that women in Japan and the rest of the world, psychologically resist screening with the use of internal examination tables [31, 32]. As such, female university students are vaguely aware of this and may be surprised when faced with the examination table. However, at the time of developing the educational materials, none of the teaching materials explained the specific contents of cervical cancer screening for students. The increase in the number of items related to screening in the revised version of the teaching material content may be the result of those study subjects who have experienced the screening strongly demanding that the content be enhanced.

The value of this program to the health and physical education teacher training course

In this study, we analyzed the content of the students’ reports and confirmed a certain number of statements about the deepening of knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer after the developed program was implemented. In addition, the extraction of the ‘preparation for action’ category confirmed that the subjects had a desire to convey the knowledge they had learned to others. Although the subjects were students training to become teachers of health and physical education, as current students, they would like to convey the acquired knowledge to their immediate families and friends, and as teachers to child students in the future. Such a change of consciousness that leads to peer education is because women form the majority of health volunteers who disseminate information on health in Japan [33]. These health volunteers have been working well with families and residents while playing a role in maintaining and fostering social capital such as community-based trust and networks [34]. Though there are differences between all 47 prefectures, the pass rate for the teacher recruitment test in Japan in the summer of 2019 was about two to 20 times for junior high school health and physical education, and five to 60 times for high school health and physical education [35]. This shows it is not easy to be hired as a health and physical education teacher. In addition, the percentage of female teachers in Japan is almost the lowest among the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries [36]. As such, even if one obtains a license for teaching health and physical education, the opportunities for using it may be limited. Even under such circumstances, Japanese women have been reported to be able to improve their Quality of Life as full-time housewives [37] and to have a positive effect on others, especially their families. The ripple effect of providing the cervical cancer education program to female university students is significant.

Three categories were extracted in the content analysis of the student report descriptions. Among them, ‘preparation for action’ is a category that was derived from ‘improvement of awareness’ and ‘improvement of knowledge level’. The human mindset and the desire to convey to others when something valuable is learned are explained by social cognitive theory [38]. The Learning Partner Model, which incorporates this, shows the potential for cancer knowledge to spread to others [39, 40]. The concept of the learning pyramid, which shows that active learning has the greatest effect on conveying learning to others, is also shown [41]. Therefore, it is worthwhile to investigate the learning effect and the possibility of its diffusion in the future.

Limitations and challenges

This study has several limitations. First, it is not clear what parts of the teaching material development and cancer lectures, which are the input of this study, were used in the students; reports. Second, this study used the AR methodology and the subjects are only female university students in Tokyo, Japan. In addition, there may be subject bias. The Hawthorne effect, which feels more promising as a subject of the research per se, causes behavioral changes and eventually leads to favorable results [42]. Third, the most of participants in this study were female university students, and it is unclear from this study whether the results can be applied to male university students. To generalize the usefulness of the teaching materials developed in this study, it is necessary to compare the results with those of the validation conducted at a coeducational general university, which is being conducted in parallel with this study. Forth, the educational materials developed do not include recommendations for HPV vaccination for the prevention of cervical cancer. This was due to public overreaction to adverse reactions to the vaccine in Japan at the time of development. This is because boards of education and others avoided addressing the HPV vaccine issue in cancer education. However, active vaccination recommendations are scheduled to resume after April 2022. From now on, HPV vaccination recommendations can be handled in education.

On the other hand, this study also has some strengths. We used AR in this study. The results of the study showed aspects of Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) [43], as there is bidirectional learning and acquisition of knowledge between researchers and the community - in the case of this study, the student population. For this reason, this study has the potential to lead to students being empowered and to knowledge dissemination activities. While paying attention to the interpretation of the results based on the limitations of this study described above, it is necessary to accumulate practices of cervical cancer education programs through education for female university students. Therefore, it is needed to plan to compare the effectiveness of this material and educational program using a literacy scale to compare behavior change (e.g., cancer screening uptake rates) among groups of students with and without peer education.

Conclusions

In this study, we developed a cervical cancer education program using AR and evaluated the process for female students of a Sports Science University who are training to become teachers of health and physical education in Japan and evaluated the process. By so doing, the intentions of the university students were reflected in the developed educational materials for cervical cancer. Moreover, knowledge and awareness of cervical cancer deepened due to the teaching materials, and lectures. A report describing the thoughts of students wanting to convey what they have learned to others was collected. Based on this, certain processes could be visualized. These include the development of teaching materials, lectures by experts, and the mindset of the students after receiving lessons on cervical cancer. In the future, further accumulation of educational programs on cervical cancer that are implemented through the education of female university students is necessary.

Abbreviations

AR

Action Research

HPV

Human Papilloma Virus

CBPR

Community-Based Participatory Research

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

In this study, students participated in all phases of organizing the editorial committee, reviewing the prototype version of the teaching materials, attending lectures, and submitting reports. Participants were informed, both orally and in writing, regarding the study and given the opportunity to ask questions before the data collection started, and written informed consent was obtained including for publication of identifying images in online open access. They were given the opportunity to guide a series of activities in advance and voluntarily participated in each activity. At the same time, they were informed there were free to withdraw at any point of the exercise. For the report, personal information (name) was anonymized and the students were informed that all descriptions would be used for content analysis. The reports were collected after getting the consent of the students. All methods were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Review Committee of the Japan Women’s College of Physical Education (application number 2016-27, approval date February 10, 2017).

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained for publication of identifying images in online open access.

Availability of data and materials

The data generated or analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was conducted as part of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (Basic Research C) KAKENHI (JP16K11168).

Authors' contributions

HYS conceived the project, facilitate the cervical cancer lectures, contributed to collecting and interpreting data, and drafted the manuscript. KK assisted in recruiting students as the principal investigator. KK was responsible for facilitating lectures and was involved in data interpretation and report writing. AO and MS were involved in all aspects of the work, including the collection and interpretation of data, and were major contributors to the knowledge translation efforts and in the writing of the manuscript. Two leaders of the students' community were involved in interpreting results from workshops and in developing and advancing the knowledge translation initiatives. All authors listed by name read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

　We thank everyone involved for their cooperation, in particular, Midori Kawae, Kanako Negishi, and Yoshino Hosokawa who made significant contributions to managing the vast collection of materials.

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, Parkin DM, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E359–86.
  2. National Cancer Center, Japan, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services (NCC-CIS). Cancer Registry and Statistics. http://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/statistics/stat/summary.html. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
  3. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Health Bureau Cancer and Disease Control Division. 2nd Basic Plan for Cancer Control Promotion. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/dl/gan_keikaku 02.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
  4. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare Health Bureau Cancer and Disease Control Division. Third Basic Plan for Cancer Control Promotion. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/04-Houdouhappyou- 10901000-Kenkoukyoku-Soumuka/0000181862.pdf. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
  5. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Guidelines for learning instruction in junior high school. March 2017. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1413522_002.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.
  6. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Commentary on junior high school teaching guidelines Health and Physical Education. July 2017. https://www.mext.go.jp/component/a_menu/education/micro_detail/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2019/03/18/1387018_008.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.
  7. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. High school study guideline. March 2018. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1384661_6_1_3.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.
  8. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Explanation of High School Learning Guideline Health and Physical Education. July 2018. https://www.mext.go.jp/content/1407073_07_1_2.pdf. Accessed 28 Aug 2022.
  9. Ueda S, Sugisaki H, Monobe H, Eto T, Watanabe M, Yako-Suketomo H, Mori R. Actual status of cancer awareness among Japanese school students. Jpn J School Health. 2014; 56 (3): 185–98.
  10. Sugisaki K, Ueda S, Monobe H, Yako-Suketomo H, Eto T, Watanabe M, Mori R. Cancer understanding among Japanese students based on a nationwide survey. Environ Health Prev Med. 2014; doi: 10.1007/s12199-014-0406-6.
  11. Yako-Suketomo H, Katanoda K, Kawamura Y, Katayama K, Yuasa M, Horinouchi H, Saito K. Children's Knowledge of Cancer Prevention and Perceptions of Cancer Patients: Comparison Before and After Cancer Education with the Presence of Visiting Lecturer -Guided Class. J Cancer Educ. 2019; 34(6): 1059–66.
  12. Yako-Suketomo H, Kawamura Y, Kubota M. Cancer education in the school setting for upper grade pupils: a consideration of relevancy to school subjects and teacher attitudes toward cancer education. Jpn J School Health. 2012; 54 (3): 250–9.
  13. Hamashima C, Aoki D, Miyagi E, Saito E, Nakayama T, Sagawa M, Saito H, et al. The Japanese guideline for cervical cancer screening. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2010; 40(6): 485–502.
  14. Cancer Research Promotion Foundation. Cancer statistics ‘18. 2019. https://ganjoho.jp/data/reg_stat/statistics/brochure/2018/cancer_statistics_2018.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2022.
  15. Ueda Y, Enomoto T, Sekine M, Egawa-Takata T, Morimoto A, Kimura T. Japan's failure to vaccinate girls against human papilloma-virus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212: 405–6.
  16. Sekine M, Kudo R, Adachi S, Yamaguchi M, Ueda Y, Takata T, Morimoto A, et al. Japanese crisis of HPV vaccination. Int J Pathol Clin Res. 2016; 2: 2–39.
  17. Hanley SJ, Yoshioka E, Ito Y, Kishi R. HPV vaccination crisis in Japan. Lancet. 2015; 385: 2571.
  18. Pope C, Mays N. (eds.) Qualitative research in health care, 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.
  19. Kawamura Y, Yako-Suketomo H, Katanoda K. Development and evaluation of a cancer education material for school-aged children: implications for cancer education. Kumamoto University Policy Research. 2010; (1): 69-84.
  20. Tobari H, Yamagishi K, Iso H. An occupational physician-pharmacist cooperative management for hypertension by the use of educational letters and posters. Jpn J Hyg. 2011; 66 (3): 608–15.
  21. Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Kikuchi Y, Takebayashi T, Chiba N, Tamaki J, Miura K, et al. The evaluation of materials to provide health-related information as a population strategy in the worksite: the high-risk and population strategy for occupational health promotion (HIPOP-OHP) study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2004; 9: 144–51.
  22. Mimura A, Sudo N, Kato N. Educational effect of a single distribution of a leaflet on alcohol and pregnancy among female university students. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2010; 57(6): 431–8.
  23. Coghlan D, Brannick T. Doing action research in your own organization, 4th ed. London: SAGE Publications, 2014.
  24. Heron J, Reason P. The practice of co-operative inquiry: Research “with” rather than “on” people. In Reason P & Bradbury H (Eds.), Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice, 179–88. London: Sage, 2001.
  25. National Cancer Center, Japan, Center for Cancer Control and Information Services. Development of materials for cancer education for school children. https://www.ncc.go.jp/jp/cis/divisions/sup/project/080/index.html. Accessed 14 Aug 2022.
  26. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. Teaching materials for promoting cancer education. https://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/kenko/hoken/1385781.htm. Accessed 14 Aug 2022.
  27. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A. Stigma, shame, and blame experienced by patients with lung cancer: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004; Jun 19; 328(7454): 1470. Epub 2004 Jun 11.
  28. Fujisawa D, Hagiwara N. Cancer stigma and its health consequences. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2015; (7): 143–50.
  29. Inoue M, Sawada N, Matsuda T, Iwasaki M, Sasazuki S, Shimazu T, Shibuya K, et al. Attributable causes of cancer in Japan in 2005 - systematic assessment to estimate current burden of cancer attributable to known preventable risk factors in Japan. Ann Oncol. 2012; 23 (5): 1362–9.
  30. Katayama K, Kato H, Sato-Asai M, Yako-Suketomo H, Ougihara A. Gan ni tsuite manabukoto. (Learning about cancer.) KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). 2019. https://on-cancer.jp/teaching-materials_01/. Accessed 10 Aug 2022.
  31. Kagiya A. About curtains for gynecological consultation (internal consultation table). Journal of The Aomori Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 1989; 4 (1): 32.
  32. Black E, Hyslop F, Richmond R. Barriers and facilitators to uptake of cervical cancer screening among women in Uganda: a systematic review. BMC Women’s Health. 2019; 19(1): 108.
  33. Taguchi A, Murayama H, Takeda K, Ito K, Tonai S. Characteristics and challenges of health promotion volunteer organizations in Japan: findings from a national municipality survey. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2019; 66 (11): 712–22.
  34. Hoshino A, Katsura T, Naruki H. Effect of participation in community health promotion activities. Journal of Japan Health Medicine Association. 2001; 10: 12–19.
  35. Education newspaper. Latest trends in teacher recruitment exams: pass rate. https://www.kyobun. co.jp/rate/. Accessed 14 Aug 2022.
  36. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/f8d7880d-en.pdf?expires=1584166388&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=B1704A9A1255834BFB8796B64A3CFD7F. Accessed 14 Aug 2022.
  37. Wakimizu R, Yamaguchi K, Fujioka H. Family empowerment and quality of life of parents raising children with developmental disabilities in 78 Japanese families. Int J Nurs Sci. 2016; 4 (1): 38–45.
  38. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1986.
  39. Yako-Suketomo H, Navarro AM. Diffusion of cancer knowledge through the Learning Partner Model: feasibility and potential of community workshops hosted by Japanese municipalities. Japanese Journal of Health Education and Promotion. 2016; 24 (1): 12–22.
  40. Navarro AM, Raman R, McNicholas LJ, Loza O. Diffusion of cancer education information through a Latino community health advisor program. Prev Med. 2007; 45(2–3): 135–8.
  41. Dale E. Audio-Visual Methods in teaching. NY: Dryden Press, 1946.
  42. Sedgwick P, Greenwood N. Understanding the Hawthorne effect. BMJ. 2015; 351: h4672.
  43. Andrews JO, Cox MJ, Newman SD, Gillenwater G, Warner G, Winkler JA, Slaughter S. Training partnership dyads for community-based participatory research: strategies and lessons learned from community engaged scholars program. Health Promotion Practice. 2012; 14(4): 524–33.

Tables

Tables 1 to 3 are available in the Supplementary Files section.