Physical and cognitive function to explain the quality of life among older adults with cognitive impairment: Exploring cognitive function as a mediator

Abstract

Background: Physical and cognitive function are both indicators of aging, characterized by a loss of adaptive response to life challenges and functional limitations subsequently affecting their quality of life. This study aimed to identify the direct effect of physical function and the indirect effect of cognitive function on the quality of life in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods: The study participants were 79 older adults recruited from community centers in four urban districts of Korea. All participants completed a self-reported questionnaire for demographic characteristics and outcome variables. Outcome measures included physical function (grip strength, balance, and mobility), cognitive function, and mental and physical components of quality of life (QOL). Statistical analyses were conducted using hierarchical multiple linear regression and the PROCESS macro for mediation analysis.

Results: The mean age of participants was 77.46 years old with an elementary or lower education level (53.2%). The mean score of cognitive function was 16.39 (SD=6.5). Physical function (grip strength, balance, mobility) and cognitive function explained 25% of the variance in physical (p=0.004) and 29% in mental (p<0.001) components of QOL after controlling for age, sex, and education level. Mobility was associated with both physical (β=-0.27, p=0.024) and mental (β=-0.36, p=0.002) components of QOL. The cognitive function partially mediated the relationship between balance and the physical component of QOL; the proportion of mediation was 55%.

Conclusions: In conclusion, physical and cognitive function were significant predictors of QOL in older adults with cognitive impairment. Specifically, balance has significant indirect effects on the physical component of QOL through cognitive function as a mediator. Health-promoting strategies could be more effective when focusing on the direct effect of physical function as well as the mediating effect of cognitive function to promote the quality of life in this population.

Background

According to an unprecedented aging growth, the number of older adults has been growing in the last few decades [1]. The impact of an aging population on health care systems is potentially overwhelming, particularly for age-related disorders such as dementia [1]. Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as the transition between normal cognitive aging and early dementia [2]. One of the key differences between people with MCI and those with dementia is how independent they are in their daily functioning [3]. The annual conversion rates from mild cognitive impairment to dementia are estimated from 10% to 15%, higher than the yearly incidence rate of dementia in the overall elderly population, calculated from 1% to 3% [4]. But there are no definite pharmacological treatments to prevent or delay cognitive decline [5]; it is necessary to develop effective interventions to support people with cognitive impairment to improve their quality of life.

Quality of life (QOL) is a crucial concept for understanding the impact of cognitive decline on those affected [6]. QOL is a subjective and multidimensional concept that consists of physical and mental well-being [7]. The cognitive, behavioral, and functional symptoms of cognitive decline and aging can significantly affect a patient’s overall well-being or QOL [8]. A systematic review of 19 studies addressing QOL in older adults with dementia reported that functional impairment and depression were the significant influencing factors of QOL [9]. A previous survey of 230 adults with dementia showed that impaired ability of daily living was the substantial determinant in the self-reported QOL in individuals with dementia [10]. 

Loss of function with aging has been linked not only to a reduction in physical function, such as difficulties in daily activities and decreased balance and grip strength [11], but also in cognitive functions such as delayed processing speed, memory, language, and executive functions [12]. Physical and cognitive functions are closely associated with QOL because it focuses on an individual’s activities and social participation, especially regarding participation in general daily tasks as well as community and social interactions [13]. Previous studies consistently demonstrated physical and cognitive function are significantly and positively correlated. A secondary analysis of a randomized study with 185 dementia patients showed that the performance of instrumental daily activities was reliant on cognitive function [14]. Stroke patients with cognitive impairment also had worse balance function, since they needed a longer time to turn around or sit down [15]. On the other hand, physical activities affect brain plasticity, influencing both cognitive function and quality of life [16]. Deficits in physical function have also been associated with increased risk of falls, diminished ability to live independently, and poorer self-reported health [17]. While much evidence shows that physical and cognitive function is associated with each other to explain quality of life, the underlying mechanisms of their relationship and how they work together to induce beneficial effects on quality of life still need to be clarified.

It has been postulated that improving physical function has beneficial effects on quality of life directly, while cognitive function may play a role as an intervening variable [18]. Several studies have found positive associations between physical and cognitive function in the elderly [19]. While aerobic exercise plus resistance training improved physical function and balance, leading to improved quality of life [20], 6-month aerobic exercise also improved cognitive function in older adults with MCI [21]. Greater levels of physical function (mobility, flexibility, and grip strength) were associated with better cognitive and executive function performance and improved quality of life in older adults [22]. The association of physical and cognitive function should be considered when designing lifestyle interventions to improve QOL in this population.

With increased awareness concerning the efficacy of preventive and complementary intervention strategies for older adults with declining cognitive function, the improved physical function may have a positive impact on the QOL through cognitive function as a mediator [14]. Despite evidence supporting the cognitive benefit of physical functioning, studies examining the mediating mechanisms underlying the physical-cognitive functioning relationship on QOL are still lacking. This study aims to explore the underlying mechanism of physical and cognitive function to explain QOL among older adults with cognitive impairment while focusing on cognitive function as a mediator. 

Specific research questions were:

1. Do physical and cognitive functions predict physical and mental components of QOL in older adults with cognitive impairment after controlling for demographic characteristics?
2. Do cognitive function mediate between the indicators of physical function and QOL in older adults with cognitive impairment?

Methods

Study design

The secondary data analysis was conducted with the survey data from a larger intervention study [23], where data were collected from community-dwelling older adults with cognitive impairment, aged 75 years or above through a face-to-face, interviewer-administered survey. 

Participants

From March to September 2020, all participants were recruited from community centers in four urban districts of South Korea. The inclusion criteria were 1) aged 75 years or older; 2) living in urban or rural communities; 3) scores on a test of K-MoCA less than 22; 4) were able to understand and communicate during the interview. Those currently hospitalized or living in long-term care facilities were excluded from this study. Eligible participants signed an informed consent form and participated in an interview to fill out the structured questionnaire in a meeting room of the centers. A total of 135 candidates were screened for eligibility and 79 participants were enrolled in the study and completed the measures. 

Measures 

Physical function

Measurements of grip strength, Time Up and Go (TUG) for mobility, and One Leg Standing (OLS) for balance were used in the study to assess the physical function of older adults [24].  

Grip Strength was measured with a dynamometer (GRIP-D; Takei Ltd, Niigata, Japan). The participant was asked to squeeze the dynamometer with maximal effort, twice with each hand. An average score was recorded from both hands [25].

Mobility was measured by the TUG test with a stopwatch, timed from the point when the participants stood up from the chair to walk 3 m distance, turned around, and walked back to the chair till they sat down. The recorded time on the stopwatch in seconds is the value of TUG [26]. A less score of TUG represents better mobility.

Balance was measured by one leg standing with eyes open (OLS) test with a stopwatch, asking the participants to stand unassisted on one leg with eyes open, timed from the other foot leaves the ground till when the foot touches the ground again [27]. A higher score refers to a better balance. The research staff was present to protect the participants from falling during the process.

Cognitive function

The Korean version of the Montreal cognitive assessment (K-MoCA) was used to assess cognitive function [28]. The K-MoCA consisted of eight cognitive domains (memory, visuospatial ability, executive function, attention, concentration, working memory, language, and orientation) with 12 items, and the summed score was adjusted by adding 1 point for those with less than 6-year-educational level. A higher score represents a better cognitive function. The reliability and concurrent validity of the K-MoCA have been reported in the Korean population [28].

Quality of life

The Korean version of the 12-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) [29] was used to assess the quality of life with eight dimensions. Using the standard scoring system, the scores of physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) of QOL were calculated in this study. The scores ranged from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicated a better quality of life [30]. This scale was validated in the Korean general population with a reliability of 0.88 [29]. 

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 26.0) with the consideration of a two-tailed p< 0.05 to be statistically significant. The descriptive statistics were used for demographic characteristics and study variables with means, standard deviation, and frequency distributions. Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis was conducted to assess the relationship between the indicators of physical function (Grip strength, TUG, OLS), cognitive function (K-MoCA), and the physical and metal components of QOL (PCS and MCS respectively). Hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to enter demographic characteristics (age, sex, and education level) first, followed by physical functions in step 2, and cognitive function in step 3. The variance inflation factor (VIF) values<10 were considered to be non-collinear [31]. Finally, the mediating effect of cognitive function on the relationship between physical function and QOL was performed using the PROCESS macro for SPSS developed by Hayes [32] with model 4 (http://www.afhayes.com). The number of bootstrap samples was chosen to be 5000, under the bias-corrected 95% confidence interval (CI). The mediation analysis by PROCESS macro was based on regression-based path analysis. We proceeded using the conceptual framework of physical function as a predictor of QOL, mediated by cognitive function (Figure. 1). 

Results

Characteristics of older adults with MCI

Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants and group differences were shown in Table 1. Of the 79 study subjects, 18 (22.8%) were males and 61 (77.2%) were females with a mean age of 77.46 ± 7.03 years (52~88 years). Thirty-seven participants (46.8%) were widowed, and 23 (29.1%) participants had high school graduation. Most of participants (n=69; 87.3%) were unemployed, and self-reported economic status were under average (n=63; 79.7%). Most participants perceived their ADL level as independent (n=69; 87.3%). Among the history of chronic illness, 45 (60.8%) participants had hypertension, 33 (41.8%) with osteoarthritis, and 23 (29.1%) with diabetes mellitus.

Correlations between physical function, cognitive function, and quality of life

Correlations among physical function (grip strength, mobility, and balance), cognitive function, and physical and mental components of QOL (PCS and MCS) were shown in Table 2. Grip strength was positively associated with PCS (r=0.28, p<0.05). mobility (lower score of TUG represents better motility) was negatively associated with cognition (r=-0.23, p<0.05), PCS (r=-0.32, p<0.01), and MCS (r=-0.42, p<0.01). Balance (OLS) was positively correlated with K-MoCA (r=0.33, p<0.01). 

Effects of physical and cognitive function on quality of life

To confirm the direct effect of physical function (Grip strength, TUG, OLS) and cognitive function (K-MoCA) on QOL (PCS and MCS) in older adults with MCI, hierarchical multiple  regression analysis was performed on each PCS and MCS of QOL after controlling for demographic characteristics, and the results are presented in the Table 3 & 4. 

Factors to explain PCS

As shown in Table 3, when the independent variables of age, sex, and education level were entered, the regression model was not statistically significant (F=0.53, p=0.658). In step 2, the demographic characteristics and the indicators of physical function (Grip strength, TUG, OLS) together explained 15% of variables in PCS (F=2.25, p=0.047), and mobility was the significant predictor after controlling for demographic characteristics. After adding cognitive function (K-MoCA) in step 3, the regression model was significant (F=3.37, p=0.004), explaining 25% of the variance in PCS. Cognitive function (β=0.34, p=0.004) and mobility (β=-0.31, p=0.007) were significant predictors of PCS after controlling for demographic characteristics. 

Factors to explain MCS

As shown in Table 4, the regression model with independent variables of age, sex, and education level was not statistically significant (F=2.21, p=0.094). In step 2, the demographic characteristics and the indicators of physical function (Grip strength, TUG, OLS) together explained 29% of variables in MCS (F=5.12, p<0.001), and mobility was also the significant predictor after controlling for demographic characteristics. After adding cognitive function (K-MoCA) in step 3, the regression model was significant (F=4.33, p<0.001), explaining 29% of the variance in MCS. Cognitive function was not a significant factor (β=0.03, p=0.976), while mobility (β=-0.36, p=0.002) was a significant predictor of MCS after controlling for demographic characteristics. 

Mediating effects of cognitive function between physical function and quality of life

The indirect effects of physical function (grip strength, mobility, and balance) on PCS and MCS with cognitive function as mediators were examined (Figure 2). Among the indicators of physical function, balance has a significant indirect effect through cognitive function on PCS (b=0.08, 95% CI 0.004,0.199). 

Discussion

This study aimed to verify the mediating effect of cognitive function in the relationship between physical function (grip strength, mobility, and balance) and physical and mental components of QOL in older adults with MCI. 

Among the indicators of physical function, mobility was the most significant factor in predicting PCS and MCS in older adults with MCI after controlling for age, sex, and education level. This finding was supported by previous studies, confirming the relationship between mobility and quality of life among older adults [33, 34]. The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is simple and widely used in clinical practice as a reliable measurement to quantify mobility performance in persons with cognitive impairment [35, 36]. The slower performance of TUG (less mobility) was associated with lower cognitive function in individuals with Parkinson’s disease; both were the most significant predictors of QOL in individuals with Parkinson’s disease [35]. Older people with cognitive impairment are at high risk for falls due to mobility impairment, and consequently, mobility as a fall prevention strategy would be an important predictor of changes in QOL in later life [34]. 

Grip strength is a useful index of aging that is easy to perform as a comprehensive indicator of whole body muscle strength [37]. Previous studies suggested that grip strength may be used as an indicator of overall strength, function, and QOL [38, 39], but we found no significant direct effects between grip strength and both PCS and MCS in older adults with MCI. A study by Hooghiemsta et al. reported that the relationship between grip strength and cognitive decline was age-dependent, which could be stronger in more advanced stages of cognitive decline rather than in the early cognitive decline [25]. The inclusion criteria for the present study was mild cognitive impairment with an average K-MoCA score of 16.39, which may be the reason for the non-significant association between grip strength and QOL found in the present study.

Balance can play an essential role in providing strategies to prevent falls which is one of the important factors for QOL in older adults with MCI [40]. Balance impairments are common in individuals with cognitive impairment [41]. While balance was positively correlated with cognitive function in our study, there was no significant direct effect of balance on both PCS and MCS in older adults with MCI. Taguchi et al. (2010) found that a 12-month program of a variety of exercises significantly improved balance in older adults with MCI, but no significant effect on QOL was found [42]. As previous studies have found that improvements in postural control are associated with cognitive training, the role of cognitive function needs to be explored to understand the underlying mechanism of balance and QOL in older adults with cognitive impairment [41, 43].  

Our study explored the relationship between physical function and QOL with cognitive function as a mediator. While there was no significant direct effect of balance on QOL, our finding indicated the significant indirect effect of balance on PCS through cognitive function. Using a comprehensive clinical test of balance in conjunction with multiple cognitive domains, Tangen et al. [41] found that balance control deteriorates with increasing severity of cognitive impairment. Neuroimaging studies have shown that motor function decline is associated with age-related white matter changes [44, 45] or vestibular loss occurs with aging [46]. In the context of anatomical and functional changes in MCI, the balance is seen as a result of complex integration and coordination of multiple basic systems covering sensory/perceptual processes, cognitive influences and motor processes [47]. 

In previous research, Rogge et al. (2017) found that 12 weeks of balance training improved memory and spatial cognition in healthy adults [48]. Mouthon and Taube (2019) found that two weeks of balance training improved postural control, which was associated with improved intracortical inhibition [49]. It has been speculated that when balance training sends signals to specific areas of the brain, it may affect cognitive functions and that increased stimulation of the vestibular system during balance exercise may be a mediator between physical movement and cognitive function [50]. Therefore, enhancing the balance of physical function can improve the QOL among older adults with MCI through improving cognitive function, which supports the findings of our study. 

There were limitations in our study. Our study assessed cognitive function using a single measurement of MoCA. Future studies are warranted with systematically assessing multi-dimensions of cognitive function and a longitudinal design to add evidence to the present results. 

Conclusion

Physical and cognitive functions were important factors that can predict QOL of older adults with cognitive impairment. Among the indicators of physical function, mobility was the significant predictor of the physical and mental components of QOL. Cognitive function partially mediated the relationship between OLS of physical function and PCS of QOL in older adults with MCI. Health promoting strategies should focus on mobility and balance in association with cognitive function to delay or prevent cognitive decline, and to promote QOL in older adults with MCI.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The original intervention study was approved by the institutional review board of the institution where the researchers were affiliated. The participants received oral and written information and provided written informed consent before participating in the study. 

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

None of the authors report conflicts of interest.

Funding

Supported by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022R1A2C2011502)

Authors’ contributions

RS contributed to the conception of the study, organized the investigation, secured funding, and revised the manuscript. JS analyzed the data and wrote the original paper. Xing Fan helped data collection and wrote the original manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Author details

¹Department of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Munhwa-ro 266, Jung-gu, Daejeon, Korea

References

1. Carvalho A, Rea IM, Parimon T, Cusack BJ: Physical activity and cognitive function in individuals over 60 years of age: a systematic review. Clin Interv Aging 2014, 9:661.
2. Roberts R, Knopman DS: Classification and epidemiology of MCI. Clin Geriatr Med 2013, 29:753-72.
3. Shandera-Ochsner AL, Chandler MJ, Locke DE, Ball CT, Crook JE, Phatak VS, Smith GE: Comparative effects of physical exercise and other behavioral interventions on functional status outcomes in mild cognitive impairment. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2021, 27:805-12.
4. Satizabal CL, Beiser AS, Chouraki V, Chêne G, Dufouil C, Seshadri S: Incidence of dementia over three decades in the Framingham Heart Study. N Engl J Med 2016, 374:523-32.
5. Mehta D, Jackson R, Paul G, Shi J, Sabbagh M: Why do trials for Alzheimer’s disease drugs keep failing? A discontinued drug perspective for 2010-2015. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017, 26:735-39.
6. Hussenoeder FS, Conrad I, Roehr S, Fuchs A, Pentzek M, Bickel H, Moesch E, Weyerer S, Werle J, Wiese B: Mild cognitive impairment and quality of life in the oldest old: a closer look. Qual Life Res 2020, 29:1675-83.
7. Kruger J, Bowles HR, Jones D, Ainsworth BE, Kohl Hr: Health-related quality of life, BMI and physical activity among US adults (⩾ 18 years): National Physical Activity and Weight Loss Survey, 2002. Int J Obes 2007, 31:321-27.
8. Teng E, Tassniyom K, Lu PH: Reduced quality-of-life ratings in mild cognitive impairment: analyses of subject and informant responses. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2012, 20:1016-25.
9. Burks HB, des Bordes JKA, Chadha R, Holmes HM, Rianon NJ: Quality of Life Assessment in Older Adults with Dementia: A Systematic Review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2021, 50:103-10.
10. Bruvik FK, Ulstein ID, Ranhoff AH, Engedal K: The quality of life of people with dementia and their family carers. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2012, 34:7-14.
11. Nagi SZ: An epidemiology of disability among adults in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 1976:439-67.
12. Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L: Assessing the building blocks of function: utilizing measures of functional limitation. Am J Prev Med 2003, 25:112-21.
13. WHO: Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF. In The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
14. Clemmensen FK, Hoffmann K, Siersma V, Sobol N, Beyer N, Andersen BB, Vogel A, Lolk A, Gottrup H, Hogh P, et al: The role of physical and cognitive function in performance of activities of daily living in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease - a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2020, 20:513.
15. Yu HX, Wang ZX, Liu CB, Dai P, Lan Y, Xu GQ: Effect of Cognitive Function on Balance and Posture Control after Stroke. Neural Plast 2021, 2021:6636999.
16. Mandolesi L, Polverino A, Montuori S, Foti F, Ferraioli G, Sorrentino P, Sorrentino G: Effects of Physical Exercise on Cognitive Functioning and Wellbeing: Biological and Psychological Benefits. Front Psychol 2018, 9:509.
17. Brown RT, Diaz-Ramirez LG, Boscardin WJ, Lee SJ, Steinman MA: Functional impairment and decline in middle age: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2017, 167:761-68.
18. Phillips C: Lifestyle modulators of neuroplasticity: how physical activity, mental engagement, and diet promote cognitive health during aging. Neural Plast 2017.
19. Falck RS, Landry GJ, Best JR, Davis JC, Chiu BK, Liu-Ambrose T: Cross-sectional relationships of physical activity and sedentary behavior with cognitive function in older adults with probable mild cognitive impairment. Phys Ther 2017, 97:975-84.
20. Galvao DA, Taaffe DR, Spry N, Joseph D, Newton RU: Combined resistance and aerobic exercise program reverses muscle loss in men undergoing androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer without bone metastases: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28:340-47.
21. Baker LD, Frank LL, Foster-Schubert K, Green PS, Wilkinson CW, McTiernan A, Plymate SR, Fishel MA, Watson GS, Cholerton BA: Effects of aerobic exercise on mild cognitive impairment: a controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2010, 67:71-79.
22. Stavrinou PS, Aphamis G, Pantzaris M, Sakkas GK, Giannaki CD: Exploring the Associations between Functional Capacity, Cognitive Function and Well-Being in Older Adults. Life (Basel) 2022, 12.
23. Song R, Ju K, Jung MS, Kim H, Fan X: Effects of Tai Chi Exercise Program on Cognitive Function among Older Adults at Risk for Dementia Living in Rural Areas. Korean J Rehabil Nurs 2021, 24:67-77.
24. Michikawa T, Nishiwaki Y, Takebayashi T, Toyama Y: One-leg standing test for elderly populations. J Orthop Sci 2009, 14:675-85.
25. Hooghiemstra AM, Ramakers IH, Sistermans N, Pijnenburg YA, Aalten P, Hamel RE, Melis RJ, Verhey FR, Olde Rikkert MG, Scheltens P: Gait speed and grip strength reflect cognitive impairment and are modestly related to incident cognitive decline in memory clinic patients with subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment: findings from the 4C study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2017, 72:846-54.
26. Shumway-Cook A, Brauer S, Woollacott M: Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Phys Ther 2000, 80:896-903.
27. Drusini A, Eleazer G, Caiazzo M, Veronese E, Carrara N, Ranzato C, Businaro F, Boland R, Wieland D: One-leg standing balance and functional status in an elderly community-dwelling population in northeast Italy. Aging Clin Exp Res 2002, 14:42-46.
28. Lee J-Y, Lee DW, Cho S-J, Na DL, Jeon HJ, Kim S-K, Lee YR, Youn J-H, Kwon M, Lee J-H: Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment in elderly outpatient clinic: validation of the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 2008, 21:104-10.
29. Kim S-H, Jo M-W, Ahn J, Ock M, Shin S, Park J: Assessment of psychometric properties of the Korean SF-12 v2 in the general population. BMC Public Health 2014, 14:1-7.
30. Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD: A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996:220-33.
31. O’brien RM: A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity 2007, 41:673-90.
32. Hayes AF: PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. 2012. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
33. Bergland A, Jørgensen L, Emaus N, Strand BH: Mobility as a predictor of all-cause mortality in older men and women: 11.8 year follow-up in the Tromsø study. BMC Health Serv Res 2017, 17:1-7.
34. Davis JC, Bryan S, Best JR, Li LC, Hsu CL, Gomez C, Vertes KA, Liu-Ambrose T: Mobility predicts change in older adults’ health-related quality of life: evidence from a Vancouver falls prevention prospective cohort study. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2015, 13:1-10.
35. Stegemöller EL, Nocera J, Malaty I, Shelley M, Okun MS, Hass CJ, Investigators NQII: Timed up and go, cognitive, and quality-of-life correlates in Parkinson's disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2014, 95:649-55.
36. Ansai JH, Andrade LPd, Nakagawa TH, Rebelatto JR: Performances on the timed up and go test and subtasks between fallers and non-fallers in older adults with cognitive impairment. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2018, 76:381-86.
37. Ikegami S, Takahashi J, Uehara M, Tokida R, Nishimura H, Sakai A, Kato H: Physical performance reflects cognitive function, fall risk, and quality of life in community-dwelling older people. Sci Rep 2019, 9:1-7.
38. Musalek C, Kirchengast S: Grip strength as an indicator of health-related quality of life in old age—a pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017, 14:1447.
39. Bohannon RW: Grip strength: an indispensable biomarker for older adults. Clin Interv Aging 2019, 14:1681.
40. Makizako H, Shimada H, Park H, Yoshida D, Uemura K, Tsutsumimoto K, Liu-Ambrose T, Suzuki T: Poor balance and lower gray matter volume predict falls in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. BMC Neurol 2013, 13:1-8.
41. Tangen GG, Engedal K, Bergland A, Moger TA, Mengshoel AM: Relationships between balance and cognition in patients with subjective cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer disease. Phys Ther 2014, 94:1123-34.
42. Taguchi N, Higaki Y, Inoue S, Kimura H, Tanaka K: Effects of a 12-month multicomponent exercise program on physical performance, daily physical activity, and quality of life in very elderly people with minor disabilities: an intervention study. J Epidemiol 2010:0911020115-15.
43. Richer N, Saunders D, Polskaia N, Lajoie Y: The effects of attentional focus and cognitive tasks on postural sway may be the result of automaticity. Gait Posture 2017, 54:45-49.
44. Onen F, Feugeas MCH, Baron G, De Marco G, Godon-Hardy S, Peretti II, Ravaud P, Legrain S, Moretti JL, Claeys ES: Leukoaraiosis and mobility decline: a high resolution magnetic resonance imaging study in older people with mild cognitive impairment. Neurosci Lett 2004, 355:185-88.
45. Van Harten B, Oosterman J, Muslimovic D, Van Loon B-JP, Scheltens P, Weinstein HC: Cognitive impairment and MRI correlates in the elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Age Ageing 2007, 36:164-70.
46. Agrawal Y, Smith PF, Rosenberg PB: Vestibular impairment, cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease: balancing the evidence. Aging Ment Health 2020, 24:705-08.
47. Mancini M, Horak FB: The relevance of clinical balance assessment tools to differentiate balance deficits. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010, 46:239.
48. Rogge A-K, Röder B, Zech A, Hötting K: Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: Balance training increases cortical thickness in visual and vestibular cortical regions. Neuroimage 2018, 179:471-79.
49. Mouthon A, Taube W: Intracortical inhibition increases during postural task execution in response to balance training. Neuroscience 2019, 401:35-42.
50. Smith PF, Darlington CL, Zheng Y: Move it or lose it—is stimulation of the vestibular system necessary for normal spatial memory?Hippocampus 2010, 20:36-43.

Tables

Table 1. Demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 79)

Table 2. Correlation between physical function, cognitive function and quality of life

^*p<0.05, ^**p<0.01;

TUG=Timed up and go, OLS=One leg standing, K-MoCA=Korean version of Montreal cognitive assessment, QOL-PCS=Physical component summary of the quality of life, QOL-MCS=Mental component summary of the quality of life.

Table 3. Physical and cognitive functions to explain the physical component of QOL 

TUG=Timed up and go, OLS=One leg standing, K-MoCA=Korean version of Montreal cognitive assessment, QOL=quality of life.

Table 4. Physical and cognitive functions to explain the mental component of QOL 

TUG=Timed up and go, OLS=One leg standing, K-MoCA=Korean version of Montreal cognitive assessment, QOL=quality of life.